Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolution and visual outcomes of outer foveolar lucency after surgery for large idiopathic macular hole

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the evolution of outer foveolar lucency (OFL) after vitrectomy and the correlation between OFL and visual acuity (VA) outcome in eyes with large idiopathic macular hole (IMH).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 244 eyes of 233 subjects with large IMH (diameter > 400 μm), who underwent vitrectomy, were included. Preoperative clinical data, postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, and VA at 1-, 4-, and 10-month visits were documented. The prevalence, incidence, and width of OFL and their correlation with postoperative VA were analyzed.

Results

The prevalence of OFL was 10.4% (24/231) at 1 month and significantly increased to 30.4% (55/181) at 4 months (P < 0.001) and 34.2% (25/73) at 10 months (P < 0.001). The incidence was 26.1% (40/153) and 22.0% (9/41) at 4 and 10 months, respectively. OFL appeared at 1 month while disappeared at 4 or 10 months in 8 eyes (50.0%). The presence of OFL at 1 month was negatively associated with IMH diameter (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.06; P = 0.02). Eyes with OFL at 4 months had better VA at their 4-month visit than eyes without OFL (P = 0.02). Eyes with early-developed OFLs had better VA at 10 months than those with later-developed ones (P = 0.02). Width of OFL was not associated with postoperative VA at any point.

Conclusions

OFL is not rare in eyes with large IMH after surgery. It can occur gradually and remain during the 10-month follow-up. The presence of OFL appears to have no negative impact on the postoperative VA and it may represent the remodeling of foveal photoreceptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data relevant to the study are included in the article. The deidentified participant data are in the team’s database, which is available only from the corresponding author. For reusing, please contact WL (wuliubj@sina.com) for permission.

References

  1. Kim JW, Freeman WR, Azen SP, El-Haig W, Klein DJ, Bailey IL (1996) Prospective randomized trial of vitrectomy or observation for stage 2 macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 121(6):605–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70625-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman WR, Azen SP, Kim JW, el-Haig W, Mishell DR 3rd, Bailey I (1997) Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 115(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150013002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott IU, Moraczewski AL, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW, Feuer WJ (2003) Long-term anatomic and visual acuity outcomes after initial anatomic success with macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 135(5):633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02240-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahmoud TH, McCuen BW 2nd (2007) Natural history of foveolar lucencies observed by optical coherence tomography after macular hole surgery. Retina 27(1):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iae.0000223758.17543.49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herbert EN, Sheth HG, Wickremasinghe S, Luthert PJ, Bainbridge J, Gregor ZJ (2008) Nature of subretinal fluid in patients undergoing vitrectomy for macular hole: a cytopathological and optical coherence tomography study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 36(9):812–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01901.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sano M, Shimoda Y, Hashimoto H, Kishi S (2009) Restored photoreceptor outer segment and visual recovery after macular hole closure. Am J Ophthalmol 147(2):313–318.e311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawano H, Uemura A, Sakamoto T (2011) Incidence of outer foveal defect after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 151(2):318–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang SW, Lim JW, Chung SE, Yi C-H (2010) Outer foveolar defect after surgery for idiopathic macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 150(4):551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moshfeghi AA, Flynn HW Jr, Elner SG, Puliafito CA, Gass JD (2005) Persistent outer retinal defect after successful macular hole repair. Am J Ophthalmol 139(1):183–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rahman R, Oxley L, Stephenson J (2013) Persistent outer retinal fluid following non-posturing surgery for idiopathic macular hole. Br J Ophthalmol 97(11):1451–1454. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ehlers JP, Itoh Y, Xu LT, Kaiser PK, Singh RP, Srivastava SK (2014) Factors associated with persistent subfoveal fluid and complete macular hole closure in the PIONEER study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56(2):1141–1146. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasler PW, Prunte C (2008) Early foveal recovery after macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 92(5):645–649. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.130971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ko TH, Witkin AJ, Fujimoto JG, Chan A, Rogers AH, Baumal CR, Schuman JS, Drexler W, Reichel E, Duker JS (2006) Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography of surgically closed macular holes. Arch Ophthalmol 124(6):827–836. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.124.6.827

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bottoni F, De Angelis S, Luccarelli S, Cigada M, Staurenghi G (2011) The dynamic healing process of idiopathic macular holes after surgical repair: a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(7):4439–4446. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Cisiecki S, Adelman R, Nawrocki J (2008) Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery: a spectral optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246(6):823–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0764-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takahashi H, Kishi S (2000) Tomographic features of early macular hole closure after vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 130(2):192–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00456-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Nawrocki J (2010) Continuous changes in macular morphology after macular hole closure visualized with spectral optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248(9):1249–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1370-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grewal DS, Reddy V, Mahmoud TH (2015) Assessment of foveal microstructure and foveal lucencies using optical coherence tomography radial scans following macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 160(5):990–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zarranz-Ventura J, Ellabban AA, Sim DA, Keane PA, Kirkpatrick JN, Sallam AAB (2018) Prevalence of foveolar lucency with different gas tamponades in surgically closed macular holes assessed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 38(9):1699–1706. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gass JD (1995) Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 119(6):752–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72781-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tschulakow AV, Oltrup T, Bende T, Schmelzle S, Schraermeyer U (2018) The anatomy of the foveola reinvestigated. PeerJ 6:e4482–e4482. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Trauzettel-Klosinski S (2010) Rehabilitation for visual disorders. J Neuroophthalmol 30(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181ce7e8f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu Y, Liang X, Wang Z, Wang J, Liu X, Chen J, Liu W (2020) Internal limiting membrane peeling and air tamponade for stage iii and stage iv idiopathic macular hole. Retina 40(1):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000002340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jessica Mahlum from Oregon Health Science University for her kind help editing the language within this paper.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology: Biying Qi, Yanping Yu, and Wu Liu. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis: Biying Qi. Writing—original draft preparation: Biying Qi. Writing—review and editing: Yanping Yu, Wu Liu, Qisheng You, and Biying Qi. Support of statistical techniques: Zengyi Wang, Jing Wang, and Lingzi Liu. Supervision and surgical support: Wu Liu. Approval of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wu Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the ethical review committee of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Consent to publish

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Proprietary interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of a topical collection on Macular Holes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, B., Yu, Y., You, Q. et al. Evolution and visual outcomes of outer foveolar lucency after surgery for large idiopathic macular hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258, 2117–2124 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04814-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04814-5

Keywords

Navigation