Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Staphylococcus aureus epidemic in a neonatal nursery: a strategy of infection control

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The risk of nosocomial infection due to Staphylococcus aureus in fullterm newborns is higher under hospital conditions where there are overcrowded nurseries and inadequate infection control techniques. We report on an outbreak of skin infection in a Maternity Nursery (May 21, 2000) and the measures undertaken to bring the epidemic under control. These measures included: separating neonates already present in the nursery on August 23, 2000 from ones newly arriving by creating two different cohorts, one of neonates born before this date and one of neonates born later; restricting healthcare workers caring for S. aureus- infected infants from working with non-infected infants; disallowing carrier healthcare workers from caring for patients; introducing contact and droplet precautions (including the routine use of gowns, gloves, and mask); ensuring appropriate disinfection of potential sources of contamination. A representative number of isolates were typed by genomic DNA restriction length polymorphism analysis by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Among the 227 cases of skin lesions, microbiological laboratory analyses confirmed that 175 were staphylococcal infections. The outbreak showed a gradual reduction in magnitude when the overcrowding of the Nursery was reduced by separating the newborns into the two different Nurseries (two cohorts). The genotyping of the strains by PFGE confirmed the nurse-to-newborn transmission of S. aureus. The measures adopted for controlling the S. aureus outbreak can, in retrospect, be assessed to have been very effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GM:

Gentamicin

E:

Erythromycin

MIC:

Minimal inhibitory concentration

MRSA:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MRP:

Macrorestriction profiling

MSSA:

Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

PFGE:

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

STX:

Trimetoprim/sulfametoxazole

References

  1. Auriti, C, Maccallini A, Di Liso G, Di Ciommo V, Ronchetti MP, Orzalesi M (2003) Risk factors for nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive-care unit. J Hosp Infect 53:25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Back NA, Linnemann CC, Staneck JL, Kotagal UR (1996) Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive-care unit: use of intensive microbiological surveillance and mupirucin. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17:227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bannerman TL, Hancock, Tenover FC, Miller JM (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns by pulsed-filed gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33:22–33

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen B, Saiman L, Cimiotti J, Larson E (2003) Factors associated with hand hygiene practices in two neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 22:494–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haley RW, Bregmen DJ (1982) The role of understaffing and overcrowding in recurrent outbreaks of staphylococcal infection in a neonatal special care unit. J Infect Dis 145:875–885

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitajima H (2003) Prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in neonates. Pediatr Int 45:238–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE, Richet HM, Jarvis WR, Boyce JM, Farr BM (2003) SHEA. SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:362–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagata E, Brito AS, Matsuo T (2002) Nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control 30:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scully BE, Briones F, Gu J, Neu HC (1992) Mucipirin treatment of nasal staphylococcal colonization. Arch Intern Med 152:353–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sohn AH, Garrett DO, Sinkowitz-Cochran RL, Grohskopf LA, Levine GL, Stover BH, Siegel JD, Jarvis WR; Pediatrics Prevention Network (2001) Prevalence of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care unit patients: results from the first national point-prevalence survey. J Pediatr 139:821–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang P, Low DE, Atkinson S, Pike K, Ashi-Sulaiman A, Simor A, Richardson S, Willey BM (2003) Investigation of Staphylococcus aureus isolates identified as erythromycin intermediate by the Vitek-1 System: comparison with results obtained with the Vitek-2 and Phoenix systems. J Clin Microbiol 41:4823–4825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trzcinski KW, Hryniewicz W, Kluymans J, van Leeuwen W, Sijmons M, Dulny G, Verbrugh H, van Belkum A (1997) Simultaneous persistence of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal ward of a Warsaw Hospital. J Hosp Infect 36:291–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilcox MH, Fitzgerald P, Freeman J, Denton M, Gill AB, Hoy C, Parnell P, Porter C, Haspinall L, Hawkey P (2000) A five year outbreak of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus phage type 53.85 in a regional neonatal unit. Epidemiol Infect 124:37–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Bertini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertini, G., Nicoletti, P., Scopetti, F. et al. Staphylococcus aureus epidemic in a neonatal nursery: a strategy of infection control. Eur J Pediatr 165, 530–535 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0121-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0121-4

Keywords

Navigation