Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome after individualized stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation and navigated resection in patients with lesional and non-lesional focal epilepsy

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Refined localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy proceeding to resective surgery might improve postoperative outcome. We here report seizure outcome after stereo EEG (sEEG) evaluation with individually planned stereotactically implanted depth electrodes and subsequent tailored resection.

Methods

A cohort of consecutive patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy, evaluated with a non-invasive evaluation protocol and invasive monitoring with personalized, stereotactically implanted depth electrodes for sEEG was analyzed. Co-registration of post-implantation CT scan to presurgical MRI data was used for 3D reconstructions of the patients’ brain surface and mapping of neurophysiology data. Individual multimodal 3D maps of the EZ were used to guide subsequent tailored resections. The outcome was rated according to the Engel classification.

Results

Out of 914 patients who underwent non-invasive presurgical evaluation, 85 underwent sEEG, and 70 were included in the outcome analysis. Median follow-up was 31.5 months. Seizure-free outcome (Engel class I A-C, ILAE class 1–2) was achieved in 83% of the study cohort. Patients exhibiting lesional and non-lesional (n = 42, 86% vs. n = 28, 79%), temporal and extratemporal (n = 45, 80% vs. n = 25, 84%), and right- and left-hemispheric epilepsy (n = 44, 82% vs. n = 26, 85%) did similarly well. This remains also true for those with an EZ adjacent to or distant from eloquent cortex (n = 21, 86% vs. n = 49, 82%). Surgical outcome was independent of resected tissue volume.

Conclusion

Favourable post-surgical outcome can be achieved in patients with resistant focal epilepsy, using individualized sEEG evaluation and tailored navigated resection, even in patients with non-lesional or extratemporal focal epilepsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwan P, Schachter SC, Brodie MJ (2011) Drug-resistant epilepsy. N Engl J Med 365(10):919–926. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1004418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenow F, Luders H (2001) Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Brain 124(Pt 9):1683–700

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noachtar S, Borggraefe I (2009) Epilepsy surgery: a critical review. Epilepsy Behav 15(1):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.02.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartolomei F, Trebuchon A, Bonini F, Lambert I, Gavaret M, Woodman M et al (2016) What is the concordance between the seizure onset zone and the irritative zone? A SEEG quantified study. Clin Neurophysiol 127(2):1157–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.10.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryvlin P, Cross JH, Rheims S (2014) Epilepsy surgery in children and adults. Lancet Neurol 13(11):1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70156-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. David O, Blauwblomme T, Job AS, Chabardes S, Hoffmann D, Minotti L et al (2011) Imaging the seizure onset zone with stereo-electroencephalography. Brain 134(Pt 10):2898–2911. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wellmer J, von der Groeben F, Klarmann U, Weber C, Elger CE, Urbach H et al (2012) Risks and benefits of invasive epilepsy surgery workup with implanted subdural and depth electrodes. Epilepsia 53(8):1322-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03545.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Tisi J, Bell GS, Peacock JL, McEvoy AW, Harkness WF, Sander JW et al (2011) The long-term outcome of adult epilepsy surgery, patterns of seizure remission, and relapse: a cohort study. Lancet 378(9800):1388–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60890-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. West S, Nolan SJ, Cotton J, Gandhi S, Weston J, Sudan A et al (2015) Surgery for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010541.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Winkler PA, Vollmar C, Krishnan KG, Pfluger T, Bruckmann H, Noachtar S (2000) Usefulness of 3-D reconstructed images of the human cerebral cortex for localization of subdural electrodes in epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Res 41(2):169–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vollmar CNS, Winkler PA (2008) Multimodal image processing in pre-surgical planning. In: HO L (ed) Textbook of epilepsy surgery. Informa UK Ltd, London, pp 771–777

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Engel J (2001) Classification of epileptic disorders. Epilepsia 42(3):316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wieser HG, Blume WT, Fish D, Goldensohn E, Hufnagel A, King D et al (2001) ILAE Commission Report. Proposal for a new classification of outcome with respect to epileptic seizures following epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 42(2):282–6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez-Martinez J, Bulacio J, Alexopoulos A, Jehi L, Bingaman W, Najm I (2013) Stereoelectroencephalography in the “difficult to localize” refractory focal epilepsy: early experience from a North American epilepsy center. Epilepsia 54(2):323–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03672.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez-Martinez J, Mullin J, Bulacio J, Gupta A, Enatsu R, Najm I et al (2014) Stereoelectroencephalography in children and adolescents with difficult-to-localize refractory focal epilepsy. Neurosurgery 75(3):258–68. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000453 (discussion 67–8)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tellez-Zenteno JF, Hernandez Ronquillo L, Moien-Afshari F, Wiebe S (2010) Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 89(2–3):310–318 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Lorenzo B, Del Pino-Sedeno T, Rocamora R, Lopez JE, Serrano-Aguilar P, Trujillo-Martin MM (2018) Stereoelectroencephalography for refractory epileptic patients considered for surgery: systematic review, meta-analysis, and economic evaluation. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bulacio JC, Jehi L, Wong C, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Kotagal P, Nair D et al (2012) Long-term seizure outcome after resective surgery in patients evaluated with intracranial electrodes. Epilepsia 53(10):1722–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03633.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carrette E, Vonck K, De Herdt V, Van Dycke A, El Tahry R, Meurs A et al (2010) Predictive factors for outcome of invasive video-EEG monitoring and subsequent resective surgery in patients with refractory epilepsy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 112(2):118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Immonen A, Jutila L, Muraja-Murro A, Mervaala E, Aikia M, Lamusuo S et al (2010) Long-term epilepsy surgery outcomes in patients with MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 51(11):2260–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02720.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez-Martinez J, Mullin J, Vadera S, Bulacio J, Hughes G, Jones S et al (2014) Stereotactic placement of depth electrodes in medically intractable epilepsy. J Neurosurg 120(3):639–644 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.JNS13635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bien CG, Szinay M, Wagner J, Clusmann H, Becker AJ, Urbach H (2009) Characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with refractory magnetic resonance imaging-negative epilepsies. Arch Neurol 66(12):1491–1499. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Remi J, Vollmar C, de Marinis A, Heinlin J, Peraud A, Noachtar S (2011) Congruence and discrepancy of interictal and ictal EEG with MRI lesions in focal epilepsies. Neurology 77(14):1383–1390. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823152c3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang EF, Wang DD, Barkovich AJ, Tihan T, Auguste KI, Sullivan JE et al (2011) Predictors of seizure freedom after surgery for malformations of cortical development. Ann Neurol 70(1):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DiLorenzo DJ, Mangubat EZ, Rossi MA, Byrne RW (2014) Chronic unlimited recording electrocorticography-guided resective epilepsy surgery: technology-enabled enhanced fidelity in seizure focus localization with improved surgical efficacy. J Neurosurg 120(6):1402–1414. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.1.JNS131592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamiwka L, Jayakar P, Resnick T, Morrison G, Ragheb J, Dean P et al (2005) Surgery for epilepsy due to cortical malformations: ten-year follow-up. Epilepsia 46(4):556–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.52504.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Brien TJ, So EL, Mullan BP, Cascino GD, Hauser MF, Brinkmann BH et al (2000) Subtraction peri-ictal SPECT is predictive of extratemporal epilepsy surgery outcome. Neurology 55(11):1668–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakamoto S, Takami T, Tsuyuguchi N, Morino M, Ohata K, Inoue Y et al (2009) Prediction of seizure outcome following epilepsy surgery: asymmetry of thalamic glucose metabolism and cerebral neural activity in temporal lobe epilepsy. Seizure 18(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2008.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zentner J, Hufnagel A, Wolf HK, Ostertun B, Behrens E, Campos MG et al (1995) Surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings in 178 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 58(6):666–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McIntosh AM, Averill CA, Kalnins RM, Mitchell LA, Fabinyi GC, Jackson GD et al (2012) Long-term seizure outcome and risk factors for recurrence after extratemporal epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 53(6):970–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03430.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Delev D, Oehl B, Steinhoff BJ, Nakagawa J, Scheiwe C, Schulze-Bonhage A et al (2018) Surgical treatment of extratemporal epilepsy: results and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liang S, Li A, Zhao M, Jiang H, Meng X, Sun Y (2010) Anterior temporal lobectomy combined with anterior corpus callosotomy in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and mental retardation. Seizure 19(6):330–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2010.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schramm J, Lehmann TN, Zentner J, Mueller CA, Scorzin J, Fimmers R et al (2011) Randomized controlled trial of 2.5-cm versus 3.5-cm mesial temporal resection in temporal lobe epilepsy–Part 1: intent-to-treat analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153(2):209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0900-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wyler AR, Hermann BP, Somes G (1995) Extent of medial temporal resection on outcome from anterior temporal lobectomy: a randomized prospective study. Neurosurgery 37(5):982–990 (discussion 90–1)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Althausen A, Gleissner U, Hoppe C, Sassen R, Buddewig S, von Lehe M et al (2013) Long-term outcome of hemispheric surgery at different ages in 61 epilepsy patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84(5):529–536. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dorward IG, Titus JB, Limbrick DD, Johnston JM, Bertrand ME, Smyth MD (2011) Extratemporal, nonlesional epilepsy in children: postsurgical clinical and neurocognitive outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.11.PEDS10265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Elsharkawy AE, Behne F, Oppel F, Pannek H, Schulz R, Hoppe M et al (2008) Long-term outcome of extratemporal epilepsy surgery among 154 adult patients. J Neurosurg 108(4):676–686. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee JJ, Lee SK, Lee SY, Park KI, Kim DW, Lee DS et al (2008) Frontal lobe epilepsy: clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes and diagnostic modalities. Seizure 17(6):514–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2008.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liava A, Francione S, Tassi L, Lo Russo G, Cossu M, Mai R et al (2012) Individually tailored extratemporal epilepsy surgery in children: anatomo-electro-clinical features and outcome predictors in a population of 53 cases. Epilepsy Behav 25(1):68–80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pinheiro-Martins AP, Bianchin MM, Velasco TR, Terra VC, Araujo D, Wichert-Ana L et al (2012) Independent predictors and a prognostic model for surgical outcome in refractory frontal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 99(1–2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tigaran S, Cascino GD, McClelland RL, So EL, Richard Marsh W (2003) Acute postoperative seizures after frontal lobe cortical resection for intractable partial epilepsy. Epilepsia 44(6):831–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Urbach H, Binder D, von Lehe M, Podlogar M, Bien CG, Becker A et al (2007) Correlation of MRI and histopathology in epileptogenic parietal and occipital lobe lesions. Seizure 16(7):608–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurelia Peraud.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

JCT discloses support for counselling and travel grants by Brainlab.

Ethical standard

The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorsteinsdottir, J., Vollmar, C., Tonn, JC. et al. Outcome after individualized stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation and navigated resection in patients with lesional and non-lesional focal epilepsy. J Neurol 266, 910–920 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09213-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09213-3

Keywords

Navigation