## Abstract

Charles Sanders Peirce wrote the article ‘The probability of induction’ in 1878. It was the fourth article of the series ‘Illustrations of the Logic of Science’ which comprised a total of six articles. According to Peirce, to get a clear idea of the conception of probability, one has ‘to consider what real and sensible difference there is between one degree of probability and another.’ He endorsed what John Venn had called the ‘materialistic view’ of the subject, namely that probability is the proportion of times in which an occurrence of one kind is accompanied by an occurrence of another kind. On the other hand, Peirce recognized the existence of a different interpretation of probability, which was termed by Venn the ‘conceptualistic view,’ namely the degree of belief that ought to be attached to a proposition. Peirce’s intent on writing this article seems to be to inquire about the claims of the conceptualists concerning the problem of induction. After reasoning on some examples, he concluded on the impossibility of assigning probability for induction. We show here that the arguments advanced in his article are not sufficient to support such conclusion. Peirce’s thoughts on the probability of induction surely may have influenced statisticians and research scientists of the twentieth century in shaping data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

## References

Bayes, T. 1763. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances.

*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London*53: 370–418.Carnap, R. 1955.

*Statistical and inductive probability: Inductive logic and science*. Brooklyn: Galois Institute of Mathematics and Art.D’Agostini, G. 2003.

*Bayesian reasoning in data analysis—A critical introduction*. New Jersey: World Scientific.D’Agostini, G. 2010. On the Peirce’s

*balancing reasons rule*failure in his “large bag of beans” example. https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3659. Accessed 29 June 2020.De Morgan, A. 1857.

*Formal logic: The calculus of inference, necessary and probable*. London: Taylor and Walton.Feller, W. 1968.

*An introduction to probability theory and its applications*, vol. 1. Wiley: New York.Fisher, R.A. 1922. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics.

*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A*222: 309–368.Jaynes, E.T. 2003.

*Probability theory: The logic of science*, ed. G.L. Bretthorst. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressLaplace, P.S. 1774. Mémoire sur la probabilité des causes par les évènements.

*Memoire de l’Academie Royale des Science*6: 621–656.Laplace, P.S. 1820.

*Théorie Analytique des Probabilités, 2 vols*, 3rd edition with supplements ed. Paris: Courcier Imprimeur.Laplace, P.S. 1825.

*Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilités*, 5th ed. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Molina, E.C. 1930. The theory of probability: Some comments on Laplace’s théorie analitique.

*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society*36: 369–392.Molina, E.C. 1931. Bayes’ theorem—An expository presentation.

*The Bell System Technical Journal*2: 23–37.Peirce, C. S. 1877a. The fixation of belief.

*Popular Science Monthly*. Reprinted as Chapter 2 in J. Buchler (ed.)*Philosophical Writings of Peirce*. Dover Publications: New York, 1955.Peirce, C. S. 1877b. The essentials of pragmatism. Reprinted as Chapter 17 in J. Buchler (ed.)

*Philosophical Writings of Peirce*. Dover Publications: New York, 1955.Peirce, C. S. 1878a. How to make our ideas clear.

*Popular Science Monthly*. Reprinted as Chapter 3 in J. Buchler (ed.)*Philosophical Writings of Peirce*. Dover Publications: New York, 1955.Peirce, C. S. 1878b. On the doctrine of chances, with later reflections.

*Popular Science Monthly*. Reprinted as Chapter 12 in J. Buchler (ed.)*Philosophical Writings of Peirce*. Dover Publications: New York, 1955.Peirce, C. S. 1878c. The probability of induction.

*Popular Science Monthly*. Reprinted as Chapter 13 in J. Buchler (ed.)*Philosophical Writings of Peirce*. Dover Publications: New York, 1955.Peirce, C. S. 1878d. The order of nature.

*Popular Science Monthly*. Reprinted as Chapter 11 in N. Houser and C. Kloesel (eds.)*The Essential Peirce*—*Selected Philosophical Writings*. Indiana University Press: Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1992.Peirce, C. S. 1878e. Deduction, induction and hypothesis.

*Popular Science Monthly*. Reprinted as Chapter 12 in N. Houser and C. Kloesel (eds.)*The Essential Peirce*—*Selected Philosophical Writings*. Indiana University Press: Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1992.Peirce, C. S. 1883. The theory of probable inference. John Hopkins

*Studies in Logic*. Peirce (ed.). Reprinted as Chapter 14, part I, in J. Buchler (ed)*Philosophical Writings of Peirce*. Dover Publications: New York, 1955.Peirce, C. S. 1901. Abduction and induction. Reprinted as Chapter 11 in J. Buchler (ed)

*Philosophical Writings of Peirce*. Dover Publications: New York, 1955.Sheynin, O.B. 1976. P. S. Laplace’s work on probability.

*Archive for History of Exact Sciences*16: 137–187.Stigler, S.M. 1986. Translation of Laplace’s 1774 memoir on ‘Probability of Causes’.

*Statistical Science*1: 359–378.Venn, J. 1866.

*The Logic of Chance*. Macmillan: London. 2nd ed: 1876, 3rd ed: 1888.Zabell, S.L. 1989. The rule of succession.

*Erkenntnis*31: 283–321.

## Author information

### Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Ethics declarations

### Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

## Additional information

### Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by John Norton.

## Rights and permissions

## About this article

### Cite this article

Kyriazis, G.A. On Peirce’s 1878 article ‘*The probability of induction*’: a conceptualistic appraisal.
*Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.* **75, **1–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-020-00256-x

Received:

Published:

Issue Date: