The aims of this article are: (1) is there an ideal incudostapedial joint (ISJ) angle after stapedotomy? (2) is there any difference between pre- and postoperative ISJ angle? and (3) what is the significance of the ISJ angle in postoperative hearing outcomes?
Forty six ears from 39 different adult patients (28 women and 11 men; 21 left and 25 right ears) with a mean age of 39 years with clinical otosclerosis who underwent stapedotomy between May 2017 and May 2019 were retrospectively registered, including seven bilateral surgery cases. ISJ angle and intravestibular depth of the stapes prosthesis were measured from multiple planar reconstruction-computed tomography images and the length of the prosthesis was measured during surgery. Relationships between the ISJ angle parameters and postoperative hearing outcomes and parameters of the prosthesis were analyzed.
The mean ISJ angle was 93.3° ± 8.8° preoperatively and 101.9° ± 6.3° postoperatively, increasing by 8.6° during stapedotomy (p < 0.01). There were weak and negative correlations between ISJ angle changes and postoperative air conduction gains at frequencies ≤1 kHz and bone conduction gains at 0.5 kHz. When the postoperative ISJ angle changed more than 20°, the success rate of the procedure decreased to 0%.
The stapedotomy operation increased the ISJ angle. The success of postoperative auditory outcomes had more to do with the ISJ angle change than the value of the angle itself, indicating there is no universal ideal ISJ angle that surgeons should aim for during stapedotomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Zhang K, Fang Y, Wang B, Cheng X, Chen B, Shu Y (2020) Frequency-specific hearing results after stapes surgery for Chinese population otosclerosis with different degrees of hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 140(5):356–360
Mann WJ, Amedee RG, Fuerst G, Tabb HG (1996) Hearing loss as a complication of stapes surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115(4):324–328
Nakajima HH, Ravicz ME, Merchant SN, Peake WT, Rosowski JJ (2005) Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear's response to sound: evidence for a flexible ossicular chain. Hear Res 204(1–2):60–77
Cuny P, Alsolami NJ, Dobrev I, Warnholtz B, Röösli C, Sim JH (2019) Influence of angular positioning of the prosthesis in stapes surgeries with a NiTiBond prosthesis: investigation in cadaveric temporal bones. Hearing Res 378:149–156
Skinner M, Honrado C, Prasad M, Kent HN, Selesnick SH (2003) The incudostapedial joint angle: implications for stapes surgery prosthesis selection and crimping. Laryngoscope 113(4):647–653
Alian W, Majdalawieh O, Kiefte M, Ejnell H, Bance M (2013) The effect of increased stiffness of the incudostapedial joint on the transmission of air-conducted sound by the human middle ear. Otol Neurotol 34(8):1503–1509
Szymanski M, Rusinek R, Zadrozniak M, Morshed K, Warminski J (2014) The influence of incudostapedial joint separation on the middle ear transfer function. Clin Exp Otorhinolar 7(4):250–253
Henrot P, Iochum S, Batch T, Coffinet L, Blum A, Roland J (2005) Current multiplanar imaging of the stapes. AM J Neuroradiol 26(8):2128
Panda N, Bakshi J, Verma R, Kaushal D, Gupta N (2014) Piston diameter in stapes surgery. Does it have a bearing? Indian J Otolog 20(1):33
Cavaliere M, Ricciardiello F, Mesolella M, Iengo M (2012) Stapedotomy: functional results with different diameter prostheses. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 74(2):93–96
Laske RD, Roosli C, Chatzimichalis MV, Sim JH, Huber AM (2011) The influence of prosthesis diameter in stapes surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Otol Neurotol 32(4):520–528
Wegner I, Eldaebes MM, Landry TG, Grolman W, Bance ML (2016) The effect of piston diameter in stapedotomy for otosclerosis: a temporal bone model. Otol Neurotol 37(10):1497–1502
Sudhoff H, Gehl HB, Boga E, Müller S, Wilms K, Mutze S, Todt I (2019) Stapes prosthesis length: one size fits all? Audiolog Neurotolog 24(1):1–7
Ali HI, Khater NH (2018) Otosclerosis and complications of stapedectomy: CT and MRI correlation. Alexandria J Med 54(3):197–201
Karhuketo TS, Lundmark J, Vanhatalo J, Rautiainen M, Sipilä M (2007) Stapes surgery: a 32-year follow-up. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 69(5):322–326
Hornung JA, Brase C, Bozzato A, Zenk J, Iro H (2009) First experience with a new titanium clip stapes prosthesis and a comparison with the earlier model used in stapes surgery. The Laryngoscope 119(12):2421–2427
Lemmerling MM, Stambuk HE, Mancuso AA, Antonelli PJ, Kubilis PS (1997) Normal and opacified middle ears: CT appearance of the stapes and incudostapedial joint. Radiology 203(1):251–256
Singh A, Irugu DVK, Kumar R, Verma H, Gupta A, Kumari A (2020) Study of morphologic variability of incudostapedial angle and its relation with temporal bone pneumatization. J Otol 15:50–53
Sohoel T (1957) The course of bone conduction after fenestration operation. Acta Oto-Laryngol 47(5):462
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81822011, 81771013, 81700925, 81870726). No funding was received for this work from any of the following organizations: National Institutes of Health (NIH), Wellcome Trust, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and other(s).
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationship with any company whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. This research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Internal Review Board of EENT Hospital affiliated with Fudan University. I, Bing Chen, as the corresponding author, ensure that there is no author identifying information anywhere in the blinded manuscript (i.e., author details, ethical statements, acknowledgements, author contribution, grant information, funding number, etc.).
Availability of data and material
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, Y., Zhang, K., Ren, LJ. et al. Changes of incudostapedial joint angle in stapedotomy: does it impact hearing outcomes?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 645–652 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06103-7
- Incudostapedial joint (ISJ)
- MPR-CT (multiple planar reconstruction-computed tomography)