Skip to main content
Log in

Five-year postoperative outcomes of modified staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for primary acquired cholesteatoma

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

For successful canal wall up tympanoplasty (CWUT) for the treatment of cholesteatoma, the restoration of stable middle ear aeration is also important; however, little is known about the dynamics of such aeration or the optimal surgical procedure. In this study, alternative additional surgical procedure was selected based on the grade of middle ear aeration during the second-stage operation.

Subjects and methods

Patients included in this study underwent staged CWUT surgeries with mastoid cortex plasty (MCP) for well-aerated ears (grade 3) and bony mastoid obliteration (BMO) for poorly aerated ears (grade 2–0). Of the 115 ears included in this study, 62 were followed for more than 5 years. Recurrence rates with deep retraction pocket formation were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The aeration was graded as: 0, no aeration; 1, aeration of only the mesotympanum; 2, aeration of the entire tympanic cavity; and 3, aeration of both the tympanic and mastoid cavities.

Results

No recurrence was observed in ears associated with grade 3 aeration that underwent MCP or in ears with grade 2 aeration that underwent BMO during second-stage surgery. For grades 0 and 1 aeration ears, the recurrence rates were 8.1% after 5 years and 12.5% after 10 years (p < 0.05), and the aeration of recurrent ears deteriorated to grade 0.

Conclusion

Aeration during second-stage surgery predicts the final outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheehy JL, Patterson ME (1967) Intact canal wall tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy. A review of eight years’ experience. Laryngoscope 77:1502–1542. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-196708000-00018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheehy JL, Brackmann DE, Graham MD (1977) Cholesteatoma surgery: residual and recurrent disease. A review of 1,024 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 86:451–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donald P, McCabe BF, Loevy SS (1974) Atticotomy: a neglected otosurgical technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 83:652–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348947408300514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pou JW (1977) Reconstruction of bony canal with autogenous bone graft. Laryngoscope 87:1826–1832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakai M, Shinkawa A, Miyake H, Fujii K (1986) Reconstruction of scutum defects (scutumplasty) for attic cholesteatoma. Am J Otol 7:188–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson JM (1988) Repair of the outer attic wall in closed cavity mastoidectomy. In: Babighian G, Veldman JE, Portmann M et al. (eds) Transplants and implants in otology. Kugler and Gheddini Publications, Amsterdam, pp 173–174

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanna M, Zini C, Gamoletti R, Delogu P, Scandellari R, Russo A, Taibah A (1987) Prevention of recurrent cholesteatoma in closed tympanoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96:273–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348948709600307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marquet J (1989) My current cholesteatoma techniques. Am J Otol. 10:124–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tos M (1995) 6. Classic intact canal wall mastoidectomy. In: Tos M (eds) Manual of middle ear surgery; vol 2 mastoid surgery and reconstructive procedures. Thieme, New York, pp 106–155

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tos M (1995) Part II reconstruction. In: Tos M (eds) Manual of middle ear surgery; vol 2 mastoid surgery and reconstructive procedures. Thieme, New York, pp 285–416

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mercke U (1987) The cholesteatomatous ear one year after surgery with obliteration technique. Am J Otol 8:534–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vartinen E, Harma R (1987) Mastoid obliteration in intact canal wall mastoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 12:327–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee WS, Choi JY, Song MH, Son EJ, Jung SH, Kim SH (2005) Mastoid and epitympanic obliteration in canal up mastoidectomy for prevention of retraction pocket. Otol Neurotol 26:1107–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Somers T, Casselman JW, Offeciers E (2008) Mastoid and epitympanic bony obliteration in pediatric cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 29:953–960. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318184f4d6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yanagihara N, Gyo K, Sasaki Y, Hinohira Y (1993) Prevention of recurrence of cholesteatoma in intact canal wall tympanoplaty. Am J Otol 14:590–594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Csakanyi Z, Katona G, Konya D, Mohos F, Sziklai I (2014) Middle ear gas pressure regulation: the relevance of mastoid obliteration. Otol Neurotol 35:944–953. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gyo K, Goode RL, Miller C (1986) Effect of middle ear modification on umbo vibration. Human temporal bone experiments with a new vibration measuring system. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:1262–1268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (1995) Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction. Am J Otol 16:486–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Whittemore KR Jr, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (1998) Acoustic mechanisms: canal wall upversus canal wall-down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:751–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashimoto K, Yanagihara N, Hyodo J, Sakagami M (2015) Osseous eustachian tube and peritubal cells in patients with unilateral cholesteatoma comparison between healthy and diseased sides using high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 36:776–781. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haginomori S, Takamaki A, Nonaka R, Mineharu A, Kanazawa A, Takenaka H (2009) Postoperative aeration in the middle ear and hearing outcome after canal wall down tympanoplasty with soft-wall reconstruction for cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 30:478–483. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819e634a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hinohira Y, Yanagihara N, Gyo K (2005) Surgical treatment of retraction pocket with bone pate: scutum plasty for cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:625–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yanagihara N, Hinohira Y, Sato H (2002) Mastoid cortex plasty using bone pate. Otol Neurotol 23:422–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hinohira Y, Yanagihara N, Gyo K (2007) Improvements to staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for middle ear cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:913–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yanagihara N, Komori M, Hinohira Y (2009) Total mastoid obliteration in staged intact canal wall tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma facilitates tympanic aeration. Otol Neurotol 30:766–770. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b23698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Minoda R, Yanagihara N, Hinohira Y, Yumoto E (2002) Efficacy of mastoid cortex plasty for middle ear aeration in intact canal wall tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 23:425–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Okumura S (2008) The investigation of the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Otol Neurotol 29:803–806. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318181337f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mor N, Finkel DA, Hanson MB, Rosenfeld RM (2014) Middle ear cholesteatoma treated with a mastoidectomy: a systematic review of the measures used. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151:923–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814549547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Kubo T (2008) Long-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty in comparison to short-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:326–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Zinis LO, Tonni D, Barezzani MG (2010) Single-stage canal wall-down tympanoplasty: long-term results and prognostic factors. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:304–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuo CL, Lien CF, Shiao AS (2014) Mastoid obliteration for pediatric suppurative cholesteatoma: long-term safety and sustained effectiveness after 30 years’ experience with cartilage obliteration. Audiol Neurootol 19:358–369. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stangerup SE, Drozdziewicz D, Tos M, Trabalzini F (1998) Surgery for acquired cholesteatoma in children: long-term results and recurrence of cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 112:742–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no financial and material support for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Komori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komori, M., Yanagihara, N., Hyodo, J. et al. Five-year postoperative outcomes of modified staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for primary acquired cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275, 691–698 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4863-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4863-1

Keywords

Navigation