International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 405–408 | Cite as

Genetic analysis of 12 X-STR loci in the Serbian population from Vojvodina Province

  • Igor Veselinović
  • Dušan Vapa
  • Mihajla Djan
  • Nevena Veličković
  • Tanja Veljović
  • Galina Petrić
Population Data

Abstract

The analysis of 12 X-STR loci included in the Investigator® Argus X-12 kit was performed on a sample of 325 unrelated persons from Vojvodina Province, Republic of Serbia. No significant differences were observed in the allele frequencies in males and females. Heterozygosity values among the studied loci ranged from 67.62 to 94.28%. All loci in female individuals were consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. The combined power of discrimination values in male and female individuals was 0.9999999994 and 0.999999999999999, respectively. The combined mean exclusion chance was 0.999998 in deficiency cases, 0.9999999977 in normal trio cases, and 0.9999994 in duo cases. Loci DXS10135 and DXS10101 were found to be most polymorphic. The haplotype diversity was found to be greater than 0.993 for all linkage groups. The exact test for pairwise linkage disequilibrium for the 12 loci in the male samples showed significant linkage disequilibrium for the DXS10103-DXS10101 and DXS10134-DXS10146 pairs of loci. The results from the current study confirmed that the panel of 12 X-STR loci is highly polymorphic and informative and can be implemented as a powerful tool in deficient paternity testing and kinship analysis, as well as a useful complement tool of autosomal short tandem repeats (STRs) in forensic investigation. Population differentiation analyses indicated significant differences in genetic structure between the Serbian population and the geographically and ethno-linguistically distant populations, while genetic homogeneity was present in populations with similar geographic origin.

Keywords

Genetic polymorphisms X-STR Haplotype Linkage groups Forensics Kinship analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (project no 175093).

Compliance with ethical standards

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

The ethical considerations in this study were approved by The Institutional Review Board of Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, IRB No 00-08/332.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

414_2017_1677_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (14 kb)
Table S1 (XLSX 13 kb).
414_2017_1677_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Table S2 (XLSX 12 kb).
414_2017_1677_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (29 kb)
Table S3 (XLSX 28 kb).
414_2017_1677_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Table S4 (XLSX 10 kb).
414_2017_1677_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Table S5 (XLSX 12 kb).
414_2017_1677_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
Table S6 (XLSX 9 kb).

References

  1. 1.
    Szibor R (2007) X-chromosomal markers: past, present and future. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1(2):93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szibor R, Krawczak M, Hering S, Edelmann J, Kuhlisch E, Krause D (2003) Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 117(2):67–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-002-0352-5 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10(4):506–551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10(3):564–567.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tomas C, Pereira V, Morling N (2012) Analysis of 12 X-STRs in Greenlanders, Danes and Somalis using Argus X-12. Int J Legal Med 126:121–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0609-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sufian A, Hosen MI, Fatema K, Hossain T, Hasan MM, Mazumder AK, Akhteruzzaman S (2017) Genetic diversity study on 12 X-STR loci of Investigator® Argus X STR kit in Bangladeshi population. Int J Legal Med.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1513-2
  7. 7.
    Takezaki N, Nei M, Tamura K (2014) POPTREEW: web version of POPTREE for constructing population trees from allele frequency data and computing some other quantities. Mol Biol Evol 31(6):1622–1624.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu093 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poetsch M, Bajanowski T, Pfeiffer H (2012) The publication of population genetic data in the international journal of legal medicine: guidelines. Int J Legal Med 126:489–490.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0700-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bar W, Brinkmann B, Budowle B, Carracedo A, Gill P, Lincoln P, Olaisen B (1997) DNA recommendations: further report of the DNA commission of the ISFH regarding the use of short tandem repeat systems. Int J Legal Med 110(4):175–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Medical FacultyUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  3. 3.Medical FacultyUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations