Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 5, pp 1095–1102 | Cite as

Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a new surgical treatment

  • Daniele Marchioni
  • Stefano De Rossi
  • Davide Soloperto
  • Livio Presutti
  • Luca Sacchetto
  • Alessia Rubini
Otology
  • 120 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To define a new surgical option, with lower morbidity, for the treatment of intralabyrinthine schwannomas.

Study design

Retrospective case review.

Setting

Tertiary referral centers.

Patients

Eight patients affected by an intralabyrinthine schwannoma, with or without extension to the internal auditory canal, that underwent surgery with a transcanal transpromontorial approach, were included in the study. The average age at presentation was 47 years. Patients’ characteristics, symptoms, tumor features, and surgical results were analyzed.

Interventions

All patients were diagnosed and evaluated pre-operatively with high-resolution, gadolinium-enhanced MRI and CT scan of the temporal bone, and underwent surgery via either transcanal transpromontorial endoscopic approach (TTEA) or enlarged transcanal transpromontorial endoscopic approach (ETTA).

Main outcome measures

Hearing function was evaluated with the Hearing Classification System according to the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines. Facial nerve function was evaluated using the House–Brackmann grading system (HB).

Results

In six patients out of eight, a TTEA was performed, whereas, due to the extension of the pathology to the cerebellopontine angle, two patients underwent an ETTA. The mean follow-up period was 15.5 months (range 1–69). No intra-operative and post-operative major complications were observed. Post-operative facial nerve function was normal in seven out of eight patients (grade I HB). One patient presented a grade II HB.

Conclusion

The endoscopic approach to cochlear schwannoma represents a good treatment option for patients and should be preferred to other more invasive surgical techniques when indicated, to reduce complications, hospitalization, and offer to patients the chance to eradicate the disease, thus avoiding the stress of a long-life radiological follow-up.

Level of evidence

4.

Keywords

Cochlear schwannoma Endoscopic ear surgery Intralabyrinthine schwannoma 

Notes

Author contributions

All of the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

The present authors have no financial relationship to disclose.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bouchetemble P et al (2013) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a case series with discussion of the diagnosis and management. Otol Neurotol 34(5):944–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brian A, Neff TOW Jr, Sataloff RT (2003) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 24:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salzman KL et al (2012) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: imaging diagnosis and classification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(1):104–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennedy RJ et al (2004) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: diagnosis, management, and a new classification system. Otol Neurotol 25(2):160–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anonymous (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. INC. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):179–180Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93(2):146–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Presutti L et al (2017) Expanded transcanal transpromontorial approach to the internal auditory canal: pilot clinical experience. Laryngoscope 127(11):2608–2614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoistad DL et al (2001) Update on conservative management of acoustic neuroma. Otol Neurotol 22(5):682–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mirz F et al (1999) Investigations into the natural history of vestibular schwannomas. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24(1):13–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stangerup SE et al (2004) Increasing annual incidence of vestibular schwannoma and age at diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol 118(8):622–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karpinos M et al (2002) Treatment of acoustic neuroma: stereotactic radiosurgery vs. microsurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(5):1410–1421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw EG, Coffey RJ, Dinapoli RP (1995) Neurotoxicity of radiosurgery. Semin Radiat Oncol 5(3):235–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leksell L (1983) Stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46(9):797–803CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leksell DG (1987) Stereotactic radiosurgery. Present status and future trends. Neurol Res 9(2):60–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doyle KJ, Brackmann DE (1994) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 110(6):517–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee JJ et al (2015) Recovery of hearing after surgical removal of intralabyrinthine schwannoma. Laryngoscope 125(8):1968–1971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mazzoni A et al (2017) Acoustic schwannoma with intracochlear extension and primary intracochlear schwannoma: removal through translabyrinthine approach with facial bridge cochleostomy and transcanal approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(5):2149–2154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mahboubi H et al (2014) Complications of surgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150(2):275–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coca A, Gómez JR, Llorente JL, Rodrigo JP, Núñez F, Sevilla MA et al (2007) Complicaciones y secuelas en la cirugía de los neurinomas del acústico. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 58:470–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marchioni D et al (2015) Endoscopic transcanal corridors to the lateral skull base: initial experiences. Laryngoscope 125(Suppl 5):S1–S13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wick CC, Arnaoutakis D, Barnett SL, Rivas A, Isaacson B (2017) Endoscopic transcanal transpromontorial approach for vestibular schwannoma resection: a case series. Otol Neurotol 38(10):490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Presutti L et al (2017) Expanded transcanal transpromontorial approach to the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle: a cadaveric study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 37(3):224–230PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery DepartmentUniversity Hospital of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery DepartmentUniversity Hospital of ModenaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations