Pacing accuracy in collegiate and recreational runners
- 250 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
To examine runners’ ability to produce a prescribed pace, we compared prescribed versus actual 400 m splits for collegiate (COL, n = 12) and recreational runners (REC, n = 16). Participants completed a VO2max trial and on a 400 m track, three 3,200 m time trials. During three subsequent sessions, participants completed 800 m warm-up; then, based on their fastest 3,200 m steady pace, subjects completed six laps total at three prescribed paces: (a) 2× 400 m at 7% slower than steady pace (SLO), (b) 2× 400 m at steady pace (AT) and (c) 2× 400 m at 7% faster than steady pace (FAS). Instructions were to complete the sets of two laps in prescribed times (e.g., 75 s per 400 m) (no feedback). Deviation scores (absolute value of difference: prescribed vs. actual time) (s) for each 400 m lap were compared using a 2 (group) × 3 (trial) repeated measures ANOVA. Main effects for deviations among trials SLO (7.3 ± 6.5), AT (6.6 ± 6.9) and FAS (6.2 ± 5.7) were not significantly different (p > 0.05). However, group main effect for deviation scores was significantly (p < 0.05) lower (greater accuracy) for COL (2.9 ± 3.2 s) versus REC (9.5 ± 6.6 s). Deviation scores were also significantly different (p < 0.05) for SLO (COL: 3.1 ± 2.7 s, REC: 10.4 ± 6.7 s) and AT (COL: 1.9 ± 1.9 s, REC: 10.1 ± 7.2 s), with a trend for FAS (p = 0.06) (COL: 3.8 ± 4.3 s, REC: 7.9 ± 6.1 s). Bland–Altman plots showed better agreement (prescribed vs. actual) for COL. Experience and fitness of collegiate runners resulted in improved pacing accuracy.
Keywords
Running splits Pacing Racing FitnessReferences
- Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ansley A, Schabort E, Gibson A, Lambert M, Noakes TD (2004) Regulation of pacing strategies during successive 4-km time trials. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1819–1825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bannister R (2002) (Interview), website: http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/ban0int-1
- Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 346:1085–1087CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borg G (1982) Psychological bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:377–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Firth M (1998) From high-tech to low tech: another look at time trail pacing strategy. Coaching News 3:7–10Google Scholar
- Foster C, Snyder AC, Thompson NN, Green MA, Foley M, Schrager M (1993) Effect of pacing strategy on cycle time trial performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:383–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maud PJ, Foster C (2006) Physiological assessment of human fitness. Human Kinetics, Champagne, ILGoogle Scholar
- Pollock ML, Schmidt DH, Jackson AS (1980) Measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition in the clinical setting. Clin Therapy 6:12–27Google Scholar
- Sapp AL, Green JM, Bishop PA, Richardson M, Kerr K, Pritchett RC, Curtner-Smith M, Geisen J (2007) Pacing strategies: effects of experience and gender in runners during a 3200-m time trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:S349Google Scholar
- Tucker R, Lambert MI, Noakes TD (2004) An analysis of pacing strategies during men’s world-record performances in track athletics. Int J Sports Physiol Perf 1:233–245Google Scholar