Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 3, pp 691–698 | Cite as

Five-year postoperative outcomes of modified staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for primary acquired cholesteatoma

  • Masahiro Komori
  • Naoaki Yanagihara
  • Jun Hyodo
  • Ryosei Minoda
  • Yasuyuki Hinohira
Otology
  • 160 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

For successful canal wall up tympanoplasty (CWUT) for the treatment of cholesteatoma, the restoration of stable middle ear aeration is also important; however, little is known about the dynamics of such aeration or the optimal surgical procedure. In this study, alternative additional surgical procedure was selected based on the grade of middle ear aeration during the second-stage operation.

Subjects and methods

Patients included in this study underwent staged CWUT surgeries with mastoid cortex plasty (MCP) for well-aerated ears (grade 3) and bony mastoid obliteration (BMO) for poorly aerated ears (grade 2–0). Of the 115 ears included in this study, 62 were followed for more than 5 years. Recurrence rates with deep retraction pocket formation were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The aeration was graded as: 0, no aeration; 1, aeration of only the mesotympanum; 2, aeration of the entire tympanic cavity; and 3, aeration of both the tympanic and mastoid cavities.

Results

No recurrence was observed in ears associated with grade 3 aeration that underwent MCP or in ears with grade 2 aeration that underwent BMO during second-stage surgery. For grades 0 and 1 aeration ears, the recurrence rates were 8.1% after 5 years and 12.5% after 10 years (p < 0.05), and the aeration of recurrent ears deteriorated to grade 0.

Conclusion

Aeration during second-stage surgery predicts the final outcome.

Keywords

Staged tympanoplasty Intact canal wall up tympanoplasty Computed tomography Middle ear aeration level 

Notes

Funding

There was no financial and material support for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Sheehy JL, Patterson ME (1967) Intact canal wall tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy. A review of eight years’ experience. Laryngoscope 77:1502–1542.  https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-196708000-00018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sheehy JL, Brackmann DE, Graham MD (1977) Cholesteatoma surgery: residual and recurrent disease. A review of 1,024 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 86:451–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donald P, McCabe BF, Loevy SS (1974) Atticotomy: a neglected otosurgical technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 83:652–662.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000348947408300514 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pou JW (1977) Reconstruction of bony canal with autogenous bone graft. Laryngoscope 87:1826–1832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakai M, Shinkawa A, Miyake H, Fujii K (1986) Reconstruction of scutum defects (scutumplasty) for attic cholesteatoma. Am J Otol 7:188–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robinson JM (1988) Repair of the outer attic wall in closed cavity mastoidectomy. In: Babighian G, Veldman JE, Portmann M et al. (eds) Transplants and implants in otology. Kugler and Gheddini Publications, Amsterdam, pp 173–174Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanna M, Zini C, Gamoletti R, Delogu P, Scandellari R, Russo A, Taibah A (1987) Prevention of recurrent cholesteatoma in closed tympanoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96:273–275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000348948709600307 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marquet J (1989) My current cholesteatoma techniques. Am J Otol. 10:124–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tos M (1995) 6. Classic intact canal wall mastoidectomy. In: Tos M (eds) Manual of middle ear surgery; vol 2 mastoid surgery and reconstructive procedures. Thieme, New York, pp 106–155Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tos M (1995) Part II reconstruction. In: Tos M (eds) Manual of middle ear surgery; vol 2 mastoid surgery and reconstructive procedures. Thieme, New York, pp 285–416Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mercke U (1987) The cholesteatomatous ear one year after surgery with obliteration technique. Am J Otol 8:534–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vartinen E, Harma R (1987) Mastoid obliteration in intact canal wall mastoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 12:327–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee WS, Choi JY, Song MH, Son EJ, Jung SH, Kim SH (2005) Mastoid and epitympanic obliteration in canal up mastoidectomy for prevention of retraction pocket. Otol Neurotol 26:1107–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Somers T, Casselman JW, Offeciers E (2008) Mastoid and epitympanic bony obliteration in pediatric cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 29:953–960.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318184f4d6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yanagihara N, Gyo K, Sasaki Y, Hinohira Y (1993) Prevention of recurrence of cholesteatoma in intact canal wall tympanoplaty. Am J Otol 14:590–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Csakanyi Z, Katona G, Konya D, Mohos F, Sziklai I (2014) Middle ear gas pressure regulation: the relevance of mastoid obliteration. Otol Neurotol 35:944–953.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000282 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gyo K, Goode RL, Miller C (1986) Effect of middle ear modification on umbo vibration. Human temporal bone experiments with a new vibration measuring system. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:1262–1268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (1995) Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction. Am J Otol 16:486–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whittemore KR Jr, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (1998) Acoustic mechanisms: canal wall upversus canal wall-down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:751–761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hashimoto K, Yanagihara N, Hyodo J, Sakagami M (2015) Osseous eustachian tube and peritubal cells in patients with unilateral cholesteatoma comparison between healthy and diseased sides using high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 36:776–781.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000711 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haginomori S, Takamaki A, Nonaka R, Mineharu A, Kanazawa A, Takenaka H (2009) Postoperative aeration in the middle ear and hearing outcome after canal wall down tympanoplasty with soft-wall reconstruction for cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 30:478–483.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819e634a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hinohira Y, Yanagihara N, Gyo K (2005) Surgical treatment of retraction pocket with bone pate: scutum plasty for cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:625–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yanagihara N, Hinohira Y, Sato H (2002) Mastoid cortex plasty using bone pate. Otol Neurotol 23:422–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hinohira Y, Yanagihara N, Gyo K (2007) Improvements to staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for middle ear cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:913–917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yanagihara N, Komori M, Hinohira Y (2009) Total mastoid obliteration in staged intact canal wall tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma facilitates tympanic aeration. Otol Neurotol 30:766–770.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b23698 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Minoda R, Yanagihara N, Hinohira Y, Yumoto E (2002) Efficacy of mastoid cortex plasty for middle ear aeration in intact canal wall tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 23:425–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Okumura S (2008) The investigation of the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Otol Neurotol 29:803–806.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318181337f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mor N, Finkel DA, Hanson MB, Rosenfeld RM (2014) Middle ear cholesteatoma treated with a mastoidectomy: a systematic review of the measures used. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151:923–929.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814549547 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Kubo T (2008) Long-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty in comparison to short-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:326–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    De Zinis LO, Tonni D, Barezzani MG (2010) Single-stage canal wall-down tympanoplasty: long-term results and prognostic factors. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:304–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kuo CL, Lien CF, Shiao AS (2014) Mastoid obliteration for pediatric suppurative cholesteatoma: long-term safety and sustained effectiveness after 30 years’ experience with cartilage obliteration. Audiol Neurootol 19:358–369.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000363685 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stangerup SE, Drozdziewicz D, Tos M, Trabalzini F (1998) Surgery for acquired cholesteatoma in children: long-term results and recurrence of cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 112:742–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyTakanoko HospitalMatsuyamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologySchool of Medicine, Kochi UniversityNankokuJapan
  3. 3.Department of OtolaryngologyKumamoto General HospitalYatsushiroJapan
  4. 4.Department of OtolaryngologyKamio Memorial HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations