Abstract
Objective
To describe a sensitive and rapid method for the determination of toluene in saliva. Biomonitoring of toluene exposure is commonly performed by determination of urinary hippuric acid, o-cresol or toluene itself. The analysis of blood toluene has been verified as another method for biomonitoring. However, drawing blood is invasive and can often not be performed at the workplace for hygienic reasons. Sampling of saliva may be non-invasive, easy to perform and a viable alternative for biomonitoring in the workplace.
Methods
We measured the solvent concentration in saliva specimens of 5 healthy volunteers studied in the laboratory and a group of 36 workers exposed to toluene in the synthetic leather industry. Saliva was collected into Salivette (Sarstedt, Germany) devices by sterile cotton rolls placed in the mouth and then squeezed into pre-weighted vials. Environmental toluene was collected for the duration of a work-shift by Radiello (FSM, Italy) passive samplers. Toluene in urine and saliva (head space analysis) and in environmental samples was measured by GC–MS.
Results
Environmental toluene levels ranged from 0.22 to 57.20 mg/m3, while the concentrations of the solvent in saliva and urine ranged from 0.12 to 18.30 μg/L, and from 0.47 to 26.64 μg/L, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r) between biological and environmental levels of toluene were 0.77 and 0.93, respectively, for saliva and urine samples.
Conclusion
This preliminary study suggests that saliva may offer many advantages over ‘classical’ biological fluids such as blood as it is readily accessible and collectible: therefore saliva toluene may be considered as a possible biomarker of exposure to toluene.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACGIH (2007) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: TLV’s and BEI’s based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological indices. ACGIH, Cincinnati
Chang HY, Yun YD, Yu YC, Shih TS, Lin MS, Kuo HW, Chen KM (2005) The effects of simultaneous exposure to methyl ethyl ketone and toluene on urinary biomarkers of occupational N,N-dimethylformamide exposure. Toxicol Lett 155(3):385–395
Cocheo V, Boaretto C, Sacco P (1996) High uptake rate radial diffusive sampler suitable for both solvent and thermal desorption. AIHA J 57:897–904
Ernstgard L, Shibata E, Johanson G (2005) Uptake and disposition of inhaled methanol vapour in humans. Toxicol Sci 88:30–38
Fenske RA, Bradman A, Whyatt RM, Wolff MS, Barr DB (2005) Lessons learned for the assessment of children’s pesticide exposure: critical sampling and analytical issues for future studies. Environ Health Perspect 113:1455–1462
Höld KM, De Boer D, Zuidema J, Maes RAA (1995) Saliva as an analytical tool in toxicology. International journal of drug testing. Available at: http://www.criminology.fsu.edu/journal/hold.html (accessed April 2007)
IPCS-INCHEM (2002) The international programme on chemical safety: international chemical safety cards; date of peer review: October 2002: Toluene (online). Available at http://www.inchem.org/documents/icsc/icsc/eics0078.htm (accessed April 2007)
Kawai T, Mizunuma K, Okada Y, Horiguchi S, Ikeda M (1996) Toluene itself as the best urinary marker of toluene exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 68:289–297
Lauwerys R, Hoet P (2001) Industrial chemical exposure guidelines for biological monitoring, 3rd edn. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
Lu C, Rodriguez T, Funez A, Irish RS, Fenske RA (2006) The assessment of occupational exposure to diazinon in nicaraguan plantation workers using saliva biomonitoring. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1076:355–365
Lutogniewska J (1980). Simple test for the tentative evaluation of occupational exposure to phenol (in Polish). Med Pr 31:399–401
Monster AC, Kezic S, Van de Gevel I, De Wolff FA (1993) Evaluation of biological monitoring parameters for occupational exposure to toluene. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65:s159–162
Orlewski P, Tomaszewski L (1982) Usefulness of a modified screening method for ter detection of phenol in the saliva in evaluating occupational exposure to this compound (in Polish). Med Pr 31:399–401
Rose DM, Muttray A, Mayer-Popken O, Jung D, Konietzko J (1999) Saliva as an alternate for blood to measure concentrations of acetone under exposure to isopropanol. Eur J Med Res 4:529–532
Soo-Quee KD, Choon-Huat KG (2007) The use of salivary biomarkers in occupational and environmental medicine. Occup Environ Med 64:202–210
Thaweboon S, Thaweboon B, Veerapradist W (2005) Lead in saliva and its relationship to blood in the residents of Klity Village in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 36:1576–1579
Tomkins BA, Van Berkel GJ, Jenkins RA, Counts RW (2006) Quantitation of cotinine in nonsmoker saliva using chip-based nanoelectrospraytandem mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 30:178–186
Tomita M, Tanaka K, Tanaka H, Nishimura M (1978) Volatile matters in oral cavity. Determination of alcohol and acetone in saliva (in Japanese). Koku Eisei Gakkai Zasshi 28:35–42
Wang G, Maranelli G, Perbellini L, Guglielmi G, Brugnone F (1993) Reference values for blood toluene in the occupationally non-exposed general population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65:201–203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrari, M., Negri, S., Zadra, P. et al. Saliva as an analytical tool to measure occupational exposure to toluene. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81, 1021–1028 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0295-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0295-8