Advertisement

International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp 1161–1166 | Cite as

The application of the Kvaal method to estimate the age of live Korean subjects using digital panoramic radiographs

  • Byung-yoon Roh
  • Won-Joon Lee
  • Ji-Won Ryu
  • Jong-Mo Ahn
  • Chang-Lyuk Yoon
  • Sang-Seob Lee
Original Article

Abstract

Dental age estimation of the living is limited because observing the histological structure of teeth is difficult. Therefore, several methods have been proposed to estimate age by observing changes on dental radiographs of pulpal size caused by secondary dentin deposition. This study aims to evaluate the validity of the Kvaal method to estimate the ages of Korean subjects using digital panoramic radiographs and formulate regression equations for use in Korean subjects. We included 266 Korean subjects (age 21–69 years) visiting Chosun University Dental Hospital (Gwangju, South Korea). The pulpal size and width of six tooth types (maxillary central incisor, lateral incisor, second premolar, mandibular lateral incisor, canine, and first premolar) were measured on digital panoramic radiographs according to the Kvaal method. Statistical interobserver/intraobserver reliabilities were calculated to evaluate the reproducibility of the measured values, and correlations between actual ages and measured values were identified. The differences between the predicted ages and the actual age were analyzed. Paewinsky method was also applied and its validity was evaluated. In addition, a series of new regression equations for the age estimation of Korean subjects was produced. When both methods were applied directly to the teeth of the subjects, significant differences were observed between the estimated and chronological ages. The length-related parameters of the teeth of subjects calculated by the original Kvaal method showed no significant correlation. A regression equation derived from the width parameters without the length ratios is proposed for use in Korean subjects.

Keywords

Age estimation Dental pulp Secondary dentin Panoramic radiography Kvaal method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Soo-young Choi and Dae-seung Ryu for their technical assistance. This work was partly based on the master’s thesis of Byung-yoon Roh presented to Chosun University (Gwangju, Republic of Korea).

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Forensic Service (NFS2016MED04), Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Republic of Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Chosun University Dental Hospital (Gwangju, South Korea) (approval no. CDMDIRB153).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Senn DR, Weems RA (2013) Manual of forensic odontology. CRC Press, Boca Raton.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b13744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johanson G (1971) Age determinations from human teeth: a critical evaluation with special consideration of changes after fourteen years of age, vol 22. Berlingska BoktryckerietGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gustafson G, Malmö DO (1950) Age determinations on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 41(1):45–54.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1950.0132 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willems G (2001) A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 19(1):9–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossintchouk RM, Zerilli A (1992) A simple technique for age estimation in adult corpses: the two criteria dental method. J Forensic Sci 37(5):1373–1379.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS13327J CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T (1995) Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 74(3):175–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(95)01760-G CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erbudak HÖ, Özbek M, Uysal S, Karabulut E (2012) Application of Kvaal et al.’s age estimation method to panoramic radiographs from Turkish individuals. Forensic Sci Int 219(1-3):141–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bosmans N, Ann P, Aly M, Willems G (2005) The application of Kvaal’s dental age calculation technique on panoramic dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 153(2-3):208–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Landa MI, Garamendi PM, Botella MC, Aleman I (2009) Application of the method of Kvaal et al. to digital orthopantomograms. Int J Legal Med 123(2):123–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0268-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meinl A, Tangl S, Pernicka E, Fenes C, Watzek G (2007) On the applicability of secondary dentin formation to radiological age estimation in young adults. J Forensic Sci 52(2):438–441.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00377.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paewinsky E, Pfeiffer H, Brinkmann B (2005) Quantification of secondary dentine formation from orthopantomograms--a contribution to forensic age estimation methods in adults. Int J Legal Med 119(1):27–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0492-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Muhler M, Wernecke KD, Geserick G (2004) Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 118(1):5–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-003-0404-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Pryzbeck TR, Mensforth RP (1985) Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. Am J Phys Anthropol 68(1):15–28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330680103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bocklandt S, Lin W, Sehl ME, Sanchez FJ, Sinsheimer JS, Horvath S, Vilain E (2011) Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS One 6(6):e14821.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014821 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harris EF, Hicks JD, Barcroft BD (2001) Tissue contributions to sex and race: differences in tooth crown size of deciduous molars. Am J Phys Anthropol 115(3):223–237.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1077 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim E, Fallahrastegar A, Hur YY, Jung IY, Kim S, Lee SJ (2005) Difference in root canal length between Asians and Caucasians. Int Endod J 38(3):149–151.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00881.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee SS, Kim D, Lee S, Lee UY, Seo JS, Ahn YW, Han SH (2011) Validity of Demirjian’s and modified Demirjian’s methods in age estimation for Korean juveniles and adolescents. Forensic Sci Int 211(1-3):41–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.04.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    White SC, Pharoah MJ (2008) Oral radiology principles and interpretation. Elsevier, Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schulze R, Krummenauer F, Schalldach F, d'Hoedt B (2000) Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29(1):52–56.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600500 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kolltveit KM, Solheim T, Kvaal SI (1998) Methods of measuring morphological parameters in dental radiographs: comparison between image analysis and manual measurements. Forensic Sci Int 94(1-2):87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00058-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Forensic Odontology, Medical Examiner’s OfficeNational Forensic ServiceWonjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Oral Medicine, School of DentistryChosun UniversityGwangjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations