Advertisement

Associations of psychosocial working conditions with health outcomes, quality of care and intentions to leave the profession: results from a cross-sectional study among physician assistants in Germany

  • Patricia Vu-Eickmann
  • Jian Li
  • Andreas Müller
  • Peter Angerer
  • Adrian Loerbroks
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Numerous epidemiological studies among health care staff have documented associations of adverse psychosocial working conditions with poorer health-related outcomes, a reduced quality of patient care and intentions to leave the profession. The evidence for physician assistants in Germany remains limited though.

Methods

We surveyed a total of 994 physician assistants between September 2016 and April 2017. Psychosocial working conditions were measured by the established effort–reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire and by a questionnaire specifically developed to capture psychosocial working conditions among physicians. Health outcomes (i.e., self-rated health, depression, anxiety), self-rated quality of care and the intention to leave the profession were assessed by established measures. We ran multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

The prevalence of work stress in terms of ERI equalled 73.77%. Work stress according to the ERI model was associated with significantly poorer self-rated health [odds ratio (OR) 3.62], elevated symptoms of depression (OR 8.83) and anxiety (OR 4.95), poorer quality of care (OR for medical errors 4.04; OR for interference of work with patient care 3.88) and an increased intention to leave one’s current profession (OR 3.74). The PA-specific questionnaire showed similar, albeit weaker, associations (all ORs > 1.22).

Conclusions

Our results are in line with previous findings among health care staff and provide specific and novel evidence for physician assistants. Interventions aiming at the improvement of working conditions seem needed given their potential adverse consequences in terms of employee health, quality of care, and personnel policy.

Keywords

Psychosocial working conditions Health care staff Health Quality of care Intention to leave 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Research Commission of the Medical Faculty of the University of Düsseldorf. We are grateful to the PAs for their participation in our study. We would also like to thank in particular the Association of Medical Professionals (VMF e.V.) for supporting our recruitment efforts as main cooperation partner. In addition, we are indebted to Dr. Mergenthal from the Institute for General Practice in Frankfurt for her recruitment support (via “AG WiForMFA” at the 2016 DEGAM Congress). We would also like to thank the following persons and institutions: (a) for forwarding study information to PAs in registered physician practices: association of statutory health insurance physicians Saarland and Mrs. Insa Seeger from the Department of Healthcare Research at the Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, (b) for forwarding study information to vocational training PA schools: association of statutory health insurance physicians Hamburg, (c) for distribution via internal distribution list and/or publication on their homepage: association of statutory health insurance physicians Brandenburg; section press and media of the association of statutory health insurance physicians Nordrhein; association of statutory health insurance physicians Sachsen; medical association Hamburg; Mr. Paul Hauschild, Managing Director of the local medical association of Trier; and Dr. Müller-Sacks of BAD GmbH.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Angerer P, Weigl M (2015) Physicians’ psychosocial work conditions and quality of care: a literature review. Prof Prof.  https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angerer P, Petru R, Nowak D, Weigl M (2008) Arbeitsbedingungen und Depression bei Ärzten. DMW Dtsch Med Wochenschr 133:26–29.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1017467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backé E-M, Seidler A, Latza U et al (2012) The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85:67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0643-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonde JPE (2008) Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Occup Environ Med 65:438–445.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2007.038430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Degen C, Li J, Angerer P (2015) Physicians’ intention to leave direct patient care: an integrative review. Hum Resour Health.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0068-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derycke H, Vlerick P, Burnay N et al (2010) Impact of the effort-reward imbalance model on intent to leave among Belgian health care workers: a prospective study. J Occup Organ Psychol 83:879–893.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X477594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dragano N, Siegrist J, Nyberg ST et al (2017) Effort–reward imbalance at work and incident coronary heart disease: a multicohort study of 90,164 individuals. Epidemiology 28:619–626.  https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gavartina A, Zaroti S, Szecsenyi J, Miksch A, Ose D, Campbell SM, Goetz K (2013) Practice assistants in primary care in Germany–associations with organizational attributes on job satisfaction. BMC Fam Pract 14(1):110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goetz K, Campbell SM, Steinhaeuser J et al (2011) Evaluation of job satisfaction of practice staff and general practitioners: an exploratory study. BMC Fam Pract 12:137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goetz K, Berger S, Gavartina A et al (2015) How psychosocial factors affect well-being of practice assistants at work in general medical care?—a questionnaire survey. BMC Fam Pract 16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0366-y
  11. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, GKV-Spitzenverband (2015) Vereinbarung über die Delegation ärztlicher Leistungen an nichtärztliches Personal in der ambulanten vertragsärztlichen Versorgung gemäß § 28 Abs. 1 S. 3 SGB V vom 1, Oktober 2013, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Kathmann T, Dingeldey I (2013) Prekarisierung berufsfachlich qualifizierter Beschäftigung? Eine Analyse der Arbeitsbedingungen von medizinischen Fachangestellten. Reihe Arbeit und Wirtschaft, BremenGoogle Scholar
  13. Kivimaki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M et al (2007) Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: complementary or redundant models? Occup Environ Med 64:659–665.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.031310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein J, Frie KG, Blum K et al (2010) Berufliche Gratifikationskrisen, job strain und Burnout bei chirurgisch tätigen Krankenhausärzten. PPmP Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 60:374–379.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1246173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein J, Frie KG, Blum K, von dem Knesebeck O (2011) Psychosocial stress at work and perceived quality of care among clinicians in surgery. BMC Health Serv Res.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kraatz S, Lang J, Kraus T et al (2013) The incremental effect of psychosocial workplace factors on the development of neck and shoulder disorders: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86:375–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0848-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Löwe B (2010) The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 32:345–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kurioka S, Inoue A, Tsutsumi A (2013) Optimum cut-off point of the Japanese short version of the effort-reward imbalance questionnaire. J Occup Health 55:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lampert T, Kroll LE, von der Lippe E et al (2013) Sozioökonomischer status und Gesundheit: Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 56:814–821.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-013-1695-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larisch M, Joksimovic L, von dem Knesebeck O et al (2003) Berufliche Gratifikationskrisen und depressive Symptome. PPmP Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 53:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li J, Galatsch M, Siegrist J et al (2011) Reward frustration at work and intention to leave the nursing profession—prospective results from the European longitudinal NEXT study. Int J Nurs Stud 48:628–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li J, Shang L, Galatsch M et al (2013a) Psychosocial work environment and intention to leave the nursing profession: a cross-national prospective study of eight countries. Int J Health Serv 43:519–536.  https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.43.3.i CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li J, Weigl M, Glaser J et al (2013b) Changes in psychosocial work environment and depressive symptoms: a prospective study in junior physicians: changes in ERI and depressive symptoms. Am J Ind Med 56:1414–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loerbroks A, Meng H, Chen M-L et al (2014) Primary school teachers in China: associations of organizational justice and effort–reward imbalance with burnout and intentions to leave the profession in a cross-sectional sample. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:695–703.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0912-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loerbroks A, Weigl M, Li J, Angerer P (2016) Effort–reward imbalance and perceived quality of patient care: a cross-sectional study among physicians in Germany. BMC Public Health.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3016-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mark G, Smith AP (2012) Occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and the mental health of nurses: stress and nurses. Br J Health Psychol 17:505–521.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02051.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Msaouel P, Keramaris NC, Apostolopoulos AP et al (2012) The effort–reward imbalance questionnaire in Greek: translation, validation and psychometric properties in health professionals. J Occup Health 54:119–130.  https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.11-0197-OA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M (2010) Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occup Med 60:277–286.  https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rau R, Henkel D (2013) Zusammenhang von Arbeitsbelastungen und psychischen Erkrankungen: review der Datenlage. Nervenarzt 84:791–798.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-013-3743-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rössler W (2012) Stress, burnout, and job dissatisfaction in mental health workers. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 262:65–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-012-0353-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rugulies R, Aust B, Madsen IE (2017) Effort–reward imbalance at work and risk of depressive disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 43:294–306.  https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegrist J (2012) Die ärztliche Rolle im Wandel. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 55:1100–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1527-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T et al (2004) The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00351-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2016a) Staat & Gesellschaft - Berufliche Bildung - Neu abgeschlossene Ausbildungsverträge. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  36. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2016b) Staat & Gesellschaft - Berufliche Bildung - Weibliche Auszubildende. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  37. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2017) Anzahl der Beschäftigten im Gesundheitswesen 2015 in Deutschland nach Berufen, Einrichtungen, Art der Beschäftigung. Alter und Geschlecht, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  38. Szecsenyi J, Goetz K, Campbell S et al (2011) Is the job satisfaction of primary care team members associated with patient satisfaction? BMJ Qual Saf 20:508–514.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2009.038166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trybou J, Germonpre S, Janssens H et al (2014) Job-related stress and sickness absence among Belgian nurses: a prospective study: job-related stress among nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh 46:292–301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsutsumi A, Kawanami S, Horie S (2012) Effort–reward imbalance and depression among private practice physicians. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85:153–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0656-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Viehmann A, Kersting C, Thielmann A, Weltermann B (2017) Prevalence of chronic stress in general practitioners and practice assistants: personal, practice and regional characteristics. PLOS ONE 12:e0176658.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Virtanen P, Oksanen T, Kivimaki M et al (2008) Work stress and health in primary health care physicians and hospital physicians. Occup Environ Med 65:364–366.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2007.034793 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. von dem Knesebeck O, Klein J, Grosse Frie K et al (2010) Psychosocial stress among hospital doctors in surgical fields: results of a Nationwide Survey in Germany. Dtsch Aerzteblatt Online.  https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vu-Eickmann P, Loerbroks A (2017a) Psychosoziale Arbeitsbedingungen Medizinischer Fachangestellter: Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie zu den berufsspezifischen Belastungen, Ressourcen, Präventionsmöglichkeiten und Interventionsbedürfnissen. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 126:43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vu-Eickmann P, Loerbroks A (2017b) Psychosoziale Arbeitsbedingungen und Versorgungsqualität: Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie unter Medizinischen Fachangestellten (MFAs). Gesundheitswesen 79:1–4 (in press)Google Scholar
  46. Weigl M, Hornung S, Angerer P et al (2013) The effects of improving hospital physicians working conditions on patient care: a prospective, controlled intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res 13:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ et al (2006) Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA 296:1071.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and SocietyMedical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Psychology, Work and Organizational PsychologyUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations