Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Setting the light conditions for measuring root transparency for age-at-death estimation methods

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Age‐at‐death estimation is one of the main goals in forensic identification, being an essential parameter to determine the biological profile, narrowing the possibility of identification in cases involving missing persons and unidentified bodies. The study of dental tissues has been long considered as a proper tool for age estimation with several age estimation methods based on them. Dental age estimation methods can be divided into three categories: tooth formation and development, post‐formation changes, and histological changes. While tooth formation and growth changes are important for fetal and infant consideration, when the end of dental and skeletal growth is achieved, post‐formation or biochemical changes can be applied. Lamendin et al. in J Forensic Sci 37:1373–1379, (1992) developed an adult age estimation method based on root transparency and periodontal recession. The regression formula demonstrated its accuracy of use for 40 to 70-year-old individuals. Later on, Prince and Ubelaker in J Forensic Sci 47(1):107–116, (2002) evaluated the effects of ancestry and sex and incorporated root height into the equation, developing four new regression formulas for males and females of African and European ancestry. Even though root transparency is a key element in the method, the conditions for measuring this element have not been established. The aim of the present study is to set the light conditions measured in lumens that offer greater accuracy when applying the Lamendin et al. method modified by Prince and Ubelaker. The results must be also taken into account in the application of other age estimation methodologies using root transparency to estimate age‐at‐death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Adams B (2007) Forensic anthropology. Chelsea House Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adserias-Garriga J (2016) Forensic application of telomere shortening in age-at- death estimation. In: Mechanisms linking aging, diseases and biological age estimation. CRC Press, Boca Raton ISBN 9781498709699

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahlqvist J, Damsten O (1969) A modification of Kerley’s method for the microscopic determination of age in human bone. J Forensic Sci 14(2):205–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bang G, Ramm E (1970) Determination of age in humans from root dentin transparency. Acta Odontol Scand 56:238–244

  5. Brooks S (1955) Skeletal age at death: reliability of cranial and pubic age indicators. Am J Phys Anthropol 3:567–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks S, Suchey J (1990) Skeletal age determination base on the os pubis: a comparison of the Acsádi–Nemeskéri and Suchey–brooks methods. Hum Evol 5:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckberry JL, Chamberlain AT (2002) Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: a revised method. Am J Phys Anthropol 119(3):231–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler F, Prieto J, Schuliar Y, Lynnerup N, Cattaneo C (2009) The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int 193(1–3):1–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elamin F, Liversidge HM (2013) Malnutrition has no effect on the timing of human tooth formation. PLoS One 8:e72274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Falys CG, Prangle D (2015) Estimating age of mature adults from the degeneration of the sternal end of the clavicle. Am J Phys Anthropol 156(2):203–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS (1965) Genetic, nutritional and maturational correlates of dental development. J Dent Res 44:228–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez-Colmenares G, Botella-Lopez MC, Moreno-Rueda G, Fernandez-Cardenete JR (2007) Age estimation by a dental method: a comparison of Lamendin’s and Prince & Ubelaker’s technique. J Forensic Sci 52:1156–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gustafson G (1950) Age determination on teeth. Journal of American Dental Association 41:45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris EF, Mincer HH, Anderson KM, Senn DR (2010) Age estimation from oral and dental structures. In: Senn DR, Stimson PG (eds) Forensic dentistry, 2nd edn. Taylor & Frances Group, Boca Raton, pp 263–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Iscan MY, Loth SR, Wright RK (1984) Age estimation from the rib by phase analysis: white males. J Forensic Sci 29(4):1094–1104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iscan MY, Loth SR, Wright RK (1985) Age estimation from the rib by phase analysis: white females. J Forensic Sci 30(3):853–863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Iscan MY, Loth SR, Wright RK (1987) Racial variation in the sternal extremity of the rib and its effect on age determination. J Forensic Sci 32(2):452–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johanson G (1971) Age determinations from human teeth: a critical evaluation with special consideration of changes after fourteen years of age. Odontologisk Revy 22:1–126

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kerley ER (1965) The microscopic determination of age in human bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 23(1965):149–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerley ER, Ubelaker DH (1978) Revisions in the microscopic method of estimating age at death in human cortical bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 49(4):545–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossintchouk RM, Zerilli A (1992) A simple technique for age estimation in adult corpses: the two criteria dental method. J Forensic Sci 37:1373–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Pryzbeck TR, Mensforth RP (1985) Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. Am J Phys Anthropol 68(1):15–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maples WR, Rice WR (1979) Some difficulties in the Gustafson dental age estimations. J Forensic Sci 24:168–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meindl RS, Lovejoy CO (1985) Ectocranial suture closure: a revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures. Am J Phys Anthropol 68(1):57–66. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prince DA, Ubelaker DH (2002) Application of Lamendin’s adult ageing technique to a diverse skeletal sample. J Forensic Sci 47(1):107–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stout SD, Paine RR (1992) Histological age estimation using rib and clavicle. Am J Phys Anthropol 87:111–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Todd TW (1920) Age changes in the pubic bone I: the male white pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 3(1920):285–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Todd TW (1921a) Age changes in the pubic bone II. The pubis of the male negro–white hybrid. III the pubis of the white female. IV. The pubis of the female negro–white hybrid. Am J Phys Anthropol 4:1–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Todd TW (1921b) Age changes in the pubic bone VI: the interpretation of variations in the symphyseal area. Am J Phys Anthropol 4:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ubelaker DH, Parra RC (2008) Application of three dental methods of adult age estimation from intact single rooted teeth to a Peruvian sample. J Forensic Sci 53:608–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fundació UdG: Innovació i Formació, University of Girona, Girona, Spain

    Joe Adserias-Garriga

  2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona, Spain

    Laia Nogué-Navarro

  3. Department of Anthropology, NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA

    Sara C. Zapico & Douglas H. Ubelaker

Authors
  1. Joe Adserias-Garriga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laia Nogué-Navarro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara C. Zapico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Douglas H. Ubelaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Adserias-Garriga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adserias-Garriga, J., Nogué-Navarro, L., Zapico, S.C. et al. Setting the light conditions for measuring root transparency for age-at-death estimation methods. Int J Legal Med 132, 637–641 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1582-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1582-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation