No gold-standard investigation exists for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH testing has uncertain utility in LPR. Meanwhile, reflux scintigraphy allows immediate and delayed visualisation of tracer reflux in the esophagus, pharynx, and lungs. The present study aimed to correlate MII-pH and scintigraphic reflux results in patients with primary LPR.
Consecutive patients with LPR underwent MII-pH and scintigraphic reflux studies. Abnormal values for MII-pH results were defined from existing literature. MII-pH and scintigraphic data were correlated.
105 patients with LPR [31 males (29.5%), median age 60 years (range 20–87)] were studied. Immediate scintigraphic reflux was seen in the pharynx in 94 (90.4%), and in the proximal esophagus in 94 (90.4%). Delayed scintigraphic contamination of the pharynx was seen in 101 patients (96.2%) and in the lungs of 56 patients (53.3%). For MII-pH, abnormally frequent reflux was seen in the distal esophagus in 12.4%, proximal esophagus in 25.7%, and in the pharynx in 82.9%. Patients with poor scintigraphic clearance had higher Demeester scores (p = 0.043), more proximal reflux episodes (p = 0.046), more distal acid reflux episodes (p = 0.023), and more prolonged bolus clearance times (p = 0.002).
Reflux scintigraphy has a high yield in LPR patients. Scintigraphic time-activity curves correlated with validated MII-pH results. A high rate of pulmonary microaspiration was found in LPR patients. This study demonstrated a high level of pharyngeal contamination by scintigraphy and MII-pH, which supports the use of digital reflux scintigraphy in diagnosing LPR.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and material (data transparency)
Code availability (software application or custom code)
Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal. Laryngoscope 101:1–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.1991.101.s53.1
Khoma O, Falk SE, Burton L, Van der Wall H, Falk GL (2018) Gastro-oesophageal reflux and aspiration: does laparoscopic fundoplication significantly decrease pulmonary aspiration? Lung 196(4):491–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-018-0128-4
Lechien JR et al (2019) Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: state of the art review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 160(5):762–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819827488
Jaspersen D et al (2003) Prevalence of extra-oesophageal manifestations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an analysis based on the ProGERD study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17(12):1515–1520. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01606.x
Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R, Global Consensus Group (2006) The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 101(8):1900–1920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x (quiz 1943)
Gyawali CP et al (2018) Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon consensus. Gut 67(7):1351–1362. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722
Dent J et al (2010) Accuracy of the diagnosis of GORD by questionnaire, physicians and a trial of proton pump inhibitor treatment: the Diamond study. Gut 59(6):714–721. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.200063
Anandasabapathy S, Jaffin BW (2006) Multichannel intraluminal impedance in the evaluation of patients with persistent globus on proton pump inhibitor therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Thousand Oaks 115(8):563–570
Harrell SP, Koopman J, Woosley S, Wo JM (2007) Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring. Laryngoscope 117(3):470–474. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802d344c
Zerbib F et al (2013) Normal values of pharyngeal and esophageal 24-hour pH impedance in individuals on and off therapy and interobserver reproducibility. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(4):366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.041
Falk GL (2015) Scintigraphy in laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a definitive diagnostic test? WJG 21(12):3619. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3619
Falk M, Van der Wall H, Falk GL (2015) Differences between scintigraphic reflux studies in gastrointestinal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and correlation with symptoms. Nucl Med Commun 36(6):625–630. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000289
Burton L, Falk GL, Beattie J, Novakovic D, Simpson S, Van der Wall H (2020) Findings from a novel scintigraphic gastroesophageal reflux study in asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 10(6):342–348
Vance D et al (2020) The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score. J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.11.008
Hoppo T et al (2012) How much pharyngeal exposure is ‘Normal’? Normative data for laryngopharyngeal reflux events using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII). J Gastrointest Surg 16(1):16–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1741-1
Shay S et al (2004) Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol New York 99(6):1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04172.x
Johnson LF, Demeester TR (1974) Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62(4):325–332
Burton L, Falk GL, Baumgart K, Beattie J, Simpson S, Van der Wall H (2020) Esophageal clearance in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: correlation of reflux scintigraphy and 24-hour impedance/pH in a cohort of refractory symptomatic patients. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 29(1):7–16. https://doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.30085
Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M (2000) Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):385–388. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.109935
de Bortoli N et al (2012) How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related? World J Gastroenterol 18(32):4363–4370. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363
Lee BE et al (2010) Combined dual channel impedance/pH-metry in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 16(2):157–165. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2010.16.2.157
Vaezi MF et al (2006) Treatment of chronic posterior laryngitis with esomeprazole. Laryngoscope 116(2):254–260. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000192173.00498.ba
Merati AL, Ulualp SO (2005) Toohill, “Metaanalysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.” Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:177–182
Ummarino D, Vandermeulen L, Roosens B, Urbain D, Hauser B, Vandenplas Y (2013) Gastroesophageal reflux evaluation in patients affected by chronic cough: restech versus multichannel intraluminal impedance/pH metry. Laryngoscope 123(4):980–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23738
Hayat JO et al (2012) Su1056 do patients with hoarseness and endoscopic signs of LPR have abnormal esophago-pharyngeal reflux? A study using simultaneous impedance-phmetry, oro-pharyngeal pH monitoring (restech) and pepsin measurements in saliva. Gastroenterology 142(5):S411–S412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(12)61556-X
Bestetti A, Carola F, Carnevali-Ricci P, Sambataro G, Tarolo GL (2000) 99mTc-sulfur colloid gastroesophageal scintigraphy with late lung imaging to evaluate patients with posterior laryngitis. J Nucl Med 41(10):1597–1602
Galli J, Volante M, Parrilla C, Rigante M, Valenza V (2005) Oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy in the diagnostic algorithm of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a useful exam? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(5):717–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.043
No declarations or conflicts.
Conflict of interest
No declarations or conflicts.
Ethics approval as per Sydney Local Health District (Concord Hospital) Human Research Ethics Committee, reference LNR/12/CRGH/248.
Consent to participate
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.
Consent for publication
All patients gave written informed consent.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, Js., Khoma, O., Burton, L. et al. A new diagnostic paradigm for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: correlation of impedance-pH monitoring and digital reflux scintigraphy results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06658-z
- Pharyngeal impedance
- Laryngopharyngeal reflux
- Pulmonary microaspiration