Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology

, Volume 471, Issue 2, pp 313–327 | Cite as

Involvement of butyrate in electrogenic K+ secretion in rat rectal colon

  • Akihiro InagakiEmail author
  • Mikio Hayashi
  • Naaz Andharia
  • Hiroko Matsuda
Open Access
Ion channels, receptors and transporters
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Ion channels, receptors and transporters


Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are synthesized from dietary carbohydrates by colonic bacterial fermentation. These SCFAs supply energy, suppress cancer, and affect ion transport. However, their roles in ion transport and regulation in the intracellular environment remain unknown. In order to elucidate the roles of SCFAs, we measured short-circuit currents (ISC) and performed RT-PCR and immunohistochemical analyses of ion transporters in rat rectal colon. The application of 30 mM butyrate shifted ISC in a negative direction, but did not attenuate the activity of epithelial Na+ channels (ENaC). The application of bumetanide, a Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter inhibitor, to the basolateral side reduced the negative ISC shift induced by butyrate. The application of XE991, a KCNQ-type K+ channel inhibitor, to the apical side decreased the ISC shift induced by butyrate in a dose-dependent manner. The ISC shift was independent of HCO3 and insensitive to ibuprofen, an SMCT1 inhibitor. The mucosa from rat rectal colon expressed mRNAs of H+-coupled monocarboxylate transporters (MCT1, MCT4, and MCT5, also referred to as SLC16A1, SLC16A3, and SLC16A4, respectively). RT-PCR and immunofluorescence analyses demonstrated that KCNQ2 and KCNQ4 localized to the apical membrane of surface cells in rat rectal colon. These results indicate that butyrate, which may be transported by H+-coupled monocarboxylate transporters, activates K+ secretion through KCNQ-type K+ channels on the apical membrane in rat rectal colon. KCNQ-type K+ channels may play a role in intestinal secretion and defense mechanisms in the gastrointestinal tract.


Short-chain fatty acid Rectal colon Short-circuit current KCNQ 



Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator


Distal colon


Epithelial Na+ channel




Short-circuit current


Amiloride-insensitive short-circuit current


Amiloride-sensitive short-circuit current


Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution


Monocarboxylate transporter


Logarithmic acid dissociation constant


Rectal colon


Short-chain fatty acid

SD rats

Sprague-Dawley rats


Solute carrier


Na+-coupled transporter for monocarboxylates.


Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs: mainly acetate, propionate, and butyrate) are produced by anaerobic bacterial fermentation from dietary fiber within the lumen of the mammalian colon [51]. SCFAs are considered to play important roles as a source of nutrients and suppressant of colonic carcinoma [21]. They are transported into cells through the apical membrane by ionic transport pathways [45, 47] and non-ionic diffusion [10]. SCFA transport is regarded as an important factor that regulates colonic fluid balance, absorption of NaCl, and luminal and intracellular pH [40]. The pKa of SCFAs is approximately 4.8 and, thus, most SCFAs are present as anions at physiological pH 6–7 in the lumen of the colon [18, 51]. The carrier-mediated transport of ionized SCFAs into colonic epithelial cells includes (1) Na+-coupled transporters for monocarboxylates (SMCT1, also referred to as SLC5A8), (2) SCFA/HCO3 exchangers (primarily SLC26A3 with the possible additional involvement of SLC26A6), and (3) H+-coupled monocarboxylate transporters (MCT1, MCT4, and MCT5, also referred to as SLC16A1, SLC16A3, and SLC16A4, respectively) [51].

Frank et al. [19] previously reported that SMCT1 was expressed on the apical side, but not on the basolateral membrane of the colonic mucosa of mice. SMCT1 has been shown to possess the capacity for electrogenic SCFA transport with a 3:1 [13] or 2:1 [14, 23] stoichiometry between Na+ and monocarboxylates. Electroneutral SCFA/HCO3 exchange is regarded as the main transport pathway for ionized SCFAs in the intestine and colon [40, 45]. Electroneutral MCTs, MCT1 and members of its family, were previously reported to affect electrogenic transport [7]. The localization of MCT1 to the small and large intestines of humans, cows, and rodents remains controversial [19, 22, 38, 53].

The concentration of butyrate may reach approximately 10 to 20 mM in rat and other mammalian colons [54]. Mucosal application of propionate and butyrate caused transient increases in the short-circuit current (ISC) at 0.5 mM and stimulated Na+ absorption at 50 mM in rat distal colon [58, 60]. Butyrate at 5 mM upregulated the mRNA expression of β- and γ-subunits of epithelial Na+ channels (ENaC) in the human colorectal cancer cell line HT-29/B6 [61]. In contrast, butyrate inhibited cAMP-mediated Cl secretion with a 50% inhibitory concentration of 8 mM [15]. Butyrate is the only SCFA to be extensively metabolized within the epithelium, leading to the production of ketone bodies, H+, CO2, and ATP. It also acts as a histone deacetylase inhibitor [18]. These factors may exert direct or indirect effects on electrolyte transport in colon.

The aim of the present study was to clarify the effects of butyrate on electrolyte transport in rat rectal colon (RC). The surface cells of the rat RC show electrogenic Na+ absorption through ENaC [29], which is inhibited by amiloride. We used Ussing chambers to measure amiloride-sensitive and amiloride-insensitive currents across the mucosa and demonstrated that butyrate activated K+ secretion through KCNQ-type K+ channels on the apical membrane in epithelial cells. We discussed the possibility of butyrate being transported by an electroneutral pathway via H+-coupled MCTs and non-ionic diffusion into rectal epithelial cells.

Materials and methods

Animals and tissue preparation

All experiments were performed in accordance with a protocol approved by the Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Tokushima and by the Animal Experimentation Committee, Kansai Medical University. Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (200–425 g; n = 144) were fed a standard rat diet (Labo MR Standard; Na+ content 2.1 g/kg, K+ content 7.8 g/kg; Nosan Corporation, Yokohama, Japan) and tap water.

Animals were killed by cervical dislocation. Pelvic bones were immediately cut open, and a segment from distal colon (DC) to anus was excised. The rectal colon (RC) between the lymph nodes (typically located 3 cm from the anus) at the pelvic brim and anus was divided into two segments of equal lengths and the segment near the anus was used in the present study. Ileum (IL) was also excised to investigate mRNA expression. Each segment was cut open longitudinally and flushed to remove fecal pellets with standard NaCl solution containing (in mM) NaCl (145), KCl (5), CaCl2 (1), MgCl2 (1), HEPES (10; pH 7.4, adjusted with NaOH), and D-glucose (10). The epithelium (mucosa) was separated from the underlying submucosa and muscle layers by gently scraping mucosal side up along the length of the colonic segment using a glass slide [59]. We did not confirm the condition of the mucosa, but it may be similar to the “partial mucosal strip” described by Frizzell et al. [20]. When we observed the muscle layer, we turned the mucosa upside down and removed the muscle using fine forceps.

Transepithelial current measurements

The stripped mucosa was mounted in a modified Ussing chamber with a tissue holder having an aperture surface area of 0.5 cm2, and then bathed bilaterally in modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution (KRB, also referred to as “124 Cl” in the figure, see Table 1) consisting of (in mM) NaCl (115), KCl (5), CaCl2 (1), MgCl2 (1), NaHCO3 (25), HEPES (10; pH 7.4, adjusted with NaOH), and D-glucose (10) as metabolic fuel. The bathing solution was continuously gassed with a mixture of 95% O2–5% CO2 and kept at 37 °C. Unless otherwise noted, the bathing solution, which was kept at 5 ml in the chambers, was perfused at a rate of 1 ml/min with a peristaltic pump (MINIPULS 3, Gilson). Two lanes of the pump were used to input fresh solution to the apical and basolateral baths, while the other two lanes were used to pump the solution out of the baths. When drugs were applied to either side of the bathing solution, 5 μl of stock solutions were added to give the desired final concentration, immediately followed by continuous perfusion with the solution containing the appropriate concentration. Antibiotics were not needed because epithelia were continuously perfused with bathing solution. Indomethacin (5 μM) was routinely added to the solutions bathing the serosal surfaces in order to inhibit endogenous prostaglandin formation because prostaglandins are known to influence electrolyte transport across the hindgut epithelium [26].
Table 1

Experimental solutions in Ussing chamber experiments (all concentrations were indicated as mM)


KRB (124 Cl)

30 butyrate KRB

HEPES buffer

HCO3-free butyrate













30 formate KRB

60 butyrate KRB

10 butyrate KRB

3 butyrate KRB

















All solutions contained (in mM) KCl (5), MgCl2 (1), CaCl2 (1), HEPES (10), and D-glucose (10), adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH (approximately 5 mM for titration), and were continuously gassed with a mixture of 95% O2–5% CO2 (for KRB or other bicarbonate buffers similar to KRB) or 100% O2 (for HEPES buffer and bicarbonate-free HEPES buffer)

Tissues were continuously short-circuited to monitor the short-circuit current (ISC, μA/cm2) using a voltage-clamping amplifier (CEZ-9100, Nihon Kohden Co., Tokyo) as described previously [29]. In brief, the transepithelial electrical potential difference (Vte) was measured by a pair of pipette-shaped voltage-sensing electrodes made of a sintered Ag-AgCl pellet filled with a solution of 3% (w/v) agarose in 3 M KCl solution. A transepithelial current was passed across the tissue through a pair of pipette-shaped electrodes made of Ag wire (Physiologic Instruments) filled with a solution of 3% (w/v) agarose in 3 M KCl solution. ISC was referred to as positive for cations flowing across the epithelium from the mucosal side to the serosal side. All preparations were allowed to equilibrate for 40–90 min after mounting on the chambers before measurements were taken. Transepithelial resistance (Rt) was typically estimated from the current change in response to square voltage pulses (+ 2 mV, 1-s duration) imposed across the mucosa at 2-min intervals or manually. The resistance of the bathing fluid between the voltage-sensing electrodes was measured and compensated for by the amplifier before each experiment. In order to avoid using tissues that were damaged during preparation, we only proceeded with experiments when initial Rt values were larger than 50 Ω cm2. The averaged Rt values in the present study, approximately 90 Ω cm2, i.e., 11.1 mS/cm2 (see Results), were similar to those previously reported for the rat colon [5, 28, 29, 30, 35]. The potential difference in the voltage electrodes was less than ± 1.0 mV during the period of measurements. Stock solutions of drugs were applied to give the desired final concentration. In order to replace solution, 2.5 ml of solution was withdrawn from the apical and basolateral bathing solutions and each was added successively with an equal volume. This procedure was repeated 10 times in parallel for continuous perfusion with the bathing solution. ISC, amiloride-sensitive ISC (ISC-amil/sen), and Rt were stable during the experiments [30]. We defined amiloride-insensitive ISC as ISC-amil/insen. In order to estimate the effects of butyrate on ISC-amil/insen, we subtracted ISC-amil/insen in KRB from that in 30 butyrate KRB and defined the yield as the ISC-amil/insen shift. We applied bumetanide, a Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter inhibitor, to the basolateral bath and verified the accuracy of the recording at the end of experiments. We ceased perfusion in this protocol to save the chemical.

Curve fitting

The dependency of the amiloride-insensitive short-circuit current (ISC-amil/insen) shift on substitute (butyrate or XE991) concentrations was fit using the following Hill equation:
$$ \mathrm{I}={\mathrm{I}}_0+\left({\mathrm{I}}_{\mathrm{max}}-{\mathrm{I}}_0\right)/\left\{1+{\left(\mathrm{S}/{\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{D}}\right)}^n\right\}, $$
where I, I0, and Imax are the ISC-amil/insen shift as a function of the substitute concentration, the residual ISC-amil/insen shift independent of the substitute concentration, and the ISC-amil/insen shift (extrapolated) at the maximal substitute concentration, respectively. S is the substitute concentration, KD is the dissociation constant (for XE991, Ki is used instead as the inhibitory constant), that is, the substitute concentration of the half-maximal ISC-amil/insen shift, and n is the Hill coefficient.


All chemicals employed were reagent grade. Amiloride and bumetanide were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Sodium butyrate and sodium formate were obtained from Wako Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). HEPES, indomethacin, and ibuprofen were obtained from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). XE991 (10, 10-bis (4-pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenonedihydrochloride) was obtained from Alomone Labs (Israel). Chromanol 293B and bupivacaine were obtained from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK) and Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Stock solutions of amiloride (10 mM), XE991 (100 mM), and barium chloride (1 M) were prepared in distilled water. Indomethacin (5 mM) and ibuprofen (300 mM) were dissolved in ethanol. Bumetanide (100 mM), chromanol 293B (100 mM), and bupivacaine (300 mM) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Stock solutions were prepared at a 1000-fold concentration for administration, except for barium chloride at a 200-fold concentration.

Statistical analysis

Results were reported as the means ± SE of several experiments (n). The significance of differences was evaluated using the two-tailed paired and unpaired Student’s t test. Differences between means were considered to be significant at a value of p < 0.05.

RT-PCR analysis

RNA was extracted from the mucosae of rat rectal colon (RC), distal colon (DC), and ileum (IL) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), treated with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), extracted with phenol–chloroform, precipitated with ethanol, and then resuspended in ultra-pure water. First-strand cDNA was generated using SuperScript III RT (Invitrogen). PCR analyses were performed using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes, Vantaa, Finland) with primers designed to recognize different types of transporters and channels (Table 2). The amplification parameters used were as follows: one cycle at 98 °C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles at 98 °C for 5 s, 63–64 °C for 10 s, 72 °C for 15 s, and one cycle at 72 °C for 5 min. The transcripts were subsequently checked by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Table 2

Primer sets used for the rat intestine in the RT-PCR analysis

Gene (subunit)


Size (bp)

Slc16a1 (MCT1)






Slc16a3 (MCT4)






Slc16a4 (MCT5)






Slc16a8 (MCT3)






Kcnq1 (Kv7.1)






Kcnq2 (Kv7.2)






Kcnq3 (Kv7.3)






Kcnq4 (Kv7.4)






Kcnq5 (Kv7.5)





































Immunolocalization was performed on the rat rectal colon. The rectal colon was obtained from male Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats (n = 3). Protocols involving the handling of animals were approved by the Animal Experimentation Committee, Kansai Medical University. Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and a mixture of medetomidine (0.4 mg/kg body weight), midazolam (2.0 mg/kg b.w.), and butorphanol (5.0 mg/kg b.w.), and perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The rectal colon was removed, cut into small pieces, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. Detailed methods for immunohistochemistry are described elsewhere [27]. Briefly, the specimen was permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min. Autofluorescence was blocked in 0.1 M Tris-glycine. Non-specific binding was blocked with 2% normal donkey serum in PBS and incubated with primary antibodies (1:100 to 1:400) with antibodies for Ezrin (1:400, clone 3C12, MS-661; Lab Vision) in immunoreaction enhancer solution (Can Get Signal immunostain; Toyobo) at 4 °C overnight. Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa488 or Alexa568 (1:400; Molecular Probes) were added for 1 h. Antibodies for KCNQ1 (APC-022), KCNQ2 (APC-050), KCNQ4 (APC-164), and KCNE3 (APC-118) were obtained from Alomone Labs (Israel). As the negative control, primary antibodies were preincubated with control peptide antigens (Alomone Labs) at room temperature for 30 min and scanning was performed using the same settings. Nuclei were stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at 1 μg/ml. Fluorescence was observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM510 META; Carl Zeiss).


Butyrate induced an amiloride-insensitive short-circuit current in rat rectal colon

Surface cells of rat rectal colon express ENaC, which is responsible for electrogenic Na+ absorption [29]. Thus, we used amiloride, a blocker of ENaC, to assess whether butyrate affected the activity of ENaC measured as an amiloride-sensitive short-circuit current (ISC-amil/sen) in the Ussing chamber. Figure 1a shows an example of control experiments. When amiloride (10 μM) was added to the apical solution, ISC-amil/sen was 23.1 ± 1.7 μA/cm2 (n = 73) and the values obtained for transepithelial resistance (Rt) significantly increased from 89.7 ± 2.0 to 91.5 ± 2.0 Ω cm2 (p < 0.0001; n = 73). During two consecutive applications of amiloride, the first and second ISC-amil/sen were 24.1 ± 4.2 and 20.7 ± 3.7 μA/cm2, respectively (n = 7). These stable and reproducible responses to amiloride ensured similar basal ISC-amil/sen; therefore, we examined the effects of butyrate on the second ISC-amil/sen in different mucosal preparations, as described in previous studies [29, 30].
Fig. 1

Effects of butyrate on ISC. a Effects of butyrate applied to the apical and basolateral sides on short-circuit currents (ISC) in rat rectal colonic mucosa. Current deflections are caused by a 2-mV voltage pulse injection every 2 min or by manual insertion. Bars on the top of this figure indicate the perfusion solution. Filled boxes indicate the timing of the apical application of amiloride (Amil; 10 μM). A positive deflection in ISC indicates cation movement from the apical to basolateral bathing solution or anion movement from the basolateral to apical solution. 124 Cl indicates KRB and 94 Cl/30 butyrate indicates 30 butyrate KRB (see Table 1). b Effects of butyrate on amiloride-sensitive ISC (ISC-amil/sen). No significant differences were observed in ISC-amil/sen between control and 30 mM butyrate KRB. Values are means ± SE (n = 11). c Representative experiment of the basolateral administration of 100 μM bumetanide after the application of amiloride with butyrate. Major anion compositions are shown on top of the trace (see Table 1). The shaded box indicates the basolateral application of bumetanide (Bumet; 100 μM). The trace only shows after the third amiloride application in 30 butyrate-KRB, as shown in Fig. 1a, for clarity

When 30 mM butyrate (30 butyrate KRB, Table 1) was applied to both sides of the mucosa (Fig. 1a), ISC showed transient negative, followed by positive changes, as reported previously [37], and then a negative shift. This negative shift indicated a decrease in cation absorption or anion secretion and/or an increase in cation secretion or anion absorption. In order to assess cation absorption through ENaC, we added 10 μM amiloride to the apical bath. ISC-amil/sen in 30 butyrate KRB, 18.4 ± 3.2 μA/cm2, was not significantly different from that in KRB (n = 11, Fig. 1b), suggesting that butyrate did not attenuate the activity of ENaC. We measured ISC with 10 μM amiloride (ISC-amil/insen) in KRB and 30 butyrate KRB. The subtraction of ISC-amil/insen in KRB from ISC-amil/insen in 30 butyrate KRB yielded an ISC-amil/insen shift induced by 30 mM butyrate of −29.5 ± 2.7 μA/cm2 (n = 11). In preliminary experiments, we found that acetate caused a similar ISC-amil/insen shift.

Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporters on the basolateral membrane uptake Na+, K+, and Cl into the surface cells of the colonic epithelium and provide sufficient intracellular Cl and K+ for secretion [48, 50]. The application of bumetanide (100 μM), an inhibitor of Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter, to the basolateral side in addition to butyrate and apical amiloride returned ISC-amil/insen to nearly zero, +0.3 ± 2.6 μA/cm2 (n = 5; Fig. 1c). Thus, the butyrate-dependent ISC-amil/insen shift may result from an increase in K+ uptake across basolateral membrane and K+ efflux across apical membrane.

Effects of K+ channel inhibitors on the ISC-amil/insen shift

In order to identify the K+ secretion pathway on the apical membrane, we tested the effects of K+ channel inhibitors on the ISC-amil/insen shift by butyrate. We maintained the concentration of amiloride at 10 μM in the bathing solution. The apical application of 100 μM XE991, a KCNQ-type K+ channel inhibitor, significantly decreased the ISC-amil/insen shift (−8.2 ± 0.9 μA/cm2, n = 13; Fig. 2a). The value of the ISC-amil/insen shift induced by butyrate was −25.3 ± 1.1 μA/cm2. XE991 (100 μM) increased ISC-amil/insen to −17.1 ± 1.2 μA/cm2, and bumetanide (100 μM) further increased ISC-amil/insen to 1.2 ± 1.0 μA/cm2 (n = 13; Fig. 2a, b). XE991 inhibited the ISC-amil/insen shift in a concentration-dependent manner and the relationship was fit well by the Hill equation (Fig. 2c), which estimated Ki and n as 34 ± 19 μM and 0.87 ± 0.07 (n = 5), respectively. In control KRB solution, 100 μM XE991 slightly decreased ISC by −1.6 ± 0.8 μA/cm2 (n = 5). In preliminary experiments, ISC-amil/insen in 30 butyrate KRB was not affected by chromanol 293B (KCNQ1 inhibitor, 100 μM, n = 2), paxilline (BK channel inhibitor, 100 nM, n = 2), TRAM34 (KCa 3.1 inhibitor, 1 μM, n = 2), or bupivacaine (two-pore domain K+ channel inhibitor, 300 μM, n = 3) (not shown). Additionally, the apical application of 5 mM Ba2+, a non-specific K+ channel inhibitor, did not inhibit the ISC-amil/insen shift (n = 5; not shown).
Fig. 2

Effects of XE991 on ISC. a Representative experiment of the apical administration of 100 μM XE991 after the application of amiloride and butyrate. b A summary of the effects of XE991 on ISC. Bars refer to the cumulative addition of drugs shown in Fig. 2a. c Dose dependency of XE991 for the shift in ISC-amil/insen (n = 5). The solid curve shows the fit of results using the Hill equation (see the "Materials and methods" section). Values are the means ± SE of five experiments

Effects of formate on the ISC-amil/insen shift

In the experiments described above, the chloride concentration was reduced from 124 to 94 mM in 30 butyrate KRB. In order to examine whether reductions in chloride concentrations affect the butyrate-induced ISC-amil/insen shift, we measured ISC in a solution containing 30 mM formate (methanoate) (Fig. 3). In 30 formate KRB, ISC-amil/sen was 15.0 ± 2.7 μA/cm2 and ISC-amil/insen was 5.3 ± 3.7 μA/cm2 (n = 5). ISC-amil/insen in 30 formate KRB was not significantly different from that in KRB (5.5 ± 1.8 μA/cm2, n = 7). The substitution to 30 butyrate KRB from 30 formate KRB caused an ISC-amil/insen shift of −29.1 ± 3.7 μA/cm2 (n = 5), which was similar to that in the control experiments shown in Fig. 1. These results suggest that the ISC-amil/insen shift induced by butyrate was not due to a reduction in the chloride concentration.
Fig. 3

Effects of formate (methanoate) on the short-circuit current (ISC) in rat rectal colon. In order to clarify the shift in amiloride-insensitive ISC, a part of the transient direction was deleted from the trace

Dependency of the ISC-amil/insen shift on butyrate concentrations

We examined the dependency of the ISC-amil/insen shift on butyrate concentrations. When 0 (only performed with the solution exchange with KRB), 3, 10, 30, and 60 mM butyrate were applied on both sides after the first application of amiloride, the ISC-amil/insen shifts observed were −0.2 ± 0.3 (n = 7), −2.7 ± 0.5 (n = 3), −11.5 ± 2.7 (n = 4), −29.5 ± 2.7 (n = 11), and −30.1 ± 2.9 (n = 5) μA/cm2, respectively (Fig. 4). The ISC-amil/insen shift showed dependency on the butyrate concentration and the relationship was fit well by the Hill equation, which estimated KD and n as 12.0 mM and 2.9, respectively.
Fig. 4

Concentration dependency of butyrate for the shift in amiloride-insensitive ISC (ISC-amil/insen shift). The solid curve shows the fit of results using the Hill equation (see the "Materials and methods" section)

Transport pathway for butyrate into colonic epithelial cells

SCFA/HCO3 exchangers and Na+-coupled transporters for monocarboxylates (SMCT1) are candidates for the electrogenic SCFA transport pathway on colonic epithelia. In HCO3-free solution, ISC-amil/sen were 23.8 ± 5.0 and 16.3 ± 3.4 μA/cm2 with 0 and 30 mM butyrate, respectively (Fig. 5a). The ISC-amil/insen shift was also observed in HCO3-free solution with a value of −25.8 ± 2.4 μA/cm2 (n = 8), which was not significantly different from that obtained under HCO3 conditions in Fig. 1 (−29.5 ± 2.7 μA/cm2, n = 11; Fig. 5b). Ibuprofen at 300 μM, which inhibited a propionate-evoked current through SMCT1 with a Ki value of 70 μM [42], had no effects on ISC-amil/insen in 30 butyrate KRB (n = 6; Fig. 5c). Therefore, it is unlikely that SCFA/HCO3 exchangers and SMCT1 were involved in the ISC-amil/insen shift induced by butyrate.
Fig. 5

a Effects of butyrate on amiloride-sensitive ISC (ISC-amil/sen) without HCO3 (substituted for NaCl with O2 bubbling). No significant differences were observed in ISC-amil/sen between control and 30 mM butyrate without HCO3. Under HCO3-free conditions, the epithelium did not have the endurance required for a long-term experiment with the third amiloride application; therefore, this comparison was performed on the second amiloride application. Values are the means ± SE (n = 8). b Effects of butyrate on the shift in amiloride-insensitive ISC (ISC-amil/insen shift). No significant differences were observed in ISC-amil/insen shift with or without HCO3 (substituted for NaCl with O2 bubbling). c Ibuprofen (Ibu; 300 μM) did not affect ISC after the application of amiloride with butyrate. d Effects of 30 mM butyrate applied to the apical side on short-circuit currents (ISC) in rat rectal colonic mucosa. e Effects of 30 mM butyrate applied to the basolateral side on ISC. f Averaged ISC-amil/insen shift by the application of butyrate to the apical, basolateral, or both sides. Values are the means ± SE. Numbers in parentheses refer to the number of experiments

The apical application of 30 mM butyrate only induced a markedly reduced ISC-amil/insen shift (−2.3 ± 1.2 μA/cm2, n = 17; Fig. 5d, f). These values may have been underestimated because we did not compensate for liquid junction potential in the transepithelial electrical potential difference. In contrast, the basolateral application of 30 mM butyrate caused an ISC-amil/insen shift with a value of −31.0 ± 2.5 μA/cm2 (n = 5; Fig. 5e, f).

Expression of MCTs in rat rectal colon

The expression of MCTs on the isolated rat mucosa was confirmed using an RT-PCR analysis. Figure 6 shows that the mucosae of the rectal colon (RC), distal colon (DC), and ileum (IL) expressed Slc16a1 (MCT1), Slc16a3 (MCT4), and Slc16a4 (MCT5), but not Slc16a8 (MCT3) (n = 3 animals).
Fig. 6

RT-PCR analysis of H+-coupled monocarboxylate transporters. An ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel shows RT-PCR products generated from total RNA isolated from the mucosa of rectal colon (RC), distal colon (DC), and ileum (IL). The primers used gave the expected fragment lengths for Slc16a1 (859 bp; a), Slc16a3 (929 bp; b), Slc16a4 (880 bp; c), and Slc16a8 (717 bp; d). First-strand cDNA was generated with SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (RT, +). No DNA fragment was amplified with the template without reverse transcription (−). B in panels c and d, positive controls obtained from brain. A representative gel for at least three independent experiments is shown. M, molecular mass

Expression of α- and β-subunits of KCNQ channels in rat rectal colon

The apical addition of XE991, a KCNQ-type K+ channel inhibitor, reduced the ISC-amil/insen shift. Thus, we examined the expression of the α- and β-subunits of KCNQ channels on the isolated rat mucosa using a RT-PCR analysis. Figure 7 shows that the mucosae of rectal colon (RC), distal colon (DC), and ileum (IL) expressed Kcnq1 (Kv7.1), Kcnq2 (Kv7.2), Kcnq4 (Kv7.4), Kcnq5 (Kv7.5), Kcne2, Kcne3, Kcne4, and Kcne5; however, Kcnq3 (Kv7.3) and Kcne1 were not detected (n = 3 animals).
Fig. 7

RT-PCR analysis of α- and β-subunits of KCNQ channels from the mucosa of rectal colon (RC), distal colon (DC), and ileum (IL). The primers used gave the expected fragment lengths for Kcnq1 (613 bp; a), Kcnq2 (510 bp; b), Kcnq3 (790 bp; c), Kcnq4 (664 bp; d), Kcnq5 (502 bp; e), Kcne1 (281 bp; f), Kcne2 (224 bp; g), Kcne3 (232 bp; h), Kcne4 (476 bp; i), and Kcne5 (228 bp; j). RNA was treated with (+) or without (−) reverse transcriptase (RT). Positive controls obtained from brain (B) or kidney (K). A representative gel for at least three independent experiments is shown. M, molecular mass

Immunolocalization of KCNQ subunits in rat rectal colon

The immunolocalization of KCNQ subunits was examined with paraffin sections of the rat rectal colon (n = 3 animals). Immunofluorescence ascribed to KCNQ2 colocalized with Ezrin, an A-kinase anchoring protein, to the luminal membrane of surface cells in rat rectal colon (Fig. 8a–c). Immunofluorescence on the luminal membranes was diminished with KCNQ2 antibody, which was pre-absorbed with the control peptide antigen for the negative control (Fig. 8d). Additionally, immunofluorescence in the luminal membrane of surface cells was detected by antibodies against KCNQ4 (not shown). Antibodies against the KCNQ4 and KCNE3 subunits showed immunofluorescence in the luminal membranes of crypt cells (Fig. 8e–g and i–k, respectively). Immunofluorescence in the crypt cells was also detected by antibodies against KCNQ2 (not shown). However, antibodies against the KCNQ1 subunit did not show immunofluorescence in the luminal membrane, but did in the basolateral membrane of crypt cells (Fig. 8m–o), as reported previously [48]. Immunofluorescence was reduced when antibodies were pre-absorbed with the control peptide antigens (Fig. 8l, p).
Fig. 8

Immunolocalization of α- and β-subunits of KCNQ channels in the rat rectal colon. a Fluorescence of KCNQ2 on the luminal membranes of surface cells (arrowheads). b Fluorescence image of ezrin. c Overlay image of a and b. d Overlay image of ezrin and green fluorescence with KCNQ2 antibody pre-absorbed with the control peptide antigen. e Fluorescence of KCNQ4 on the luminal membrane of crypt cells (arrowheads). Fluorescence images of ezrin (f), the overlay (g), and negative control with the pre-absorbed KCNQ4 antibody (h). i Fluorescence of KCNE3 on the luminal membrane of crypt cells (arrowheads). Fluorescence images of ezrin (j), the overlay (k), and negative control with the pre-absorbed KCNE3 antibody (l). Fluorescence of KCNQ1 (m), ezrin (n), and the overlay (o) in crypts. Arrowheads show the luminal membrane of crypt cells. p Negative control with the pre-absorbed KCNQ1 antibody. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (blue). Bars = 20 μm


Possible involvement of KCNQ-type K+ channels in cation secretion by butyrate in rat rectal colon

In the present study, we demonstrated that butyrate regulated K+ secretion through KCNQ-type K+ channels in the apical membrane of rat rectal colon (Fig. 9). This conclusion was based on the following main results: the application of butyrate elicited a shift in ISC-amil/insen in a negative direction and in a concentration-dependent manner; the butyrate response was inhibited by a KCNQ-type K+ channel inhibitor and Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter inhibitor; a RT-PCR analysis confirmed the expression of KCNQ and KCNE subunits; an immunohistochemical analysis showed immunoreactivity for KCNQ2 and KCNQ4 in the luminal membranes of surface and crypt cells.
Fig. 9

Proposed model for the regulation of K+ secretion by butyrate in rat rectal colon. Butyrate was transported into epithelial cells via monocarboxylate transporter 1 and/or 4 (MCT1/4) and non-ionic diffusion via lipid membrane and affected K+ secretion through KCNQ-type K+ channels on the apical membrane

The apical addition of XE991, a KCNQ-type K+ channel inhibitor, inhibited the ISC-amil/insen shift with a Ki value of 34 μM. The K+ channel proteins of KCNQ2 and KCNQ4 were detected in the luminal membranes of surface and crypt cells in rat rectal colon, whereas the KCNQ1 protein was localized to the basolateral membrane of crypt cells (Fig. 8). Immunoreactivity for KCNQ4 was observed in muscle layers in murine distal colon as well as in crypt cells [33]. In addition, XE991 increased the integral of tension in a segment of distal colon circular muscle exhibiting spontaneous phasic contractions. Further studies will be required in order to investigate the combination of these subunits and elucidate the physiological role of KCNQ channels in colon.

Although XE991 inhibited 32% of butyrate-stimulated K+ secretion (ISC-amil/insen), we had yet to characterize the rest of K+ pathway on the apical membrane (Fig. 2). The apical application of 5 mM Ba2+, a non-specific K+ channel inhibitor [26], had no effect on butyrate-stimulated K+ secretion in the colonic mucosa. The efficacy of the Ba2+ blockade may have been markedly underestimated because binding with mucins and carbonate ions reduces the effective free concentration of Ba2+ in microenvironment near apical membrane. This Ba2+-insensitive K+ conductance was identified as a bupivacaine-sensitive two-pore domain K+ channel in H441 human airway epithelial cells [31]. However, bupivacaine did not exert inhibitory effects on butyrate-stimulated ISC-amil/insen in the mucosa in our preliminary experiments. Further studies will be required in order to characterize the electrophysiological and pharmacological properties of butyrate-stimulated K+ conductance at single cell level.

In the present study, the application of butyrate to both apical and basolateral solutions shifted ISC-amil/insen in a negative direction (Fig. 1a), indicating an increase in cation secretion or anion absorption and/or a decrease in cation absorption or anion secretion. The Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter is one of the transport systems that includes Na+ transport and supplies K+ and Cl from the basolateral membrane in the surface cells of the colonic epithelium [48, 50]. The basolateral application of bumetanide, a Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter inhibitor, inhibited the butyrate-induced ISC-amil/insen shift (Fig. 1c). Among ion transport pathways related to the Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter, an increase in K+ secretion matches the direction of the negative shift. On the other hand, a decrease in Cl secretion on the apical membrane via the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, CFTR, may not be involved in the shift by butyrate. We added 5 μM indomethacin to the basolateral solution to suppress the production of endogenous prostaglandins, which may have increased intracellular cAMP concentrations and, as a result, activated cAMP-activated CFTR Cl channels. Further experiments with specific inhibitors are required in order to elucidate the pathway of cation secretion in the rat rectal colon.

Transport pathway for butyrate in rat rectal colon

The relationship between the ISC-amil/insen shift and concentration of butyrate was fit well by the Hill equation (Fig. 4). The value of KD, 12.0 mM, corresponds approximately to that of 5.6 mM of the equine large intestine [41]. A KD value for the dependency of pHi acidification on propionate concentrations was reported as 32 mM [12]. Previous studies showed that the concentration of butyrate may reach approximately 10 to 20 mM in rat and other mammalian colons [54], implying that butyrate plays a physiological role in the transport of ions and intracellular factors. In addition, the KD value obtained in the present study was similar to that for the uptake of butyrate into luminal membrane vesicles in pig colon [49] and MCT1 in tumor cells [9]. This similarity supports the ISC-amil/insen shift being due to the absorption of butyrate through MCT1. The Hill coefficient, which was estimated to be 2.9, suggested that butyrate induces K+ secretion with positive cooperativity [3]. Previous studies described the transport of monocarboxylates or lactate via MCT1/4, particularly in the brain and muscle [25]. The SCFA/H+ transport ratio of MCT1 was shown to be 1:1 [4]. Furthermore, the transport of butyrate was found to be increased under acidic conditions [10]. Thus, butyrate may be absorbed by an electroneutral pathway via MCT1, MCT4, and/or MCT5 in the colon [19, 22, 25, 32].

The apical application of 30 mM butyrate caused a markedly smaller ISC-amil/insen shift than its basolateral application (Fig. 5f). Previous studies demonstrated that butyrate markedly changed the intracellular pH of enterocytes from the serosal rather than the mucosal side [8]. Immunohistochemical analyses also showed that MCT1 was predominantly distributed in the basolateral membrane of the surface epithelium and crypts of mice, rats, and humans [19, 32, 53]. In contrast, MCT1 was only weakly detected in the apical membrane of surface cells [53]. Thus, low permeability at the apical membrane serves as the rate-limiting step for the overall absorption of butyrate in colonic epithelial cells.

The negative shift caused by butyrate may also result from a decrease in cation absorption. However, the stoichiometry of SMCT1, which is considered to be 3:1 or 2:1 between Na+ and monocarboxylate [13, 14], is expected to induce an increase in cation absorption. Additionally, ibuprofen as an SMCT1 inhibitor [13, 42] did not exert any effects on ISC after the administration of butyrate (Fig. 5c). Thus, a large amount of butyrate was not transported via SMCT1 in rat rectal colon. Kaji et al. [36] recently showed that acetate (maximum concentration of 30 mM) activated ISC in rat duodenum and attributed this to the activation of SMCT1. However, in that study, HCO3-free bathing solution was used on the apical side and HCO3-containing bathing solution on the basolateral side. Differences in the region of the gastrointestinal tract and/or experimental settings may result in different conclusions.

Previous studies demonstrated that butyrate induced bicarbonate secretion and that SCFA was transported via the SCFA/HCO3 exchanger [2, 16]. SLC26A3 was also shown to be preferentially expressed over other SLC26 family members in rat rectal colon [52, 57]. SLC26A3 expressed in Xenopus oocytes only weakly transported butyrate [11]. However, no significant differences were observed in the ISC-amil/insen shift between control and HCO3-free conditions in rat rectal colon (Fig. 5b). While SLC26A3 and 6 also mediate SCFA/Cl exchange under HCO3-free conditions [40, 51], the SCFA/HCO3 exchange may not be the electrogenic transport pathway for butyrate.

Previous studies reported that rat rectal colon (RC), distal colon (DC), and ileum (IL) expressed the mRNAs of MCT1 and 4 [32], as well as those of SMCT1 [32, 42], SLC26A3, and SLC26A6 [46, 52]. In the present study, we confirmed expression at the mRNA level of Slc16a1 (MCT1), Slc16a3 (MCT4), and Slc16a4 (MCT5), which may participate in SCFA transport (Fig. 6). However, we cannot rule out unidentified transporters and non-ionic diffusion via the lipid membrane because butyrate is the most lipophilic SCFA [56].

Regulation of electrogenic Na+ transport via ENaC by butyrate

In our previous study, amiloride-sensitive ISC in rectal colon of rats fed a normal Na+ diet was enhanced after a 5- to 8-h incubation with aldosterone [29]. In addition, Zeissig et al. [61] showed that 1.25 mM butyrate increased dexamethasone-activated, electrogenic sodium absorption via ENaC in rat distal colon 8 h after its application. However, our results demonstrated that amiloride-sensitive ISC (ISC-amil/sen) was not affected by butyrate at a concentration of 30 mM within 1 h in rat rectal colon (Fig. 1a, b). These results indicated that butyrate regulated the transcription and/or translation of ENaC subunits as well as the insertion of channels into the apical membrane of enterocytes, but not the activity of ENaC in the short term.

Physiological significance of butyrate in colon

Previous studies demonstrated that butyrate and monocarboxylates decrease the intracellular pH of colonocytes in rodents [8, 17] and MCT1-expressing cells, respectively, without changing the membrane potential [4]. The acidification of cytosolic pH increased whole-cell currents in KCNQ1/KCNE1-expressing cells [55]. In addition, intracellular acidification with butyrate augmented the amplitude of voltage-dependent K+ currents in canine pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells [1]. KCNQ4 channels were shown to regulate the tone of rat pulmonary artery [34]. Thus, KCNQ4 channels may maintain the membrane potential of colonic epithelial cells under intracellular acidification with butyrate.

Butyrate also increased cell volume in rat distal colon [17]. KCNQ1 and KCNQ4 channels were regulated by cell volume changes through the interaction of the N terminus of the channel protein with the cytoskeleton in Xenopus oocytes [24]. Previous findings suggested that phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) was involved in the volume sensitivity of KCNQ1/KCNE1 channels expressed in COS-7 cells [43]. It was hypothesized that the intracellular concentrations of Mg2+ and polyamines are diluted during cell swelling, resulting in a weaker interaction between these cations and PIP2, leading to channel activation. KCNQ-type K+ channels may have been regulated by butyrate via intracellular pH and cell volume changes in colonic cells. However, the metabolism of butyrate, even in the presence of glucose, may lead to the production of substrates, such as ATP, which stimulate K+ channels.

The concentration of SCFAs in peripheral blood was one thousandth that in the large intestine, suggesting that SCFAs are actively metabolized both in the gastrointestinal tract and in other organs such as liver and muscles [44]. However, a previous study revealed that the concentration of SCFAs in peripheral blood of patients with acute salmonellosis caused by Salmonella enteritidis and S. typhimurium was significantly and consistently higher, from 5- to 20-fold, than that in healthy subjects [39]. Many pathogens interact with elements of the intestinal barrier, which emphasizes the importance of bacterial-host interactions. For example, they have been shown to compromise epithelial tight junctions, resulting in the excessive translation of luminal contents, including butyrate, into the systemic circulation [6]. Although the pathophysiological concentration of butyrate in the basolateral interstitium currently remains unknown, butyrate may be taken into colonic cells via basolateral MCTs from interstitial fluid and metabolized. The results of the present study indicate that KCNQ-type K+ channels contribute to intestinal secretion, flushing out enteric bacteria, and maintaining the environment in the lumen.

In conclusion, we herein showed that butyrate regulated K+ secretion through KCNQ-type K+ channels and may be absorbed by an electroneutral pathway via H+-coupled MCTs, such as MCT1, in the apical membrane of rat rectal colon. KCNQ-type K+ channels composed of KCNQ2 and KCNQ4 may play a role in intestinal secretion and defense mechanisms in the case of infection and loss of epithelial integrity.


Funding information

This work was supported by the Pancreas Research Foundation of Japan and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (24790226). N. Andharia was supported by the Rotary Yoneyama Memorial Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.


  1. 1.
    Ahn DS, Hume JR (1997) pH regulation of voltage-dependent K+ channels in canine pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. Pflügers Arch 433(6):758–765. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aschenbach JR, Bilk S, Tadesse G, Stumpff F, Gäbel G (2009) Bicarbonate-dependent and bicarbonate-independent mechanisms contribute to nondiffusive uptake of acetate in the ruminal epithelium of sheep. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296(5):G1098–G1107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babu E, Ananth S, Veeranan-Karmegam R, Coothankandaswamy V, Smith SB, Boettger T, Ganapathy V, Martin PM (2011) Transport via SLC5A8 (SMCT1) is obligatory for 2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylate to enhance glutathione production in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(8):5749–5757. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker HM, Bröer S, Deitmer JW (2004) Facilitated lactate transport by MCT1 when coexpressed with the sodium bicarbonate cotransporter (NBC) in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys J 86(1):235–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binder HJ, Rawlins CL (1973) Effect of conjugated dihydroxy bile salts on electrolyte transport in rat colon. J Clin Invest 52(6):1460–1466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bischoff SC, Barbara G, Buurman W, Ockhuizen T, Schulzke JD, Serino M, Tilg H, Watson A, Wells JM (2014) Intestinal permeability – a new target for disease prevention and therapy. BMC Gastroenterol 14(189).
  7. 7.
    Bröer S, Schneider HP, Bröer A, Rahman B, Hamprecht B, Deitmer JW (1998) Characterization of the monocarboxylate transporter 1 expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes by changes in cytosolic pH. Biochem J 333(1):167–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Busche R, Bartels J, Kirschberger S, von Engelhardt W (2002) Intracellular pH regulation in guinea-pig caecal and colonic enterocytes during and after loading with short-chain fatty acids and ammonia. Pflügers Arch 444(6):785–794. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpenter L, Halestrap AP (1994) The kinetics, substrate and inhibitor specificity of the lactate transporter of Ehrlich-Lettre tumour cells studied with the intracellular pH indicator BCECF. Biochem J 304(3):751–760. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charney AN, Micic L, Egnor RW (1998) Nonionic diffusion of short-chain fatty acids across rat colon. Am J Phys 274(3):G518–G524. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chernova MN, Jiang L, Shmukler BE, Schweinfest CW, Blanco P, Freedman SD, Stewart AK, Alper SL (2003) Acute regulation of the SLC26A3 congenital chloride diarrhoea anion exchanger (DRA) expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol 549(1):3–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chu S, Montrose MH (1995) An Na+-independent short-chain fatty acid transporter contributes to intracellular pH regulation in murine colonocytes. J Gen Physiol 105(5):589–615. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coady MJ, Chang MH, Charron FM, Plata C, Wallendorff B, Sah JF, Markowitz SD, Romero MF, Lapointe JY (2004) The human tumour suppressor gene SLC5A8 expresses a Na+-monocarboxylate cotransporter. J Physiol 557(3):719–731. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coady MJ, Wallendorff B, Bourgeois F, Charron F, Lapointe JY (2007) Establishing a definitive stoichiometry for the Na+/monocarboxylate cotransporter SMCT1. Biophys J 93(7):2325–2331. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dagher PC, Egnor RW, Taglietta-Kohlbrecher A, Charney AN (1996) Short-chain fatty acids inhibit cAMP-mediated chloride secretion in rat colon. Am J Phys 271(6):C1853–C1860. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dengler F, Rackwitz R, Benesch F, Pfannkuche H, Gäbel G (2014) Bicarbonate-dependent transport of acetate and butyrate across the basolateral membrane of sheep rumen epithelium. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 210(2):403–414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diener M, Helmle-Kolb C, Murer H, Scharrer E (1993) Effect of short-chain fatty acids on cell volume and intracellular pH in rat distal colon. Pflügers Arch 424(3–4):216–223. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Encarnação JC, Abrantes AM, Pires AS, Botelho MF (2015) Revisit dietary fiber on colorectal cancer: butyrate and its role on prevention and treatment. Cancer Metastasis Rev 34(3):465–478. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frank H, Gröger N, Diener M, Becker C, Braun T, Boettger T (2008) Lactaturia and loss of sodium-dependent lactate uptake in the colon of SLC5A8-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 283(36):24729–24737. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frizzell RA, Koch MJ, Schultz SG (1976) Ion transport by rabbit colon. I. Active and passive components. J Membr Biol 27(3):297–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ganapathy V, Thangaraju M, Prasad PD, Martin PM, Singh N (2013) Transporters and receptors for short-chain fatty acids as the molecular link between colonic bacteria and the host. Curr Opin Pharmacol 13(6):869–874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gill RK, Saksena S, Alrefai WA, Sarwar Z, Goldstein JL, Carroll RE, Ramaswamy K, Dudeja PK (2005) Expression and membrane localization of MCT isoforms along the length of the human intestine. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289(4):C846–C852. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gopal E, Fei YJ, Sugawara M, Miyauchi S, Zhuang L, Martin P, Smith SB, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V (2004) Expression of slc5a8 in kidney and its role in Na+-coupled transport of lactate. J Biol Chem 279(43):44522–44532. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grunnet M, Jespersen T, MacAulay N, Jørgensen NK, Schmitt N, Pongs O, Olesen SP, Klaerke DA (2003) KCNQ1 channels sense small changes in cell volume. J Physiol 549(2):419–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halestrap AP, Meredith D (2004) The SLC16 gene family-from monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) to aromatic amino acid transporters and beyond. Pflügers Arch 447(5):619–628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Halm DR, Frizzell RA (1986) Active K transport across rabbit distal colon: relation to Na absorption and Cl secretion. Am J Phys 251(2):C252–C267. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hayashi M, Inagaki A, Novak I, Matsuda H (2016) The adenosine A2B receptor is involved in anion secretion in human pancreatic duct Capan-1 epithelial cells. Pflügers Arch 468(7):1171–1181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hörger S, Schultheiß G, Diener M (1998) Segment-specific effects of epinephrine on ion transport in the colon of the rat. Am J Phys 275(6):G1367–G1376. Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Inagaki A, Yamaguchi S, Ishikawa T (2004) Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel currents in surface cells of rat rectal colon. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286(2):C380–C390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Inagaki A, Yamaguchi S, Takahashi-Iwanaga H, Iwanaga T, Ishikawa T (2010) Functional characterization of a ClC-2-like Cl– conductance in surface epithelial cells of rat rectal colon. J Membr Biol 235(1):27–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Inglis SK, Brown SG, Constable MJ, McTavish N, Olver RE, Wilson SM (2007) A Ba2+-resistant, acid-sensitive K+ conductance in Na+-absorbing H441 human airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 292(5):L1304–L1312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Iwanaga T, Takebe K, Kato I, Karaki S, Kuwahara A (2006) Cellular expression of monocarboxylate transporters (MCT) in the digestive tract of the mouse, rat, and humans, with special reference to slc5a8. Biomed Res 27(5):243–254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jepps TA, Greenwood IA, Moffatt JD, Sanders KM, Ohya S (2009) Molecular and functional characterization of Kv7 K+ channel in murine gastrointestinal smooth muscles. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 297(1):G107–G115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Joshi S, Sedivy V, Hodyc D, Herget J, Gurney AM (2009) KCNQ modulators reveal a key role for KCNQ potassium channels in regulating the tone of rat pulmonary artery smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 329(1):368–376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaji I, Karaki S, Kuwahara A (2011) Effects of luminal thymol on epithelial transport in human and rat colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300(6):G1132–G1143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaji I, Iwanaga T, Watanabe M, Guth PH, Engel E, Kaunitz JD, Akiba Y (2015) SCFA transport in rat duodenum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 308(3):G188–G197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Karaki S, Kuwahara A (2011) Propionate-induced epithelial K+ and Cl–/HCO3– secretion and free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFA2, GPR43) expression in the guinea pig distal colon. Pflügers Arch 461(1):141–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kirat D, Matsuda Y, Yamashiki N, Hayashi H, Kato S (2007) Expression, cellular localization, and functional role of monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. Gene 391(1–2):140–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ktsoyan ZA, Mkrtchyan MS, Zakharyan MK, Mnatsakanyan AA, Arakelova KA, Gevorgyan ZU, Sedrakyan AM, Hovhannisyan AI, Arakelyan AA, Aminov RI (2016) Systemic concentrations of short chain fatty acids are elevated in salmonellosis and exacerbation of familial mediterranean fever. Front Microbiol 7(776).
  40. 40.
    Kunzelmann K, Mall M (2002) Electrolyte transport in the mammalian colon: mechanisms and implications for disease. Physiol Rev 82(1):245–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nedjadi T, Moran AW, Al-Rammahi MA, Shirazi-Beechey SP (2014) Characterization of butyrate transport across the luminal membranes of equine large intestine. Exp Physiol 99(10):1335–1347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paroder V, Spencer SR, Paroder M, Arango D, Schwartz S Jr, Mariadason JM, Augenlicht LH, Eskandari S, Carrasco N (2006) Na+/monocarboxylate transport (SMCT) protein expression correlates with survival in colon cancer: molecular characterization of SMCT. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(19):7270–7275. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Piron J, Choveau FS, Amarouch MY, Rodriguez N, Charpentier F, Mérot J, Baró I, Loussouarn G (2010) KCNE1-KCNQ1 osmoregulation by interaction of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate with Mg2+ and polyamines. J Physiol 588(18):3471–3483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pouteau E, Meirim I, Métairon S, Fay LB (2001) Acetate, propionate and butyrate in plasma: determination of the concentration and isotopic enrichment by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with positive chemical ionization. J Mass Spectrom 36(7):798–805. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rajendran VM, Binder HJ (1994) Apical membrane Cl-butyrate exchange: mechanism of short chain fatty acid stimulation of active chloride absorption in rat distal colon. J Membr Biol 141(1):51–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rajendran VM, Black J, Ardito TA, Sangan P, Alper SL, Schweinfest C, Kashgarian M, Binder HJ (2000) Regulation of DRA and AE1 in rat colon by dietary Na depletion. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 279(5):G931–G942. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reynolds DA, Rajendran VM, Binder HJ (1993) Bicarbonate-stimulated [14C]butyrate uptake in basolateral membrane vesicles of rat distal colon. Gastroenterology 105(3):725–732. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reynolds A, Parris A, Evans LA, Lindqvist S, Sharp P, Lewis M, Tighe R, Williams MR (2007) Dynamic and differential regulation of NKCC1 by calcium and cAMP in the native human colonic epithelium. J Physiol 582(2):507–524. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ritzhaupt A, Ellis A, Hosie KB, Shirazi-Beechey SP (1998) The characterization of butyrate transport across pig and human colonic luminal membrane. J Physiol 507(3):819–830. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sørensen MV, Strandsby AB, Larsen CK, Praetorius HA, Leipziger J (2011) The secretory KCa1.1 channel localises to crypts of distal mouse colon: functional and molecular evidence. Pflügers Arch 462(5):745–752. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stumpff F (2018) A look at the smelly side of physiology: transport of short chain fatty acids. Pflügers Arch 470(4):571–598. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Talbot C, Lytle C (2010) Segregation of Na/H exchanger-3 and Cl/HCO3 exchanger SLC26A3 (DRA) in rodent cecum and colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 299(2):G358–G367. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tamai I, Sai Y, Ono A, Kido Y, Yabuuchi H, Takanaga H, Satoh E, Ogihara T, Amano O, Izeki S, Tsuji A (1999) Immunohistochemical and functional characterization of pH-dependent intestinal absorption of weak organic acids by the monocarboxylic acid transporter MCT1. J Pharm Pharmacol 51(10):1113–1121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Topping DL, Clifton PM (2001) Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev 81(3):1031–1064. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Unsöld B, Kerst G, Brousos H, Hübner M, Schreiber R, Nitschke R, Greger R, Bleich M (2000) KCNE1 reverses the response of the human K+ channel KCNQ1 to cytosolic pH changes and alters its pharmacology and sensitivity to temperature. Pflügers Arch 441(2–3):368–378. Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    von Engelhardt W, Burmester M, Hansen K, Becker G, Rechkemmer G (1993) Effects of amiloride and ouabain on short-chain fatty acid transport in guinea-pig large intestine. J Physiol 460:455–466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wang Z, Petrovic S, Mann E, Soleimani M (2002) Identification of an apical Cl–/HCO3– exchanger in the small intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 282(3):G573–G579. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yajima T (1988) Luminal propionate-induced secretory response in the rat distal colon in vitro. J Physiol 403:559–575. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yajima T, Suzuki T, Suzuki Y (1988) Synergism between calcium-mediated and cyclic AMP-mediated activation of chloride secretion in isolated guinea pig distal colon. Jpn J Physiol 38(4):427–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zaharia V, Varzescu M, Djavadi I, Newman E, Egnor RW, Alexander-Chacko J, Charney AN (2001) Effects of short chain fatty acids on colonic Na+ absorption and enzyme activity. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 128(2):335–347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zeissig S, Fromm A, Mankertz J, Weiske J, Zeitz M, Fromm M, Schulzke JD (2007) Butyrate induces intestinal sodium absorption via Sp3-mediated transcriptional up-regulation of epithelial sodium channels. Gastroenterology 132(1):236–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Research Project, Institute of Biomedical SciencesTokushima University Graduate SchoolTokushimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyKansai Medical UniversityHirakataJapan

Personalised recommendations