The aim of this Letter to the Editor was to report some methodological short comings in a recently published article. Issues regarding group dividing, misunderstanding of 5-min Apgar score and inconsistent findings. In conclusion, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution and further research is necessary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Tayyar AT, Karakus R, Eraslan Sahin M, Topbas NF, Sahin E, Karakus S, Yalcin ET, Tayyar A (2019) Wnt signaling pathway in early- and late-onset preeclampsia: evaluation with Dickkopf-1 and R-Spondin-3 glycoproteins. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299(6):1551–1556
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Committee on Obstetric Practice (2015) The Apgar Score. Pediatrics 136(4):819–822
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Committee on Obstetric Practice (2006) The Apgar Score. Pediatrics 117(4):1444–1447
No funding was supported for this study.
Conflict of interest
We declare we have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, J., Luo, J., Wu, H. et al. Letter to the editor on “Wnt signaling pathway in early‑ and late‑onset preeclampsia: evaluation with Dickkopf‑1 and R‑Spondin‑3 glycoproteins”. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05653-9
- Wnt signaling pathway
- Apgar score