The effect of electrolyte balance on the voice in hemodialysis patients
- 113 Downloads
The aim of the study was to demonstrate the effect of blood electrolytes on the voice in chronic hemodialysis patients.
The study included a total of 59 hemodialysis patients. Pre- and post-dialysis voice recordings were performed. In the analysis of vocal acoustic parameters, fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, the noise-to-harmonics ratio (NHR), and F0 minimum and F0 maximum were measured. The Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), and maximum phonation time (MPT) were evaluated. For perceptual evaluation, the GRBAS scale was used. The duration of dialysis (years) and changes in weight during dialysis were recorded for each patient. From venous blood samples, measurements were taken of hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, Na+, K+, creatinine, uric acid, phosphorus, Ca++, and parathormone.
The difference in the pre and post-dialysis values of F0, shimmer, NHR and MPT were found to be statistically significant (p = 0.001). The only variable determined to have an effect on the change in F0 values was uric acid, and the change in the F0 values was statistically significant (p = 0.009). The only variable determined to have an effect on the change in shimmer values was sodium, and the change was statistically significant (p = 0.034). The only variable determined to have an effect on the change in NHR values was creatinine, and the change in the NHR values was statistically significant (p = 0.028). Hb and the duration of dialysis were determined to have a statistically significant effect on the change in MPT values (p = 0.001).
The results showed that uric acid was the agent creating a reduction in vocal cord vibration, the agent increasing the difference between vibration waves was Na+, and creatinine increased the NHR rate. The effect of these variables can be considered important in the understanding of vocal cord physiology.
KeywordsHemodialysis Acoustic analysis Voice Electrolytes
No funding was received for this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Approval was obtained from the ethical committee of Kahramanmaras Sutçu Imam University (protocol no; 19, date: 14/02/2018).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 10.Coresh J, Wei GL, McQuillan G, Brancati FL, Levey AS, Jones C et al (2001) Prevalence of high blood pressure and elevated serum creatinine level in the United States findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1994). Arch Intern Med 161(9):1207–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Raphael LJ, Borden GJ, Harris KS (2007) The raw materials—phonation. In: Raphael LJ, Borden GJ, Harris KS (eds) Speech science primer: physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 85–103Google Scholar
- 21.Nesić M, Veljković S, Obrenović J, Cekić S, Velicković D, Radenković M (1996) Voice frequencies in patients treated with chronic hemodialysis. Srp Arc Celok Lek 124:99–101Google Scholar
- 34.Dejonckere P, Remacle M, Frensel EE, Woisard V, Crevier BL, Millet B (1996) Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 117:219–224Google Scholar
- 36.Pierson DJ (2006) Respiratory considerations in the patients with the renal failure. Respir care 53:413–422Google Scholar