European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 5, pp 1149–1156 | Cite as

Endoscopic transnasal surgery of clival lesions: our experience

  • Daniele Marchioni
  • Angelo Musumeci
  • Cristoforo Fabbris
  • Stefano De Rossi
  • Davide Soloperto
Rhinology

Abstract

Background

The clivus is a region characterized by complex anatomy, with vascular and neural structures that are located in close proximity. Different pathologies can affect this area, and traditional surgical approaches were open approaches. Recently, the endoscopic transnasal technique has been introduced, and currently represents a good alternative for the surgical management of these lesions. This is a preliminary report on patients treated endoscopically for clival lesions by the authors’ Skull Base Team.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent an endoscopic exclusive transnasal approach (EEA) or a transoral one (TO) for clival lesions between June 2015 and November 2017 at our Skull Base Referral Center. Patient characteristics and symptoms, preoperative neuroradiological evaluation, surgical approach, complications, and postoperative results were evaluated.

Results

Nine patients (6 females and 3 males; age range 6–82 years, mean 50.8 years) underwent EEA or TO. From histological analysis, we found chordomas (6/9 subjects), chondrosarcoma (1/9), craniopharyngioma (1/9), and eosinophilic granuloma (1/9). Three patients had previously been operated for a parasellar chondrosarcoma (1/9), a pituitary macroadenoma (1/9), or a chondroid chordoma (1/9). The lesions were totally (2/9) or sub-totally (5/9) resected, debulked (1/9), or analyzed with a biopsy (1/9). Reconstruction was accomplished with a multilayer technique (7/9), or with a gasket–seal (1/9), using a mucoperichondrial graft, a single/double nasoseptal flap, a middle turbinate flap, a fascia lata, or a synthetic fascia. One patient (11.1%) was re-operated on due to cerebrospinal leakage, without further complications. Two patients (22.2%) were re-operated on due to chordoma regrowth. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 1/9 patient with progressive healing. All of the other patients underwent proton-beam radiotherapy with no documented tumor growth (median follow-up: 20 months; range 5.1–29.9 months).

Conclusions

Clival lesions represent a heterogeneous group of lesions located in a very complex and difficult area. EEA and TO approaches are safe and mini-invasive, with lower morbidity and with postoperative complications when compared to the traditional open approaches, according to the extent and type of pathology.

Keywords

Clivus Chordoma Craniopharyngioma Chondrosarcoma Eosinophilic granuloma Transnasal endoscopy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Research involving animal and human participants

This research involved human participants, who all signed an informed consent before any further treatment.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Vellutini Ede A, Balsalobre L, Hermann DR, Stamm AC (2014) The endoscopic endonasal approach for extradural and intradural clivus lesions. World Neurosurg 82(6 Suppl):S106–S115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnautović KI, Al-Mefty O (2001) Surgical seeding of chordomas. J Neurosurg 95:798–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colli BO, Al-Mefty O (2001) Chordomas of the cranio-cervical junction: follow-up review and prognostic factors. J Neurosurg 95:933–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heffelfinger MJ, Dahlim DC, MacCarty CS, Beabout JW (1973) Chordomas and cartilaginous tumors at the skull base. Cancer 32:410–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patibandla MR, Thotakura AK, Rao MN, Addagada GC, Nukavarapu MC, Panigrahi MK, Uppin S, Challa S, Dandamudi S (2017) Clival giant cell tumor—a rare case report and review of literature with respect to current line of management. Asian J Neurosurg 12(1):78–81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee J, Kulubya E, Pressman BD, Mamelak A, Bannykh S, Zada G, Cooper O (2017) Sellar and clival plasmacytomas: case series of 5 patients with systematic review of 65 published cases. Pituitary 20(3):381–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tajudeen BA, Kuan EC, Adappa ND, Han JK, Chandra RK, Palmer JN, Kennedy DW, Wang MB, Suh JD (2017) Ectopic pituitary adenomas presenting as sphenoid or clival lesions: case series and management recommendations. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Apr 78(2):120–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Farneti G et al (2006) The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 59(1 Suppl 1):ONS75-83 (discussion ONS75-83)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank G, Sciarretta V, Calbucci F, Farneti G, Mazzatenta D, Pasquini E (2006) The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery 59(1 Suppl):ONS50–ONS57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Grahovac S et al (2008) Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg 109:6–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gay E, Sekhar LN, Rubinstein E, Wright DC, Sen C, Janecka IP et al (1995) Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the cranial base: results and follow-up of 60 patients. Neurosurgery 36:887–897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dehdashti AR, Karabatsou K, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F (2008) Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for treatment of clival chordomas: early results in 12 patients. Neurosurgery 63:299–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fraser F, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz JH (2010) Endoscopic endonasal minimal access approach to the clivus: case series and technical nuances. Neurosurgery 67(3 Suppl Operative):ONS150–ONS158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2011) The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas. World Neurosurg 76:318–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P et al (2010) European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinology Suppl 22:1–143Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stamm AC, Balsalobre L, Hermann DR, Chisholm E (2011) Endonasal endoscopic approach to clival and posterior fossa chordomas. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stamm AC, Pignatari SS, Vellutini E (2006) Transnasal endoscopic surgical approaches to the clivus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39:639–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stippler M, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB (2009) Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery 64:268–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leng LZ, Brown S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2008) “Gasket-seal” watertight closure in minimal access endoscopic cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery 62(ONS Suppl 2):ONSE342–ONSE343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A (2006) A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116(10):1882–1886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kimura F, Kim KS, Friedman H, Russell EJ, Breit R (1990) MR imaging of the normal and abnormal clivus. Am J Neuroradiol 11:1015–1021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menezes AH (2008) Craniovertebral junction neoplasms in the pediatric population. Childs Nerv Syst 10:1173–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heffelnger MJ, Dahlin DC, MacCarty CS, Beabout JW (1973) Chordomas and cartilaginous tumors at the skull base. Cancer 32:410–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roberti F, Sekhar LN, Jones RV, Wright DC (2007) Intradural cranial chordoma: a rare presentation of an uncommon tumor. Surgical experience and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 106:270–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cianfriglia F, Pompili A, Occhipinti E (1978) Intracranial malignant cartilaginous tumours. Report of two cases and review of literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 45(1–2):163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ellison DW, Perry A, Rosenblum M, Asa S, Reid R, Louis DN (2008) Tumors: non-neuroepithelial tumours and secondary effects. Edward Arnold, London, pp 2002–2182Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bloch OG, Jian BJ, Yang I, Han SJ, Aranda D, Ahn BJ, Parsa AT (2009) A systematic review of intracranial chondrosarcoma and survival. J Clin Neurosci 16(12):1547–1551CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Belza J (1966) Double midline intracranial tumors of vestigial origin: Contiguous intrasellar chordoma and suprasellar craniopharyngioma. Case report. J Neurosurg 25:199–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kawamata T, Kubo O, Kamikawa S, Hori T (2002) Ectopic clival craniopharyngioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1221–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kilpatrick SE, Wenger DE, Gilchrist GS, Shives TC, Wollan PC, Unni KK (1995) Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X) of bone. A clinicopathologic analysis of 263 pediatric and adult cases. Cancer 76:2471–2484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brisman JL, Feldstein NA, Tarbell NJ, Cohen D, Cargan AL, Haddad J Jr, Bruce JN (1997) Eosinophilic granuloma of the clivus: case report, follow-up of two previously reported cases, and review of the literature on cranial base eosinophilic granuloma. Neurosurgery Jul 41(1):273–278 (discussion 278–279)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lederman CR, Lederman ME (1998) Unifocal Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis in the clivus of a child with abducens palsy and diplopia. J AAPOS 2(6):378–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Al-Mefty O, Borba LA (1997) Skull base chordomas: a management challenge. J Neurosurg 86:182–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Forsyth PA, Cascino TL, Shaw EG, Scheithauer BW, O’Fallon JR, Dozier JC et al (1993) Intracranial chordomas: a clinicopathological and prognostic study of 51 cases. J Neurosurg 78:741–747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hug EB (2001) Review of skull base chordomas: prognostic factors and long-term results of proton-beam radiotherapy. Neurosurg Focus 10(3):E11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Samii A, Gerganov VM, Herold C, Hayashi N, Naka T, Mirzayan MJ et al (2007) Chordomas of the skull base: surgical management and outcome. J Neurosurg 107:319–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sen CN, Sekhar LN, Schramm VL, Janecka IP (1989) Chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the cranial base: an 8-year experience. Neurosurgery 25:931–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sen CN, Sekhar LN (1990) The subtemporal and preauricular infratemporal approach to intradural structures ventral to the brain stem. J Neurosurg 73:345–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hug EB, Loredo LN, Slater JD, DeVries A, Grove RI, Schaefer RA et al (1999) Proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. J Neurosurg 91:432–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carrabba G, Dehdashti AR, Gentili F (2008) Surgery for clival lesions: open resection versus the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Neurosurg Focus 25(6):E7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ et al (2012) Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery 71:614–624; (discussion 624–625)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zoli M, Milanese L, Bonfatti R, Faustini-Fustini M, Marucci G, Tallini G, Zenesini C, Sturiale C, Frank G, Pasquini E, Mazzatenta D et al (2017) Clival chordomas: considerations after 16 years of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 128(2):329–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brito da Silva H, Straus D, Barber JK, Rostomily RC, Ferreira M Jr, Sekhar LN (2017) Cranial chordoma: a new preoperative grading system. Neurosurgery.  https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx423 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dhall G, Traverso M, Finlay JL, Shane L, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Jubran R (2011) The role of chemotherapy in pediatric clival chordomas. J Neurooncol 103(3):657–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity Hospital of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations