Oecologia

, Volume 184, Issue 1, pp 171–182 | Cite as

Dispersal traits may reflect dispersal distances, but dispersers may not connect populations demographically

Population ecology – original research

Abstract

Ecological traits that reflect movement potential are often used as proxies for measured dispersal distances. Whether such traits reflect actual dispersal is often untested. Such tests are important because maximum dispersal distances may not be achieved and many dispersal events may be unsuccessful (without reproduction). For insects, many habitat patches harbour ‘resident’ species that are present as larvae (sedentary) and adults (winged and dispersing), and ‘itinerant’ species present only as adults that have dispersed from elsewhere and fail to reproduce. We tested whether itinerancy patterns were temporally consistent, and whether itinerant and resident species differed in wing morphology, a strong correlate of flight capability. Over 3 years and at multiple locations in a 22 km stream length, we sampled larvae and adults of caddisflies in the genus Ecnomus to categorize species as residents or itinerants. Flight capacity was measured using wing size (length and area) and shape parameters (aspect ratio and the second moment of wing area). Three species of Ecnomus were residents and three species were itinerants, and patterns were consistent over 3 years. On average, itinerant species had larger wings, suggesting a greater capacity to fly long distances. Wing shape differed between species, but did not differ systematically between residents and itinerants. Wing morphology was associated with actual but not effective dispersal of some species of Ecnomus. Morphological traits may have weak explanatory power for hypotheses regarding the demographic connectedness of populations, unless accompanied by data demonstrating which dispersers contribute new individuals to populations.

Keywords

Aspect ratio Ecnomidae Insect flight Moment of area Trichoptera Wing morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the many people who helped with field collections at various times, including Claire Allison, Wim Bovill, Alena Glaister, Steve Horn, Ashley Macqueen, Bobbi Peckarsky, Jared Polkinghorne, Bob Smith and Allyson Yarra. We are deeply indebted to Wim Bovill and Alena Glaister for their stellar assistance with identifications. This project was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Australian Research Council (DP120103145) awarded to JL and BJD. Adult sampling in 2015 was carried out in conjunction with an NSF Postdoctoral Extension awarded to R. Smith and hosted by the University of Melbourne.

Author contribution statement

JL and BJD collected samples; JL measured wings; JL and BJD analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Beirinckx K, Van Gossum H, J Lajeunesse M, R Forbes M (2006) Sex biases in dispersal and philopatry: insights from a meta-analysis based on capture–mark–recapture studies of damselflies. Oikos 113:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belyea LR, Lancaster J (1999) Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos 86:402–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betts CR, Wooton RJ (1988) Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a preliminary analysis. J Exp Biol 138:271–288Google Scholar
  4. Bilton DT, Freeland JR, Okamura B (2001) Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates: mechanisms and consequences. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:159–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright DI (1990) The Australian species of Ecnomus McLachlan (Trichoptera: Ecnomidae). Mem Mus Vic 51:1–48Google Scholar
  6. Cartwright DI (1997) Preliminary guide to the identification of late instar larvae of Australian Ecnomidae, Philopotamidae and Tasmiidae (Insecta: Trichoptera). Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, AlburyGoogle Scholar
  7. Caudill CC (2003) Measuring dispersal in a metapopulation using stable isotope enrichment: high rates of sex-biased dispersal between patches in a mayfly metapopulation. Oikos 101:624–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chessman BC (1986) Dietary studies of aquatic insects from two Victorian rivers. Aust J Mar Freshwat Res 37:129–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collier KJ, Smith BJ (1998) Dispersal of adult caddisflies (Trichoptera) into forests alongside three New Zealand streams. Hydrobiologia 361:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conrad KF, Willson KH, Harvey IF, Thomas CJ, Sherratt TN (1999) Dispersal characteristics of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 22:524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downes BJ, Lancaster J (2010) Does dispersal control population densities in advection-dominated systems? A fresh look at critical assumptions and a direct test. J Anim Ecol 79:235–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Downes BJ, Lancaster J, Hale R, Glaister A, Bovill W (2011) Plastic and unpredictable responses of stream invertebrates to leaf pack patches across sandy-bottomed streams. Mar Freshw Res 62:394–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downes BJ, Lancaster J, Glaister A, Bovill W (2017) A fresh approach reveals how dispersal shapes metacommunity structure in a human-altered landscape. J Appl Ecol 54:588–598Google Scholar
  14. Dudley R (2000) The biomechanics of insect flight: form, function, evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Duputié A, Massol F (2013) An empiricist’s guide to theoretical predictions on the evolution of dispersal. Interface Focus 3:20130028CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellington CP (1984a) The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 305:17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellington CP (1984b) The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 305:145–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Floreano D, Zufferey J-C, Srinivasan MV, Ellington CP (eds) (2010) Flying insects and robots. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  19. Gullefors B, Petersson E (1993) Sexual dimorphism in relation to swarming and pair formation patterns in leptocerid caddisflies (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae). J Insect Behav 6:563–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedrick TL, Combes SA, Miller LA (2015) Recent developments in the study of insect flight. Can J Zool 93:925–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes JM (2007) Constraints on recovery: using molecular methods to study connectivity of aquatic biota in rivers and streams. Freshw Biol 52:616–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hughes JM, Mather PB, Sheldon AL, Allendorf FW (1999) Genetic structure of the stonefly, Yoraperla brevis, populations: the extent of gene flow among adjacent montane streams. Freshw Biol 41:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphries P, Brown P, Douglas J, Pickworth A, Strongman R, Hall K, Serafini L (2008) Flow-related patterns in abundance and composition of the fish fauna of a degraded Australian lowland river. Freshw Biol 53:789–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivanov VD (1986) Comparative analysis of wing kinematics in caddis flies (Trichoptera). Entomol Rev 65:60–71Google Scholar
  25. Ivanov VD (1989) Action of wing articulations of caddis-flies (Trichoptera) in flight. Entomol Rev 68:119–129Google Scholar
  26. Ivanov VD (1990) Comparative analysis of the aerodynamics of flight of caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera). Entomol Rev 69:51–66Google Scholar
  27. Kovats ZE, Ciborowski JJH, Corkum LD (1996) Inland dispersal of adult aquatic insects. Freshw Biol 36:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuusela K, Huusko A (1996) Post-emergence migration of stoneflies (Plecoptera) into the nearby forest. Ecol Entomol 21:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lancaster J, Downes BJ (2015) Population densities and density-area relationships in a community with advective dispersal and variable mosaics of resource patches. Oecologia 176:985–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lancaster J, Downes BJ (2017) A landscape-scale field experiment reveals the importance of dispersal in a resource-limited metacommunity. Ecology 98:565–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lancaster J, Downes BJ, Glaister A (2009) Interacting environmental gradients, trade-offs and reversals in the abundance–environment relationships of stream insects: when flow is unimportant. Mar Freshw Res 60:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lancaster J, Downes BJ, Arnold A (2011) Lasting effects of maternal behaviour on the distribution of a dispersive stream insect. J Anim Ecol 80:1061–1069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Levin SA, Muller-Landau HC, Nathan R, Chave J (2003) The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: a theoretical perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 34:575–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lowe WH, McPeek MA (2014) Is dispersal neutral? Trends Ecol Evolut 29:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macqueen A, Downes BJ (2015) Large-scale manipulations of oviposition substrata affects egg supply to populations of some stream-dwelling caddisflies. Freshw Biol 60:802–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marchant R (1988) A subsampler for samples of benthic invertebrates. Bull Aust Soc Limnol 12:49–52Google Scholar
  37. McCauley SJ (2006) The effects of dispersal and recruitment limitation on community structure of odonates in artificial ponds. Ecography 29:585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller SW, Budy P, Schmidt JC (2010) Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restor Ecol 18:8–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrison CA, Robinson RA, Clark JA, Risley K, Gill JA (2013) Recent population declines in Afro-Palaearctic migratory birds: the influence of breeding and non-breeding seasons. Divers Distrib 19:1051–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murrell DJ, Travis JMJ, Dytham C (2002) The evolution of dispersal distance in spatially-structured populations. Oikos 97:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neboiss A (1986) Atlas of Trichoptera of the SW Pacific–Australia region. Dr W. Junk, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  42. Outomuro D, Adams DC, Johansson F (2013) Wing shape allometry and aerodynamics in calopterygid damselflies: a comparative approach. BMC Evol Biol 13:118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Petersen I, Winterbottom JH, Orton S, Friberg N, Hildrew AG, Speirs DC, Gurney WSC (1999) Emergence and lateral dispersal of adult Plecoptera and Trichoptera from Broadstone stream, UK. Freshw Biol 42:401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rasband WS (1997–2012) ImageJ. U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij. Accessed Feb 2013
  45. Ribak G, Pitts ML, Wilkinson GS, Swallow JG (2009) Wing shape, wing size, and sexual dimorphism in eye-span in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Biol J Linn Soc 98:860–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sakar S (2012) A meta-analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy? J Anim Ecol 81:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schoener TW, Losos JB, Spiller DA (2005) Island biogeography of populations: an introduced species transforms survival patterns. Science 310:1807–1809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schreiber ESG (1995) Long-term patterns of invertebrate stream drift in an Australian temperate stream. Freshw Biol 33:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Serrano-Meneses MA, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Azpilicueta-Amorín M, González-Soriano E, Székeley T (2008) Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch’s rule in Odonata. J Evol Biol 21:1259–1273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sode A, Wiberg-Larsen P (1993) Dispersal of adult Trichoptera at a Danish forest brook. Freshw Biol. 30:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Stevens VM, Turlure C, Baguette M (2010) A meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies. Biol Rev 85:625–642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Stocks IC (2010) Comparative and functional morphology of wing coupling structures in Trichoptera: Annulipalpia. J Morphol 271:152–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Svensson BW (1974) Population movements of adult Trichoptera in a South Swedish stream. Oikos 25:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Svensson BW (1998) Local dispersal and its life-history consequences in a rock pool population of a gyrinid beetle. Oikos 82:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Verberk WCEP, van Noordwijk CGE, Hildrew AG (2013) Delivering on a promise: integrating species traits to transform descriptive community ecology. Freshw Sci 32:531–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vittoz P, Engler R (2007) Seed dispersal distances: a typology based on dispersal modes and plant traits. Bot Helv 117:109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waringer JA (1991) Phenology and the influence of meteorological parameters on the catching success of light-trapping for Trichoptera. Freshw Biol 25:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weis-Fogh T (1973) Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J Exp Biol 59:169–230Google Scholar
  61. Zobel M (1992) Plant species coexistence—the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors. Oikos 65:314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GeographyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations