Skip to main content
Log in

Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a new surgical treatment

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To define a new surgical option, with lower morbidity, for the treatment of intralabyrinthine schwannomas.

Study design

Retrospective case review.

Setting

Tertiary referral centers.

Patients

Eight patients affected by an intralabyrinthine schwannoma, with or without extension to the internal auditory canal, that underwent surgery with a transcanal transpromontorial approach, were included in the study. The average age at presentation was 47 years. Patients’ characteristics, symptoms, tumor features, and surgical results were analyzed.

Interventions

All patients were diagnosed and evaluated pre-operatively with high-resolution, gadolinium-enhanced MRI and CT scan of the temporal bone, and underwent surgery via either transcanal transpromontorial endoscopic approach (TTEA) or enlarged transcanal transpromontorial endoscopic approach (ETTA).

Main outcome measures

Hearing function was evaluated with the Hearing Classification System according to the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines. Facial nerve function was evaluated using the House–Brackmann grading system (HB).

Results

In six patients out of eight, a TTEA was performed, whereas, due to the extension of the pathology to the cerebellopontine angle, two patients underwent an ETTA. The mean follow-up period was 15.5 months (range 1–69). No intra-operative and post-operative major complications were observed. Post-operative facial nerve function was normal in seven out of eight patients (grade I HB). One patient presented a grade II HB.

Conclusion

The endoscopic approach to cochlear schwannoma represents a good treatment option for patients and should be preferred to other more invasive surgical techniques when indicated, to reduce complications, hospitalization, and offer to patients the chance to eradicate the disease, thus avoiding the stress of a long-life radiological follow-up.

Level of evidence

4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouchetemble P et al (2013) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a case series with discussion of the diagnosis and management. Otol Neurotol 34(5):944–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brian A, Neff TOW Jr, Sataloff RT (2003) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 24:299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salzman KL et al (2012) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: imaging diagnosis and classification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(1):104–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy RJ et al (2004) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: diagnosis, management, and a new classification system. Otol Neurotol 25(2):160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. INC. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):179–180

  6. House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93(2):146–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Presutti L et al (2017) Expanded transcanal transpromontorial approach to the internal auditory canal: pilot clinical experience. Laryngoscope 127(11):2608–2614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoistad DL et al (2001) Update on conservative management of acoustic neuroma. Otol Neurotol 22(5):682–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirz F et al (1999) Investigations into the natural history of vestibular schwannomas. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24(1):13–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stangerup SE et al (2004) Increasing annual incidence of vestibular schwannoma and age at diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol 118(8):622–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karpinos M et al (2002) Treatment of acoustic neuroma: stereotactic radiosurgery vs. microsurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(5):1410–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw EG, Coffey RJ, Dinapoli RP (1995) Neurotoxicity of radiosurgery. Semin Radiat Oncol 5(3):235–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leksell L (1983) Stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46(9):797–803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leksell DG (1987) Stereotactic radiosurgery. Present status and future trends. Neurol Res 9(2):60–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doyle KJ, Brackmann DE (1994) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 110(6):517–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JJ et al (2015) Recovery of hearing after surgical removal of intralabyrinthine schwannoma. Laryngoscope 125(8):1968–1971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazzoni A et al (2017) Acoustic schwannoma with intracochlear extension and primary intracochlear schwannoma: removal through translabyrinthine approach with facial bridge cochleostomy and transcanal approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(5):2149–2154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahboubi H et al (2014) Complications of surgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150(2):275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coca A, Gómez JR, Llorente JL, Rodrigo JP, Núñez F, Sevilla MA et al (2007) Complicaciones y secuelas en la cirugía de los neurinomas del acústico. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 58:470–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marchioni D et al (2015) Endoscopic transcanal corridors to the lateral skull base: initial experiences. Laryngoscope 125(Suppl 5):S1–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wick CC, Arnaoutakis D, Barnett SL, Rivas A, Isaacson B (2017) Endoscopic transcanal transpromontorial approach for vestibular schwannoma resection: a case series. Otol Neurotol 38(10):490–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Presutti L et al (2017) Expanded transcanal transpromontorial approach to the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle: a cadaveric study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 37(3):224–230

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present authors have no financial relationship to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All of the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano De Rossi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marchioni, D., De Rossi, S., Soloperto, D. et al. Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a new surgical treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275, 1095–1102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4937-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4937-0

Keywords

Navigation