Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in wild bird species of the order Columbiformes

Abstract

Diseases can play a role in species decline. Among them, haemosporidian parasites, vector-transmitted protozoan parasites, are known to constitute a risk for different avian species. However, the magnitude of haemosporidian infection in wild columbiform birds, including strongly decreasing European turtle doves, is largely unknown. We examined the prevalence and diversity of haemosporidian parasites Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon and subgenera Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus in six species of the order Columbiformes during breeding season and migration by applying nested PCR, one-step multiplex PCR assay and microscopy. We detected infections in 109 of the 259 screened individuals (42%), including 15 distinct haemosporidian mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages, representing five H. (Haemoproteus), two H. (Parahaemoproteus), five Leucocytozoon and three Plasmodium lineages. Five of these lineages have never been described before. We discriminated between single and mixed infections and determined host species-specific prevalence for each parasite genus. Observed differences among sampled host species are discussed with reference to behavioural characteristics, including nesting and migration strategy. Our results support previous suggestions that migratory birds have a higher prevalence and diversity of blood parasites than resident or short-distance migratory species. A phylogenetic reconstruction provided evidence for H. (Haemoproteus) as well as H. (Parahaemoproteus) infections in columbiform birds. Based on microscopic examination, we quantified parasitemia, indicating the probability of negative effects on the host. This study provides a large-scale baseline description of haemosporidian infections of wild birds belonging to the order Columbiformes sampled in the northern hemisphere. The results enable the monitoring of future changes in parasite transmission areas, distribution and diversity associated with global change, posing a potential risk for declining avian species as the European turtle dove.

Introduction

There is increasing evidence that pathogens can play a significant role in species decline (Bunbury et al. 2007). Haemosporidian parasites, including Plasmodium, known as avian malaria, and related malaria-like pathogens Leucocytozoon and subgenera Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus have been associated to negatively affect bird population dynamics (Yanga et al. 2011; Yoshimura et al. 2014). Several studies demonstrated different costs on life-history traits associated with haemosporidian infections, such as impairment on the body condition (Valkiūnas et al. 2006), reduced reproductive success (Merino et al. 2000; Marzal et al. 2005; Knowles et al. 2010) and lower chance of survival (Earle et al. 1993; Sol et al. 2003; Bunbury et al. 2007; Lachish et al. 2011).

Haemosporidian parasites are widespread and infect a great variety of avian host species (Valkiūnas 2005; Boundenga et al. 2017). Nevertheless, most studies have specifically addressed avian haemosporidians of passerine birds, while research on non-passerine host species is underrepresented (Santiago-Alarcon et al. 2010; Clark et al. 2014). There is only a small number of recent publications dealing with haemosporidian parasites in wild columbiform birds, particularly in Europe, apart from feral pigeon Columba livia domestica (e.g. Sol et al. 2003; Foronda et al. 2004; Scaglione et al. 2015).

In general, given their common evolutionary background, closely related host species (i.e. species belonging to the same family) are expected to be similar in their susceptibility to parasitic infestations and exposure to vectoring dipterans and their parasite community (Ricklefs and Fallon 2002; Dubiec et al. 2016; Ciloglu et al. 2020a; Ellis et al. 2020). However, only few studies have presented data on the prevalence and diversity of haemosporidian parasites in closely related bird species. Differences in prevalence between species are associated with several factors and the interactions between those, including life-history traits and ecology of the hosts and vectors, parasite characteristics and environmental conditions, that may affect the activity of vectors and the development of parasites (Sol et al. 2000; Gupta et al. 2011; Quillfeldt et al. 2011; Hellard et al. 2016; Chakarov et al. 2020; Ciloglu et al. 2020b; Ellis et al. 2020). Also different behavioural characteristics (e.g. cavity-nesting vs. open-nesting or migrant vs. resident species) may influence haemosporidian prevalence and community (Dunn et al. 2017; Emmenegger et al. 2018), whereas no evidence that closely related host species share parasites due to overlapping geographic ranges was found (Ciloglu et al. 2020a). Cavity-nesting species may be shielded from vector exposure due to their enclosed surroundings, while open-nesting birds should be more susceptible to flying dipteran vectors. Migratory species, particularly long-distance migrants, are expected to host a higher diversity of parasites (Walther et al. 2016; Emmenegger et al. 2018; Ciloglu et al. 2020b) as they encounter parasites and their vectors in multiple ecosystems each year, whereas residents only encounter parasites in one ecosystem (Møller and Erriyzøe 1998). The European turtle dove Streptopelia turtur (henceforth turtle dove) is the only long-distance migrant among the columbiform birds we tested. The European population follows three main migration flyways (western, central and eastern) between Europe and sub-Saharan Africa (Marx et al. 2016). The population trend of turtle doves across Europe declined by almost 80% since the 1970s, whereas population trends of other columbiform species, like Common woodpigeon C. palumbus (henceforth woodpigeon) and stock dove C. oenas, are increasing (PECBMS 2020). Stock doves and woodpigeons from Central Europe are partial migrants. Migratory individuals are mainly wintering in France and Iberia (Cramp 1985; von Blotzheim and Bauer 1994). The main reasons for the turtle dove population decline are the loss of good-quality habitats as well as illegal and unsustainable legal hunting. Additional threats were identified, but these are either considered to have a small or unknown impact or need further research (Fisher et al. 2018); among these are diseases like haemosporidian infections.

We used molecular and microscopic techniques to screen the columbiform species for haemosporidian infections and to identify genetic lineages in order to test the following hypotheses: (i) the prevalence of haemosporidian parasites is higher in long-distance compared to short-distance migratory or resident species, (ii) the diversity of lineages differs among related species and (iii) the prevalence and lineage occurrence in turtle doves varies across their flyways due to possible differing parasite-vector-communities at different breeding, stopover and wintering areas.

Material and methods

Origin and preparation of the samples

Blood samples from 259 individuals belonging to six species of the order Columbiformes were collected from 2013 to 2019 over a broad geographical extent (Table 1; Fig. S1) by venipuncture of the brachial or metatarsal vein and stored on Whatman FTA cards (Whatman®, UK). A blood smear was prepared in the field for 251 of the sampled birds. The blood smears were fixed with methanol (100%) for 30 s and stained with Giemsa in a work solution prepared with buffer pH 7.0 (ratio 1:5) for 30 min. For DNA isolation, a 3 × 3 mm piece of each sample was cut out of the FTA card. Subsequently, the DNA was extracted according to the ammonium-acetate protocol by Martínez et al. (2009) and purified with Zymo-SpinTM IIC columns (Zymo Research, USA). DNA concentration and purity were quantified by using NanoDrop2000c UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, USA).

Table 1 Number of blood samples analysed, split by species year and site

Parasite detection

Nested PCR assay and Sanger sequencing

The presence or absence of avian haemosporidians was determined through nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting a 479 base pair (bp) region of the cytochrome b gene (cyt b; Hellgren et al. 2004). For the initial PCR reaction, the primer pair HaemNFI/HaemNR3 was applied. A 4 μl aliquot of this PCR product was subsequently used as template DNA for the second PCR reactions with specific primer pairs HaemF/HaemR2 for Haemoproteus (henceforth Haemoproteus refers to both subgenera H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) infections, unless explicitly defined) and Plasmodium and HaemFL/HaemR2L for Leucocytozoon amplification. All PCR reactions were carried out in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 12.5 μl 2x DreamTaq Master-Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), 1.65 μl of each primer (10 μM), 4 μl template DNA (20–80 ng/μl) and 5.2 μl deionized water. DNA from passerine birds with known infection and deionized water were included in each PCR run as positive and negative controls, respectively. PCR protocols (see Hellgren et al. 2004 for cycling conditions) were carried out on a Biometra TOne Cycler (Analytik Jena, Germany).

As multiple PCR runs can produce additional positives (Dunn et al. 2017), each sample resulting in a negative PCR reaction was conducted a second time to confirm the absence of parasites, whereas a single positive PCR result was interpreted as an infected bird. PCR products of samples rendering a clear band during gel electrophoresis (QIAxcel Advanced, Qiagen, Switzerland) were Sanger sequenced bi-directional by Microsynth-Seqlab (Sequence Laboratories Goettingen GmbH, Germany). Forward and reverse sequences were assembled and trimmed in CLC Main Workbench 7.6.4 (CLC Bio, Qiagen, Denmark) and checked for mixed infections (Ferreira Junior et al. 2017).

To identify lineages, the sequences were aligned with reference sequences deposited in MalAvi database (Bensch et al. 2009) using BLASTN 2.3.0+ (Zhang et al. 2000). Sequences are considered as distinct lineages if they differ by one or more nucleotides in the cyt b fragment (Hellgren et al. 2004; Bensch et al. 2009). Lineages with no database records in MalAvi were considered novel. For novel lineages, PCR and sequencing were performed twice to verify the results. Novel sequences and sequences found in a host species for the first time are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MT888848-60.

One-step multiplex PCR assay

The aforementioned widely used nested PCR assay is sufficient for genus and lineage identification. However, it is ineffective at detecting mixed infections of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium because it favours the amplification of the most abundant parasite in the sample or the parasite for which the primers are a better match (Ciloglu et al. 2019). But since mixed infections are very common and have been shown to be particularly virulent (Valkiūnas et al. 2006; Bernotienė et al. 2016), a PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon was additionally applied for samples tested positive for either Haemoproteus or Plasmodium by the nested PCR assay.

The PCR was performed according to Ciloglu et al. (2019) by using equimolar concentrations of three primer sets PMF/PMR, HMF/HMR and LMF/LMR in a single reaction tube, targeting different sized fragments (approx. 380 bp fragment of non-coding region of Plasmodium mtDNA, approx. 530 bp fragment between the 5′ end of cyt b and a non-coding region of mtDNA of Haemoproteus, and approx. 220 bp fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COX1) gene of Leucocytozoon, respectively).

The reactions were set up in total volumes of 20 μl containing 10 μl of 2x Multiplex PCR Master-Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 0.4 μl of each primer (10 μM), 3.6 μl of deionized water and 4 μl of DNA template. PCR protocols (see Ciloglu et al. 2019 for cycling conditions) were carried out on a Biometra TOne Cycler. Every PCR run contained positive and negative samples (cf. nested PCR assay). PCR amplicons were visualized using QIAxcel Advanced (Qiagen, Switzerland) high-resolution capillary gel electrophoresis.

Examination of blood films

To confirm the presence or absence of intracellular parasite gametocytes, blood smears (n = 251) were examined at × 1000 magnification for at least 10,000 monolayered erythrocytes using a light microscope (PrimoStar Zeiss, Germany). The intensity of parasitemia was determined by counting the number of infected blood cells per 10,000 erythrocytes (Godfrey et al. 1987). Identification of haemosporidian parasites, limited to genus level, followed the criteria of Clark et al. (2009).

Phylogenetic and statistical analyses

Constructions of lineage networks, using the medium joining network method, were performed with PopART 1.7 (Leigh and Bryant 2015).

For phylogenetic tree reconstruction, in addition to newly found lineages, we downloaded one sequence from NCBI GenBank for each haemosporidian lineage (n = 148) shown to infect species of the order Columbiformes and deposited in MalAvi (MalAvi 2020). Some sequences (n = 45) were excluded due to insufficient sequence length or only partial coverage of the chosen 477 bp cyt b fragment. However, all lineages detected in the present study are represented in the phylogenetic analysis.

The best-fit model of DNA sequence evolution was selected using jModeltest 2.1.7 (Darriba et al. 2012). According to the Akaike information criterion, we used the General Time Reversible model including invariable sites and variation among sites (GTR+I+G; Gu et al. 1995). Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed with BEAST 1.8.4. (Drummond et al. 2012). Tree priors were selected using the interface BEAUTi 1.8.4. with strict clock and a Yule speciation process (Yule 1925; Gernhard 2008). Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were run with 50,000,000 generations and one tree was recorded every 1000 generations. In all, 10% of the trees were discarded as burn-in in TreeAnnotator (BEAST package). We validated the results of the Bayesian analyses in Tracer 1.6. (Drummond and Rambaut 2007). The phylogenetic tree was constructed with FigTree 1.4.3 (Rambaut 2007).

Statistical analyses were performed with R 3.6.3 (R Core Team 2016). Due to a sufficient sample size (cf. Jovani and Tella 2006), we selected turtle doves (n = 141), woodpigeons (n = 60) and stock doves (n = 52) to assess whether overall prevalence and prevalence per genus varied across species. To compare the equality of proportions (e.g. to assess the difference in prevalence between species), the frequency distribution test ‘Pearson’s chi-squared test’ was applied. To determine whether prevalence (infection status as determined by nested PCR expressed as binominal contrast: presence/absence of infection) of turtle doves was associated with timing of sampling (breeding season vs. spring migration) or flyway, we constructed a general linear model (GLM). A significance level of p < 0.05 was used.

Results

Prevalence of haemosporidian parasites

Of the 259 individuals screened for haemosporidian parasites using specific nested PCR assay, 109 were infected (42.1%). We successfully obtained a sequence from all positive PCR results (n = 109). Most individuals (n = 40) were infected with a single Leucocytozoon lineage (15.4%), 40 with a single Haemoproteus lineage (15.4%; divided in H. (Haemoproteus) 13.1%, H. (Parahaemoproteus) 2.3%) and nine with a single Plasmodium lineage (3.5%). Two individuals (0.8%) had mixed homogeneric infections, 17 columbiform birds (6.6%) showed different types of heterogeneric infections and one turtle dove had both (Haemoproteus/Haemoproteus/Leucocytozoon) (Table 2).

Table 2 Number of avian haemosporidian infections per sampled species and sites. The composition of occurring mixed infections is shown in the right-most column. We refer ‘infected’ birds to individuals tested positive through nested PCR assay

Woodpigeons had the highest overall prevalence (61.7%), followed by turtle doves (48.9%), while stock doves had the lowest prevalence (3.8%) (Fig. 1). Overall prevalence differed significantly between the species (χ2 = 43.2, df = 2, p < 0.001). Comparing the species pairwise, there was a significant difference between stock doves and the other two species (stock dove/woodpigeon χ2 = 41.0, df = 1, p < 0.001; stock dove/turtle dove χ2 = 33.2, df = 1, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between turtle doves and woodpigeons (χ2 = 2.7, df = 1, p = 0.098). In turtle doves, a single infection with Haemoproteus was the most prevalent (25.5%), whereas in woodpigeons, it was a single infection with Leucocytozoon (48.3%). Turtle doves were significantly more often infected with Haemoproteus compared to woodpigeons (χ2 = 10.6, df = 1, p = 0.001) and stock doves (χ2 = 20.7, df = 1, p < 0.001). Conversely, woodpigeons significantly showed more infections with Leucocytozoon than turtle doves (χ2 = 33.1, df = 1, p < 0.001) and stock doves (χ2 = 44.1, df = 1, p < 0.001). An infection with Plasmodium was present at a rather low frequency in turtle doves (5.6%) and stock doves (1.9%) and absent in woodpigeons. Haemoproteus and Plasmodium infections were found in only one stock dove individual each (1.9%). We did not detect Leucocytozoon infections in any sampled stock doves. Mixed infection occurred in turtle doves and woodpigeons with a similar prevalence (9.9% and 10%, respectively) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Prevalence of infection [%] for haemosporidian genera (Haemoproteus refers to the subgenera H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) combined) and mixed infections in the three species: European turtle doves Streptopelia turtur (n = 141), common woodpigeons Columba palumbus (n = 60) and stock doves C. oenas (n = 52). We refer ‘infected’ birds to individuals tested positive through nested PCR assay

There was no age-related significant difference (juveniles vs. adults) in woodpigeons for neither Haemoproteus (χ2 = 0.9, df = 1, p = 0.334) nor Leucocytozoon infections (χ2 = 1.3, df = 1, p = 0.256).

In turtle doves, an infection with Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon depended on the sampling season, while there was no effect of the migration flyway (Haemoproteus: season: χ2 = 4.0, df = 1, p = 0.045; flyway: χ2 = 0.1, df = 1, p = 0.781; Leucocytozoon: season: χ2 = 5.1, df = 1, p = 0.024; flyway: χ2 < 0.001, df = 1, p = 1.0). Independent of sampling location in Europe, Haemoproteus was most prevalent in turtle doves sampled during spring migration (n = 75; 52.0%) compared to breeding season (n = 54; 11.1%) and autumn migration (n = 3; 0.0%). Leucocytozoon infections (32.0%) could be detected for individuals sampled during spring migration only. Plasmodium infections were neither dependent on flyway nor sampling season (season: χ2 = 0.7, df = 1, p = 0.392; flyway: χ2 = 1.5, df = 1, p = 0.227).

Lineage diversity and phylogenetic analyses

The 109 positive samples represented 15 distinct lineages, including five H. (Haemoproteus), two H. (Parahaemoproteus), three Plasmodium and five Leucocytozoon lineages (Fig. 2, Table 3). The highest lineage diversity was found in turtle doves (n = 11), followed by woodpigeons (n = 5) and stock doves (n = 2). The most frequently occurring lineage was AEMO02 (Leucocytozoon), followed by COLIV04 (Leucocytozoon) and the H. (Haemoproteus) lineages STRTUR02 and STRTUR03. All other lineages had a prevalence of less than 10% (Table 3). Eleven lineages were present in a single host species, whereas the remaining four infected two host species (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Median-joining network of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene lineages (n = 130, 496 bp fragment) of haemosporidian parasites Haemoproteus (refers to the subgenera H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) combined), Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium infecting columbiform birds. Circles represent lineages, and the circle sizes are proportional to the lineage frequencies in the sample set. Lineage names are noted at the associated circles. One hatch mark represents one mutation. Sampled host species are represented by different colours

Table 3 Haemosporidian lineages found in bird species of the order Columbiformes with the respective GenBank accession number and lineage prevalence. If mixed homogeneric infection occurred, the lineage combination of the two lineages is presented

We identified five novel lineages. Novel lineages were found in turtle doves (STRTUR04 H. (Haemoproteus), MT888848 and STRTUR05 H. (Parahaemoproteus), MT888849) and in the Namaqua dove sample (OENCAP01 H. (Haemoproteus), MT888850). Two novel Leucocytozoon lineages infected woodpigeons (COLPAL03 MT888851 and COLPAL04 MT888852). For some already known lineages, we provide first records of them infecting species of the order Columbiformes (Table 3).

Turtle doves following the central/eastern flyway showed a higher lineage diversity for all haemosporidian genera than individuals using the western flyway (Haemoproteus: five vs. three, Plasmodium: three vs. one, and Leucocytozoon: three vs. zero lineages, respectively). All lineages infecting turtle doves sampled along the western flyway were also found in individuals following the central/eastern flyway (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Median-joining network of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene lineages (n = 81, 496 bp fragment) of haemosporidian parasites Haemoproteus (refers to the subgenera H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) combined), Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium infecting European turtle doves Streptopelia turtur. Circles represent lineages, and the circle sizes are proportional to the lineage frequencies in the sample set. Lineage names are noted at the associated circles. One hatch mark represents one mutation. Positive samples of individual birds from the western (n = 10 sequences) and the central/eastern flyway (n = 71 sequences) are represented by different colours

The Bayesian-based phylogeny of mitochondrial cyt b gene fragment revealed three well-supported major clades, representing Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium and Haemoproteus. Whereby Haemoproteus showed two monophyletic subclades, indicating the subgenera H. (Parahaemoproteus) and H. (Haemoproteus) (Fig. 4). From the 109 lineages included in the phylogenetic tree reconstruction, 22 belong to Leucocytozoon, 15 to Plasmodium and 72 to Haemoproteus, divided in 54 lineages clustering to H. (Haemoproteus) and 18 to H. (Parahaemoproteus).

Fig. 4
figure4

Phylogeny of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene lineages (477 bp fragment) of avian haemosporidian parasites (n = 109) isolated from blood samples of columbiform birds based on a Bayesian analysis. The four different clades Leucocytozoon (L), Plasmodium (P), H. (Haemoproteus) (H) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) (ParaH) are shown in the overview tree and in one individual zoomed-in tree each together with lineage names. Lineages found in the present study are shown in bold. Newly discovered lineages are marked with ‘*’. Toxoplasma gondii (KM657812) was included as outgroup. GenBank accession numbers are given in Table S1. Nodal support values indicate posterior clade probabilities. If the node support is not shown by digits, nodes with posterior probabilities < 90% are coloured in grey

Blood slide screening and one-step multiplex PCR assay

The overall prevalence according to counts of infected erythrocytes in blood smears was 28.3% (Haemoproteus 12.7%, Plasmodium 1.2%, Leucocytozoon 4.8%; 27 samples could not be assigned reliably to one of the genera). This overall prevalence is lower than the prevalence according to nested PCR results (42.1%) (χ2 = 10.6, df = 1, p = 0.001). With the exception of COLPAL03, MILANS06 and RTSR1, we found in at least one sample per lineage infected erythrocytes (Table 3).

The average parasitemia estimated from blood smears was 17.6, ranging from 0.8 to 912.3 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes. However, 90.1% of the samples had a parasitemia lower than 10 infected blood cells per 10,000 erythrocytes. One turtle dove sampled during spring migration in 2019 in Greece showed an extremely high parasitemia with 912.3 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes (Fig. S2) compared to the remaining samples (maximum of 43.6 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes).

From the 259 samples, 67 were tested positive for Haemoproteus or Plasmodium with the nested PCR assay. These samples were included in the one-step multiplex PCR runs. The one-step multiplex PCR assay showed a positive PCR result for 64 (95.5%) samples. All Plasmodium lineages GRW02, MILSAN06 and RTSR1 were displayed at the expected band height. While Haemoproteus lineages STRTUR01 and STRTUR05 were displayed at the expected band height, AFR119, STRTUR02, STRTUR03 and STRTUR04 were displayed at a height expected for Plasmodium lineages. All Haemoproteus lineages with ‘wrong’ band heights cluster in the phylogenetic tree into the H. (Haemoproteus) clade (Fig. 4) and group together in the networks (Figs. 2 and 3). An apparent mixed infection of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium was present in three turtle dove samples according to the results of the one-step multiplex PCR assay. No mixed Haemoproteus/Plasmodium infection could be proved by the nested PCR assay (Table 2) and for one turtle dove only by microscopic examination. However, for the mixed infections according to the one-step multiplex PCR assay, we cannot distinguish between Plasmodium/Haemoproteus mixed infections and mixed infections of the two subgenera H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) due to the ‘wrong’ band heights displayed for H. (Haemoproteus) lineages. Given these inconsistencies, we classified individuals tested positive through nested PCR-based assay (and verified by Sanger sequencing) as ‘infected’.

Discussion

Interspecific differences and lineage diversity

Even though common lineages were detected in the sampled columbiform birds, the overall and genus-specific prevalence as well as the lineage diversity differed among the species. Similar differences in parasite prevalence were reported from other closely related species (e.g. tree sparrow Passer montanus and house sparrow P. domesticus, Lee et al. 2006; great tit Parus major and blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus, Dubiec et al. 2016).

Our results could have been affected by changes in prevalence over time, as the samples were collected from various years. However, there are studies that found no significant changes in the parasite or lineage prevalence between years (Bensch et al. 2007; Shurulinkov and Ilieva 2009, but see Dunn et al. 2017) and the majority of studies investigating prevalence are based on non-uniform distributed data (e.g. birds of different age or variable sample sizes among sample locations; see Dubiec et al. 2016). Therefore, we deem at least our observed main patterns of prevalence and lineage diversity as reliable and evaluable.

The general pattern with woodpigeons showing the highest overall prevalence, followed by turtle doves and stock doves being the least infected ones, is quite similar with the results of Dunn et al. (2017), who tested nestlings of these species. However, in contrast to Dunn et al. (2017), we found evidence for Plasmodium infections in turtle doves and stock doves. The fact that woodpigeons and turtle doves showed a significantly higher infection rate than stock doves might be due to different nesting behaviours. Open-nesting species are expected to have higher rates of infection than cavity-nesters (Hellard et al. 2016; Dunn et al. 2017, but see Quillfeldt et al. 2011). While turtle doves and woodpigeons built open nests in shrubs or trees, stock doves breed in tree cavities or artificial nest boxes (von Blotzheim and Bauer 1994). We found the overall prevalence was markedly higher in open-nesting vs. cavity-nesting species. Since only one stock dove individual each was infected with Haemoproteus or Plasmodium, it is possible that also Leucocytozoon infections occur in stock doves at a similar low rate, even if we could not prove this in our study. Dunn et al. (2017) could prove an infection with Leucocytozoon for a single stock dove nestling. The nesting behaviour together with other behavioural traits (e.g. being less gregarious or having a low habitat overlap with other columbiform birds, particularly feral pigeons) may explain the low prevalence in stock doves. However, also other factors such as differences in the host immune system, resistance to parasites and other idiosyncrasies of vectors and parasites (Reinoso-Pérez et al. 2016) may influence the low infection rates in stock doves.

Haemoproteus is the most frequently reported blood parasite in birds, followed by Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium (Carlson et al. 2013; Heym et al. 2019). In this study, this pattern was observed for turtle doves, but not for woodpigeons, for which Leucocytozoon was the most prevalent. Although the Leucocytozoon prevalence was rather high (58.3%), the genetic diversity was rather low. The two lineages AEMO02 and COLIV04 were present in 94.4% of Leucocytozoon-infected woodpigeons. Both lineages were detected in feral pigeons previously (MalAvi 2020). Feral pigeons are widely distributed and their number is increasing, especially in urban areas (Haag-Wackernagel and Moch 2004). In this study, the majority of sampled woodpigeons (82%) were from urban areas. Hence, it is likely that feral pigeons could have acted as a reservoir and blackflies transmitted the lineages from feral pigeons to woodpigeons and vice versa. While Scaglione et al. (2015) states that Leucocytozoon parasites are not routinely found in pigeons, a study sampling blackflies in Central Europe showed pigeons to be one of the main targets of ornithophilic blackflies (Chakarov et al. 2020). High rates of Leucocytozoon in the sampled woodpigeons may have been favoured by the opportunities for transmission that the woodpigeons offered (e.g. flocking behaviour, increased host densities in urban areas, proximity to feral pigeons; cf. Sol et al. 2000).

High infection rate with Leucocytozoon and lower rates of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus in residents or short-distance migrants (woodpigeons) compared to higher Haemoproteidae prevalence in long-distance migrants (turtle doves) were observed. This is in line with previous research, as Haemoproteid transmission to the birds breeding in the northern hemisphere takes place mostly at wintering areas and along the migration route of the long-distance migrants in contrast to Leucocytozoon that is transmitted mainly at the breeding grounds (Valkiūnas 2005; Shurulinkov and Ilieva 2009).

Turtle doves hosted the highest parasite diversity, being the only species infected with all tested haemosporidian genera and harbouring the highest number of lineages. This is in line with previous studies, which have shown that migratory birds have a higher prevalence and diversity of blood parasites than resident or short-distance migratory species (Figuerola and Green 2000; Jenkins et al. 2012; Walther et al. 2016; Ciloglu et al. 2020b). This could be explained by the fact that residents and short-distance migrants travel between areas that are likely to be within a single transmission area, e.g. within a continent, and so are confronted with a single parasite fauna (Hellgren et al. 2007; Jenkins et al. 2012). In contrast, long-distance migrants move between vastly separated areas and thereby encounter different faunas of parasites (Waldenström et al. 2002). Being a long-distance migrant also increases the time being exposed to parasites compared to residents or short-distance migrants in temperate regions, which lack parasite transmission during autumn and winter when vector activity wanes (Cosgrove et al. 2008). Furthermore, environmental challenges, inducing stress and increased day length at the distant wintering grounds may induce infections (Valkiūnas et al. 2004). Since migration is an energetically costly, strenuous physical activity, resources may be traded-off from immune defence, making it likely that migrant species are more susceptible than residents (Waldenström et al. 2002; Jenkins et al. 2012, but see Hegemann et al. 2012).

Migratory birds can transport parasite lineages to novel environments (Waldenström et al. 2002; Adamik et al. 2016). It has been suggested that some lineages are transmitted in Africa only, while others are transmitted in Europe only and a few in both continents (Ferraguti et al. 2019). The presence of the seven lineages found in woodpigeons and stock doves (Table 3) indicates that these lineages are transmitted in Europe. For turtle doves of the subspecies S. t. turtur as Palearctic-African migrants, transmission can take place both on the African and European continents, whereas for the subspecies S. t. rufescens, infected with the lineages STRTUR01, STRTUR02 and STRTUR03, transmission can occur in Africa only. As for some lineages (COLPAL03, MILSAN06 and RTSR1), no infected erythrocytes could be found during blood smear screening and possible mixed infections of lineages belonging to the same genus were not considered in the microscopic examinations, assigned transmission areas are likely but not definitely proven.

Despite a rather high overall prevalence, the infection intensity (parasitemia) was in general rather low. Studies on parasitemia are still limited despite their importance (Huang et al. 2020). The damage produced on the host species greatly depends on the infection intensity with the harmful effects being most pronounced when parasitemia is very high (Sol et al. 2003). However, medication experiments have shown that also chronic infections at lower intensities can influence host reproductive success and conditions (Merino et al. 2000; Knowles et al. 2010). To our knowledge, there is no study examining the parasitemia of the species sampled here. However, the average parasitemia (approx. 10 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes) was lower than in wild columbiform birds sampled in Nigeria (100 per 10,000; Akinpelu 2008), on the Canary Islands (148 per 10,000; Foronda et al. 2004) and in India (Haemoproteus: 350, and Plasmodium 150 per 10,000; Gupta et al. 2011). Only one of our sampled birds, a turtle dove, showed a severe Haemoproteus infection with parasitemia of approx. 900 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes. However, the adverse effects of haemosporidian infections to the avian host depend on many factors (e.g. host immunity, food availability, or infection intensity) (Chagas et al. 2016) and are therefore difficult to assess for our sampled birds.

Intraspecific differences in turtle doves

Population genetic analyses have shown that turtle doves are not genetically structured across their flyways (Calderon et al. 2016). For haemosporidian parasites infecting turtle doves, we found differences in Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon prevalence with the timing of sampling, but no significant differences in prevalence between the flyways. These results are consistent with other studies that have described seasonal variation in the prevalence over the annual cycle (Klei and DeGiusti 1975; Cosgrove et al. 2008; Hellgren et al. 2013; Dubiec et al. 2016; Walther et al. 2016; Pulgarín-R et al. 2018; Soares et al. 2020).

Leucocytozoon prevalence was highest in turtle doves sampled during spring migration. This pattern fits previous work showing that Leucocytozoon infections mainly occur in spring and autumn (Atkinson and van Riper 1991). However, other studies found contrasting Leucocytozoon prevalence patterns. Significantly, lower infection rates at spring migration stopover sites compared to breeding areas were detected for redstarts Phoenicurus phoenicurus (Rintamäki et al. 1999). In garden warblers Sylvia borin, pooled Leucocytozoon infections showed no circannual variation in prevalence, but variation could be detected for some lineages when analysed individually (Hellgren et al. 2013). The higher infection rate of Leucocytozoon in turtle doves in spring might be due to a seasonal outbreak. The infection peak might be induced by a spring relapse due to physiological cues in the host (Applegate and Beaudoin 1970; Valkiūnas et al. 2004; Cornelius et al. 2014) and/or with the return of the simuliid vectors (adult female blackflies) in spring, when environmental conditions enable increased blackfly emergence and activity (Reidelbach and Christl 2002). Mechanisms for seasonal peaks in infection outbreaks include changes in the behaviour and physiology of the parasite, vector and host, but these are difficult to tease apart as many of these changes occur simultaneously (Cornelius et al. 2014). Haemoproteus prevalence in turtle doves was particularly high during migration compared to the breeding season. Klei and DeGiusti (1975) determined a peak of H. columbae infection in feral pigeons during autumn; other studies demonstrated Haemoproteus peaks not only during autumn migration but also during the breeding season (Hellgren et al. 2013; Pulgarín-R et al. 2018). Besides sampling date, Haemoproteus prevalence and diversity might be influenced by differences at the African wintering grounds, where Haemoproteus transmission mainly takes place (Valkiūnas 2005; Waldenström et al. 2002; Shurulinkov and Ilieva 2009). Mirroring the different migration flyways of turtle doves, studies indicate different winter regions in the western, central and eastern Sub-Sahara (Zwarts et al. 2009). Pathogen transmission may be an important driver of site selection during the non-breeding period. Some migration strategies are thought to be the result of species actively avoiding parasite-rich habitats by choosing a winter site with low prevalence of haemosporidian parasites (Waldenström et al. 2002; Clark et al. 2016). However, many variables shape migration patterns and non-breeding habitat choice, and the relative importance of active parasite avoidance compared to other factors needs further research (Clark et al. 2016).

Plasmodium infections showed no seasonality in our study. Contrarily, seasonal variation in pooled Plasmodium prevalence was found in a population of blue tits with prevalence peaks in spring and autumn. However, this variation was present in pooled Plasmodium infections only, whereas P. relictum prevalence was more stable through the annual cycle (Cosgrove et al. 2008). In garden warblers, Plasmodium infection peak was during the wintering stage. However, this pattern was not consistent for all lineages, and one of the most common Plasmodium lineages SGS1 showed no significant circannual variation (Hellgren et al. 2013). To give a more accurate picture of genus-specific or even lineage-specific seasonality of haemosporidian parasites in turtle doves, we would need samples from the autumn migration and wintering season.

Haemosporidian parasite prevalence was rather high in turtle doves and these parasites can have negative effects on hosts, but as observed parasitemia was rather low, we deem the contribution of haemosporidian infections to the turtle doves’ decline to be rather insignificant. Plasmodium is known to cause mortality in wild susceptible bird populations, especially when birds are co-infected with other pathogens such as Usutu virus (Rouffaer et al. 2018). However, Plasmodium infection in turtle doves was rather rare and the impact of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon, which had a higher prevalence, on avian populations is generally thought to be less severe (Yanga et al. 2011). Nevertheless, the future development of avian haemosporidians in declining turtle doves should be monitored. Under a scenario of global change, a temperature increase and anthropogenic land-use change may provide new opportunities for blood parasite transmission in areas where they were previously absent as well as alter their diversity and composition (Dunn and Outlaw 2019; Ferraguti et al. 2019; Heym et al. 2019).

The identification of current transmission areas and parasite diversity is highly relevant to recognize and understand possible future changes (Ciloglu et al. 2020b). As habitat destruction and land-use intensification are among the main reasons causing the sharp decline of turtle doves (Fisher et al. 2018), they seem especially prone to be affected by these changes, and thus, parasites could gain importance as threats in the future.

Methodological inconsistencies regarding parasite prevalence

To achieve an assessment of prevalence as accurately as possible, we applied two PCR assays as well as microscopic examination. Different methodological approaches led to differing prevalence. A lower prevalence was derived from blood smear counts. This is in line with other studies on columbiform birds, determining a lower prevalence based on microscopic examination compared to molecular techniques (Dunn et al. 2017; Tavassoli et al. 2018). The absence of gametocytes in blood smears of birds PCR positive can be explained by light gametocyte parasitemia, DNA amplification of circulating sporozoites or presence of remnants of parasites that aborted development (Valkiūnas et al. 2009; Chagas et al. 2016). The PCR-based method displays the detection of parasitic genome, but does not reveal whether parasites have or will develop into a successful infection (Valkiūnas 2005). Therefore, microscopic examination is important to distinguish between abortive and successful chronic infections. In general, when finding a ‘rare’ lineage, we cannot exclude the scenario that the host is a ‘dead-end’ (Hellgren et al. 2013). For three ‘rare’ lineages (COLPAL03, MILANS06, RTSR1), we could not find infected erythrocytes, indicating a potential abortive infection, i.e. parasites initiate development in a ‘wrong’ host, in which sporozoites initiate exo-erythrocytic development, which is then aborted, resulting in merozoites and gametocytes do not appear (Ciloglu et al. 2020b). Abortive infections are ‘dead ends’ of transmission, but might still be virulent (Valkiūnas and Iezhova 2017) and therefore are important to determine as such. Furthermore, microscopy can quantify infection intensity. Quantifying the parasitemia as average number of parasites in one affected host is important, as infection intensity appears to be a more reliable predictor of the parasite virulence than prevalence, given as the number of infected animals per total number of animals (Sol et al. 2003). The parasitemia was rather low for the majority of our samples, indicating mainly chronic instead of acute infections. Pathological effects are expected to be higher at the acute infection than at chronic stages (Townsend et al. 2018).

The applied nested PCR method may have underestimated mixed infections of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium. Therefore, we have used a second PCR assay. Ciloglu et al. (2019) stated that the multiplex PCR assay was designed for amplification of H. (Parahaemoproteus) and that it needs to be tested whether the amplification of primers works for H. (Haemoproteus). We could show that the primers amplify H. (Haemoproteus) infections, but display them at the same band height as Plasmodium infections. Hence, it was not possible to distinguish between H. (Haemoproteus) and Plasmodium infections according to obtained PCR bands. Therefore, the multiplex PCR assay seems not effective for species that are prone to H. (Haemoproteus) infections. Besides the order of Columbiformes, this mainly applies to the orders Pelecaniformes, Charadriiformes and Suliformes (Valkiūnas 2005; Levin et al. 2011, 2012; Merino et al. 2012). Occasionally, H. (Haemoproteus) also infects Passeriformes (Lacorte et al. 2013; Ferreira Junior et al. 2017). Our results indicate that the amplified fragment of non-coding mtDNA is more similar between H. (Haemoproteus) and Plasmodium than between H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus). However, the PCR amplified a rather short fragment only. In general, there is no agreement on deep-level phylogenetic of avian haemosporidian parasites (Walther et al. 2016). While some authors refer to H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus) as subgenera (Iezhova et al. 2011; Valkiūnas et al. 2013), others propose splitting them into two separate genera (Borner et al. 2016; Galen et al. 2018; Soares et al. 2020). Even though our study did not clarify the phylogenetic classification of H. (Haemoproteus) and H. (Parahaemoproteus), we could show that both infect columbiform birds. Several studies stated that all Haemoproteus parasites found in birds of the order Columbiformes belong to H. (Haemoproteus) (Boundenga et al. 2017). In fact, our phylogenetic analyses placed most lineages infecting columbiform birds into the H. (Haemoproteus) clade, but some also clustered within the H. (Parahaemoproteus) clade (STRTUR01 and STRTUR05). These results are in line with a few other studies, which isolated H. (Parahaemoproteus) from columbiform species (Križanauskienė et al. 2013; Boundenga et al. 2017).

In conclusion, this study contributes to our understanding of the haemosporidian parasite diversity circulating in free-living birds of the order Columbiformes. In addition to reporting novel lineages and novel host species, the data obtained here contribute to improve our knowledge on the taxonomic relationship of avian haemosporidians and offer reference information to monitor likely future changes in parasite ranges and diversity as a consequence of climate change, representing a potential relevant risk for declining turtle doves.

Data availability

Sequences are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MT888848-60.

References

  1. Adamik P, Emmenegger T, Briedis M et al (2016) Barrier crossing in small avian migrants: individual tracking reveals prolonged nocturnal flights into the day as a common migratory strategy. Sci Rep 6:21560. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21560

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Akinpelu AI (2008) Prevalence and intensity of blood parasites in wild pigeons and doves (Family: Columbidae) from Sasha Forest Reserve, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 3:109–114. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2008.109.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Applegate JE, Beaudoin RL (1970) Mechanism of spring relapse in avian malaria: effect of gonadotropin and corticosterone. J Wildl Dis 6:443–447. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-6.4.443

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson CT, Van Riper C (1991) Pathogenicity and epizootiology of avian haematozoa: Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon and Haemoproteus. In: Loye JE, Zuk M (eds.) Bird-parasite interactions: ecology, evolution and behaviour. Oxford Ornithology Series, pp 19–48

  5. Bensch S, Waldenström J, Jonzen N, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Sejberg D, Hasselquist D (2007) Temporal dynamics and diversity of avian malaria parasites in a single host species. J Anim Ecol 76:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01176.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Peréz-Tris J (2009) MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1353–1358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02692.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernotienė R, Palinauskas V, Iezhova T, Murauskaitė D, Valkiūnas G (2016) Avian haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida): a comparative analysis of different polymerase chain reaction assays in detection of mixed infections. Exp Parasitol 163:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2016.01.009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Borner J, Pick C, Thiede J, Kolawole OM et al (2016) Phylogeny of haemosporidian blood parasites revealed by a multi-gene approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol 94:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.09.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boundenga L, Perkins SL, Ollomo B, Rougeron V, Leroy EM, Renaud F, Prugnolle F (2017) Haemosporidian parasites of reptiles and birds from Gabon, Central Africa. J Parasitol 103:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148958

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bunbury N, Barton E, Jones CG, Greenwood AG, Tyler KM, Bell DJ (2007) Avian blood parasites in an endangered columbid: Leucocytozoon marchouxi in the Mauritian Pink Pigeon Columba mayeri. Parasitology 134:797–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182006002149

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Calderon L, Campagna L, Wilke T et al (2016) Genomic evidence of demographic fluctuations and lack of genetic structure across flyways in a long distance migrant, the European turtle dove. BMC Evol Biol 16:237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0817-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlson J, Martínez-Gómez JE, Valkiūnas G, Loiseau C, Bell DA, Sehgal RN (2013) Diversity and phylogenetic relationships of hemosporidian parasites in birds of Socorro Island, México and their role in the re-introduction of the Socorro Dove (Zenaida graysoni). J Parasitol 99:270–276. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-3206.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chagas CRF, de Oliveira Guimarães L, Monteiro EF et al (2016) Hemosporidian parasites of free-living birds in the São Paulo Zoo, Brazil. Parasitol Res 115:1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4878-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chakarov N, Kampen H, Wiegmann A, Werner D, Bensch S (2020) Blood parasites in vectors reveal a united blackfly community in the upper canopy. Parasites Vectors 13:309. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04177-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ciloglu A, Ellis VA, Bernotienė R, Valkiūnas G, Bensch S (2019) A new one-step multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection and identification of avian haemosporidian parasites. Parasitol Res 118:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6153-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciloglu A, Ellis VA, Duc M, Downing PA, Inci A, Bensch S (2020a) Evolution of vector transmitted parasites by host switching revealed through sequencing of Haemoproteus parasite mitochondrial genomes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 153:106947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106947

  17. Ciloglu A, Ergen AG, Inci A et al (2020b) Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites at an intersection point of bird migration routes: Sultan Marshes National Park, Turkey. Acta Trop 210:105465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105465

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark P, Boardman W, Raidal S (2009) Atlas of clinical avian hematology. Wiley-Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clark NJ, Clegg SM, Lima MR (2014) A review of global diversity in avian haemosporidians (Plasmodium and Haemoproteus: Haemosporida): new insights from molecular data. Int J Parasitol 44:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clark NJ, Clegg SM, Klaassen M (2016) Migration strategy and pathogen risk: non-breeding distribution drives malaria prevalence in migratory waders. Oikos 125:1358–1368. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cornelius JM, Zylberberg M, Breuner CW, Gleiss AC, Hahn TP (2014) Assessing the role of reproduction and stress in the spring emergence of haematozoan parasites in birds. J Exp Biol 217:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.080697

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cosgrove CL, Wood MJ, Day KP, Sheldon BC (2008) Seasonal variation in Plasmodium prevalence in a population of blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. J Anim Ecol 77:540–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01370.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cramp S (1985) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Volume IV, Terns to Woodpeckers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  24. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-214

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A (2012) Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol 29:1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubiec A, Podmokła E, Zagalska-Neubauer M, Drobniak SM, Arct A, Gustafsson L, Cichoń M (2016) Differential prevalence and diversity of haemosporidian parasites in two sympatric closely related non-migratory passerines. Parasitology 143:1320–1329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016000779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dunn JC, Outlaw DC (2019) Flying into the future: avian haemosporidians and the advancement of understanding host–parasite systems. Parasitology 146:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118201900057X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunn JC, Stockdale JE, Bradford EL et al (2017) High rates of infection by blood parasites during the nestling phase in UK Columbids with notes on ecological associations. Parasitology 144:622–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016002274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Earle RA, Batianello SS, Bennet GF, Krecek RC (1993) Histopathology and morphology of the tissue stages of Haemoproteus columbae causing mortality in Columbiformes. Avian Pathol 22:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459308418901

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ellis VA, Huang X, Westerdahl H et al (2020) Explaining prevalence, diversity, and host specificity in a community of avian haemosporidian parasites. Oikos 129:1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Emmenegger T, Bauer S, Dimitrov D, Marin JO, Zehtindjiev P, Hahn S (2018) Host migration strategy and blood parasite infections of three sparrow species sympatrically breeding in Southeast Europe. Parasitol Res 117:3733–3741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6072-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferraguti M, Martínez-de la Puente J, Garcia-Longoria L, Soriguer R, Figuerola J, Marzal A (2019) From Africa to Europe: evidence of transmission of a tropical Plasmodium lineage in Spanish populations of house sparrows. Parasites Vectors 12:548. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3804-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferreira Junior FC, Rodrigues RA, Ellis VA, Leite LO, Borges MAZ, Braga EM (2017) Habitat modification and seasonality influence avian haemosporidian parasite distributions in southeastern Brazil. PLoS ONE 12:e0178791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178791

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Figuerola J, Green AJ (2000) Hematozoan parasites and migratory behaviour in waterfowl. Evol Ecol 14:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011009419264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fisher I, Ashpole J, Scallan D, Carboneras C, Proud T (compilers) (2018) International Single Species Action Plan for the conservation of the European Turtle-dove Streptopelia turtur (2018 to 2028). European Commission Technical Report xxx-2018

  37. Foronda P, Valladares B, Rivera-Medina JA, Figueruelo E, Abreu N, Casanova JC (2004) Parasites of Columba livia (Aves: Columbiformes) in Tenerife (Canary Islands) and their role in the conservation biology of the Laurel pigeons. Parasite 11:311–316. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2004113311

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Galen SC, Borner J, Martinsen ES, Schaer J, Austin CC, West CJ, Perkins SL (2018) The polyphyly of Plasmodium: comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of the malaria parasites (order Haemosporida) reveal widespread taxonomic conflict. R Soc Open sci 5:171780. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171780

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gernhard T (2008) Yule process. J Theor Biol 253:769–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Godfrey RD, Fedynich AM, Pence DB (1987) Quantification of hematozoa in blood smears. J Wildl Dis 23:558–565. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-23.4.558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gu X, Fu YX, Li WH (1995) Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol Biol Evol 12:546–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040235

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta DK, Jahan N, Gupta N (2011) New records of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium (Sporozoa: Haemosporida) of rock pigeon (Columba livia) in India. J Parasit Dis 35:155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-011-0044-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Haag-Wackernagel D, Moch H (2004) Health hazards posed by feral pigeons. J Infect 48:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2003.11.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hegemann A, Matson KD, Versteegh MA, Tieleman BI (2012) Wild skylarks seasonally modulate energy budgets but maintain energetically costly inflammatory immune responses throughout the annual cycle. PLoS One 7:e36358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036358

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hellard E, Cumming GS, Caron A, Coe E, Peters JL (2016) Testing epidemiological functional groups as predictors of avian haemosporidia patterns in southern Africa. Ecosphere 7:e01225. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, Bensch S (2004) A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J Parasitol 90:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-184R1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, Peréz-Tris J et al (2007) Detecting shifts of transmission areas in avian blood parasites - a phylogenetic approach. Mol Ecol 16:1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03227.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hellgren O, Wood MJ, Waldenström J, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U, Stervander M, Bensch S (2013) Circannual variation in blood parasitism in a sub-Saharan migrant passerine bird, the garden warbler. J Evol Biol 26:1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12129

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Heym EC, Kampen H, Krone O, Schäfer M, Werner D (2019) Molecular detection of vector-borne pathogens from mosquitoes collected in two zoological gardens in Germany. Parasitol Res 118:2097–2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06327-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang X, Huang D, Liang Y et al (2020) A new protocol for absolute quantification of haemosporidian parasites in raptors and comparison with current assays. Parasites Vectors 13:354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04195-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Iezhova TA, Dodge M, Sehgal RN, Smith TB, Valkiūnas G (2011) New avian Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from African birds, with a critique of the use of host taxonomic information in hemoproteid classification. J Parasitol 97:682–694. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-2709.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jenkins T, Thomas GH, Hellgren O, Owens IPF (2012) Migratory behaviour of birds affects their coevolutionary reationship with blood parasites. Evolution 66:740–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01470.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jovani R, Tella JL (2006) Parasite prevalence and sample size: misconceptions and solutions. Trends Parasitol 22:214–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Klei TR, DeGiusti DL (1975) Seasonal occurrence of Haemoproteus columbae Kruse and its vector Pseudolynchia canariensis Bequaert. J Wildl Dis 11:130–135. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-11.1.130

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Knowles SCL, Palinauskas V, Sheldon BC (2010) Chronic malaria infections increase family inequalities and reduce parental fitness: experimental evidence from a wild bird population. J Evol Biol 23:557–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01920.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Križanauskienė A, Iezhova TA, Sehgal RNM, Carlson JS, Palinauskas V, Bensch S, Valkiūnas G (2013) Molecular characterization of Haemoproteus sacharovi (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae), a common parasite of columbiform birds, with remarks on classification of haemoproteids of doves and pigeons. Zootaxa 3613:085–094. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3616.1.7

  57. Lachish S, Knowles SCL, Alves R, Wood MJ, Sheldon BC (2011) Fitness effects of endemic malaria infections in a wild bird population: the importance of ecological structure. J Anim Ecol 80:1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01836.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lacorte GA, Felix GMF, Pinheiro RRB et al (2013) Exploring the diversity and distribution of Neotropical avian malaria parasites - a molecular survey from Southeast Brazil. PLoS ONE 8:e57770. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057770

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee KA, Martin LB, Hasselquist D, Ricklefs RE, Wikelski M (2006) Contrasting adaptive immune defenses and blood parasite prevalence in closely related Passer sparrows. Oecologia 150:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0537-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Leigh JW, Bryant D (2015) PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Levin II, Valkiūnas G, Santiago-Alarcon D et al (2011) Hippoboscid-transmitted Haemoproteus parasites (Haemosporida) infect Galapagos Pelecaniform birds: evidence from molecular and morphological studies, with a description of Haemoproteus iwa. Int J Parasitol 41:1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.03.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Levin II, Valkiūnas G, Iezhove TA, O’Brien SL, Parker PG (2012) Novel Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from the swallow-tailed gull (Lariidae), with remarks on the host range of hippoboscid-transmitted avian hemoproteids. J Parasitol 98:847–854. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-3007.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. MalAvi (2020) MalAvi: a database for avian haemosporidian parasites. https://130.235.244.92/Malavi/ Download of the ‘Hosts and Sites Table’, accessed 13.03.2020

  64. Martínez J, Martínez-de La Puente J, Herrero J et al (2009) A restriction site to differentiate Plasmodium and Haemoproteus infections in birds: on the inefficiency of general primers for detection of mixed infections. Parasitology 136:713722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182009006118

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Marx M, Korner-Nievergelt F, Quillfeldt P (2016) Analysis of ring recoveries of European turtle doves Streptopelia turtur - flyways, timing of migration and origins of hunted birds. Acta Orn 51:55–70. https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2016.51.1.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Marzal A, De Lope F, Navarro C, Møller AP (2005) Malarial parasites decrease reproductive success: an experimental study in a passerine bird. Oecologia 142:541–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1757-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Merino S, Moreno J, Sanz JJ, Arriero E (2000) Are avian blood parasites pathogenic in the wild? A medication experiment in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Proc Royal Soc B 267:2507–2510. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1312

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Merino S, Hennicke J, Martínez J et al (2012) Infection by Haemoproteus parasites in four species of frigatebirds and the description of a new species of Haemoproteus (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae). J Parasitol 98:388–397. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-2415.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Møller AP, Erriyzøe J (1998) Host immune defence and migration in birds. Evol Ecol 12:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006516222343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. PECBMS (2020) Population Trends of Common European Breeding Birds. https://pecbms.info/trends-and-indicators/species-trends/ accessed 23.09.2020

  71. Pulgarín-R PC, Gomez C, Bayly NJ et al (2018) Migratory birds as vehicles for parasite dispersal? Infection by avian haemosporidians over the year and throughout the range of a long-distance migrant. J Biogeogr 46:83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Quillfeldt P, Arriero E, Martínez J, Masello JF, Merino S (2011) Prevalence of blood parasites in seabirds- a review. Front Zool 8:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-8-26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.2.4. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/

  74. Rambaut A (2007) FigTree. https://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/

  75. Reidelbach J, Christl H (2002) A quantitative investigation into the temporal and spatial variations in the emergence of adult blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) from the Breitenbach, a small upland stream in Germany. Limnologica 32:206–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0075-9511(02)80029-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Reinoso-Pérez MT, Canales-Delgadillo JC, Chapa-Vargas L, Riego-Ruiz L (2016) Haemosporidian parasite prevalence, parasitemia, and diversity in three resident bird species at a shrubland dominated landscape of the Mexican highland plateau. Parasites Vectors 9:307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1569-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Ricklefs RE, Fallon SM (2002) Diversification and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Proc Royal Soc B 269:885–892. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Rintamäki P, Huhta E, Jokimäki J, Squires-Parsons D (1999) Leucocytozoonosis and Trypanosomiasis in Redstarts in Finland. J Wildl Dis 35:603–607. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-35.3.603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Rouffaer LO, Steensels M, Verlinden M, Vervaeke M, Boonyarittichaikij R, Martel A, Lambrecht B (2018) Usutu virus epizootic and Plasmodium coinfection in Eurasian Blackbirds (Turdus merula) in Flanders, Belgium. J Wildl Dis 54:859–862. https://doi.org/10.7589/2017-07-163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Santiago-Alarcon D, Outlaw DC, Ricklefs RE, Parker PG (2010) Phylogenetic relationships of haemosporidian parasites in New World Columbiformes, with emphasis on the endemic Galapagos dove. Int J Parasitol 40:463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.10.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Scaglione FE, Pregel P, Cannizzo FT, Pérez-Rodríguez AD, Ferroglio E, Bollo E (2015) Prevalence of new and known species of haemoparasites in feral pigeons in northwest Italy. Malar J 14:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0617-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Shurulinkov P, Ilieva M (2009) Spatial and temporal differences in the blood parasite fauna of passerine birds during the spring migration in Bulgaria. Parasitol Res 104:1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1349-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Soares L, Young EI, Ricklefs RE (2020) Haemosporidian parasites of resident and wintering migratory birds in The Bahamas. Parasitol Res 119:1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06646-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Sol D, Jovani R, Torres J (2000) Geographical variation in blood parasites in feral pigeons: the role of vectors. Ecography 23:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00286.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Sol D, Jovani R, Torres J (2003) Parasite mediated mortality and host immune response explain age-related differences in blood parasitism in birds. Oecologia 135:542–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1223-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Tavassoli M, Esmaeilnejad B, Malekifard F, Mardani K (2018) PCR-RFLP detection of Haemoproteus spp. (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) in pigeon blood samples from Iran. Bulg J Vet Med 21:429-435. https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.2014

  87. Townsend AK, Wheeler SS, Freund D, Sehgal RNM, Boyce WM (2018) Links between blood parasites, blood chemistry, and the survival of nestling American crows. Ecol Evol 8:8779–8790. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4287

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Valkiūnas G (2005) Avian malaria parasites and other Haemosporidia. CRC Press

  89. Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA (2017) Exo-erythrocytic development of avian malaria and related haemosporidian parasites. Malar J 16:101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1746-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Valkiūnas G, Bairlein F, Iezhova TA, Dolnik OV (2004) Factors affecting the relapse of Haemoproteus belopolskyi infections and the parasitaemia of Trypanosoma spp. in a naturally infected European songbird, the blackcap, Sylvia atricapilla. Parasitol Res 93:218–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-004-1071-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Valkiūnas G, Bensch S, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Hellgren O, Bolshakov CV (2006) Nested cytochrome b polymerase chain reaction diagnostics underestimate mixed infections of avian blood haemosporidian parasites: Microscopy is still essential. J Parasitol 92:418–422. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-3547RN.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Loisseau C, Sehgal RNM (2009) Nested cythochrome b polymerase chain reaction diagnostics detect sporozoites of haemosporidian parasites in peripheral blood of naturally infected birds. J Parasitol 95:1512–1515. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-2105.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Evans E, Carlson JS, Martínez-Gómez JE, Sehgal RNM (2013) Two new Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from columbiform birds. J Parasitol 99:513–521. https://doi.org/10.1645/12-98.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. von Blotzheim UG, Bauer KM (1994) Handbuch Der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band. Columbiformes-Piciformes. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  95. Waldenström J, Bensch S, Kiboi S, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U (2002) Cross-species infection of blood parasites between resident and migratory songbirds in Africa. Mol Ecol 11:1545–1554. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01523.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Walther EL, Carlson JS, Cornel A, Morris BK, Sehgal RNM (2016) First molecular study of prevalence and diversity of avian haemosporidia in a Central California songbird community. J Ornithol 157:549–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1301-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Yanga S, Martínez-Goméz JE, Sehgal RNM, Escalante P, Camacho FC, Bell DA (2011) A preliminary survey for avian pathogens in Columbiformes birds on Socorro Island, Mexico. Pac Conserv Biol 17:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC110011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Yoshimura A, Koketsu M, Bando H et al (2014) Phylogenetic comparisons of avian haemospridian parasites from resident and migratory birds in northern Japan. J Wildl Dis 50:235–242. https://doi.org/10.7589/2013-03-071

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Yule GU (1925) Yule process. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 213:21–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W (2000) A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1089/10665270050081478

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Zwarts L, Bijlsma RG, van der Kamp J, Wymenga E (2009) Living on the edge: wetlands and birds in a changing Sahel. Chapter 32: European turtle dove Streptopelia turtur, 2nd edn. KNNV Publishing, Zeist, pp 378–389

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the many landowners who allowed access to their land for bird catching, to helpers in the field (among others: Hervé Bidault, Hagen Deutschmann, Steffen Koschkar, Elisabeth Navarrete, Marcel Rivière, Luc Tison, Lennart Wegner) and to Marco Alvarez-Alvarez and Jennifer Greiner who assisted with the laboratory work. We acknowledge for supporting the field work at Lake Nasser Ramadan Fox and his boat crews, the ‘Lake Nasser Adventure’ company, Steven Mayor and Hartmut Meyer from Bartmeise travel, ProRing e.V., and the expedition team. Samples from the Chizé forest were collected in the Biological Reserve of ‘Sylve d’Argenson” with the permission of Office National des Forêts (ONF). We gratefully acknowledge the support of Dr. Sara Riello and all volunteers operating the ringing station of Ventotene and we warmly thank the Riserva Naturale Statale “Isole di Ventotene e S. Stefano” for logistic and financial support to ringing activity. Results of the Progetto Piccole Isole ISPRA: paper n. 74. This is contribution No. 29 from the Antikythira Bird Observatory, Hellenic Ornithological Society/BirdLife Greece. Moreover, we thank the staff of the Clinic for Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians and Fish of Justus Liebig University Giessen for sampling of admitted patient birds and the association to support avian medicine Giessen (Verein zur Foerderung der Vogelmedizin in Giessen e.V.) for support. JFM work was partly funded by the Hessen State Ministry for Higher Education, Research and the Arts, Germany, as part of the LOEWE priority project Nature 4.0 – Sensing Biodiversity.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The Naturschutz Bund Deutschland e.V. (NABU) provided financial support to YRS and PQ for fieldwork in Germany. JFM work was funded by the Hessen State Ministry for Higher Education, Research and the Arts, Germany, as part of the LOEWE priority project Nature 4.0 – Sensing Biodiversity.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YRS and PQ conceived the study. All authors planned and performed fieldwork including blood sample collection. YRS and PQ designed methodology, conducted the analyses and led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonne R. Schumm.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The blood samples at the veterinary clinic were obtained as surplus from those taken initially in course of routine examinations of sick or injured birds upon admission to the veterinary service to perform necessary serological, hematological or blood chemical diagnostics. All authors voluntarily agree to participate in the elaboration and publication of this manuscript.

Consent for publication

All authors declare that they participated in the study and in the development of the manuscript as well as read the final version and give consent for the article to be published in Parasitol Res.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Section Editor: Leonhard Schnittger

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 279 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 1593 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schumm, Y.R., Bakaloudis, D., Barboutis, C. et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in wild bird species of the order Columbiformes. Parasitol Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07053-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Avian malaria
  • Woodpigeon
  • Turtle dove
  • Stock dove
  • Parasite ecology