Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Asymmetric hearing loss and the benefit of cochlear implantation regarding speech perception, tinnitus burden and psychological comorbidities: a prospective follow-up study

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We determined the audiological outcome, the subjective and objective hearing quality in patients suffering from asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Furthermore, we evaluated psychological comorbidities and tinnitus burden before and after cochlear implantation.

Study design

Prospective cohort study.

Methods

44 AHL patients were unilaterally implanted with a multichannel cochlear implant between 2011 and 2016. Speech discrimination (Freiburg Monosyllable Word Test, Oldenburg Sentence Test) was measured before, 6 and 12 months after implantation. Subjective hearing quality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), tinnitus burden, anxiety, depressiveness, perceived stress level and coping abilities were evaluated before implantation, 6 and 12 months postoperative using specific validated questionnaires (Oldenburg Inventory, Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire, Tinnitus Questionnaire, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Questionnaire and Cope Inventory).

Results

Subjective and objective hearing quality, speech discrimination and health-related quality of life were significantly increased in AHL patients. Tinnitus burden significantly decreased over the 12 postoperative months. No significant alteration was observed for anxiety, depressiveness, coping abilities and stress level.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that cochlear implantation achieves hearing rehabilitation, increases HRQoL and decreases tinnitus burden in patients suffering from AHL. Subjective hearing quality increased, while tinnitus burden significantly decreased 6 and 12 months after implantation. HRQoL in AHL patients is an important factor to focus on and is significantly increased postoperatively. In contrast, general anxiety, depressiveness, coping abilities and perceived stress level remained unaffected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson G, Freijd A, Baguley DM, Idrizbegovic E (2009) Tinnitus distress, anxiety, depression, and hearing problems among cochlear implant patients with tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol 20(5):315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arndt S, Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F, Beck R, Wesarg T (2017) Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. HNO. 10

  4. Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):75S–79S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borton SA, Mauze E, Lieu JE (2010) Quality of life in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study. Am J Audiol 19(1):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd PJ (2015) Potential benefits from cochlear implantation of children with unilateral hearing loss. Cochlear Implants Int 16(3):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brüggemann P, Szczepek AJ, Klee K, Gräbel S, Mazurek B, Olze H (2017) In Patients undergoing cochlear implantation, psychological burden affects tinnitus and the overall outcome of auditory rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci 5(11):226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 56(2):267–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Damen GW, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PF, Mulder JJ, Mylanus EA (2007) Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(4):597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fellinger J, Holzinger D, Gerich J, Goldberg D (2007) Mental distress and quality of life in the hard of hearing. Acta Psychiatr Scand 115(3):243–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fliege H, Rose M, Arck P, Walter OB, Kocalevent RD, Weber C, Klapp BF (2005) The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples. Psychosom Med 67(1):78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK (2002) Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 112(8 Pt 1):1482–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goebel G, Hiller W (1994) The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire. HNO 42(3):166–172 (German)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hahlbrock KH (1953) Speech audiometry and new word-tests. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 162(5):394–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hiller W, Goebel G, Rief W (1994) Reliability of self-rated tinnitus distress and association with psychological symptom patterns. Br J Clin Psychol 33(Pt 2):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):756–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H (2008) The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008 138(3):357–362

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 306(6890):1437–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ketterer MC, Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Hassepass F, Wesarg T, Laszig R, Beck R (2018) The influence of cochlearmorphology on the final electrode array position. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(2):385–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Knoll N, Rieckmann N, Schwarzer R (2005) Coping as a mediator between personality and stress outcomes: a longitudinal study with cataract surgery patients. Eur J Pers 19:229–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knopke S, Szczepek AJ, Häussler SM, Gräbel S, Olze H (2017) Cochlear implantation of bilaterally deafened patients with tinnitus induces sustained decrease of tinnitus-related distress. Front Neurol 25(8):158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Knopke S, Gräbel S, Förster-Ruhrmann U, Mazurek B, Szczepek AJ, Olze H (2016) Impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and mental comorbidity in patients aged 80 years. Laryngoscope 126(12):2811–2816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kollmeier B, Holube I (1991) Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung des subjektiven Hörvermögens; Erstellung der Fragen und Beziehungen zum Tonschwellenaudiogramm. Audiologische Diagnostik 30:48–64

    Google Scholar 

  24. Levenstein S, Prantera C, Varvo V, Scribano ML, Berto E, Luzi C, Andreoli A. Development of the perceived stress questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research. J Psychosom Res 37(1):19–32

  25. Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, Harris TB, Purchase-Helzner E, Satterfield S, Ayonayon HN, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM (2013) Health ABC Study Group. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 173(4):293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin FR (2011) Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66(10):1131–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Louza J, Hempel JM, Krause E, Berghaus A, Müller J, Braun T (2017) Patient benefit from Cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(6):2405–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, Brähler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, Herzberg PY. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care 46(3):266–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miyamoto RT, Bichey BG (2003) Cochlear implantation for tinnitus suppression. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 36(2):345–352 (Review)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mo B, Harris S, Lindbaek M (2002) Tinnitus in cochlear implant patients—a comparison with other hearing-impaired patients. Int J Audiol 41(8):527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohiyeddini C, Hautzinger M, Bauer S (2002) A latent state-trait analysis on assessing trait and state components of three instruments for measuring depression: ADS, BDI, and SDS. Diagnostica 48(1):12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, Zirke N, Huhnd LE, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2012) Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope 122(1):196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Olze H, Gräbel S, Haupt H, Förster U, Mazurek B (2012) Extra benefit of a second cochlear implant with respect to health-related quality of life and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 33(7):1169–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Haupt H, Zirke N, Graebel S, Mazurek B (2012) The impact of cochlear implantation on tinnitus, stress and quality of life in postlingually deafened patients. Audiol Neurootol 17(1):2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Olze H, Knopke S, Gräbel S, Szczepek AJ (2016) Rapid positive influence of cochlear implantation on the quality of life in adults 70 years and older. Audiol Neurootol 21(Suppl 1):43–47 (Epub 2016 Nov 3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Haupt H, Förster U, Zirke N, Gräbel S, Mazurek B (2011) Cochlear implantation has a positive influence on quality of life, tinnitus, and psychological comorbidity. Laryngoscope 121(10):2220–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peracino A (2014) Hearing loss and dementia in the aging population. Audiol Neurootol 19(Suppl 1):6–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Piehlmeier W, Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Land W, Landgraf R (1996) Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus before and after organ transplantation with the SF 36 health survey. Eur J Surg 162(12):933–940

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramos-Macías Á, Falcón González JC, Borkoski-Barreiro SA, Ramos de Miguel Á, Batista DS, Pérez Plasencia D (2016) Health-related quality of life in adult cochlear implant users: a descriptive observational study. Audiol Neurootol 21(Suppl 1):36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rösli M, Hoth S, Baumann I, Praetorius M, Plinkert PK (2015) The impact of cochlear implants on the quality of life of patients with single-sided deafness. HNO 63(3):182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Seydel C, Haupt H, Szczepek AJ, Klapp BF, Mazurek B (2010) Long-term improvement in tinnitus after modified tinnitus retraining therapy enhanced by a variety of psychological approaches. Audiol Neurootol 15(2):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(9):645–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Loon MC, Smits C, Smit CF, Hensen EF, Merkus P (2017) Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss: benefits of bimodal stimulation. Otol Neurotol 38(6):e100–e106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P (2009) Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 14(3):163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vincent C, Arndt S, Firszt JB, Fraysse B, Kitterick PT, Papsin BC, Snik A, Van de Heyning P, Deguine O, Marx M (2015) Identification and evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with asymmetrical hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 20(Suppl 1):87–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wie OB, Pripp AH, Tvete O (2010) Unilateral deafness in adults: effects on communication and social interaction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(11):772–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zirke N, Seydel C, Szczepek AJ, Olze H, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2013) Psychological comorbidity in patients with chronic tinnitus: analysis and comparison with chronic pain, asthma or atopic dermatitis patients. Qual Life Res 22(2):263–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zöger S, Svedlund J, Holgers KM (2001) Psychiatric disorders in tinnitus patients without severe hearing impairment: 24 month follow-up of patients at an audiological clinic. Audiology 40(3):133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Christoph Ketterer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no funding, financial relationships or conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ketterer, M.C., Knopke, S., Häußler, S.M. et al. Asymmetric hearing loss and the benefit of cochlear implantation regarding speech perception, tinnitus burden and psychological comorbidities: a prospective follow-up study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275, 2683–2693 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5135-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5135-9

Keywords

Navigation