Advertisement

International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 609–615 | Cite as

Age estimation at death using pubic bone analysis of a virtual reference sample

  • Frédéric Savall
  • Fabrice Hérin
  • Pierre Antoine Peyron
  • Daniel Rougé
  • Eric Baccino
  • Pauline Saint-Martin
  • Norbert Telmon
Original Article

Abstract

Age at death estimation is a major part of forensic anthropology, but is often poor in the latter decades of life and should benefit from specific population standards. The aim of this study was to test a virtual reference sample with a uniform age distribution in order to improve the accuracy of age estimation for individuals over 40 years of age. We retrospectively built a random virtual reference sample of pubic symphyses from 1100 clinical cases using computed tomography at two French hospitals; this was compared with a test sample (pubic symphyses from 75 corpses undergoing post-mortem computed tomography at a French forensic department) and with the sample originally used in the Suchey-Brooks (SB) system. Inaccuracy and bias were calculated and the proportions of cases in which the real age fell within the estimated age ± 1 standard deviation were calculated. Compared to using the SB sample, using our French sample resulted in a lower inaccuracy for males over 55 years and bias showed that that for males aged 56 to 70 years were less underestimated. Compared to using the SB sample, using our French sample resulted in a lower inaccuracy for females over 70 years and bias showed that that for females aged 56 and older were less underestimated. This study presents a large data set of pubic symphyseal phases from a French virtual sample that allows for improving age estimation accuracy at death, particularly for individuals over 40 years. This kind of material can be useful to improve the age estimation accuracy in a specific region. However, the reliability remains poor and the variability of pubic symphysis morphology related to bone degeneration seems to be an unavoidable limit of the method.

Keywords

Forensic anthropology Age at death Pubic symphysis Reference sample Computed tomography French 

References

  1. 1.
    Brooks S, Suchey JM (1990) Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: a comparison of the Acsàdi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum Evol 5:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baccino E, Ubelaker DH, Hayek LA et al (1999) Evaluation of seven methods of estimating age at death from mature human skeletal remains. Journal of Forensic Science 44:931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lottering N, MacGregor DM, Meredith M et al (2013) Evaluation of the Suchey-Brooks method of age estimation in an Australian subpopulation using computed tomography of the pubic symphyseal surface. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:386–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimmerle EH, Prince DA, Berg GE (2008) Inter-observer variation in methodologies involving the pubic symphysis, sternal ribs, and teeth. J Forensic Sci 53:594–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoppa RD (2000) Population variation in osteological aging criteria: an example from the pubic symphysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 111:185–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmitt A (2004) Age-at-death assessment using the os pubis and the auricular surface of the ilium: a test on an identified Asian sample. Int J Osteoarchaeol 14:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baccino E, Tavernier JC, Lamendin H et al (1991) Recherche d’une méthode multifactorielle simple pour la détermination de l’âge des cadavres adultes. Journal de Médecine Légale et Droit Médical 34:27–33Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Tague RG et al (1995) The senescent biology of the hominoid pelvis. Rivista di Antropologia 73:31–49Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackes M (2000) Building the bases for paleodemographic analysis: adult age determination. In: Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR (eds) Biological anthropology of the human skeleton. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 417–466Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mays S (2015) The effect of factors other than age upon skeletal age indicators in the adult. Ann Hum Biol 42:332–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berg GE (2008) Pubic bone age estimation in adult women. J Forensic Sci 53:569–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartnett KM (2010) Analysis of age-at-death estimation using data from a new, modern autopsy sample—part I: pubic bone. J Forensic Sci 55:1145–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kimmerle EH, Konigsberg LW, Jantz RL et al (2008) Analysis of age-at-death estimation through the use of pubic symphyseal data. J Forensic Sci 53:558–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rissech C, Wilson J, Winburn AP et al (2012) A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample. Int J Legal Med 126:145–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sakaue K (2006) Application of the Suchey-Brooks system of pubic age estimation to recent Japanese skeletal material. Anthropol Sci 114:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Savall F, Rérolle C, Hérin F et al (2016) Reliability of the Suchey-Brooks method for a French contemporary population. Forensic Sci Int 266:586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen X, Zhang Z, Zhu G et al (2011) Determining the age at death of females in the Chinese Han population: using quantitative variables and statistical analysis from pubic bones. Forensic Sci Int 210:278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klepinger LL, Katz D, Micozzi MS et al (1992) Evaluation of cast methods for estimating age from the os pubis. J Forensic Sci 37:763–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bocquet-Appel JP, Masset C (1982) Farewell to paleodemography. J Hum Evol 11:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Usher B (2002) Reference samples: the first step in linking biology and age in the human skeleton. In: Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW (eds) Paleodemography: age distributions from skeletal samples. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saunders SR, Fitzgerald C, Rogers T et al (1992) A test of several methods of skeletal age estimation using a documented archaeological sample. J Can Soc Forensic Sci 25:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Katz D, Suchey JM (1986) Age determination of the male os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 69:427–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lucy D, Aykroyd RG, Pollard AM et al (1996) A Bayesian approach to adult human age estimation from dental observations by Johanson’s age changes. Journal of Forensic Science 41:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Villa C, Buckberry J, Cattaneo C et al (2013) Technical note: reliability of Suchey-Brooks and Buckberry-Chamberlain methods on 3D visualizations from CT and laser scans: age estimation methods and 3D visualizations. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:158–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suchey J, Katz D (1989) Applications of pubic age determination in a forensic setting. In: Charles C Thomas (ed.) Age markers in the human skeleton. Springfield, IL, pp 204–236Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    BocquetAppel JP, Masset C (1996) Paleodemography: expectancy and false hope. Am J Phys Anthropol 99:571–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Overbury RS, Cabo LL, Dirkmaat DC et al (2009) Asymmetry of the os pubis: implications for the Suchey-Brooks method. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:261–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Telmon N, Gaston A, Chemla P et al (2005) Application of the Suchey-Brooks method to three-dimensional imaging of the pubic symphysis. J Forensic Sci 50:507–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pasquier E, De Saint Martin Pernot L, Burdin V et al (1999) Determination of age at death: assessment of an algorithm of age prediction using numerical three-dimensional CT data from pubic bones. Am J Phys Anthropol 108:261–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chiba F, Makino Y, Motomura A et al (2014) Age estimation by quantitative features of pubic symphysis using multidetector computed tomography. Int J Legal Med 128:667–673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Villa C, Buckberry J, Cattaneo C et al (2015) Quantitative analysis of the morphological changes of the pubic symphyseal face and the auricular surface and implications for age at death estimation. J Forensic Sci 60:556–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Poulsen K, Simonsen J (2015) Computed tomography as routine in connection with medico-legal autopsies. Forensic Sci Int 171:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dedouit F, Savall F, Mokrane F-Z et al (2014) Virtual anthropology and forensic identification using multidetector CT. Br J Radiol 87:20130468CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frédéric Savall
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fabrice Hérin
    • 3
  • Pierre Antoine Peyron
    • 4
  • Daniel Rougé
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric Baccino
    • 4
  • Pauline Saint-Martin
    • 1
    • 5
  • Norbert Telmon
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie AMIS, UMR 5288 CNRSUniversité Paul SabatierToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Service de Médecine LégaleCentre Hospitalier Universitaire RangueilToulouse Cedex 9France
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’épidémiologie et analyses en santé publique, UMR 1027, Faculté de MédecineUniversité Paul SabatierToulouseFrance
  4. 4.Service de Médecine LégaleCentre Hospitalier Universitaire LapeyronieMontpellierFrance
  5. 5.Service de Médecine LégaleCentre Hospitalier Universitaire TrousseauChambray-lès-ToursFrance

Personalised recommendations