Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 11, pp 2675–2682 | Cite as

Cartilaginous Eustachian tube length and carotid canal dehiscence in children: a radiological study

  • E. C. TollEmail author
  • M. Browning
  • R. Shukla
  • J. W. Rainsbury
Otology

Abstract

Purpose

The use of Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) for Eustachian tube dysfunction is increasing in adults but to a lesser extent in children. Despite growing experience, concerns remain that BET could theoretically cause carotid artery rupture, which may be more likely if there is carotid canal dehiscence adjacent to the bony Eustachian tube. This radiological study aims to assess the prevalence of carotid canal dehiscence and length of cartilaginous Eustachian tube in children.

Materials and methods

75 consecutive computed tomography scans of the petrous temporal bones performed in children were identified (150 carotid canals/Eustachian tubes). Two independent raters measured the length of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube and thickness of carotid canal wall.

Results

8% of carotid canals had radiological dehiscence. Prevalence of carotid canal dehiscence on either side per child was 12%. Mean cartilaginous Eustachian tube length was 24.5 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and the minimum measured was 14.1 mm. The minimum length measured in a child over 3 years old (n = 65) was 18.1 mm. The mean thickness of bone of the carotid canal was 0.7 mm (SD 0.27 mm). There was a positive relationship between age and Eustachian tube length (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.622, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Carotid canal dehiscence in children has a low prevalence. Variation in the length of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube is low but is correlated with age. More research is required to define the indications, safety, efficacy and technical aspects of BET in children.

Keywords

Cholesteatoma, Middle ear Eustachian tube Ear, Middle Tympanic membrane 

Notes

Funding

The authors received no funding for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution (Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust R&D approval reference 15/P/073) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Due to the retrospective design of this radiological study and lack of study intervention, informed consent from the individual participants was deemed not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Han WG, Yoo J, Rah YC, Chang J, Im GJ, Song JJ, Chae SW, Jung HH, Choi J (2017) Analysis of Eustachian tube dysfunction by dynamic slow motion video endoscopy and Eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire in chronic otitis media. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 10(4):315–320.  https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.01683 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paltura C, Can TS, Yilmaz BK, Dinc ME, Develioglu ON, Kulekci M (2017) Eustachian tube diameter: Is it associated with chronic otitis media development? Am J Otolaryngol 38(4):414–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yuceturk AV, Unlu HH, Okumus M, Yildiz T, Filiz U (1997) The evaluation of eustachian tube function in patients with chronic otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 22(5):449–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ockermann T, Reineke U, Upile T, Ebmeyer J, Sudhoff HH (2010) Balloon dilatation eustachian tuboplasty: a clinical study. Laryngoscope 120(7):1411–1416.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20950 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bluestone CD, Klein JO (1996) Otitis media, atelectasis, and Eustachian tube dysfunction. In: Bluestone CD, Stool SE, Kenna MA (eds) Pediatric otolaryngology, 3rd edn. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mandel EM, Casselbrant ML, Richert BC, Teixeira MS, Swarts JD, Doyle WJ (2016) Eustachian tube function in 6-year-old children with and without a history of middle ear disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(3):502–507.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815620149 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel MA, Mener DJ, Garcia-Esquinas E, Navas-Acien A, Agrawal Y, Lin SY (2016) Tobacco smoke exposure and eustachian tube disorders in US children and adolescents. PLoS One 11(10):e0163926.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163926 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    NICE (2011) NICE interventional procedure guidance 409: Balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube. NHS Evidence, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schroder S, Lehmann M, Ebmeyer J, Upile T, Sudhoff H (2015) Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty (BET): our experience of 622 cases. Clin Otolaryngol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12429 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wanscher JH, Svane-Knudsen V (2014) Promising results after balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube for obstructive dysfunction. Dan Med J 61(4):A4818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Randrup TS, Ovesen T (2015) Balloon eustachian tuboplasty: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 152(3):383–392.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814567105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hearst MJ, Kadar A, Keller JT, Choo DI, Pensak ML, Samy RN (2008) Petrous carotid canal dehiscence: an anatomic and radiographic study. Otol Neurotol 29(7):1001–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818599ea CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moreano EH, Paparella MM, Zelterman D, Goycoolea MV (1994) Prevalence of carotid canal dehiscence in the human middle ear: a report of 1000 temporal bones. Laryngoscope 104(5 Pt 1):612–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pastor Vazquez JF, Gil Verona JA, Garcia Porrero M (1999) Carotid canal dehiscence in the human skull. Neuroradiology 41(6):447–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tisch M, Storrle P, Danz B, Maier H (2013) [Role of imaging before Eustachian tube dilation using the Bielefeld balloon catheter]. Hno 61(6):488–491.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-013-2712-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    United States Food and Drug Administration (2016) FDA permits marketing of balloon device to treat persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction. https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm521063.htm. Accessed March 2017. Washington DC
  17. 17.
    Schroder S, Lehmann M, Sauzet O, Ebmeyer J, Sudhoff H (2015) A novel diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction-the eustachian tube score. Laryngoscope 125(3):703–708.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24922 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leichtle A, Hollfelder D, Wollenberg B, Bruchhage KL (2017) Balloon eustachian tuboplasty in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(6):2411–2419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4517-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tisch M, Maier S, Hecht P, Maier H (2013) Bilateral eustachian tube dilation in infants: an alternative treatment for persistent middle ear functional dysfunction. HNO 61(6):492–493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-013-2713-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryTorbay HospitalTorquayUK
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryDerriford HospitalPlymouthUK
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryDerriford HospitalPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations