Associations of psychosocial working conditions with health outcomes, quality of care and intentions to leave the profession: results from a cross-sectional study among physician assistants in Germany
Numerous epidemiological studies among health care staff have documented associations of adverse psychosocial working conditions with poorer health-related outcomes, a reduced quality of patient care and intentions to leave the profession. The evidence for physician assistants in Germany remains limited though.
We surveyed a total of 994 physician assistants between September 2016 and April 2017. Psychosocial working conditions were measured by the established effort–reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire and by a questionnaire specifically developed to capture psychosocial working conditions among physicians. Health outcomes (i.e., self-rated health, depression, anxiety), self-rated quality of care and the intention to leave the profession were assessed by established measures. We ran multivariable logistic regression analyses.
The prevalence of work stress in terms of ERI equalled 73.77%. Work stress according to the ERI model was associated with significantly poorer self-rated health [odds ratio (OR) 3.62], elevated symptoms of depression (OR 8.83) and anxiety (OR 4.95), poorer quality of care (OR for medical errors 4.04; OR for interference of work with patient care 3.88) and an increased intention to leave one’s current profession (OR 3.74). The PA-specific questionnaire showed similar, albeit weaker, associations (all ORs > 1.22).
Our results are in line with previous findings among health care staff and provide specific and novel evidence for physician assistants. Interventions aiming at the improvement of working conditions seem needed given their potential adverse consequences in terms of employee health, quality of care, and personnel policy.
KeywordsPsychosocial working conditions Health care staff Health Quality of care Intention to leave
This study was funded by the Research Commission of the Medical Faculty of the University of Düsseldorf. We are grateful to the PAs for their participation in our study. We would also like to thank in particular the Association of Medical Professionals (VMF e.V.) for supporting our recruitment efforts as main cooperation partner. In addition, we are indebted to Dr. Mergenthal from the Institute for General Practice in Frankfurt for her recruitment support (via “AG WiForMFA” at the 2016 DEGAM Congress). We would also like to thank the following persons and institutions: (a) for forwarding study information to PAs in registered physician practices: association of statutory health insurance physicians Saarland and Mrs. Insa Seeger from the Department of Healthcare Research at the Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, (b) for forwarding study information to vocational training PA schools: association of statutory health insurance physicians Hamburg, (c) for distribution via internal distribution list and/or publication on their homepage: association of statutory health insurance physicians Brandenburg; section press and media of the association of statutory health insurance physicians Nordrhein; association of statutory health insurance physicians Sachsen; medical association Hamburg; Mr. Paul Hauschild, Managing Director of the local medical association of Trier; and Dr. Müller-Sacks of BAD GmbH.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Goetz K, Berger S, Gavartina A et al (2015) How psychosocial factors affect well-being of practice assistants at work in general medical care?—a questionnaire survey. BMC Fam Pract 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0366-y
- Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, GKV-Spitzenverband (2015) Vereinbarung über die Delegation ärztlicher Leistungen an nichtärztliches Personal in der ambulanten vertragsärztlichen Versorgung gemäß § 28 Abs. 1 S. 3 SGB V vom 1, Oktober 2013, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Kathmann T, Dingeldey I (2013) Prekarisierung berufsfachlich qualifizierter Beschäftigung? Eine Analyse der Arbeitsbedingungen von medizinischen Fachangestellten. Reihe Arbeit und Wirtschaft, BremenGoogle Scholar
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Löwe B (2010) The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 32:345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lampert T, Kroll LE, von der Lippe E et al (2013) Sozioökonomischer status und Gesundheit: Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 56:814–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-013-1695-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loerbroks A, Meng H, Chen M-L et al (2014) Primary school teachers in China: associations of organizational justice and effort–reward imbalance with burnout and intentions to leave the profession in a cross-sectional sample. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:695–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0912-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2016a) Staat & Gesellschaft - Berufliche Bildung - Neu abgeschlossene Ausbildungsverträge. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
- Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2016b) Staat & Gesellschaft - Berufliche Bildung - Weibliche Auszubildende. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
- Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (2017) Anzahl der Beschäftigten im Gesundheitswesen 2015 in Deutschland nach Berufen, Einrichtungen, Art der Beschäftigung. Alter und Geschlecht, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
- Vu-Eickmann P, Loerbroks A (2017a) Psychosoziale Arbeitsbedingungen Medizinischer Fachangestellter: Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie zu den berufsspezifischen Belastungen, Ressourcen, Präventionsmöglichkeiten und Interventionsbedürfnissen. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 126:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vu-Eickmann P, Loerbroks A (2017b) Psychosoziale Arbeitsbedingungen und Versorgungsqualität: Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie unter Medizinischen Fachangestellten (MFAs). Gesundheitswesen 79:1–4 (in press)Google Scholar