Skip to main content
Log in

Transcriptome comparison identifies potential biomarkers of spine and skull base chordomas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chordomas are rare, slowly growing, locally aggressive bone neoplasms that arise from embryonic remnants of the notochord, showing dual epithelial-mesenchymal differentiation. The high plasticity probably is the main reason for the high variety in phenotypes of chordoma, from its high heterogeneity on a cellular level to its subtype variations depending on tissue location, with its potential to develop from an inactive quiescent form to an aggressive cancer with extreme adaptability and resistance to drugs and other treatments. Gene expression profiles of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skull chordoma, spine chordoma, and normal tissue specimens were generated and compared. Using strict criteria, we identified 222 differentially expressed transcripts unique to skull base chordoma, 261 unique to spine chordoma, and 192 common to both chordoma subtypes. Further analysis of these three groups of transcripts allowed the selection of three subsets of highly differentially expressed genes as potential biomarkers, disease drivers, and therapeutic targets in both chordoma subtypes. Immunohistochemistry revealed LMX1A to be dominant in skull base chordoma, SALL3 to be unique to spine chordoma, and T to be common to both chordoma subtypes. In both chordoma subtypes, the genes with the highest expression were predominantly development-related genes, mostly transcription factors. Our findings indicate that these developmental genes play important oncogenic roles in chordoma, mainly causing high plasticity and resistance to therapy in both these cancer subtypes but also determining their differentiation status and proliferation activity, pointing to features expected of heterogeneous stem cell-like tissues with similarities to their notochord origins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams BJ, Raper DM, Godbout E et al (2013) Diagnosis and treatment of chordoma. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11:726–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chambers PW, Schwinn CP (1979) Chordoma. A clinicopathologic study of metastasis. Am J Clin Pathol 72:765–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Higinbotham NL, Phillips RF, Farr HW, Hustu HO (1967) Chordoma. Thirty-five-year study at memorial hospital. Cancer 20:1841–1850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell D, Raza SM, Bell AH, Fuller GN, DeMonte F (2016) Whole-transcriptome analysis of chordoma of the skull base. Virchows Arch 469:439–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mardis ER (2014) Sequencing the AML genome, transcriptome, and epigenome. Semin Hematol 51:250–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10:57–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell D, Bell AH, Bondaruk J, Hanna EY, Weber RS (2016) In-depth characterization of the salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma transcriptome with emphasis on dominant cell type. Cancer

  8. Faial T, Bernardo AS, Mendjan S et al (2015) Brachyury and SMAD signalling collaboratively orchestrate distinct mesoderm and endoderm gene regulatory networks in differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Development 142:2121–2135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chao TK, Yo YT, Liao YP et al (2013) LIM-homeobox transcription factor 1, alpha (LMX1A) inhibits tumourigenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem-like properties of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 128:475–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yagi K, Satou Y, Satoh N (2004) A zinc finger transcription factor, ZicL, is a direct activator of Brachyury in the notochord specification of Ciona intestinalis. Development 131:1279–1288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seifert A, Werheid DF, Knapp SM, Tobiasch E (2015) Role of Hox genes in stem cell differentiation. World J Stem Cells 7:583–595

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Heng X, Breer H, Zhang X et al (2012) Sall3 correlates with the expression of TH in mouse olfactory bulb. J Mol Neurosci 46:293–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin CC, Hsu YC, Li YH et al (2017) Higher HOPX expression is associated with distinct clinical and biological features and predicts poor prognosis in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 102:1044–1053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Li R, Campos J, Iida J (2015) A gene regulatory program in human breast cancer. Genetics 201:1341–1348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Iijima K, Yamada H, Miharu M et al (2012) ZNF385B is characteristically expressed in germinal center B cells and involved in B-cell apoptosis. Eur J Immunol 42:3405–3415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sankar S, Yellajoshyula D, Zhang B, Teets B, Rockweiler N, Kroll KL (2016) Gene regulatory networks in neural cell fate acquisition from genome-wide chromatin association of Geminin and Zic1. Sci Rep 6:37412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Aruga J, Nozaki Y, Hatayama M, Odaka YS, Yokota N (2010) Expression of ZIC family genes in meningiomas and other brain tumors. BMC Cancer 10:79

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cha N, Liu W, Yang N et al (2014) Oncogenicity of LHX4 in colorectal cancer through Wnt/beta-catenin/TCF4 cascade. Tumour Biol 35:10319–10324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonnomet A, Polette M, Strumane K et al (2008) The E-cadherin-repressed hNanos1 gene induces tumor cell invasion by upregulating MT1-MMP expression. Oncogene 27:3692–3699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Draper BW, McCallum CM, Moens CB (2007) nanos1 is required to maintain oocyte production in adult zebrafish. Dev Biol 305:589–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rimkus TK, Carpenter RL, Qasem S, Chan M, Lo HW (2016) Targeting the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway: review of smoothened and GLI inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 8

  22. Corradetti MN, Inoki K, Guan KL (2005) The stress-inducted proteins RTP801 and RTP801L are negative regulators of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. J Biol Chem 280:9769–9772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morquette B, Morquette P, Agostinone J et al (2015) REDD2-mediated inhibition of mTOR promotes dendrite retraction induced by axonal injury. Cell Death Differ 22:612–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang YF, Pan YH, Cao Y et al (2017) PDZ binding kinase, regulated by FoxM1, enhances malignant phenotype via activation of beta-catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget

  25. Li Q, Qi X, Jia W (2016) 3,3′,5-triiodothyroxine inhibits apoptosis and oxidative stress by the PKM2/PKM1 ratio during oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion AC16 and HCM-a cells: T3 inhibits apoptosis and oxidative stress by PKM2/PKM1 ratio. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 475:51–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lorenzi L, Doring C, Rausch T et al (2017) Identification of novel follicular dendritic cell sarcoma markers, FDCSP and SRGN, by whole transcriptome sequencing. Oncotarget 8:16463–16472

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu H, Zhang X, Wu J, French SW, He Z (2016) New insights on the palate, lung, and nasal epithelium clone (PLUNC) proteins: based on molecular and functional analysis of its homolog of YH1/SPLUNC1. Exp Mol Pathol 100:363–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma Z, Li M, Roy S et al (2016) Chromatin boundary elements organize genomic architecture and developmental gene regulation in Drosophila Hox clusters. World J Biol Chem 7:223–230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rhie SK, Guo Y, Tak YG et al (2016) Identification of activated enhancers and linked transcription factors in breast, prostate, and kidney tumors by tracing enhancer networks using epigenetic traits. Epigenetics Chromatin 9:50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moorthy SD, Davidson S, Shchuka VM et al (2017) Enhancers and super-enhancers have an equivalent regulatory role in embryonic stem cells through regulation of single or multiple genes. Genome Res 27:246–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mangum R, Varga E, Boue DR et al (2016) SHH desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma and Gorlin syndrome in the setting of Down syndrome: case report, molecular profiling, and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 32:2439–2446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding source

This study was supported by start-up funds from MD Anderson (DB) and presented at AACR Advances in Sarcoma, Philadelphia May 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Bell.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary materials

ESM 1

(XLSX 11778 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 30232 kb)

ESM 3

(XLSX 958 kb)

ESM 4

(XLSX 454 kb)

ESM 5

(DOCX 30 kb)

ESM 6

(DOCX 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bell, A.H., DeMonte, F., Raza, S.M. et al. Transcriptome comparison identifies potential biomarkers of spine and skull base chordomas. Virchows Arch 472, 489–497 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2224-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2224-x

Keywords

Navigation