Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 297, Issue 5, pp 1343–1343 | Cite as

Correction to: Predictors of cerclage failure in patients with singleton pregnancy undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage

  • K. Taghavi
  • M. L. Gasparri
  • D. Bolla
  • D. Surbek
Correction
  • 373 Downloads

Correction to: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2018) 297:347–352  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4600-9

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Table 3 was incorrect. The corrected Table 3 is given below.
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated to early preterm delivery after prophylactic cerclage (all patients, n = 39)

 

Early preterm delivery

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

Age

1.12 (0.96, 1.30)

0.132

1.13 (0.95, 1.34)

0.153

BMI

0.94 (0.83, 1.08)

0.427

  

History of conization (yes/no)

1.33 (0.19, 0.02)

0.768

  

History of instrumentation of uterus (yes/no)

6.67 (1.47, 30.2)

0.014

6.83 (1.38, 33.8)

0.019

Cervical swabs prior to cerclage (pos/neg)

0.61 (0.13, 2.74)

0.521

  

History of II trimester miscarriage (yes/no)

0.75 (0.11, 5.07)

0.768

  

CPR value after cerclage

0.91 (0.75, 1.10)

0.346

  

GA at the cerclage

0.93 (0.79, 1.09)

0.384

  

Delta-US at 10 days after cerclage

0.96 (0.91, 1.01)

0.139

0.97 (0.91, 1.04)

0.478

In bold are reported the p values of variables that from the univariate analysis were selected for multivariate analysis (≤ 0.2 ) and the p value of the only significant variable (< 0.05) at multivariate analysis

Multivariable models were carried out for variables reporting a p value ≤ 0.2 in univariate analysis

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for ObstetricsUniversity Hospital BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations