Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cochlear implantation in children with "CHARGE syndrome": surgical options and outcomes

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CHARGE syndrome is a rare, polymalformative disease, representing one of the major causes of associated blindness and deafness. Bilateral, severe-profound, sensorineural hearing loss is common in CHARGE children. Aim of this study is to present our results in children with “CHARGE syndrome” submitted to cochlear implantation (CI). The frequency of anatomic anomalies, possible variations in the surgical technique of CI, and the audiological/rehabilitative benefits attained in our patients are reported. we submitted 5 children affected by CHARGE syndrome with profound, bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss to CI. Otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response, acoustic impedance testing, cranial computed tomography and magnetic resonance were carried out preoperatively in all children. CI was performed using the mastoidotomy–posterior tympanotomy approach in two cases, and the suprameatal approach in three children. Infant toddler-meaningful auditory integration scale was used to evaluate kid’s audiological performance before and after CI. Intra-operatory findings and postsurgical complications were evaluated. Among our patients, intraoperative anatomical malformations were cochlear hypoplasia (100 %), ossicles malformations (100 %), semicircular canals aplasia (100 %), oval window atresia (60 %), round window atresia (40 %), widening of the aqueduct of the vestibule (20 %), and aberrant course of the facial nerve (20 %). No intra- or postoperative complication was recorded in relation to implant positioning. After a follow-up ranging from 1 to 4.5 years, only 2/5 patients used oral language as the sole mean of communication, 1 started utilizing oral language as the main mean of communication, while 2 patients did not develop any linguistic ability. In conclusion, CI in patients with CHARGE association is feasible and, despite results variability, it should be carried out in CHARGE children with severe hearing loss as soon as possible. Although the selection of a specific surgical technique does not seem to influence the audiological outcome, the suprameatal access is valuable when important surgical landmarks (i.e. lateral semicircular canal and incus) are absent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall BD (1979) Choanal atresia and associated multiple anomalies. J Pediatr 95:395–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hittner H, Hirsch N, Kreh G, Rudolph A (1979) Colobomatous microphthalmia, heart disease, hearing loss, and mental retardation: a syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalamol Strabismus 16:122–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pagon RA, Graham JM Jr, Zonana J, Young SL (1981) Coloboma, congenital heart disease, and choanal atresia with multiple anomalies: Charge association. J Pediatr 99:223–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake KD, Davenport SL, Hall BD, Hefner MA, Pagon RA, Williams MS, Lin AE, Graham JM Jr (1988) Charge association: an update and review for the primary paediatrician. Clin Pediatr 37:159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vissers LE, van Ravenswaaij CM, Admiraal R, Hurst JA, de Vries BB, Janssen IM, van der Vliet WA, Huys EH, de Jong PJ, Hamel BC, Schoenmakers EF, Brunner HG, Veltman JA, van Kessel AG (2004) Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nat Genet 36(9):955–957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lalani SR, Safiullah AM, Fernbach SD, Harutyunyan KG, Thaller C, Peterson LE, McPherson JD, Gibbs RA, White LD, Hefner M, Davenport SL, Graham JM, Bacino CA, Glass NL, Towbin JA, Craigen WJ, Neish SR, Lin AE, Belmont JW (2006) Spectrum of CHD7 mutations in 110 individuals with CHARGE syndrome and genotype-phenotype correlation. Am J Hum Genet 78(2):303–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zentner GE, Layman WS, Martin DM, Scacheri PC (2010) Molecular and phenotypic aspects of CHD7 mutation in CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet 152A(3):674–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Issekutz KA, Graham JM Jr, Prasad C, Smith IM, Blake KD (2005) An epidemiological analysis of CHARGE syndrome: preliminary results from a Canadian study. Am J Med Genet A 133A(3):309–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell-Eggitt IM, Blake KD, Taylor D, Wyse RK (1990) The eye in the CHARGE association. Br J Ophthalmol 74(7):421–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shah UK, Ohlms LA, Neault MW, Willson KD, McGuirt WF Jr, Hobbs N, Jones DT, McGill TJ, Healy GB (1998) Otologic management in children with the CHARGE association. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 44(2):139–47

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bauer PW, Wippold FJ II, Goldin J, Lussk RP (2002) Cochlear implantation in children with Charge association. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thelin JW, Fussner JC (2005) Factors related to the development of communication in CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet 133A(3):282–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Papsin BC (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laringoscope 115:1S–26S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lanson BG, Green JE, Roland JT Jr, Lalwani AK, Waltzman SB (2007) Cochlear implantation in children with Charge syndrome: therapeutic decisions and outcomes. Laryngoscope 117:1260–1266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arndt S, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Maier W, Birkenhager R, Kroeger S, Wesarg T, Aschendroff A (2010) Spectrum of hearing disorders and their management in children with Charge syndrome. Otol Neurotol 31(1):67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark GM, Patrick JF, Bailey QA (1979) Cochlear implant round window electrode array. J Laryngol Otol 93:107–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Postelmans JTF, Tange RA, Stokroos RJ, Grolman W (2010) The suprameatal approach: a safe alternative surgical technique for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 31(2):196–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Dagan T (2001) Suprameatal approach: new surgical approach for cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 115:283–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Robbins AM, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW (1991) Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 12(suppl):144–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmerman-Phillips S, Robbins AM, Osberger MJ (2000) Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 185:42–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Satar B, Mukherji SK, Telian SA (2003) Congenital aplasia of the semicircular canals. Otol Neurotol 24:437–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman RA, Cohen NL (1995) Complication of cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:420–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin S, Chen Z, Wu Y, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhou W, Zhou W, Huang J, Shen Z, Qiu J (2008) Suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation in 45 Chinese children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72(3):397–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arnolder C, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi J (2005) Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation in children and adults: a review of 342 cases in Vienna. Acta Otolaryngol 125:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Beck R, Schild C, Kröger S, Wesarg T, Arndt S (2009) Langzeitergebnisse nach cochlear implant-Versorgung bei Kindern. HNO 57:657–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raqbi F, Le Bihan C, Morisseau-Durand MP, Dureau P, Lyonnet S, Abadie V (2003) Early prognostic factors for intellectual outcome in CHARGE syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 45:483–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Perugia, Loc. S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06156, Perugia, Italy

    Giampietro Ricci, Mario Faralli, Cristina Cristi & Egisto Molini

  2. Otosurgery Department, S. Maria alle Scotte Hospital, Via Mario Bracci, 53100, Siena, Italy

    Franco Trabalzini

  3. Department of Otolaryngology, “Carlo Poma”, Civil Hospital, strada lago Paiolo 10, 46100, Mantua, Italy

    Luca D’ascanio

Authors
  1. Giampietro Ricci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franco Trabalzini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mario Faralli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luca D’ascanio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cristina Cristi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Egisto Molini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giampietro Ricci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricci, G., Trabalzini, F., Faralli, M. et al. Cochlear implantation in children with "CHARGE syndrome": surgical options and outcomes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 489–493 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2424-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2424-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation