Advertisement

Work ability score of solvent-exposed workers

  • Heidi Furu
  • Markku Sainio
  • Hanna-Kaisa Hyvärinen
  • Ari Kaukiainen
Original Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Occupational chronic solvent encephalopathy (CSE), characterized by neurocognitive dysfunction, often leads to early retirement. However, only the more severe cases are diagnosed with CSE, and little is known about the work ability of solvent-exposed workers in general. The aim was to study memory and concentration symptoms, work ability and the effect of both solvent-related and non-occupational factors on work ability, in an actively working solvent-exposed population.

Methods

A questionnaire on exposure and health was sent to 3640 workers in four solvent-exposed fields, i.e. painters and floor-layers, boat builders, printers, and metal workers. The total number of responses was 1730. We determined the work ability score (WAS), a single question item of the Work Ability Index, and studied solvent exposure, demographic factors, Euroquest memory and concentration symptoms, chronic diseases, and employment status using univariate and multivariate analyses. The findings were compared to those of a corresponding national blue-collar reference population (n = 221), and a small cohort of workers with CSE (n = 18).

Results

The proportion of workers with memory and concentration symptoms was significantly associated with solvent exposure. The WAS of solvent-exposed workers was lower than that of the national blue-collar reference group, and the difference was significant in the oldest age group (those aged over 60). Solvent-exposed worker’s WAS were higher than those of workers diagnosed with CSE. The WAS were lowest among painters and floor-layers, followed by metal workers and printers, and highest among boat builders. The strongest explanatory factors for poor work ability were the number of chronic diseases, age and employment status. Solvent exposure was a weak independent risk factor for reduced WAS, comparable to a level of high alcohol consumption.

Conclusions

Even if memory and concentration symptoms were associated with higher solvent exposure, the effect of solvents on self-experienced work ability was relatively weak. This in line with the improved occupational hygiene and reduced solvent exposure levels in industrialized countries, thus the effect may be stronger in high-level exposure environments. As a single question, WAS is easily included, applicable, and recommendable in occupational screening questionnaires.

Keywords

Solvents Work ability Work ability score Chronic solvent encephalopathy Occupational disease 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Åhlström L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L (2010) The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health—a prospective study of women on long term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health 36:404–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Airila A, Hakanen J, Punakallio A, Lusa S, Luukkonen R (2012) Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85:915–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bäck B, Furu H, Kaukiainen A, Mikkola J, Mäkelä E, Saalo A, Surakka J, Säämänen A, Toppila E, Sainio M (2016) Veneenrakentajat—Liuotinaltistuksen hallinta työkyvyn tukena (Boatbuilders—controlling solvent exposure supports work ability). The Finnish Work Environment Fund, Helsinki (Finnish) Google Scholar
  4. Beck A, Steer R, Carbin M (1988) Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 8:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bethge M, Radoschewski F, Gutenbrunner C (2012) The Work Ability Index as a screening tool to identify the need for rehabilitation: longitudinal findings from the second german sociomedical panel of employees. J Rehabil Med 44:980–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldwell D, Armstong T, Barone N, Suder J, Evans M (2000) Hydrocarbon solvent exposure data: compilation and analysis of the literature. AIHA J 61:881–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen R, Seaton A (1996) The influence of study characteristics on the healthy worker effect: a multiple regression analysis. Occup Med 46:345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chouanière D, Cassitto M, Spurgeon A, Verdier A, Gilioli G (1997) An international questionnaire to explore neurotoxic symptoms. Environ Res 73:70–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniell W, Claypoole K, Checkoway H, Smith-Weller T, Dager S, Townes B, Rosenstock L (1999) Neuropsychological function in retired workers with previous long term occupational exposure to solvents. Occup Environ Med 56:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dick F (2006) Solvent neurotoxicity. Occup Environ Med 63:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dryson E, Ogden J (1998) Chronic solvent neurotoxicity in New Zealand: notified cases between 1993 and 1997. N Z Med J 111:425–427Google Scholar
  12. El Fassi M, Bocquet V, Maiery N, Lair M, Couffignal S, Mairiaux P (2013) Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score. BMC Public Health 13:305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furu H, Sainio M, Hyvärinen HK, Akila R, Bäck B, Uuksulainen S, Kaukiainen A (2012) Detecting chronic solvent encephalopathy in occupations at risk. Neurotoxicology 33:734–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furu H, Sainio M, Ahonen G, Hyvärinen HK, Kaukiainen A (2014) Cost of detecting a chronic solvent encephalopathy case by screening. Neurotoxicology 45:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J, Koskinen S (eds) (2006) Työkyvyn ulottuvuudet (The dimensions of workability). Finnish Centre for Pensions, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland, National Public Health Institute, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki (in Finnish, English abstract) Google Scholar
  16. Grand View Research (2015) Solvent market analysis by product (hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, ketones, chlorinated) by application (printing inks, paints and coatings, pharmaceuticals, adhesives and cosmetics) and segment forecasts to 2020. Market Research Report. http://www.grandviewresearch.com
  17. Gregersen P, Klausen H, Uldal Elsnab C (1987) Chronic toxic encephalopathy in solvent-exposed painters in Denmark 1976–1980: clinical cases and social consequences after a 5-year follow-up. Am J Ind Med 11:399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hyyppä M, Mäki J (2001) Individual-level relationships between social capital and self-rated health in a bilingual community. Prev Med 32:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jääskeläinen A, Kausto J, Seitsamo J, Ojajärvi A, Nygård C-H, Arjas E, Leino-Arjas P (2016) Work ability index and perceived work ability as predictors of disability pension: a prospective study among Finnish municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 42:490–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaila-Kangas L, Koskinen A, Pensola T, Mäkelä P, Leino-Arjas P (2016) Alcohol-induced morbidity and mortality by occupation: a population-based follow-up study of working Finns. Eur J Public Health 26:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaukiainen A, Riala R, Martikainen R, Akila R, Reijula K, Sainio M (2004) Solvent-related health effects among construction painters with decreasing exposure. Am J Ind Med 46:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaukiainen A, Akila R, Martikainen R, Sainio M (2009) Symptom screening in detection of occupational solvent-related encephalopathy. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kauppinen T, Mattila-Holappa P, Perkiö-Mäkelä M, Saalo A, Toikkanen J, Tuomivaara S, Uuksulainen S, Viluksela M, Virtanen S (2013) Työ ja terveys Suomessa 2012 (Work and health in Finland 2012). Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki (Finnish) Google Scholar
  24. Keski-Säntti P, Kaukiainen A, Hyvärinen HK, Sainio M (2010) Occupational chronic solvent encephalopathy in Finland 1995–2007: incidence and exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 83:703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim Y, Jeong K, Yog-Hun Y, Myoung-Soon O (2010) Occupational neurologic disorders in Korea. J Clin Neurol 64–72Google Scholar
  26. Kriston L, Hölzel L, Weiser AK, Berner MM, Härter M (2008) Meta-analysis: are 3 questions enough to detect unhealthy alcohol use. Ann Intern Med 149:879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leira H, Austrheim H, Wannag A (2006) Løysemiddelskader meldt arbeidstilsynet 1985–2005. Ramazzini 4:4–5 (Norwegian) Google Scholar
  28. Lundin A, Kjellberg K, Leijon O, Punnett L, Hemmingsson T (2016) The association between self-assessed future work ability and long-term sickness absence, disability pension and unemployment in a general working population: a 7-year follow-up study. J Occup Rehabil 26:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandell W, Eaton W, Garrison R (1992) Alcoholism and occupations: a review and analysis of 104 occupations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 16:734–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martimo KP, Varonen H, Husman K, Viikari-Juntura E (2007) Factors associated with self-assessed work ability. Occup Med 57:380–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer-Baron M, Blaszkewicz M, Henke H, Knapp G, Muttray A, Schäper M, van Thriel C (2008) The impact of solvent mixtures on neurobehavioral performance—conclusions from epidemiological data. Neurotoxicology 29:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikkelsen S (1997) Epidemiological update on solvent neurotoxicity. Environ Res 73:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrow L. Gibson C, Bagovich G, Stein L, Condray R, Scott A (2000) Increased incidence of anxiety and depressive disorders in persons with organic solvent exposure. Psychosom Med 62:746–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nordling Nilson L, Barregård L, Sällsten G, Hagberg S (2007) Self-reported symptoms and their effects on cognitive functioning in workers with past exposure to solvent-based glues: an 18-year follow-up. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nordling Nilson L, Karlson B, Nise G, Malmberg B, Ørbæk P (2010) Delayed manifestations of CNS effects in formerly exposed printers—a 20-year follow-up. Neurotoxicol Teratol 32:620–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perkiö-Mäkelä M, Hakanen J, Hirvonen M (2012) Työkyky, Työnimu ja työssäjatkamisajatukset (Work ability, work engagement and thoughts on continuing work). In: Perkiö-Mäkelä M, Kauppinen T (eds). Työ, terveys ja työssä jatkamisajatukset (Work, health and thoughts on continuing work), Finnish Institute of Occupational Health pp 99–120 (in Finnish, English summary) Google Scholar
  37. Roelen CAM, van Rhenen W, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJI, Twisk JWR, Heymans MW (2014) Work ability as prognostic risk marker of disability pension: single-item work ability score versus multi-item work ability index. Scand J Work Environ 40:428–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sainio M (2015) Neurotoxicity of solvents. In: Lotti M, Bleecker ML (eds), Handbook of clinical neurology, occupational neurology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 93–110Google Scholar
  39. Santonen T, Aitio A, Vainio H (2010) Organic chemicals. In: Baxter P, Aw TC, Cockcroft A, Durrington P, Harrington M (eds) Hunter’s diseases of occupations. CRC Press, Cornwall, pp 321–394Google Scholar
  40. Sell L (2009) Predicting long-term sickness absence and early retirement pension from self-reported work ability. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1133–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spee T, van Valen E, van Duivenbooden C, van der Laan G (2012) A screening programme on chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy among Dutch painters. Neurotoxicology 33:727–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taskinen H et al (2011) Terveystarkastukset työterveyshuollossa (Health Checks in Occupational Health Care). Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki (in Finnish) Google Scholar
  43. Teschke K, Olshan A, Daniels J, De Roos A, Parks C, Schulz M, Vaughan T (2002) Occupational exposure assessment in case–control studies: opportunities for improvement. Occup Environ Med 59:575–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Toppila E, Forsman P, Pyykkö I, Starck J, Tossavainen T, Uitti J, Oksa P (2006) Effect of styrene on postural stability among reinforced plastic boat plant workers in Finland. J Occup Environ Med 48:175–180Google Scholar
  45. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (2006) Work Ability Index. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  46. van Valen E, Wekking E, van der Laan G, Sprangers M van Dijk (2009) The course of chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy: a systematic review. Neurotoxicology 30:1172–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Valen E, van Thriel C, Akila R, Nordling Nilson L, Bast-Pettersen R, Sainio M, van Dijk F, van der Laan G, Verberk M, Ellie Wekking E (2012) Chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy: European consensus of neuropsychological characteristics, assessment, and guidelines for diagnostics. Neurotoxicology 33:710–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van den Berg T, Elders L, de Zwart B, Burdorf A (2009) The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review (2009) Occup Environ Med 66:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Visser I, Wekking E, de Boer A, de Joode E, van der Laan G, van Dijk F, Schene A (2001) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic solvent encephalopathy (CSE). Neurotoxicology 32:916–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williamson A (2007) Using self-report measures in neurobehavioral toxicology: can they be trusted. Neurotoxicology 28:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xiao J, Levin S (2000) The diagnosis and management of solvent-related disorders. Am J Ind Med 37:44–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.DoctagonHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations