Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urachal carcinoma: from gross specimen to morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is an exceedingly rare neoplasm that develops from the urachus, an embryologic remnant of the urogenital sinus and allantois. The most commonly encountered histologic subtype is adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study is to characterize a series of UrC by morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. We retrospectively investigated seven cases of UrCs and assessed patient symptoms, imaging, histologic features, immunohistochemical profile, molecular characteristics, pathologic stages, and type of treatment. Immunostaining for CK7, CK20, Muc-2, CDX2, GATA3, β-catenin, and CK34βE12 was carried out on each neoplasm and on seven non-neoplastic urachal remnants as the control group. Additionally, a mutational analysis was performed using the QIAact Actionable Insights Tumor Panel Kit, which analyzes KRAS, NRAS, KIT, BRAF, PDGFRA, ALK, EGFR, ERBB2, PIK3CA, ERBB3, ESR1, and RAF1. Our cohort comprised five females and two males with a mean age of 64 years. UrCs consisted of two mucinous cystadenocarcinomas and five invasive, non-cystic adenocarcinomas. Carcinoma antigen expression profile was positive for CK20 and negative for CK34βE12 and GATA3 in all cases. Five of seven cases stained positively for Muc-2 and CDX2. On the contrary, non-neoplastic urachal remnants were immunoreactive for CK34βE12, CK7, and GATA3. Mutational analysis gave a positive result in four out of seven (57.1%) cases. All four positive tumors showed RAS mutation and one an additional mutation in PIK3CA. Urachal tumors exhibit peculiar morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. Due to the advanced stage at presentation, individualized treatment should be undertaken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scabini S, Rimini E, Romairone E, Scordamaglia R, Vallarino L, Giasotto V, Ferro C, Ferrando V (2009) Urachal tumour: case report of a poorly understood carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 7:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-7-82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheldon CA, Clayman RV, Gonzalez R, et al (1984) Malignant urachal lesions. J Urol 131(1): 1–8

  3. Schnur J, Nguyen S, Divino C, Heimann T, Vidal C (2009) Coexisting rectal and urachal carcinoma: a case report. Am J Clin Oncol 32:220–221. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.coc.0000230170.25322.cd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Calsteren K, Van Mensel K, Joniau S et al (2006) Urachal carcinoma during pregnancy. Urology 67:1290.e19–1290.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamat AM (2013) Commentary on “the clinical epidemiology of urachal carcinoma: results of a large, population based study.” bruins HM, Visser O, Ploeg M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Department of Urology, Radboud University medical Centre, Utrecht. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 31:720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagasaki A, Handa N, Kawanami T (1991) Diagnosis of urachal anomalies in infancy and childhood by contrast fistulography, ultrasound and CT. Pediatr Radiol 21:321–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bi X, Wu Z, Han H, Zhou F (2017) Clinical comparison of patients with benign urachal masses versus urachal carcinomas. Chin J Cancer 36:2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Amin MB, Smith SC, Eble JN, Rao P, Choi WWL, Tamboli P, Young RH (2014) Glandular neoplasms of the urachus: a report of 55 cases emphasizing mucinous cystic tumors with proposed classification. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paner GP, Lopez-Beltran A, Sirohi D, Amin MB (2016) Updates in the pathologic diagnosis and classification of epithelial neoplasms of urachal origin. Adv Anat Pathol 23:71–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gopalan A, Sharp DS, Fine SW, Tickoo SK, Herr HW, Reuter VE, Olgac S (2009) Urachal carcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases with outcome correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 33:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31819aa4ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Darwanto A, Hein AM, Strauss S, Kong Y, Sheridan A, Richards D, Lader E, Ngowe M, Pelletier T, Adams D, Ricker A, Patel N, Kühne A, Hughes S, Shiffman D, Zimmermann D, te Kaat K, Rothmann T (2017) Use of the QIAGEN GeneReader NGS system for detection of KRAS mutations, validated by the QIAGEN Therascreen PCR kit and alternative NGS platform. BMC Cancer 17:358. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3328-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen D, Li Y, Yu Z et al (2014) Investigating urachal carcinoma for more than 15 years. Oncol Lett 8:2279–2283. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Martín LB, Valbuena L, Castañón LB (2015) Urachal adenocarcinoma of the bladder, our experience in 20 years. Arch Esp Urol 68:178–182

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kosanovic R, Romero RJ, Arad JK, Gallas M, Seetharamaiah R, Gonzalez AM (2014) Rare use of robotic surgery for removal of large urachal carcinoma. J Robot Surg 8:177–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0415-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins DC, Velázquez-Kennedy K, Deady S, Brady AP, Sweeney P, Power DG (2016) National incidence, management and survival of urachal carcinoma. Rare Tumors 8:97–101. https://doi.org/10.4081/rt.2016.6257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Módos O, Reis H, Niedworok C et al (2016) Mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, EGFR, and PIK3CA genes in urachal carcinoma – occurence and prognostic significance. Oncotarget 7:39293–39301. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9828

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ormeci T, Kiremit MC, Erkurt B, Örmeci A (2015) An unusual long-term survey of a patient with widespread malignant urachal tumor, not given chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Case Rep Radiol 2015:183787–183784. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/183787

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Testa I, Verzoni E, Grassi P, Colecchia M, Panzone F, Procopio G (2014) Response to targeted therapy in urachal adenocarcinoma. Rare Tumors 6:124–127. https://doi.org/10.4081/rt.2014.5529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Begg C (1930) The Urachus : its anatomy , histology and development. J Anat 64:170–183

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Meeks JJ, Herr HW, Bernstein M, al-Ahmadie HA, Dalbagni G (2013) Preoperative accuracy of diagnostic evaluation of the urachal mass. J Urol 189:1260–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siefker-Radtke AO, Gee J, Shen Y et al (2003) Multimodality management of urachal carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer center experience. J Urol 169:1295–1298. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000054646.49381.01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong A, Zuo C, Wang Y, Lu J, Zhu H (2014) Organized urachal abscess mimicking urachal carcinoma on FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 39:71–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31827a263e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldman IL, Caldamone AA, Gauderer M, Hampel N, Wesselhoeft CW, Elder JS (1988) Infected urachal cysts: a review of 10 cases. J Urol 140:375–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)41612-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guarnaccia S, Pais V, Grous J, Spirito N (1991) Adenocarcinoma of the urachus associated with elevated levels of CA 125. J Urol 145:140–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38271-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Behrendt MA, De Jong J, Van Rhijn BWG (2016) Urachal cancer: contemporary review of the pathological, surgical, and prognostic aspects of this rare disease. Minerva Urol Nefrol 68:172–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Siefker-Radtke A (2006) Urachal carcinoma: surgical and chemotherapeutic options. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6:1715–1721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Niu HT, Dong P, Wang JN, Huang J, Zeng YX (2016) Analysis of treatment and prognosis in post-operative patients with urachal carcinoma. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 96:1923–1925. https://doi.org/10.3760/oma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.24.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bissonnette MLZ, Kocherginsky M, Tretiakova M, Jimenez RE, Barkan GA, Mehta V, Sirintrapun SJ, Steinberg GD, White KP, Stricker T, Paner GP (2013) The different morphologies of urachal adenocarcinoma do not discriminate genomically by micro-RNA expression profiling. Hum Pathol 44:1605–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2013.01.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paner GP, McKenney JK, Barkan GA et al (2011) Immunohistochemical analysis in a morphologic spectrum of urachal epithelial neoplasms: diagnostic implications and pitfalls. Am J Surg Pathol 35:787–798. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182189c11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh I, Prasad R (2013) Primary urachal mucinous adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. J Clin Diagn Res 7:911–913. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/5597.2973

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. HOWARD AH, BERGMAN RT (1948) Mucous adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. J Urol 59:455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69397-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Molina JR, Quevedo JF, Furth AF, Richardson RL, Zincke H, Burch PA (2007) Predictors of survival from urachal cancer: a mayo clinic study of 49 cases. Cancer 110:2434–2440. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mizusawa H, Oguchi T, Domen T, Koizumi K, Mimura Y, Saito T, Kato H (2014) Two cases of lower abdominal tumors difficult to differentiate from urachal tumors. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 105:17–21. https://doi.org/10.5980/jpnjurol.105.17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yoshida Y, Yamanaka K, Ueda N et al (2014) A case of urachal carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated by TS-l/CDDP chemotherapy. Acta Urol Jpn 60:147–150

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nakamura K, Terada N, Kobayash T et al (2013) Pseudomyxoma peritonei arising from urachal carcinoma. Acta Urol Jpn 59:657–662

    Google Scholar 

  36. Behrendt MA, van Rhijn BWG (2016) Genetics and biological markers in urachal cancer. Transl Androl Urol 5:655–661. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.04.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kapoor R, Darasani N, Bansal A (2016) Rare presentation of urachal adenocarcinoma with skip metastasis to colon. Indian J Urol 32:244–246. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.185106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Prakash MR, Vijayalaxmi SV, Maitreyee R, Ranjit KP (2014) Complex mucinous cystadenoma of undetermined malignant potential of the urachus: a rare case with review of the literature. Malays J Pathol 36:145–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liang L, Zhou N, Xu H, Liu D, Lu Y, Li F, Guo J (2017) Urachal mucinous adenocarcinoma with pseudomyxoma peritonei: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7548. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bruins HM, Visser O, Ploeg M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Kiemeney LALM, Witjes JA (2012) The clinical epidemiology of urachal carcinoma: results of a large, population based study. J Urol 188:1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zong L, Chen P (2013) Surgical and chemotherapeutic experience regarding a urachal carcinoma with repeated relapse: case report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol 11(1):170. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yanagihara Y, Tanji N, Miura N, Shirato A, Nishimura K, Fukumoto T, Azuma K, Miyauchi Y, Kikugawa T, Yokoyama M (2013) Modified FOLFOX6 chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urachal cancer. Chemotherapy 59:402–406. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Collazo-Lorduy A, Castillo-Martin M, Wang L, Patel V, Iyer G, Jordan E, al-Ahmadie H, Leonard I, Oh WK, Zhu J, McBride RB, Cordon-Cardo C, Solit DB, Sfakianos JP, Galsky MD (2016) Urachal carcinoma shares genomic alterations with colorectal carcinoma and may respond to epidermal growth factor inhibition. Eur Urol 70:771–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.04.037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Krane LS, Kader AK, Levine EA (2012) Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to urachal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 105:258–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.22081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Internal Funding, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, and Internal Funding, Department of Pathology, Central Hospital of Bolzano.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Riva G.: study design; data collection; data interpretation; manuscript preparation; literature search; review and approval of the final manuscript. Mian C.: study design; data collection; molecular analysis; data interpretation; review and approval of the final manuscript. Luchini C.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Girolami I.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Ghimenton C.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Cima L.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Novelli L.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Hanspeter E.: data collection; data interpretation; review and approval of the final manuscript. Mazzoleni G.: data collection; data interpretation; review and approval of the final manuscript. Schwienbacher C.: molecular analysis; data interpretation; review and approval of the final manuscript. Pycha S.: review and approval of the final manuscript. D’Elia C.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Trenti E.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Pycha A.: data collection; review and approval of the final manuscript. Eccher A.: study design; data collection; data interpretation; review and approval of the final manuscript. Nesi G.: review and approval of the final manuscript. Brunelli M.: review and approval of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio Riva.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All the procedures for this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of local institution (authorization no 36-2018, Bolzano) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Informed consent

informed consent was acquired from patients in order to perform all investigations and to allow use of colected results.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riva, G., Mian, C., Luchini, C. et al. Urachal carcinoma: from gross specimen to morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis. Virchows Arch 474, 13–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2467-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2467-1

Keywords

Navigation