Tetraspanin CD81 regulates HSV-1 infection

Abstract

Different members of the tetraspanin superfamily have been described to regulate different virus infectious cycles at several stages: viral entry, viral replication or virion exit or infectivity. In addition, tetraspanin CD81 regulates HIV reverse transcription through its association with the dNTP hydrolase SAMHD1. Here we aimed at analysing the role of CD81 in Herpes simplex virus 1 infectivity using a neuroblastoma cell model. For this purpose, we generated a CD81 KO cell line using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Despite being CD81 a plasma membrane protein, CD81 KO cells showed no defects in viral entry nor in the expression of early protein markers. In contrast, glycoprotein B and C, which require viral DNA replication for their expression, were significantly reduced in CD81 KO infected cells. Indeed, HSV-1 DNA replication and the formation of new infectious particles were severely compromised in CD81 KO cells. We could not detect significant changes in SAMHD1 total expression levels, but a relocalization into endosomal structures was observed in CD81 KO cells. In summary, CD81 KO cells showed impaired viral DNA replication and produced greatly diminished viral titers.

Introduction

Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEM) are the result of the interaction between tetraspanins, other membrane proteins and lipids. They play important roles in several physiological and pathological processes related with cell adhesion, migration or membrane functions [1]. It has been described that TEMs can serve as a platform for viral infection. Tetraspanins interact with multiple host membrane factors required in this process, collaborating in viral entry, assembly or egress steps [2,3,4,5]. For example, CD9 and CD81 regulate virus-cell membrane fusion in human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) infection [6]; CD81 facilitates Hepatitis C virus (HCV) entry in cells [7, 8]; different tetraspanins regulate entry of papilloma and cytomegalovirus [9, 10]; and TEMs are the budding sites for Influenza A virus (IAV) [11] and Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) [12].

In addition to events occurring at the plasma membrane, we recently described the functional connection between tetraspanin CD81 and SAMHD1 [13], which regulates HIV reverse transcription. SAMHD1 is a deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) hydrolase that plays an important role in cell homeostasis maintenance, controlling optimal dNTP levels for an accurate DNA synthesis and repair [14]. SAMHD1 has also been described as an effector of innate immunity and innate antiviral response, function that has been widely reviewed [15,16,17,18]. SAMHD1 antiviral effect was first described for HIV-1 [19]. In the last years, its antiretroviral activity has been demonstrated in different cell types, such as monocytes or dendritic cells [20,21,22]. Although SAMHD1 has the capacity to bind and degrade HIV-1 genomic RNA [23,24,25], it is now accepted that viral restriction by SAMHD1 is mainly mediated by its dNTPase function, given that reverse transcription is tightly dependent on cellular dNTP levels [17, 22, 26]. Our group previously reported that tetraspanin CD81 is implicated on HIV-1 infection by allowing viral reverse transcription to occur through SAMHD1 control [13]. CD81 associates with SAMHD1 to regulate its expression and subcellular localization. In the lack of CD81, a SAMHD1-dependent decrease in the dNTPs intracellular pool is observed, causing deficient reverse transcription.

Similarly to the reverse transcription of HIV-1, SAMHD1 has an impact on other viruses by regulating dNTP levels. This has been already proven for Vaccinia virus [27], Hepatitis B virus [28,29,30] and Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) [27, 31]. Herpes DNA replication blockage by SAMHD1 has been demonstrated in macrophages and non-dividing myeloid cells [27, 31]. However, herpesvirus protein kinases have recently been shown to inhibit by phosphorylation the dNTPase function of SAMHD1 [32, 33].

To address whether CD81 modulates the infection of DNA viruses we chose Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), a large doubled-stranded DNA virus and member of the Alphaherpesviridae family as a model system. HSV-1 is a neurotropic virus, usually establishing latent infections in the trigeminal ganglia followed by periodic reactivations. Due to these reactivations, HSV-1 may also reach the central nervous system causing acute events like encephalitis and/or establishing lifelong latent infections in the brain. Mounting evidence supports the involvement of neurotropic viruses from the Herpesviridae family, especially HSV-1, in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis [34]. This hypothesis argues that latent HSV-1 infection of the central nervous system could be involved in the neurodegenerative process, either via a direct effect of the infectious agent itself or via the associated inflammatory response, or both. It has been reported that reactivation of HSV-1 induces AD-related alterations such as accumulation of amyloid-β protein (Aβ), tau hyperphosphorylation and neuroinflammation episodes [35]. With all this background, we decided to explore the role of CD81 in HSV-1 infection in a neuroblastoma cell model.

Materials and methods

Cell cultures

The SK-N-MC human neuroblastoma cell line (HTB10) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). SK-N-MC cells were grown as monolayers in minimal Eagle’s medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM glutamine and 50 μg/ml gentamicin, at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.

CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used for the generation of a CD81 SK-N-MC cell line as described [13]. For CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids transfection, SK-N-MC cells were washed with PBS and electroporated with 20 µg of total DNA in incomplete medium at 200 V and 975 µF (Gene Pulser II, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A second round of transfection was performed 5 days later. One week post-transfection, cells were blocked with γ-globulin (Sigma) and stained with anti-CD81 5A6 monoclonal antibody. The negative population was isolated using a FACSARIA FUSION Cell Sorter. Cells were routinely tested for CD81 negative expression and used only in the first culture passages.

Antibodies

Rabbit anti-HSV glycoprotein B and D (gB/gD) antibody was kindly provided by E. Tabares. Antibodies that recognized viral proteins gC and ICP4 were supplied by Abcam [anti-HSV1 gC Envelope Protein (3G9) and anti-HSV 1 ICP4 Immediate Early Protein [10F1]). Mouse monoclonal anti-tubulin (clone B-5-1-2; T5168), anti-SAMHD1 Abs (SAB1101454 and HPA047072) were obtained from Sigma; and anti-EEA1 610457 from BD Biosciences. Anti-CD81 5A6 monoclonal antibody was kindly donated by S. Levy (Standford).

The secondary antibodies used for immunostaining were horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse (Vector; PI-2000) and anti-rabbit (Nordic; GAR/IgG(H + L)/PO) antibodies, and species-matching secondary antibodies coupled to 488 and 647 Alexa Fluor fluorochromes (ThermoFisher).

Infection conditions

The wild-type HSV-1 strain KOS 1.1 was propagated and purified from Vero cells as previously described [36]. SK-N-MC cells seeded in complete MEM at 70–80% confluence were exposed to HSV-1 at 37 ºC for 1 h. Mock infections were performed using a virus-free suspension. Unbound virus was removed and the cells incubated in complete MEM at 37 ºC. Time and multiplicity of infection (moi; expressed as plaque-forming units [pfu] per cell) are indicated in each experiment. The infectious titers of purified virus and cell supernatants were determined by plaque assay [37]. Briefly, the titration of serially diluted HSV-1 and cell supernatant samples was performed in Vero cells grown in 24-well plates. Cells were overlain with a mixture of DMEM containing 2% FCS and 0.7% agar. After 48 h, the cells were fixed and stained overnight with 1% crystal violet in 5% formaldehyde and the plaques counted.

Immunofluorescence analysis

Immunofluorescence assays of viral protein ICP4 were performed on cells grown on coverslips. Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated with the appropriate primary and secondary antibodies. DAPI (5 mg/ml) was added 10 min before the end of the procedure to visualize the nuclei. Cells were examined using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 fluorescence microscope. Images were captured by a Spot RT slider digital camera (Diagnostic) using MetaMorphTM imaging software, and processed using Adobe Photoshop CS4.

For confocal microscopy analysis of SAMHD1 subcellular localization, cells were grown on fibronectin-coated coverslips (20 µg/ml; Sigma) and fixed in 4% PFA. For SAMHD1 staining, blocking and staining solutions were composed of 0.2% Triton X-100, γ-globulin and TNB and appropriated primary and secondary antibodies. Samples were washed with TBS-Triton and mounted on coverslips with Flouromount-G (Thermo Fisher) containing DAPI (0.1 μM). Confocal images were obtained with an A1R + Nikon confocal microscopy attached to an inverted microscope (Eclipse Ti-E model, Nikon) with a Plan-Apocromatic 60X/1.4 oil immersion objective, using NIS Elements 4.40 acquisition software. Images were analysed with ImageJ.

Flow cytometry

For extracellular CD81 tetraspanin detection, cells were blocked with γ-globulin (Sigma) during 20 min at 4 °C, incubated with primary anti-CD81 5A6 mouse monoclonal antibody for 1 h at 4 °C and stained with secondary goat anti-mouse Alexa647 (ThermoFisher) for 30 min at 4 °C. For intracellular SAMHD1 detection, cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in 0.1% saponin. Cells were blocked 1 h at room temperature in PBS saponin 0.1%, 5% BSA and γ-globulin. Primary SAMHD1 rabbit polyclonal antibody and donkey anti-rabbit Alexa647 (ThermoFisher) were incubated in PBS 0.1% saponin, 0.5% BSA, 15 mM glycine and 10 mM HEPES solution, at 4°.

Data were acquired with a FACSCantoII flow cytometer and analysed with FlowJo.

Immunoblot analysis

For immunoblot assays, cells were lysed in RIPA cell lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40 and 0.1% SDS buffer) containing Complete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), and incubated for 30 min at 4 ºC. The protein concentration of the lysates was quantified using the BCA Kit (Pierce). Cell lysates were mixed with Laemmli buffer, sonicated, and heated for 5 min at 100 ºC. After electrophoretic separation, the gels were blotted and stained with the appropriate antibodies. The secondary antibodies used for immunostaining were horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse (Vector; PI-2000) and anti-rabbit (Nordic; GAR/IgG(H + L)/PO) antibodies. Detection by enhanced chemiluminiscence was performed using ECL™ Western Blotting Detection Reagents (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

HSV-1 DNA quantification

The amount of HSV-1 DNA was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN). The concentration of viral DNA was then quantified by qPCR with an ABI Prism 7900HT SD® system (Applied Biosystems) using a custom designed TaqMan probe specific for the US12 viral gene (5′-AGGCGGCCAGAACC-3′). Viral DNA content was then normalized in terms of human genomic DNA, quantified with a predesigned TaqMan probe specific for the 18S gene (Applied Biosystems). The quantification results were represented as viral DNA copy numbers per ng of genomic DNA, as calculated using a standard curve obtained with known quantities of human genomic DNA.

dNTP measurement

The cellular dNTP amounts were measured as previously described [38]. Briefly, cellular dNTPs were extracted from known numbers of cells, and applied to the HIV-1 RT-based dNTP assay. The determined dNTP amounts were normalized by cell numbers.

Results

CD81 gene deletion causes a reduction in HSV-1 late gene expression

To assess whether CD81 plays a functional role in the infectious cycle of DNA viruses, we chose Herpes Simplex as a model system. Because of the relevance of HSV-1 in the CNS, we generated a CD81-deficient neuroblastoma SK-N-MC cell line using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology [13]. CD81 gene deletion was verified by flow cytometry (Fig. 1a) and western blot (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure1

Characterization of CD81 SK-N-MC cells. a Flow cytometry histograms of CD81 expression in wild-type (violet) and CD81-deficient SK-N-MC cells (blue) after staining with 5A6 anti-CD81 mAb. Negative control histogram is shown in the black line profile. b Western-blot detection of CD81 protein in both cell lines. Tubulin is shown as loading control

Both wt and CD81 SK-N-MC cell lines were infected with HSV-1 at different times and multiplicities of infection (MOI). Efficiency of HSV-1 infection was determined by assessing the levels of expression of viral proteins (Fig. 2). Immunoblotting analyses were performed using antibodies specific for ICP4, an immediate early protein, whose expression begins before HSV-1 DNA replication takes place; glycoprotein B (gB), a γ1 “leaky-late” protein, the expression of which is not strictly dependent on viral DNA synthesis but once DNA replication has commenced its expression is dramatically increased; and glycoprotein C (gC), which belongs to the class of γ2 ‘‘true late’’ genes, so its expression requires viral DNA synthesis. In all conditions, the levels of viral proteins gB and gC were clearly decreased in CD81-deficient cells in comparison to wild type ones (Fig. 2a). However, protein levels of ICP4 protein, which is expressed earlier in the viral cycle showed no significant differences between wt and CD81 cells (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure2

CD81 gene deletion reduces HSV-1 protein expression. Wt and CD81-deficient SK-N-MC cells were infected with HSV-1 at the indicated multiplicities of infection and the levels of viral proteins were analysed by western blot at the indicated times post infection (hpi). a Levels of the viral glycoproteins B and C (gB and gC) in cells with 1 and 3 pfu/cell for 18 h (18 hpi) or with 0.1 and 0.3 pfu/cell for 42 h (42 hpi). The blots shown are representative of three independent experiments. A tubulin blot is provided as a control for equal loading. The ratio of viral proteins to tubulin with respect to infected wt cells is shown below the blots. b Levels of ICP4 in wt and CD81-deficient SK-N-MC cells infected with HSV-1 with 1 or 3 pfu/cell during 3 or 5 h (hpi). A tubulin blot as a control for equal loading is also shown. The ratio of ICP4 to tubulin with respect to infected wt cells is shown below the blots

CD81 gene deletion does not affect HSV-1 entry step

Viral protein expression profile suggested that CD81 may be affecting a late stage in the viral cycle, but since CD81 is expressed at the plasma membrane and has been reported to be implicated on viral entry of some viruses [7], we directly quantitated HSV-1 entry by assessing the number of cells that were infected and thus expressed nuclear ICP4 protein. ICP4 is expressed at the very early steps of the infectious process and is detected as early as 2 h post-infection. First, ICP4 shows a diffuse distribution in the nucleus, later accumulating at pre-replicative sites, which appear as small dotted structures. As the infection progresses, large globular replication compartments, termed viral replication compartments, are generated, where ICP4 is involved in the transcription and replication of viral DNA [39].

ICP4-positive nuclei were counted for both wt and CD81 cells at both 3 and 5 h post-infection, and no differences in the number of infected cells were observed at any time or MOI (Fig. 3a, b). Different staining patterns are apparent in the cultures since cell infection was performed at 37 ºC, so that it would not be synchronized in all cells. These data are consistent with the results obtained in the immunoblotting experiments that showed no changes in total ICP4 levels in wt compared to CD81-deleted cells infected with HSV-1 (Fig. 2b), indicating that CD81 does not affect viral entry into human neuroblastoma cells.

Fig. 3
figure3

CD81 gene deletion does not affect HSV-1 entry. Immunofluorescence analysis of wt and CD81-deficient SK-N-MC cells infected with HSV-1 at a moi of 1 and 3 pfu/cell for 3 h (a) or 5 h (b). The immunoreactivity of ICP4 viral protein is shown. Nuclei are stained with DAPI. Quantification of infected cells by ICP4 staining was performed and the graphs show the percentage of ICP4-positive cells. At least 300 nuclei were counted from 3 independent experiments (minimum of 100 nuclei per experiment), Graphs depict the mean ± SEM of the 3 experiments. Scale bars: 20 μm

CD81 regulates SAMHD1 subcellular localization

The molecular interaction of CD81 with the dNTP triphosphohydrolase SAMHD1 [13], may be a possible mechanism behind the inhibition of the late stages of HSV-1 infectious cycle that we observed in neuroblastoma cells upon CD81 gene deletion. To address this issue, we analysed both SAMHD1 expression and localization in SK-N-MC cells in presence or absence of CD81 expression. No differences were found in total levels of SAMHD1 by western blot (Fig. 4a) or flow cytometry analyses (data not shown). However, as we found in our previous report in Hela cells [13], SAMHD1 subcellular localization was indeed altered in CD81 knockout neuroblastoma cells, in which we observed an increase in the number of cells showing SAMHD1 endosomal localization (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure4

Regulation of SAMHD1 expression and localization by CD81 expression. a SAMHD1 levels were analysed by western blot in wild-type (WT) and CD81-deficient SK-N-MC (CD81) cells. Tubulin was used as loading control. Representative blots are shown. The plot depicts the ratio of SAMHD1 to tubulin as the mean ± SEM of six independent experiments. b Confocal microscopy analysis of SAMHD1 subcellular localization after SAMHD1 immunostaining. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Representative images are shown. (Scale bar: 40 μm). Graph depicts the percentage of cells (mean ± SEM) showing SAMHD1 relocalization to endosomal structures from 4 fields of view in 2 independent experiments (a minimum of 200 cells/experiment) **p < 0.01 in a Student’s t-test

CD81 gene deletion impairs HSV-1 DNA replication and reduces viral titers

Although we could not detect changes in SAMHD1 total expression levels, viral protein expression data suggested an effect on late stages of viral infection dependant on DNA replication. Thus, we next quantitated viral DNA replication by PCR. qPCR analysis of viral DNA replication showed a significant decrease in viral DNA content in CD81-deleted cells in comparison to wild-type cells (Fig. 5a). Finally, the effect on HSV-1 titres was measured by plaque assays. A strong reduction in the production of infectious HSV-1 particles was seen in CD81-deficient cells, which, in some experiments, produced no infectious particles (Fig. 5b). Viral DNA levels were specially reduced after 42 h of infection, time at which at least one replication cycle is likely to have taken place.

Fig. 5
figure5

CD81 gene deletion reduces HSV-1 DNA replication and viral titers. a Quantification of viral DNA by real-time quantitative PCR of six independent experiments performed in triplicate. The data represent the mean ± SEM of the six experiments performed expressed as a percentage with respect to infected wt cells (one sample t test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). b Viral titers were determined by plaque assays in the culture medium of infected SK-N-MC cells. Graph data represent the mean ± SEM of at least three experiments and are expressed as a percentage with respect to wt cells (one sample t test; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001)

All these results prove that CD81 positively regulates HSV-1-efficient infection and point to an effect in a late stage in the viral cycle, such as DNA replication.

Discussion

Several tetraspanins have been described to play important roles in viral infections [2], although most reports focus on the role of tetraspanins and tetraspanin-enriched microdomains in those processes of the viral cycle that occur at the level of the plasma membrane (entry, exit, syncytia formation) [2,3,4,5]. We have recently described that the tetraspanin CD81 collaborates in HIV-1 infection by facilitating viral reverse transcription through the control of the protein levels and subcellular localization of the dNTPase SAMHD1 [13]. All viruses depend for their cycle progression on the supply of nucleotides from the infected cell, so the mechanism described for HIV could be in principle more general. Thus, we aimed to address whether a similar mechanism could occur in other type of virus such as DNA viruses, affecting in this case viral DNA replication. We chose Herpes simplex as a model virus, because of their wide distribution in the population and the relevance it has been pointed out in the etiopathology of some neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer [34].

To directly address the role of CD81 in HSV-1 infection, we generated a KO cell line using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Since CD81 is expressed on the plasma membrane, gene-deleted cells were selected by flow cytometry, so that we were not working with clonal populations. Tetraspanins are a relatively large superfamily (33 members in humans) from which a selected repertoire is present in all cell types of the human organism, thus, there is no tetraspanin-null cell in higher eukaryotes. This ubiquitous representation of tetraspanins points out to their fundamental role in membrane structure. Therefore, upon gene deletion, compensatory mechanisms commonly occur. This is evidenced by the very severe phenotype of double KO mice [40] compared to the usually mild- or cell-type-specific effect of single tetraspanin deletion [41,42,43,44]. Thus, CD81 KO cells were used only in the first cell passages after selection to minimize these compensatory effects. In those early passages, we could not detect a compensatory upregulation of other tetraspanin members tested (CD9, CD151 and CD82) although we cannot rule out that other members of the family are upregulated since there is a lack of appropriated detection reagents for most of them.

We observed that CD81 gene deletion reduces HSV-1 infection. No differences were observed in viral entry or expression of the immediately early ICP4 protein, while all the events that require DNA replication were impaired, such as expression of late proteins (gB and gC), viral DNA replication itself, or active virion production, suggesting that the role of tetraspanin CD81 may be related to DNA replication.

In our previous report [13], we described that CD81 expression regulated SAMHD1 degradation by the proteasome in a HIV permissive HeLa cell model. Although the enzyme is predominantly localized in the nucleus, it has also been reported its presence in the cytoplasm [13, 45, 46], where dNTPs synthesis takes place. Shuttling from the nucleus to the cytoplasm seems to be regulated by its oxidation state [46]. SAMHD1 was shown to relocalized to the plasma membrane upon CD81 crosslinking, while in the absence of the tetraspanin, cytoplasmic SAMHD1 accumulated in endosomal structures and its proteasomal degradation was significantly reduced. The increment in SAMHD1 expression levels was accompanied by a reduction in the cytosolic concentration of dNTPs in the cell, thus hampering the HIV reverse transcription step. Here, we have observed a similar relocalization of SAMHD1 to endosomal structures in neuroblastoma cells upon CD81 gene deletion. However, neither SAMHD1 total expression levels nor cytosolic dNTP levels (not shown) were altered in CD81-deficient neuroblastoma cells. These discrepancies could be caused by the different cell lines employed, that could have different SAMHD1 turnover in basal conditions. Lately, viral kinases conserved in the Herpesviridae family, have been reported to inhibit SAMHD1 function by phosphorylation [32, 33]. In our experiments, SAMHD1 expression and localization and cellular dNTP levels were only analysed in non-infected cells. The change in SAMHD1 subcellular location as well as the effect of CD81 gene deletion on viral replication may suggest that upon viral infection, SAMHD1 activity may be affected. SAMHD1 is regulated by either oxidation [47] or phosphorylation [32, 33, 48]. The fact that different posttranslational modifications occur on SAMHD1 may also difficult a precise quantitation of its protein expression levels, since these modified forms may be differentially detected by specific antibodies against the enzyme.

Some DNA viruses such as HSV-1 present enzymes involved in dNTPs synthesis to ensure enough levels for viral replication [49]. Cytoplasmic SAMHD1 may be responsible of the degradation of newly synthetized dNTPs, which could explain why CD81-deficient cells show especially lower infection levels at longer times. Cellular basal dNTPs pool may be enough for the first round of replication, but subsequent replication cycles would require newly synthetized dNTPs, which can be degraded by SAMHD1 in the cytosol. It would be thus interesting in the future to analyse dNTP levels in the course of an infection in wild-type and CD81-deficient cells.

In summary, our data demonstrate that CD81 gene deletion impairs HSV-1 infection by affecting DNA replication step. Because of the reiterative appearance of emerging viral infections such as the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus, it is of crucial relevance to explore the role of cellular targets, like tetraspanins, that may be involved in the viral cycle of a wide variety of these infectious agents.

References

  1. 1.

    Yanez-Mo M, Barreiro O, Gordon-Alonso M, Sala-Valdes M, Sanchez-Madrid F (2009) Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: a functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol 19(9):434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.06.004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Florin L, Lang T (2018) Tetraspanin assemblies in virus infection. Front Immunol 9:1140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01140

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hantak MP, Qing E, Earnest JT, Gallagher T (2019) Tetraspanins: architects of viral entry and exit platforms. J Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01429-17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Martin F, Roth DM, Jans DA, Pouton CW, Partridge LJ, Monk PN, Moseley GW (2005) Tetraspanins in viral infections: a fundamental role in viral biology? J Virol 79(17):10839–10851. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.17.10839-10851.2005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Suarez H, Rocha-Perugini V, Alvarez S, Yanez-Mo M (2018) Tetraspanins, another piece in the HIV-1 replication puzzle. Front Immunol 9:1811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01811

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gordon-Alonso M, Yanez-Mo M, Barreiro O, Alvarez S, Munoz-Fernandez MA, Valenzuela-Fernandez A, Sanchez-Madrid F (2006) Tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 modulate HIV-1-induced membrane fusion. J Immunol 177(8):5129–5137. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5129

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhang J, Randall G, Higginbottom A, Monk P, Rice CM, McKeating JA (2004) CD81 is required for hepatitis C virus glycoprotein-mediated viral infection. J Virol 78(3):1448–1455. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.78.3.1448-1455.2004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alberione MP, Moeller R, Kirui J, Ginkel C, Doepke M, Stroh LJ, Machtens JP, Pietschmann T, Gerold G (2020) Single-nucleotide variants in human CD81 influence hepatitis C virus infection of hepatoma cells. Med Microbiol Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-020-00675-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fast LA, Mikulicic S, Fritzen A, Schwickert J, Boukhallouk F, Hochdorfer D, Sinzger C, Suarez H, Monk PN, Yanez-Mo M, Lieber D, Florin L (2018) Inhibition of tetraspanin functions impairs human papillomavirus and cytomegalovirus infections. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mikulicic S, Fritzen A, Scheffer K, Strunk J, Cabanas C, Sperrhacke M, Reiss K, Florin L (2020) Tetraspanin CD9 affects HPV16 infection by modulating ADAM17 activity and the ERK signalling pathway. Med Microbiol Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-020-00671-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    He J, Sun E, Bujny MV, Kim D, Davidson MW, Zhuang X (2013) Dual function of CD81 in influenza virus uncoating and budding. PLoS Pathog 9(10):e1003701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003701

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang L, Liu L, Che Y, Wang L, Jiang L, Dong C, Zhang Y, Li Q (2010) Egress of HSV-1 capsid requires the interaction of VP26 and a cellular tetraspanin membrane protein. Virol J 7:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-156

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rocha-Perugini V, Suarez H, Alvarez S, Lopez-Martin S, Lenzi GM, Vences-Catalan F, Levy S, Kim B, Munoz-Fernandez MA, Sanchez-Madrid F, Yanez-Mo M (2017) CD81 association with SAMHD1 enhances HIV-1 reverse transcription by increasing dNTP levels. Nat Microbiol 2(11):1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-017-0019-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Franzolin E, Pontarin G, Rampazzo C, Miazzi C, Ferraro P, Palumbo E, Reichard P, Bianchi V (2013) The deoxynucleotide triphosphohydrolase SAMHD1 is a major regulator of DNA precursor pools in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(35):14272–14277. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312033110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Antonucci JM, St Gelais C, Wu L (2017) The dynamic interplay between HIV-1, SAMHD1, and the innate antiviral response. Front Immunol 8:1541. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01541

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li M, Zhang D, Zhu M, Shen Y, Wei W, Ying S, Korner H, Li J (2017) Roles of SAMHD1 in antiviral defense, autoimmunity and cancer. Rev Med Virol. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.1931

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Majer C, Schussler JM, Konig R (2019) Intertwined: SAMHD1 cellular functions, restriction, and viral evasion strategies. Med Microbiol Immunol 208(3–4):513–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-019-00593-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mauney CH, Hollis T (2018) SAMHD1: Recurring roles in cell cycle, viral restriction, cancer, and innate immunity. Autoimmunity 51(3):96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916934.2018.1454912

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lahouassa H, Daddacha W, Hofmann H, Ayinde D, Logue EC, Dragin L, Bloch N, Maudet C, Bertrand M, Gramberg T, Pancino G, Priet S, Canard B, Laguette N, Benkirane M, Transy C, Landau NR, Kim B, Margottin-Goguet F (2012) SAMHD1 restricts the replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by depleting the intracellular pool of deoxynucleoside triphosphates. Nat Immunol 13(3):223–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2236

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Behrendt R, Schumann T, Gerbaulet A, Nguyen LA, Schubert N, Alexopoulou D, Berka U, Lienenklaus S, Peschke K, Gibbert K, Wittmann S, Lindemann D, Weiss S, Dahl A, Naumann R, Dittmer U, Kim B, Mueller W, Gramberg T, Roers A (2013) Mouse SAMHD1 has antiretroviral activity and suppresses a spontaneous cell-intrinsic antiviral response. Cell Rep 4(4):689–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.037

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gramberg T, Kahle T, Bloch N, Wittmann S, Mullers E, Daddacha W, Hofmann H, Kim B, Lindemann D, Landau NR (2013) Restriction of diverse retroviruses by SAMHD1. Retrovirology 10:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-10-26

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    White TE, Brandariz-Nunez A, Valle-Casuso JC, Amie S, Nguyen L, Kim B, Brojatsch J, Diaz-Griffero F (2013) Contribution of SAM and HD domains to retroviral restriction mediated by human SAMHD1. Virology 436(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.10.029

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Beloglazova N, Flick R, Tchigvintsev A, Brown G, Popovic A, Nocek B, Yakunin AF (2013) Nuclease activity of the human SAMHD1 protein implicated in the Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome and HIV-1 restriction. J Biol Chem 288(12):8101–8110. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.431148

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Choi J, Ryoo J, Oh C, Hwang S, Ahn K (2015) SAMHD1 specifically restricts retroviruses through its RNase activity. Retrovirology 12:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12977-015-0174-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ryoo J, Choi J, Oh C, Kim S, Seo M, Kim SY, Seo D, Kim J, White TE, Brandariz-Nunez A, Diaz-Griffero F, Yun CH, Hollenbaugh JA, Kim B, Baek D, Ahn K (2014) The ribonuclease activity of SAMHD1 is required for HIV-1 restriction. Nat Med 20(8):936–941. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3626

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Amie SM, Noble E, Kim B (2013) Intracellular nucleotide levels and the control of retroviral infections. Virology 436(2):247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.11.010

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hollenbaugh JA, Gee P, Baker J, Daly MB, Amie SM, Tate J, Kasai N, Kanemura Y, Kim DH, Ward BM, Koyanagi Y, Kim B (2013) Host factor SAMHD1 restricts DNA viruses in non-dividing myeloid cells. PLoS Pathog 9(6):e1003481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003481

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen Z, Zhu M, Pan X, Zhu Y, Yan H, Jiang T, Shen Y, Dong X, Zheng N, Lu J, Ying S, Shen Y (2014) Inhibition of Hepatitis B virus replication by SAMHD1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 450(4):1462–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.023

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jeong GU, Park IH, Ahn K, Ahn BY (2016) Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by a dNTPase-dependent function of the host restriction factor SAMHD1. Virology 495:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2016.05.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sommer AF, Riviere L, Qu B, Schott K, Riess M, Ni Y, Shepard C, Schnellbacher E, Finkernagel M, Himmelsbach K, Welzel K, Kettern N, Donnerhak C, Munk C, Flory E, Liese J, Kim B, Urban S, Konig R (2016) Restrictive influence of SAMHD1 on Hepatitis B Virus life cycle. Sci Rep 6:26616. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26616

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kim ET, White TE, Brandariz-Nunez A, Diaz-Griffero F, Weitzman MD (2013) SAMHD1 restricts herpes simplex virus 1 in macrophages by limiting DNA replication. J Virol 87(23):12949–12956. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02291-13

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Deutschmann J, Schneider A, Gruska I, Vetter B, Thomas D, Kiessling M, Wittmann S, Herrmann A, Schindler M, Milbradt J, Ferreiros N, Winkler TH, Wiebusch L, Gramberg T (2019) A viral kinase counteracts in vivo restriction of murine cytomegalovirus by SAMHD1. Nat Microbiol 4(12):2273–2284. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0529-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhang K, Lv DW, Li R (2019) Conserved herpesvirus protein kinases target samhd1 to facilitate virus replication. Cell Rep 28(2):449–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.020

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Itzhaki RF (2017) Herpes simplex virus type 1 and Alzheimer's disease: possible mechanisms and signposts. FASEB J 31(8):3216–3226. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201700360

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    De Chiara G, Piacentini R, Fabiani M, Mastrodonato A, Marcocci ME, Limongi D, Napoletani G, Protto V, Coluccio P, Celestino I, Li Puma DD, Grassi C, Palamara AT (2019) Recurrent herpes simplex virus-1 infection induces hallmarks of neurodegeneration and cognitive deficits in mice. PLoS Pathog 15(3):e1007617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007617

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Burgos JS, Ramirez C, Sastre I, Bullido MJ, Valdivieso F (2002) Involvement of apolipoprotein E in the hematogenous route of herpes simplex virus type 1 to the central nervous system. J Virol 76(23):12394–12398. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.76.23.12394-12398.2002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Santana S, Recuero M, Bullido MJ, Valdivieso F, Aldudo J (2012) Herpes simplex virus type I induces the accumulation of intracellular beta-amyloid in autophagic compartments and the inhibition of the non-amyloidogenic pathway in human neuroblastoma cells. Neurobiol Aging 33(2):430–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.12.010

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Diamond TL, Roshal M, Jamburuthugoda VK, Reynolds HM, Merriam AR, Lee KY, Balakrishnan M, Bambara RA, Planelles V, Dewhurst S, Kim B (2004) Macrophage tropism of HIV-1 depends on efficient cellular dNTP utilization by reverse transcriptase. J Biol Chem 279(49):51545–51553. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M408573200

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    de Bruyn KA, Uprichard SL, Chen M, Knipe DM (1998) Comparison of the intranuclear distributions of herpes simplex virus proteins involved in various viral functions. Virology 252(1):162–178. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1998.9450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jin Y, Takeda Y, Kondo Y, Tripathi LP, Kang S, Takeshita H, Kuhara H, Maeda Y, Higashiguchi M, Miyake K, Morimura O, Koba T, Hayama Y, Koyama S, Nakanishi K, Iwasaki T, Tetsumoto S, Tsujino K, Kuroyama M, Iwahori K, Hirata H, Takimoto T, Suzuki M, Nagatomo I, Sugimoto K, Fujii Y, Kida H, Mizuguchi K, Ito M, Kijima T, Rakugi H, Mekada E, Tachibana I, Kumanogoh A (2018) Double deletion of tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 in mice leads to a syndrome resembling accelerated aging. Sci Rep 8(1):5145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23338-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Deng J, Dekruyff RH, Freeman GJ, Umetsu DT, Levy S (2002) Critical role of CD81 in cognate T-B cell interactions leading to Th2 responses. Int Immunol 14(5):513–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/14.5.513

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kelic S, Levy S, Suarez C, Weinstein DE (2001) CD81 regulates neuron-induced astrocyte cell-cycle exit. Mol Cell Neurosci 17(3):551–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/mcne.2000.0955

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Le Naour F, Rubinstein E, Jasmin C, Prenant M, Boucheix C (2000) Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287(5451):319–321. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5451.319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Miyado K, Yamada G, Yamada S, Hasuwa H, Nakamura Y, Ryu F, Suzuki K, Kosai K, Inoue K, Ogura A, Okabe M, Mekada E (2000) Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science 287(5451):321–324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5451.321

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Baldauf HM, Pan X, Erikson E, Schmidt S, Daddacha W, Burggraf M, Schenkova K, Ambiel I, Wabnitz G, Gramberg T, Panitz S, Flory E, Landau NR, Sertel S, Rutsch F, Lasitschka F, Kim B, Konig R, Fackler OT, Keppler OT (2012) SAMHD1 restricts HIV-1 infection in resting CD4(+) T cells. Nat Med 18(11):1682–1687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2964

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mauney CH, Rogers LC, Harris RS, Daniel LW, Devarie-Baez NO, Wu H, Furdui CM, Poole LB, Perrino FW, Hollis T (2017) The SAMHD1 dNTP triphosphohydrolase is controlled by a redox switch. Antioxid Redox Signal 27(16):1317–1331. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2016.6888

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Patra KK, Bhattacharya A, Bhattacharya S (2019) Molecular dynamics investigation of a redox switch in the anti-HIV protein SAMHD1. Proteins 87(9):748–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25701

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hu J, Qiao M, Chen Y, Tang H, Zhang W, Tang D, Pi S, Dai J, Tang N, Huang A, Hu Y (2018) Cyclin E2-CDK2 mediates SAMHD1 phosphorylation to abrogate its restriction of HBV replication in hepatoma cells. FEBS Lett 592(11):1893–1904. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13105

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Weller SK, Coen DM (2012) Herpes simplex viruses: mechanisms of DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4(9):a013011. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a013011

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Aknowledgements

We want to thank Victor Toribio for critical reading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by grants BIO2017-86500-R from Ministerio Español de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) to MY-M and SAF2017-85747-R to MJB as well as USA NIH R01 AI136581 and AI150451 to BK. The institutional grants of Fundación Ramón Areces and Banco de Santander to the Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa are gratefully acknowledged. BB was supported by a predoctoral contract from Garantía Juvenil CAM program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jesús Aldudo or María Yáñez-Mó.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Special Issue on Tetraspanins in Infection and Immunity.

Edited by Luise Florin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benayas, B., Sastre, I., López-Martín, S. et al. Tetraspanin CD81 regulates HSV-1 infection. Med Microbiol Immunol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-020-00684-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tetraspanin
  • CD81
  • Herpes simplex-1
  • SAMHD1
  • Viral replication