Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 5, pp 1175–1181 | Cite as

Potential risk factors associated with the development of synechiae following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

  • Jamil Manji
  • Al-Rahim R. Habib
  • Ameen A. Amanian
  • Saad Alsaleh
  • Andrew Thamboo
  • Amin R. Javer
Rhinology

Abstract

Purpose

Synechiae formation in the middle meatus is the most common complication of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Our objectives were to determine the incidence of synechiae occurring in a cohort of patients that have undergone FESS and identify characteristics associated with the development of synechiae postoperatively.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of CRS patients, with or without nasal polyposis, that had undergone bilateral FESS in the past. All patients had received non-absorbable spacers intraoperatively that were left in situ for 6 days. Demographic and preoperative variables were analyzed to identify synechiae risk factors. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to estimate the probability of developing synechiae, given demographic and preoperative variables.

Results

Two hundred cases of bilateral FESS were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-eight (19.0%, 95% CI 13.6–24.4%) patients developed synechiae. Individuals receiving primary FESS and nasal septal reconstruction (NSR) were strongly associated with the development of synechiae (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5–8.5; OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3–6.9). A multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for NSR, recurrent FESS, concha bullosa, requirement of anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, Lund-Mackay CT score and gender, identified the likelihood of developing synechiae with a sensitivity of 68%, specificity of 73%, positive predictive value of 38% and likelihood ratio of 2.5.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing primary FESS and NSR are at greatest odds of developing postoperative synechiae. Methods of assessing risk factors and preventing synechiae formation in this population should be evaluated in future prospective investigations.

Keywords

Chronic rhinosinusitis Endoscopic sinus surgery FESS Postoperative care Synechiae 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict(s) of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

This was a retrospective chart review and thus, informed consent was not required by our human ethics board.

References

  1. 1.
    Bednarski KA, Kuhn FA (2009) Stents and drug-eluting stents. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:857–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller RS, Steward DL, Tami TA et al (2003) The clinical effects of hyaluronic acid ester nasal dressing (Merogel) on intranasal wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:862–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saafan ME, Ragab SM, Albirmawy OA, Elsherif HS (2013) Powered versus conventional endoscopic sinus surgery instruments in management of sinonasal polyposis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 270:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Catalano PJ, Roffman EJ. Evaluation of middle meatal stenting after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128:875–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedman M, Landsberg R, Tanyeri H (2000) Middle turbinate medialization and preservation in endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:76–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jorissen M (2004) Postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery. Rhinology 42:114–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hobson CE, Choby GW, Wang EW, Morton SC, Lee S (2015) Systematic review and metaanalysis of middle meatal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allerg 29:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee JM, Grewal A (2012) Middle meatal spacers for the prevention of synechiae following endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Forum Allerg Rhinol 2:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang TC, Tai CJ, Tsou YA, Tsai LT, Li YF, Tsai MH (2015) Absorbable and nonabsorbable packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 272:1825–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM (2004) The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1613–1618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee JY, Lee SW (2007) Preventing lateral synechia formation after endoscopic sinus surgery with a silastic sheet. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:776–779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brenner H, Gefeller O (1997) Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med 16:981–991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Acta Paediatr 96:487–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roldan Nofuentes JA, Luna del Castillo JD (2005) Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification. Biom J Biom Zeitschrift 47:442–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2004) Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 329:168–169CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mantovani M, Rinaldi V, Torretta S et al (2014) The dragonfly splint: a new disposable device designed to prevent both medial and lateral turbinate synechiae after sinonasal surgery. J Craniofacial Surg 25:547–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu JJ, Busato GM, McKnight C, Lee JM (2016) Absorbable steroid-impregnated spacer after endoscopic sinus surgery to reduce synechiae formation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125:195–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Choby GW, Hobson CE, Lee S, Wang EW (2014) Clinical effects of middle turbinate resection after endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allerg 28:502–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henriquez OA, Schlosser RJ, Mace JC, Smith TL, Soler ZM (2013) Impact of synechiae after endoscopic sinus surgery on long-term outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 123:2615–2619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Otolaryngology, St. Paul’s Sinus CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Department, King Abdulaziz University HospitalKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations