Skip to main content
Log in

Authors’ reply to Medeiros et al.: Make it easier! Evaluation of the ‘vagal-sympathetic effect’ in different conditions with R–R intervals monitoring

  • Reply
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

HRV:

Heart rate variability

LF:

Low frequency power

LF:HF:

Low frequency to high frequency ratio

RMSSD:

Root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval differences

SDNN:

Standard deviation of normal-to-normal R–R intervals

SDNN:RMSSD:

The ratio between standard deviation of normal-to-normal R–R intervals to root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval differences

References

  • Billman GE (2013) The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance. Front Physiol 4:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Esco MR, Flatt AA (2014) Ultra-short-term heart rate variability indexes at rest and post-exercise in athletes: evaluating the agreement with accepted recommendations. J Sports Sci Med 13:535–541

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Esco MR, Williford HN, Flatt AA, Freeborn TJ, Nakamura FY (2018) Ultra-shortened time-domain HRV parameters at rest and following exercise in athletes: an alternative to frequency computation of sympathovagal balance. Eur J Appl Physiol 118:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros AR, Michael S, Boullosa DA (2018) Make it easier! Evaluation of the vagal-sympathetic effect in different conditioning with R–R intervals monitoring. Eur J Appl Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3855-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nussinovitch U, Elishkevitz KP, Katz K, Nussinovitch M, Segev S, Volovitz B, Nussinovitch N (2011) Reliability of ultra-short ECG indices for heart rate variability. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 16:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00417.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996) Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 93:1043–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MRE and MVF wrote the response letter. All other authors were involved in the original publication. All authors read and approved of the response letter.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Esco.

Additional information

Communicated by Editors-in-Chief Westerterp/Westerblad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esco, M.R., Williford, H.N., Flatt, A.A. et al. Authors’ reply to Medeiros et al.: Make it easier! Evaluation of the ‘vagal-sympathetic effect’ in different conditions with R–R intervals monitoring. Eur J Appl Physiol 118, 1289–1290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3856-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3856-5

Keywords

Navigation