Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Current practice in the surgical management of parathyroid disorders: a United Kingdom survey

  • Head & Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism is undertaken by many specialties but predominantly endocrine and ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeons. There is currently no consensus on the peri-operative management of primary hyperparathyroidism. We sought to determine current surgical practice and identify any inter-specialty variation in the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods

An online survey was disseminated to members of the British Association of Endocrine & Thyroid Surgeons (BAETS) in the UK.

Results

78 surgeons responded (40 Endocrine, 37 ENT and 1 maxillofacial). 90% of surgeons used ultrasound and sestamibi for pre-operative localisation. Intraoperative frozen section (31%) and parathyroid hormone monitoring (41%) were the most common adjuncts used intraoperatively. 68% of surgeons did not use any wound drains. Nearly two-thirds of surgeons (64%) discharged patients from the clinic within 3 months, There were some significant differences (p < 0.05) in particular areas of practice between endocrine and ENT surgeons (%, p): use of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (Endocrine 25% vs. ENT 5%), preoperative laryngeal assessment (endocrine 58% vs. ENT 95%), intraoperative laryngeal nerve monitoring (endocrine 35% vs. ENT 68%), use of monopolar diathermy (endocrine 58% vs. ENT 22%), bipolar diathermy (endocrine 60% vs. 89%) and surgical ties (endocrine 48% vs. ENT 19%).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates some similarities as well as some notable differences in practice between endocrine and ENT surgeons, and therefore, highlights the need for national consensus with respect to some key areas in parathyroid surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJIII (2002) The epidemiology of primary hyperparathyroidism in North America. J Bone Miner Res 17S2:N12–N17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wermers RA, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Grant CS, Melton LJ 3rd (2006) Incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism in Rochester, Minnesota, 1993–2001: an update on the changing epidemiology of the disease. J Bone Miner Res 21(1):171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wieneke JA, Smith A (2008) Parathyroid adenoma. Head Neck Pathol 2(4):305–308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Maniakas A, Christopoulos A, Bissada E, Guertin L, Olivier MJ, Malaise J, Ayad T (2017) Peri-operative practices in thyroid surgery: an international survey. Head Neck 39(7):1296–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. BAETS (2003) BAETS guidelines. http://www.baets.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/BAETS-Guidelines-2003.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2018

  6. BAETS (2018) BAETS audit report. http://www.baets.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/BAETS-Audit-National-Report-2017.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2018

  7. Cheung K, Wang TS, Farrokhyar F, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2012) A meta-analysis of preoperative localization techniques for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg Oncol 19(2):577–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nafisi Moghadam R, Amlelshahbaz AP, Namiranian N, Sobhan-Ardekani M, Emami-Meybodi M, Dehghan A, Rahmanian M, Razavi-Ratki SK (2017) Comparative diagnostic performance of ultrasonography and 99mTc-Sestamibi scintigraphy for parathyroid adenoma in primary hyperparathyroidism; systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac Cancer Prev 18(12):3195–3200

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siperstein A, Berber E, Mackey R, Alghoul M, Wagner K, Milas M (2004) Prospective evaluation of sestamibi scan, ultrasonography, and rapid PTH to predict the success of limited exploration for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 136(4):872–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raruenrom Y, Theerakulpisut D, Wongsurawat N, Somboonporn C (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT parathyroid scintigraphy protocols in patients with hyperparathyroidism. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur 21(1):20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen W, Düren M, Morita E, Higgins C, Duh QY, Siperstein AE, Clark OH (1996) Reoperation for persistent or recurrent primary hyperparathyroidism. Arch Surg 131(8):861–867 (discussion 867–9)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gotway MB, Reddy GP, Webb WR et al (2001) Comparison between MR imaging and 99mTc MIBI scintigraphy in the evaluation of recurrent of persistent hyperparathyroidism. Radiology 218(3):783–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reading CC, Gorman CA (1993) Thyroid imaging techniques. Clin Lab Med 13(3):711–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marmin C, Toledano M, Lemaire S, Boury S, Mordon S, Ernst O (2012) Computed tomography of the parathyroids: the value of density measurements to distinguish between parathyroid adenomas of the lymph nodes and the thyroid parenchyma. Diagn Interv Imaging 93(7–8):597–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamada T, Ikuno M, Shinjo Y, Hiroishi A, Matsushita S, Morimoto T, Kumano R, Yagihashi K, Katabami T (2017) Selective venous sampling for primary hyperparathyroidism: how to perform an examination and interpret the results with reference to thyroid vein anatomy. Jpn J Radiol 35(8):409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones JJ, Brunaud L, Dowd CF, Duh QY, Morita E, Clark OH (2002) Accuracy of selective venous sampling for intact parathyroid hormone in difficult patients with recurrent or persistent hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 132(6):944–950 (discussion 950–1)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaffanjon PC, Voirin D, Vasdev A, Chabre O, Kenyon NM, Brichon PY (2004) Selective venous sampling in recurrent and persistent hyperparathyroidism: indication, technique, and results. World J Surg 28(10):958–961 (Epub 2004 Sep 29)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sinclair CF, Bumpous JM, Haugen BR, Chala A, Meltzer D, Miller BS, Tolley NS, Shin JJ, Woodson G, Randolph GW (2016) Laryngeal examination in thyroid and parathyroid surgery: an American Head and Neck Society consensus statement: AHNS Consensus Statement. Head Neck 38(6):811–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Farrag TY, Samlan RA, Lin FR, Tufano RP (2006) The utility of evaluating true vocal fold motion before thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope 116(2):235–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barczynski M, Konturek A, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A et al (2009) Evaluation of Halle, Miami, Rome, and Vienna intraoperative iPTH assay criteria in guiding minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(5):843–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel KN, Caso R (2016) Intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring: optimal utilization. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 25(1):91–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris LF, Zanocco K, Ituarte PH, Ro K, Duh QY, Sturgeon C, Yeh MW (2010) The value of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in localized primary hyperparathyroidism: a cost analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 17(3):679–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel HP, Chadwick DR, Harrison BJ, Balasubramanian SP (2012) Systematic review of intravenous methylene blue in parathyroid surgery. Br J Surg 99(10):1345–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Randolph GW, Dralle H, International Intraoperative Monitoring Study Group, Abdullah H, Barczynski M, Bellantone R, Brauckhoff M, Carnaille B, Cherenko S, Chiang FY, Dionigi G, Finck C, Hartl D, Kamani D, Lorenz K, Miccolli P, Mihai R, Miyauchi A, Orloff L, Perrier N, Poveda MD, Romanchishen A, Serpell J, Sitges-Serra A, Sloan T, Van Slycke S, Snyder S, Takami H, Volpi E, Woodson G (2011) Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope 121(Suppl 1):S1–S16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghani U, Assad S, Assad S (2016) Role of intraoperative nerve monitoring during parathyroidectomy to prevent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Cureus 8(11):e880

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mourad M, Kadakia S, Jategaonkar A, Gordin E, Ducic Y (2017) Intraoperative nerve monitoring during parathyroid surgery: the fort worth experience. Head Neck 39(8):1662–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Malik R, Linos D (2016) Intraoperative neuromonitoring in thyroid surgery: a systematic review. World J Surg 40(8):2051–2058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tabaqchali MA, Hanson JM, Proud G (1999) Drains for thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy: fact or fiction? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 81(5):302–305

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Doran HE, England J, Palazzo F, British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons (2012) Questionable safety of thyroid surgery with same day discharge. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(8):543–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lou I, Balentine C, Clarkson S, Schneider DF, Sippel RS, Chen H (2017) How long should we follow patients after apparently curative parathyroidectomy? Surgery 161(1):54–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ENT Specialist Registrar, Surrey and Sussex NHS Trust, Redhill, UK

    K. Varadharajan

  2. Consultant ENT Surgeon, Surrey and Sussex NHS Trust, Redhill, UK

    N. Choudhury

Authors
  1. K. Varadharajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Varadharajan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Human and animal participants’ statement

No human or animal participants were involved in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varadharajan, K., Choudhury, N. Current practice in the surgical management of parathyroid disorders: a United Kingdom survey. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275, 2549–2553 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5094-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5094-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation