Oecologia

, Volume 184, Issue 1, pp 59–73 | Cite as

Acquiring nutrients from tree leaves: effects of leaf maturity and development type on a generalist caterpillar

  • Raymond V. Barbehenn
  • Madhav Kapila
  • Sara Kileen
  • Caleb P. Nusbaum
Physiological ecology - original research

Abstract

The rapid growth and prolific reproduction of many insect herbivores depend on the efficiencies and rates with which they acquire nutrients from their host plants. However, little is known about how nutrient assimilation efficiencies are affected by leaf maturation or how they vary between plant species. Recent work showed that leaf maturation can greatly decrease the protein assimilation efficiency (PAE) of Lymantria dispar caterpillars on some tree species, but not on species in the willow family (Salicaceae). One trait of many species in the Salicaceae that potentially affects PAE is the continuous (or “indeterminate”) development of leaves throughout the growing season. To improve our understanding of the temporal and developmental patterns of nutrient availability for tree-feeding insects, this study tested two hypotheses: nutrients (protein and carbohydrate) are more efficiently assimilated from immature than mature leaves, and, following leaf maturation, nutrients are more efficiently assimilated from indeterminate than determinate tree species. The nutritional physiology and growth of a generalist caterpillar (L. dispar) were measured on five determinate and five indeterminate tree species while their leaves were immature and again after they were mature. In support of the first hypothesis, caterpillars that fed on immature leaves had significantly higher PAE and carbohydrate assimilation efficiency (CAE), as well as higher protein assimilation rates and growth rates, than larvae that fed on mature leaves. Contrary to the second hypothesis, caterpillars that fed on mature indeterminate tree leaves did not have higher PAE than those that fed on mature determinate leaves, while CAE differed by only 3% between tree development types. Instead, “high-PAE” and “low-PAE” tree species were found across taxonomic and development categories. The results of this study emphasize the importance of physiological mechanisms, such as nutrient assimilation efficiency, to explain the large variation in host plant quality for insect herbivores.

Keywords

Nutrient assimilation Herbivore Leaf maturity Leaf development Protein 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is dedicated to four of the outstanding mentors of RVB: Paul Feeny, Douglas Futuyma, Elizabeth Bernays, and Michael Martin. In addition, we thank Chris Andrews for statistical consultation, Christine Lokerson and Hannah Nadel (USDA) for providing L. dispar eggs, David Borneman, Kerry Gray, Robert Grese, and Marvin Pettway for permitting the use of trees in the Ann Arbor area, and Jennifer Thaler and two anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments. Support for Sara Kileen was provided by a Winnifred B. Chase Fellowship, K.L. Jones Award, and Program in Biology Fellowship, and support for Caleb Nusbaum was provided by the University of Michigan Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program.

Author contribution statement

RVB conceived and designed the experiments. RVB, MK, SK and CPN performed the experiments. RVB analyzed the data. RVB wrote the manuscript. MK, SK and CPN provided editorial advice.

References

  1. Abrams MD (1998) The red maple paradox. What explains the widespread expansion of red maple in eastern forests? Bioscience 48:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addy ND (1969) Rearing the forest tent caterpillar on an artificial diet. J Econ Entomol 62:270–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres MP, MacLean SF (1987) Development of birch leaves and the growth energetics of Epirrita autumnata (Geometridae). Ecology 68:558–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbehenn RV, Constabel CP (2011) Tannins in plant–herbivore interactions. Phytochemistry 72:1151–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbehenn RV, Weir Q, Salminen JP (2008) Oxidation of ingested phenolics in the tree-feeding caterpillar Orgyia leucostigma depends on foliar chemical composition. J Chem Ecol 34:748–756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbehenn R, Dukatz C, Holt C, Reese A, Martiskainen O, Salminen J-P (2010) Feeding on poplar leaves by caterpillars potentiates foliar peroxidase action in their guts and increases plant resistance. Oecologia 164:993–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbehenn RV, Niewiadomski J, Kochmanski J, Constabel CP (2012) Limited effect of reactive oxygen species on the composition of susceptible essential amino acids in the midguts of Lymantria dispar caterpillars. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 81:160–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbehenn RV, Niewiadomski J, Kochmanski J (2013a) Importance of protein quality versus quantity in alternative host plants for a leaf-feeding insect. Oecologia 173:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbehenn RV, Niewiadomski J, Pecci C, Salminen J-P (2013b) Physiological benefits of feeding in the spring by Lymantria dispar caterpillars on red oak and sugar maple leaves: nutrition versus oxidative stress. Chemoecology 23:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbehenn RV, Haugberg N, Kochmanski J, Menachem B, Miller C (2014) Physiological factors affecting the rapid decrease in protein assimilation efficiency by a caterpillar on newly-mature tree leaves. Physiol Entomol 39:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barbehenn RV, Knister J, Marsik F, Jahant-Miller C, Nham W (2015a) Nutrients are assimilated efficiently by Lymantria dispar caterpillars from the mature leaves of trees in the Salicaceae. Physiol Entomol 40:72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barbehenn RV, Haugberg N, Kochmanski J, Menachem B (2015b) Effects of leaf maturity and wind stress on the nutrition of the generalist caterpillar Lymantria dispar feeding on poplar. Physiol Entomol 40:212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barbosa P, Krischik VA (1987) Influence of alkaloids on feeding preference of eastern deciduous forest trees by the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar. Am Nat 130:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baron-Epel O, Gharyal PK, Schindler M (1988) Pectins as mediators of wall porosity in soybean cells. Planta 175:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Barton KE, Koricheva J (2010) The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis. Am Nat 175:482–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Behmer ST (2009) Insect herbivore nutrient regulation. Annu Rev Entomol 54:165–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bernays E, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bosch M, Berger S, Schaller A, Stintzi A (2014) Jasmonate-dependent induction of polyphenol oxidase activity in tomato foliage is important for defense against Spodoptera exigua but not against Manduca sexta. BMC Plant Biol 14:257–271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Boudet A-M (2003) Towards an understanding of the supramolecular organization of the lignified cell wall. In: Rose JKC (ed) The plant cell wall. Blackwell, UK, pp 155–182Google Scholar
  21. Brisson LF, Tenhaken R, Lamb C (1994) Function of oxidative cross-linking of cell wall structural proteins in plant disease resistance. Plant Cell 6:1703–1712CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Bursell E (1967) The excretion of nitrogen in insects. Adv Insect Physiol 4:33–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castro-Diez P, Puyravaud JP, Cornelissen JHC (2000) Leaf structure and anatomy as related to leaf mass per area variation in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types. Oecologia 124:476–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Choong MR (1996) What makes a leaf tough and how this affects the pattern of Castanopsis fissa leaf consumption by caterpillars. Funct Ecol 10:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cipollini DF, Bergelson J (2000) Environmental and developmental regulation of trypsin inhibitor activity in Brassica napus. J Chem Ecol 26:1411–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clissold FJ, Tedder BJ, Conigrave AD, Simpson SJ (2010) The gastrointestinal tract as a nutrient-balancing organ. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 277:1751–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coley PD, Bateman ML, Kursar TA (2006) The effects of plant quality on caterpillar growth and defense against natural enemies. Oikos 115:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Constabel CP, Barbehenn R (2008) Defensive roles of polyphenol oxidase in plants. In: Schaller A (ed) Induced plant resistance to herbivory. Springer, New York, pp 253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dale JE (1982) The growth of leaves. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. DeGabriel JL, Moore BD, Foley WJ, Johnson CN (2009) The effects of plant defensive chemistry on nutrient availability predict reproductive success in a mammal. Ecology 90:711–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Despland E, Noseworthy M (2006) How well do specialist feeders regulate nutrient intake? Evidence from a gregarious tree-feeding caterpillar. J Exp Biol 209:1301–1309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Doblin MS, Vergara CE, Read S, Newbigin E, Bacic A (2003) Plant cell wall biosynthesis: making the bricks. In: Rose JKC (ed) The plant cell wall. Blackwell, UK, pp 183–222Google Scholar
  33. Feeny PP (1970) Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51:565–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Felton G (1996) Nutritive quality of plant protein: sources of variation and insect herbivore responses. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 32:107–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Felton GW (2005) Indigestion is a plant’s best defense. Proc Nat Acad Sci 102:18771–18772CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanley ME, Lamont BB, Fairbanks MM, Rafferty CM (2007) Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:157–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haruta M, Major IT, Christopher ME, Patton JJ, Constabel CP (2001) A Kunitz trypsin inhibitor gene family from trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.): cloning, functional expression, and induction by wounding and herbivory. Plant Mol Biol 46:347–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Harvey GT (1975) Nutritional studies of eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). II. Starches. Can Entomol 107:717–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haukioja E (2003) Putting the insect into the birch–insect interaction. Oecologia 136:161–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL (1995) Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance in gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 103:79–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Horie Y, Nakasone S, Watanabe K, Nakamura M, Suda H (1985) Daily ingestion and utilization of various kinds of nutrients by the silkworm, Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). Appl Entomol Zool 20:159–172Google Scholar
  42. Horton DR, Redak RA (1993) Further comments on analysis of covariance in insect dietary studies. Entomol Exp Appl 69:263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hough JA, Pimentel D (1978) Influence of host foliage on development, survival and fecundity of the gypsy moth. Env Entomol 7:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hunter AF, Lechowicz MJ (1992) Foliage quality changes during canopy development of some northern hardwood trees. Oecologia 89:316–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones CG, Hare JD, Compton SJ (1989) Measuring plant protein with the Bradford assay. J Chem Ecol 15:979–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lawson DL, Merritt RW, Klug MJ, Martin JS (1982) The utilization of late season foliage by the orange striped oakworm, Anisota senatoria. Entomol Exp Appl 32:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liebhold AM, Gottschalk KW, Muzika RM, Montgomery ME, Young R, O’Day K, Kelley B (1995) Suitability of North American tree species to the gypsy moth: a summary of field and laboratory tests. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experimental Station, General Technical Report NE-211, RadnorGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindroth RL, Anson BD, Weisbrod AV (1990) Effects of protein and juglone on gypsy moths: growth performance and detoxification enzyme activity. J Chem Ecol 16:2533–2547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Maksymowych R (1973) Analysis of leaf development. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin MM, Van’t Hof HM (1988) The cause of reduced growth of Manduca sexta larvae on a low-water diet: increased metabolic processing costs or nutrient limitation? J Insect Physiol 34:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Milton K, Dintzis FR (1981) Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for tropical plant samples. Biotropica 13:177–181RCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parry D, Spence JR, Volney WJA (1998) Budbreak phenology and natural enemies mediate survival of first-instar forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Environ Entomol 27:1368–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ (1992) Analysis of covariance: an alternative to nutritional indices. Entomol Exp Appl 62:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Read J, Stokes A (2006) Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. Am J Bot 93:1546–1565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rickleffs RE, Matthew KK (1982) Chemical characteristics of the foliage of some deciduous trees in southeastern Ontario. Can J Bot 60:2037–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Riipi M, Ossipov V, Lempa K, Haukioja E, Koricheva J, Ossipova S, Pihlaja K (2002) Seasonal changes in birch leaf chemistry: are there trade-offs between leaf growth and accumulation of phenolics? Oecologia 130:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rossiter MC (1991) Maternal effects generate variation in life history: consequences of egg weight plasticity in the gypsy moth. Funct Ecol 5:38–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ruhnke H, Schadler M, Klotz S, Matthies D, Brandl R (2009) Variability in leaf traits, insect herbivory and herbivore performance within and among individuals of four broad-leaved tree species. Basic Appl Ecol 10:726–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruhnke H, Matthies D, Brandl R (2013) Experiments with Lymantria dispar do not support the idea of physiological adjustment to host individuals by insect herbivores. Web Ecol 13:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruuhola T, Ossipov V, Lempa K, Haukioja E (2003) Amino acids during development of mountain birch leaves. Chemoecology 13:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salminen J-P, Roslin T, Karonen M, Sinkkonen J, Pihlaja K, Pulkkinen P (2004) Seasonal variation in the content of hydrolyzable tannins, flavonoid glycosides, and proanthocyanidins in oak leaves. J Chem Ecol 30:1693–1711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. SAS Institute (2010) The SAS system for Windows, Version 9.3. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmidt D, Reese J (1986) Sources of error in nutritional index studies of insects on artificial diet. J Insect Physiol 32:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schroeder LA (1986) Changes in tree leaf quality and growth performance of lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 67:1628–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scriber JM, Feeny P (1979) Growth of herbivorous caterpillars in relation to feeding specialization and to the growth form of their food plants. Ecology 60:829–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scriber JM, Slansky F (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu Rev Entomol 26:183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shingfield KJ, Offer NW (1999) Simultaneous determination of purine metabolites, creatine and pseudouridine in ruminant urine by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr Biomed Sci Appl 723:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Slansky F, Feeny P (1977) Stabilization of the rate of nitrogen accumulation by larvae of the cabbage butterfly on wild and cultivated food plants. Ecol Monogr 47:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thaler JS, Stout MJ, Karban R, Duffey SS (1996) Exogenous jasmonates simulate insect wounding in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in the laboratory and field. J Chem Ecol 22:1767–1781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Trier TM, Mattson WJ (2003) Diet-induced thermogenesis in insects: a developing concept in nutritional ecology. Environ Entomol 32:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Waldbauer GP (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv Insect Physiol 5:229–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wu L, Zhou J, Xue X, Li Y, Zhao J (2009) Fast determination of 26 amino acids and their content changes in royal jelly during storage using ultra-performance liquid chromatography. J Food Compos Anal 22:242–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yeoh H-H, Wee Y-C (1994) Leaf protein contents and nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for 90 plant species. Food Chem 49:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zanotto FP, Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D (1993) The regulation of growth by locusts through post-ingestive compensation for variation in the levels of dietary protein and carbohydrate. Physiol Entomol 18:425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhao D, MacKown CT, Starks PJ, Kindiger BK (2010) Rapid analysis of nonstructural carbohydrates in grass forage using microplate enzymatic assays. Crop Sci 50:1537–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations