Two microcephaly-associated novel missense mutations in CASK specifically disrupt the CASK–neurexin interaction

  • Leslie E. W. LaConte
  • Vrushali Chavan
  • Abdallah F. Elias
  • Cynthia Hudson
  • Corbin Schwanke
  • Katie Styren
  • Jonathan Shoof
  • Fernando Kok
  • Sarika Srivastava
  • Konark Mukherjee
Original Investigation
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Deletion and truncation mutations in the X-linked gene CASK are associated with severe intellectual disability (ID), microcephaly and pontine and cerebellar hypoplasia in girls (MICPCH). The molecular origin of CASK-linked MICPCH is presumed to be due to disruption of the CASK–Tbr-1 interaction. This hypothesis, however, has not been directly tested. Missense variants in CASK are typically asymptomatic in girls. We report three severely affected girls with heterozygous CASK missense mutations (M519T (2), G659D (1)) who exhibit ID, microcephaly, and hindbrain hypoplasia. The mutation M519T results in the replacement of an evolutionarily invariant methionine located in the PDZ signaling domain known to be critical for the CASK–neurexin interaction. CASKM519T is incapable of binding to neurexin, suggesting a critically important role for the CASK–neurexin interaction. The mutation G659D is in the SH3 (Src homology 3) domain of CASK, replacing a semi-conserved glycine with aspartate. We demonstrate that the CASKG659D mutation affects the CASK protein in two independent ways: (1) it increases the protein’s propensity to aggregate; and (2) it disrupts the interface between CASK’s PDZ (PSD95, Dlg, ZO-1) and SH3 domains, inhibiting the CASK–neurexin interaction despite residing outside of the domain deemed critical for neurexin interaction. Since heterozygosity of other aggregation-inducing mutations (e.g., CASKW919R) does not produce MICPCH, we suggest that the G659D mutation produces microcephaly by disrupting the CASK–neurexin interaction. Our results suggest that disruption of the CASK–neurexin interaction, not the CASK–Tbr-1 interaction, produces microcephaly and cerebellar hypoplasia. These findings underscore the importance of functional validation for variant classification.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The current study is supported by R01EY024712 from the NIH’s National Eye Institute to KM. We gratefully acknowledge the participation and cooperation of families of children with CASK mutation in our studies. We thank Prof. Thomas Südhof for providing pCMV5-CASK plasmid, Dr. Pelagia Derizioti for providing the TBR1 plasmid and Dr. Michael Fox for critically reading the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

439_2018_1874_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (591 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 591 kb)

References

  1. Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, Lindahl E (2015) GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2:19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7:248–249.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0410-248 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen RC, Zoghbi HY, Moseley AB, Rosenblatt HM, Belmont JW (1992) Methylation of HpaII and HhaI sites near the polymorphic CAG repeat in the human androgen-receptor gene correlates with X chromosome inactivation. Am J Hum Genet 51:1229–1239PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Apic G, Huber W, Teichmann SA (2003) Multi-domain protein families and domain pairs: comparison with known structures and a random model of domain recombination. J Struct Funct Genom 4:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N (2010) ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucl Acids Res 38:W529–W533.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq399 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Atasoy D, Schoch S, Ho A, Nadasy KA, Liu X, Zhang W, Mukherjee K, Nosyreva ED, Fernandez-Chacon R, Missler M, Kavalali ET, Sudhof TC (2007) Deletion of CASK in mice is lethal and impairs synaptic function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2525–2530.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611003104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Batey S, Nickson AA, Clarke J (2008) Studying the folding of multidomain proteins. HFSP J 2:365–377.  https://doi.org/10.2976/1.2991513 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Biederer T, Sara Y, Mozhayeva M, Atasoy D, Liu X, Kavalali ET, Sudhof TC (2002) SynCAM, a synaptic adhesion molecule that drives synapse assembly. Science 297:1525–1531.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072356 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bromberg Y, Rost B (2007) SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function. Nucl Acids Res 35:3823–3835.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm238 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Burglen L, Chantot-Bastaraud S, Garel C, Milh M, Touraine R, Zanni G, Petit F, Afenjar A, Goizet C, Barresi S, Coussement A, Ioos C, Lazaro L, Joriot S, Desguerre I, Lacombe D, des Portes V, Bertini E, Siffroi JP, de Villemeur TB, Rodriguez D (2012) Spectrum of pontocerebellar hypoplasia in 13 girls and boys with CASK mutations: confirmation of a recognizable phenotype and first description of a male mosaic patient. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-18 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Butz S, Okamoto M, Sudhof TC (1998) A tripartite protein complex with the potential to couple synaptic vesicle exocytosis to cell adhesion in brain. Cell 94:773–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R (2005) I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucl Acids Res 33:W306–W310.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki375 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Capriotti E, Calabrese R, Casadio R (2006) Predicting the insurgence of human genetic diseases associated to single point protein mutations with support vector machines and evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 22:2729–2734.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl423 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chavan V, Willis J, Walker SK, Clark HR, Liu X, Fox MA, Srivastava S, Mukherjee K (2015) Central presynaptic terminals are enriched in ATP but the majority lack mitochondria. PLoS One 10:e0125185.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125185 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniels DL, Cohen AR, Anderson JM, Brunger AT (1998) Crystal structure of the hCASK PDZ domain reveals the structural basis of class II PDZ domain target recognition. Nat Struct Biol 5:317–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Daura X, Gademann K, Jaun B, Seebach D, van Gunsteren WF, Mark AE (1999) Peptide folding: when simulation meets experiment. Angew Chem Int Ed 38:236–240.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(Sici)1521-3773(19990115)38:1/2<236:Aid-Anie236>3.3.Co;2-D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dehouck Y, Grosfils A, Folch B, Gilis D, Bogaerts P, Rooman M (2009) Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0. Bioinformatics 25:2537–2543.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp445 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dehouck Y, Kwasigroch JM, Gilis D, Rooman M (2011) PoPMuSiC 2.1: a web server for the estimation of protein stability changes upon mutation and sequence optimality. BMC Bioinf 12:151.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deriziotis P, O’Roak BJ, Graham SA, Estruch SB, Dimitropoulou D, Bernier RA, Gerdts J, Shendure J, Eichler EE, Fisher SE (2014) De novo TBR1 mutations in sporadic autism disrupt protein functions. Nat Commun 5:4954.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5954 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dosztanyi Z, Fiser A, Simon I (1997) Stabilization centers in proteins: identification, characterization and predictions. J Mol Biol 272:597–612.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1242 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fallon L, Moreau F, Croft BG, Labib N, Gu WJ, Fon EA (2002) Parkin and CASK/LIN-2 associate via a PDZ-mediated interaction and are co-localized in lipid rafts and postsynaptic densities in brain. J Biol Chem 277:486–491.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109806200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrer-Costa C, Orozco M, de la Cruz X (2004) Sequence-based prediction of pathological mutations. Proteins 57:811–819.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20252 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Flanagan SE, Patch AM, Ellard S (2010) Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 14:533–537.  https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2010.0036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goujon M, McWilliam H, Li W, Valentin F, Squizzato S, Paern J, Lopez R (2010) A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucl Acids Res 38:W695–W699.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq313 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hackett A, Tarpey PS, Licata A, Cox J, Whibley A, Boyle J, Rogers C, Grigg J, Partington M, Stevenson RE, Tolmie J, Yates JR, Turner G, Wilson M, Futreal AP, Corbett M, Shaw M, Gecz J, Raymond FL, Stratton MR, Schwartz CE, Abidi FE (2010) CASK mutations are frequent in males and cause X-linked nystagmus and variable XLMR phenotypes. Eur J Hum Genet 18:544–552.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2009.220 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hata Y, Butz S, Sudhof TC (1996) CASK: a novel dlg/PSD95 homolog with an N-terminal calmodulin-dependent protein kinase domain identified by interaction with neurexins. J Neurosci 16:2488–2494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsueh YP, Yang FC, Kharazia V, Naisbitt S, Cohen AR, Weinberg RJ, Sheng M (1998) Direct interaction of CASK/LIN-2 and syndecan heparan sulfate proteoglycan and their overlapping distribution in neuronal synapses. J Cell Biol 142:139–151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Hsueh YP, Wang TF, Yang FC, Sheng M (2000) Nuclear translocation and transcription regulation by the membrane-associated guanylate kinase CASK/LIN-2. Nature 404:298–302.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35005118 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang TN, Hsueh YP (2017) Calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase (CASK), a protein implicated in mental retardation and autism-spectrum disorders, interacts with T-Brain-1 (TBR1) to control extinction of associative memory in male mice. J Psychiatry Neurosci 42:37–47.  https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.150359 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaech SM, Whitfield CW, Kim SK (1998) The LIN-2/LIN-7/LIN-10 complex mediates basolateral membrane localization of the C. elegans EGF receptor LET-23 in vulval epithelial cells. Cell 94:761–771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4:1073–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.86 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. LaConte L, Mukherjee K (2013) Structural constraints and functional divergences in CASK evolution. Biochem Soc Trans 41:1017–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20130061 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. LaConte LE, Chavan V, Mukherjee K (2014) Identification and glycerol-induced correction of misfolding mutations in the X-linked mental retardation gene CASK. PLoS One 9:e88276.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088276 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. LaConte LE, Chavan V, Liang C, Willis J, Schonhense EM, Schoch S, Mukherjee K (2016) CASK stabilizes neurexin and links it to liprin-alpha in a neuronal activity-dependent manner. Cell Mol Life Sci: CMLS 73:3599–3621.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2183-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Y, Wei Z, Yan Y, Wan Q, Du Q, Zhang M (2014) Structure of Crumbs tail in complex with the PALS1 PDZ–SH3–GK tandem reveals a highly specific assembly mechanism for the apical Crumbs complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:17444–17449.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416515111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Liang C, Kerr A, Qiu Y, Cristofoli F, Van Esch H, Fox MA, Mukherjee K (2017) Optic nerve hypoplasia is a pervasive subcortical pathology of visual system in neonates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:5485–5496.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22399 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2010) Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 78:1950–1958.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22711 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Maximov A, Sudhof TC, Bezprozvanny I (1999) Association of neuronal calcium channels with modular adaptor proteins. J Biol Chem 274:24453–24456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McGee AW, Dakoji SR, Olsen O, Bredt DS, Lim WA, Prehoda KE (2001) Structure of the SH3-guanylate kinase module from PSD-95 suggests a mechanism for regulated assembly of MAGUK scaffolding proteins. Mol Cell 8:1291–1301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Michaud JL, Lachance M, Hamdan FF, Carmant L, Lortie A, Diadori P, Major P, Meijer IA, Lemyre E, Cossette P, Mefford HC, Rouleau GA, Rossignol E (2014) The genetic landscape of infantile spasms. Hum Mol Genet 23:4846–4858.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu199 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Moog U, Kutsche K, Kortum F, Chilian B, Bierhals T, Apeshiotis N, Balg S, Chassaing N, Coubes C, Das S, Engels H, Van Esch H, Grasshoff U, Heise M, Isidor B, Jarvis J, Koehler U, Martin T, Oehl-Jaschkowitz B, Ortibus E, Pilz DT, Prabhakar P, Rappold G, Rau I, Rettenberger G, Schluter G, Scott RH, Shoukier M, Wohlleber E, Zirn B, Dobyns WB, Uyanik G (2011) Phenotypic spectrum associated with CASK loss-of-function mutations. J Med Genet 48:741–751.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100218 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Moog U, Uyanik G, Kutsche K (2013) CASK-related disorders. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA et al (eds) GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK169825/. Accessed 6 Sept 2017
  43. Mukherjee K, Sharma M, Urlaub H, Bourenkov GP, Jahn R, Sudhof TC, Wahl MC (2008) CASK functions as a Mg2+-independent neurexin kinase. Cell 133:328–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.036 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Mukherjee K, Sharma M, Jahn R, Wahl MC, Sudhof TC (2010) Evolution of CASK into a Mg2+-sensitive kinase. Sci Signal 3:ra33.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000800 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mukherjee K, Slawson JB, Christmann BL, Griffith LC (2014) Neuron-specific protein interactions of Drosophila CASK-beta are revealed by mass spectrometry. Front Mol Neurosci 7:58.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2014.00058 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Najm J, Horn D, Wimplinger I, Golden JA, Chizhikov VV, Sudi J, Christian SL, Ullmann R, Kuechler A, Haas CA, Flubacher A, Charnas LR, Uyanik G, Frank U, Klopocki E, Dobyns WB, Kutsche K (2008) Mutations of CASK cause an X-linked brain malformation phenotype with microcephaly and hypoplasia of the brainstem and cerebellum. Nat Genet 40:1065–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.194 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nix SL, Chishti AH, Anderson JM, Walther Z (2000) hCASK and hDlg associate in epithelia, and their Src homology 3 and guanylate kinase domains participate in both intramolecular and intermolecular interactions. J Biol Chem 275:41192–41200.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002078200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Olatubosun A, Valiaho J, Harkonen J, Thusberg J, Vihinen M (2012) PON-P: integrated predictor for pathogenicity of missense variants. Hum Mutat 33:1166–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22102 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pak C, Danko T, Zhang YS, Aoto J, Anderson G, Maxeiner S, Yi F, Wernig M, Sudhof TC (2015) Human neuropsychiatric disease modeling using conditional deletion reveals synaptic transmission defects caused by heterozygous mutations in NRXN1. Cell Stem Cell 17:316–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Pan L, Chen J, Yu J, Yu H, Zhang M (2011) The structure of the PDZ3-SH3–GuK tandem of ZO-1 protein suggests a supramodular organization of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family scaffold protein core. J Biol Chem 286:40069–40074.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C111.293084 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Reissner C, Missler M (2014) MAGUKs end a tale of promiscuity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:17350–17351.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420387111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Rueda M, Ferrer-Costa C, Meyer T, Perez A, Camps J, Hospital A, Gelpi JL, Orozco M (2007) A consensus view of protein dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:796–801.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605534104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234:779–815.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, Serrano L (2005) The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucl Acids Res 33:W382–W388.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki387 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Srivastava S, McMillan R, Willis J, Clark H, Chavan V, Liang C, Zhang H, Hulver M, Mukherjee K (2016) X-linked intellectual disability gene CASK regulates postnatal brain growth in a non-cell autonomous manner. Acta Neuropathol Commun 4:30.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0295-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ (2009) Jalview Version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Wei Z, Zheng S, Spangler SA, Yu C, Hoogenraad CC, Zhang M (2011) Liprin-mediated large signaling complex organization revealed by the liprin-alpha/CASK and liprin-alpha/liprin-beta complex structures. Mol Cell 43:586–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Yin S, Ding F, Dokholyan NV (2007) Eris: an automated estimator of protein stability. Nat Methods 4:466–467.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0607-466 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zeng M, Ye F, Xu J, Zhang M (2017) PDZ ligand binding-induced conformational coupling of the PDZ–SH3–GK Tandems in PSD-95 Family MAGUKs. J Mol Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.11.003 Google Scholar
  62. Zweier C, de Jong EK, Zweier M, Orrico A, Ousager LB, Collins AL, Bijlsma EK, Oortveld MA, Ekici AB, Reis A, Schenck A, Rauch A (2009) CNTNAP2 and NRXN1 are mutated in autosomal-recessive Pitt-Hopkins-like mental retardation and determine the level of a common synaptic protein in Drosophila. Am J Hum Genet 85:655–666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie E. W. LaConte
    • 1
    • 6
  • Vrushali Chavan
    • 1
  • Abdallah F. Elias
    • 2
  • Cynthia Hudson
    • 2
  • Corbin Schwanke
    • 2
  • Katie Styren
    • 2
  • Jonathan Shoof
    • 2
  • Fernando Kok
    • 3
    • 4
  • Sarika Srivastava
    • 1
  • Konark Mukherjee
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Virginia Tech Carilion Research InstituteRoanokeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medical GeneticsShodair Children’s HospitalHelenaUSA
  3. 3.Mendelics Genomic AnalysisSao PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Human Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Biosciences InstituteUniversity of Sao Paulo (USP)Sao PauloBrazil
  5. 5.Department of BiologyVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  6. 6.Virginia Tech Carilion School of MedicineRoanokeUSA

Personalised recommendations