Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 297, Issue 5, pp 1293–1299 | Cite as

Increased incidence of preeclampsia in mothers of advanced age conceiving by oocyte donation

  • Uri P. Dior
  • Neri Laufer
  • Henry H. Chill
  • Sorina Granovsky-Grisaru
  • Simcha Yagel
  • Haim Yaffe
  • Yuval Gielchinsky
Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of preeclampsia in women of advanced age who conceived through donated oocytes as compared with natural conceptions.

Methods

A historical prospective study of singleton live births of parturients ≥ 45 years of age at four university hospitals was conducted. For the purpose of the study, the population was divided by the mode of conception into two groups: oocyte donation and natural conception. The main outcome variable in this study was preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy-induced hypertension and Small for Gestational Age.

Results

Two hundred and seventy pregnancies were achieved naturally and 135 women conceived by oocyte donation. Mean age at delivery for the natural conception and oocyte donation groups was 45.7 and 47.8, respectively. Preeclampsia complicated 3 out of 270 (1.1%) natural conception pregnancies and 17 out of 135 (12.6%) oocyte donation conceptions. After adjusting for confounders, oocyte donation pregnancies were found to be associated with a 12-fold increased risk for preeclampsia (P = 0.001). Among oocyte donation pregnancies, the risk of preeclampsia was not affected by parity or age.

Conclusions

A substantially increased risk for preeclampsia was found in oocyte donation pregnancies, suggesting that the foreign oocyte may play a specific biologic role in the development of preeclampsia after the age of 45.

Keywords

Preeclampsia Assisted reproductive technology Oocyte donation Hypertension in pregnancy High-risk pregnancy 

Notes

Author contributions

UPD: project development, data collection, analysis, and writing of the manuscript. NL: project development, editing of the manuscript, and supervision. HHC: manuscript writing and editing and data analysis. SGG: project development, data analysis, and manuscript editing. HY: data collection and editing of manuscript. YG: project development, data collection, and manuscript editing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study did not receive any funding.

Research involving human and animal participants

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee at Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University Medical School and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cunningham FG, Fernandez CO, Hernandez C (1995) Blindness associated with preeclampsia and eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1291–1298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melchiorre K, Sutherland GR, Baltabaeva A, Liberati M, Thilaganathan B (2011) Maternal cardiac dysfunction and remodeling in women with preeclampsia at term. Hypertension 57:85–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rafik Hamad R, Larsson A, Pernow J, Bremme K, Eriksson MJ (2009) Assessment of left ventricular structure and function in preeclampsia by echocardiography and cardiovascular biomarkers. J Hypertens 27:2257–2264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    MacKay AP, Berg CJ, Atrash HK (2001) Pregnancy-related mortality from preeclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 97:533–538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Odegard RA, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, Salvesen KA, Austgulen R (2000) Preeclampsia and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 96:950–955PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sibai BM (2006) Preeclampsia as a cause of preterm and late preterm (near-term) births. Semin Perinatol 30:16–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calderon-Margalit R, Friedlander Y, Yanetz R, Deutsch L, Perrin MC, Kleinhaus K et al (2009) Preeclampsia and subsequent risk of cancer: update from the Jerusalem perinatal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(63):e61–e65Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stekkinger E, Zandstra M, Peeters LL, Spaanderman ME (2009) Early-onset preeclampsia and the prevalence of postpartum metabolic syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 114:1076–1084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Washburn L, Nixon P, Russell G, Snively BM, O’Shea TM (2013) Adiposity in adolescent offspring born prematurely to mothers with preeclampsia. J Pediatr 162(912–917):e911Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oglaend B, Forman MR, Romundstad PR, Nilsen ST, Vatten LJ (2009) Blood pressure in early adolescence in the offspring of preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. J Hypertens 27:2051–2054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roberge S, Giguere Y, Villa P, Nicolaides K, Vainio M, Forest JC et al (2012) Early administration of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of severe and mild preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 29:551–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sauer MV, Kavic SM (2006) Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy. Reprod Biomed Online 12:153–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Callaway LK, Lust K, McIntyre HD (2005) Pregnancy outcomes in women of very advanced maternal age. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:12–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duckitt K, Harrington D (2005) Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 330:565CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM (2001) The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy 20:IX–XIVCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poon LC, Volpe N, Muto B, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH (2012) Birthweight with gestation and maternal characteristics in live births and stillbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther 32:156–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krieg SA, Henne MB, Westphal LM (2008) Obstetric outcomes in donor oocyte pregnancies compared with advanced maternal age in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Fertil Steril 90:65–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dildy GA, Jackson GM, Fowers GK, Oshiro BT, Varner MW, Clark SL (1996) Very advanced maternal age: pregnancy after age 45. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:668–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dulitzki M, Soriano D, Schiff E, Chetrit A, Mashiach S, Seidman DS (1998) Effect of very advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome and rate of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 92:935–939PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B (1999) Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstet Gynecol 93:9–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ziadeh S, Yahaya A (2001) Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Arch Gynecol Obstet 265:30–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salihu HM, Shumpert MN, Slay M, Kirby RS, Alexander GR (2003) Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the united states. Obstet Gynecol 102:1006–1014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I (2004) Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 104:727–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH et al (2005) Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105:983–990CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simchen MJ, Yinon Y, Moran O, Schiff E, Sivan E (2006) Pregnancy outcome after age 50. Obstet Gynecol 108:1084–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffman MC, Jeffers S, Carter J, Duthely L, Cotter A, Gonzalez-Quintero VH (2007) Pregnancy at or beyond age 40 years is associated with an increased risk of fetal death and other adverse outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:e11–e13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tabcharoen C, Pinjaroen S, Suwanrath C, Krisanapan O (2009) Pregnancy outcome after age 40 and risk of low birth weight. J Obstet Gynaecol 29:378–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yogev Y, Melamed N, Bardin R, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Ben-Shitrit G, Ben-Haroush A (2010) Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(558):e551–e557Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Laskov I, Birnbaum R, Maslovitz S, Kupferminc M, Lessing J, Many A (2012) Outcome of singleton pregnancy in women ≥ 45 years old: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern fetal Neonatal 25:2190–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, Nicolaides KH (2013) Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42:634–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soderstrom-Anttila V, Tiitinen A, Foudila T, Hovatta O (1998) Obstetric and perinatal outcome after oocyte donation: comparison with in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Hum Reprod 13:483–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wiggins DA, Main E (2005) Outcomes of pregnancies achieved by donor egg in vitro fertilization—a comparison with standard in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:2002–2006 (discussion 2006–2008) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Klatsky PC, Delaney SS, Caughey AB, Tran ND, Schattman GL, Rosenwaks Z (2010) The role of embryonic origin in preeclampsia: a comparison of autologous in vitro fertilization and ovum donor pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 116:1387–1392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stoop D, Baumgarten M, Haentjens P, Polyzos NP, De Vos M, Verheyen G et al (2012) Obstetric outcome in donor oocyte pregnancies: a matched-pair analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10:42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lindheimer MD, Katz AI (1989) Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Annu Rev Med 40:233–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karumanchi SA, Lindheimer MD (2008) Preeclampsia pathogenesis: “Triple a rating”-autoantibodies and antiangiogenic factors. Hypertension 51:991–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Laresgoiti-Servitje E (2013) A leading role for the immune system in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. J Leukoc Biol 94:247–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sharma S, Norris WE, Kalkunte S (2010) Beyond the threshold: an etiological bridge between hypoxia and immunity in preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 85:112–116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith GN, Walker M, Tessier JL, Millar KG (1997) Increased incidence of preeclampsia in women conceiving by intrauterine insemination with donor versus partner sperm for treatment of primary infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:455–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang Y, Hao M, Sampson S, Xia J (2017) Elective delivery versus expectant management for pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(3):607–622CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    González-Comadran M, Urresta Avila J, Saavedra Tascón A, Jimenéz R, Solà I, Brassesco M et al (2014) The impact of donor insemination on the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 182:160–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD et al (2013) Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000–2010. JAMA 310:2426–2434PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Hypertension in pregnancy: the management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. RCOG Press; 2010. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: GuidanceGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy (2013) Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 122:1122–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, and Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, WHO Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia, World Health Organization, 2011Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nicolaides KH (2011) Turning the pyramid of prenatal care. Fetal Diagn Ther 29:183–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uri P. Dior
    • 1
  • Neri Laufer
    • 1
  • Henry H. Chill
    • 1
  • Sorina Granovsky-Grisaru
    • 2
  • Simcha Yagel
    • 1
  • Haim Yaffe
    • 3
  • Yuval Gielchinsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical SchoolJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShaare-Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University Medical SchoolJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheere-Zedek Medical Center City CampusBikur-Holim HospitalJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations