Planta

, Volume 247, Issue 5, pp 1089–1098 | Cite as

Pleiotropic effects of the wheat domestication gene Q on yield and grain morphology

  • Quan Xie
  • Na Li
  • Yang Yang
  • Yulong Lv
  • Hongni Yao
  • Rong Wei
  • Debbie L. Sparkes
  • Zhengqiang Ma
Original Article

Abstract

Main conclusion

Transformation from q to Q during wheat domestication functioned outside the boundary of threshability to increase yield, grains m−2, grain weight and roundness, but to reduce grains per spike/spikelet.

Mutation of the Q gene, well-known affecting wheat spike structure, represents a key domestication step in the formation of today’s free-threshing, economically important wheats. In a previous study, multiple yield components and spike characteristics were associated with the Q gene interval in the bread wheat ‘Forno’ × European spelt ‘Oberkulmer’ recombinant inbred line population. Here, we reported that this interval was also associated with grain yield, grains m−2, grain morphology, and spike dry weight at anthesis. To clarify the roles of Q in agronomic trait performance, a functional marker for the Q gene was developed. Analysis of allelic effects showed that the bread wheat Q allele conferred free-threshing habit, soft glumes, and short and compact spikes compared with q. In addition, the Q allele contributed to higher grain yield, more grains m−2, and higher thousand grain weight, whereas q contributed to more grains per spike/spikelet likely resulting from increased preanthesis spike growth. For grain morphology, the Q allele was associated with reduced ratio of grain length to height, indicating a rounder grain. These results are supported by analysis of four Q mutant lines in the Chinese Spring background. Therefore, the transition from q to Q during wheat domestication had profound effects on grain yield and grain shape evolution as well, being a consequence of pleiotropy.

Keywords

Grain shape Mutation Spelt Spike Threshability Yield components 

Abbreviations

AP2

APETALA2

CS

Chinese Spring

QTL

Quantitative trait locus

RIL

Recombinant inbred line

TGW

Thousand grain weight

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Beat Keller (University of Zurich) and Justin Faris (USDA-ARS) for providing the Forno × Oberkulmer mapping population and CS Q mutants, respectively. We also thank John Alcock, Matthew Tovey and Fiona Wilkinson (University of Nottingham) for their help with field and laboratory work. This study was partially supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (No.: 31430064), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (No.: BK20160714), Research Excellence Foundation for the Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, China (No.: 8020012), China Scholarship Council‒University of Nottingham Research Excellence Scholarship, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Initiative for Modern Crop Production, and ‘111’ Project (No.: B08025).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Avni R, Nave M, Barad O, Baruch K, Twardziok SO, Gundlach H, Hale I, Mascher M, Spannagl M, Wiebe K, Jordan KW, Golan G, Deek J, Ben-Zvi B, Ben-Zvi G, Himmelbach A, MacLachlan RP, Sharpe AG, Fritz A, Ben-David R, Budak H, Fahima T, Korol A, Faris JD, Hernandez A, Mikel MA, Levy AA, Steffenson B, Maccaferri M, Tuberosa R, Cattivelli L, Faccioli P, Ceriotti A, Kashkush K, Pourkheirandish M, Komatsuda T, Eilam T, Sela H, Sharon A, Ohad N, Chamovitz DA, Mayer KFX, Stein N, Ronen G, Peleg Z, Pozniak CJ, Akhunov ED, Distelfeld A (2017) Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science 357:93–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1989) Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1:37–52CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23:2633–2635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun HJ, Atlin G, Payne T (2010) Multi-location testing as a tool to identify plant response to global climate change. In: Reynolds MP (ed) Climate change and crop production. CABI, Wallingford, pp 115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuck G, Meeley R, Hake S (2008) Floral meristem initiation and meristem cell fate are regulated by the maize AP2 genes ids1 and sid1. Development 135:3013–3019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Debernardi JM, Lin H, Faris JD, Dubcovsky J (2017) microRNA172 plays a critical role in wheat spike morphology and grain threshability. Development 144:1966–1975CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Faris JD (2014) Wheat domestication: Key to agricultural revolutions past and future. In: Tuberosa R, Graner A, Frison E (eds) Genomics of plant genetic resources. Springer, Houten, pp 439–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faris JD, Fellers JP, Brooks SA, Gill BS (2003) A bacterial artificial chromosome contig spanning the major domestication locus Q in wheat and identification of a candidate gene. Genetics 164:311–321PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer RA (2011) Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments. Crop Pasture Sci 62:95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foulkes MJ, Slafer GA, Davies WJ, Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Martre P, Calderini DF, Griffiths S, Reynolds MP (2011) Raising yield potential of wheat. III. Optimizing partitioning to grain while maintaining lodging resistance. J Exp Bot 62:469–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gegas VC, Nazari A, Griffiths S, Simmonds J, Fish L, Orford S, Sayers L, Doonan JH, Snape JW (2010) A genetic framework for grain size and shape variation in wheat. Plant Cell 22:1046–1056CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gill BS, Li W, Sood S, Kuraparthy V, Friebe BR, Simons KJ, Zhang Z, Faris JD (2007) Genetics and genomics of wheat domestication-driven evolution. Isr J Plant Sci 55:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. González FG, Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (2011) Wheat floret survival as related to pre-anthesis spike growth. J Exp Bot 62:4889–4901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenwood JR, Finnegan EJ, Watanabe N, Trevaskis B, Swain SM (2017) New alleles of the wheat domestication gene Q reveal multiple roles in growth and reproductive development. Development 144:1959–1965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Irish VF, Sussex IM (1990) Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Cell 2:741–753CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jantasuriyarat C, Vales M, Watson C, Riera-Lizarazu O (2004) Identification and mapping of genetic loci affecting the free-threshing habit and spike compactness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 108:261–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jofuku KD, den Boer BGW, Van Montagu M, Okamuro JK (1994) Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the homeotic gene APETALA2. Plant Cell 6:1211–1225CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jofuku KD, Omidyar PK, Gee Z, Okamuro JK (2005) Control of seed mass and seed yield by the floral homeotic gene APETALA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3117–3122CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato K, Miura H, Sawada S (2000) Mapping QTLs controlling grain yield and its components on chromosome 5A of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 101:1114–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kato K, Sonokawa R, Miura H, Sawada S (2003) Dwarfing effect associated with the threshability gene Q on wheat chromosome 5A. Plant Breed 122:489–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerber ER, Rowland GG (1974) Origin of the free threshing character in hexaploid wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 16:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kovach MJ, Sweeney M, Mccouch SR (2007) New insights into the history of rice domestication. Trends Genet 23:578–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee D, Lee J, Moon S, Park SY, An G (2006) The rice heterochronic gene SUPERNUMERARY BRACT regulates the transition from spikelet meristem to floral meristem. Plant J 49:64–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A, Abbo S (2000) The cradle of agriculture. Science 288:1602–1603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Li B, Li Q, Mao X, Li A, Wang J, Chang X, Hao C, Zhang X, Jing R (2016) Two novel AP2/EREBP transcription factor genes TaPARG have pleiotropic functions on plant architecture and yield-related traits in common wheat. Front Plant Sci 7:1191PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu P, Liu J, Dong H, Sun J (2017) Functional regulation of Q by microRNA172 and transcriptional co-repressor TOPLESS in controlling bread wheat spike density. Plant Biotechnol J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12790 Google Scholar
  27. Ma ZQ, Sorrells ME (1995) Genetic analysis of fertility restoration in wheat using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci 35:1137–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maes T, Van de Steene N, Zethof J, Karimi M, D’Hauw M, Mares G, Van Montagu M, Gerats T (2001) Petunia Ap2-like genes and their role in flower and seed development. Plant Cell 13:229–244CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Messmer MM, Keller M, Zanetti S, Keller B (1999) Genetic linkage map of a wheat × spelt cross. Theor Appl Genet 98:1163–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muramatsu M (1963) Dosage effect of the spelta gene q of hexaploid wheat. Genetics 48:469–482PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Neff MM, Turk E, Kalishman M (2002) Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends Genet 18:613–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ohto M, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Nakamura K, Harada JJ (2005) Control of seed mass by APETALA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3123–3128CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Peleg Z, Fahima T, Korol AB, Abbo S, Saranga Y (2011) Genetic analysis of wheat domestication and evolution under domestication. J Exp Bot 62:5051–5061CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Peng J, Ronin Y, Fahima T, Röder MS, Li Y, Nevo E, Korol A (2003) Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2489–2494CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Salamini F, Özkan H, Brandolini A, Schäfer-Pregl R, Martin W (2002) Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the Near East. Nat Rev Genet 3:429–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma HC, Waines JG (1980) Inheritance of tough rachis in crosses of Triticum monococcum and T. boeoticum. J Hered 71:214–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shomura A, Izawa T, Ebana K, Ebitani T, Kanegae H, Konishi S, Yano M (2008) Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. Nat Genet 40:1023–1028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Simonetti MC, Bellomo MP, Laghetti G, Perrino P, Simeone R, Blanco A (1999) Quantitative trait loci influencing free-threshing habit in tetraploid wheats. Genet Resour Crop Evol 46:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simons KJ, Fellers JP, Trick HN, Zhang Z, Tai YS, Gill BS, Faris JD (2006) Molecular characterization of the major wheat domestication gene Q. Genetics 172:547–555CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX (2007) A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet 39:623–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Taenzler B, Esposti RF, Vaccino P, Brandolini A, Effgen S, Heun M, SchÄFer-Pregl R, Borghi B, Salamini F (2002) Molecular linkage map of Einkorn wheat: mapping of storage-protein and soft-glume genes and bread-making quality QTLs. Genet Res 80:131–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap® 4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma BV, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Ooijen JW (2009) MapQTL® 6, software for the mapping of quantitative traits loci in experimental populations of diploid species. Kyazma BV, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  44. Watanabe N, Sugiyama K, Yamagishi Y, Sakata Y (2002) Comparative telosomic mapping of homoeologous genes for brittle rachis in tetraploid and hexaploid wheats. Hereditas 137:180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xie Q, Mayes S, Sparkes DL (2015) Spelt as a genetic resource for yield component improvement in bread wheat. Crop Sci 55:2753–2765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yant L, Mathieu J, Dinh TT, Ott F, Lanz C, Wollmann H, Chen X, Schmid M (2010) Orchestration of the floral transition and floral development in Arabidopsis by the bifunctional transcription factor APETALA2. Plant Cell 22:2156–2170CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang Z, Belcram H, Gornicki P, Charles M, Just J, Huneau C, Magdelenat G, Couloux A, Samain S, Gill BS, Rasmussen JB, Barbe V, Faris JD, Chalhoub B (2011) Duplication and partitioning in evolution and function of homoeologous Q loci governing domestication characters in polyploid wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:18737–18742CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou Y, Lu D, Li C, Luo J, Zhu B, Zhu J, Shangguan Y, Wang Z, Sang T, Zhou B, Han B (2012) Genetic control of seed shattering in rice by the APETALA2 transcription factor SHATTERING ABORTION1. Plant Cell 24:1034–1048CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Applied Plant Genomics Laboratory, Crop Genomics and Bioinformatics CenterNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Division of Plant and Crop SciencesUniversity of NottinghamLeicestershireUK

Personalised recommendations