The purpose of the study was to compare treatment outcomes after short or long cephalomedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures.
A systematic review of perioperative outcomes after short or long cephalomedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures was performed. The following databases were used: using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980–2019), and MEDLINE (1980–2019). The queries were performed in June 2019.
The following search term query was used: “Intramedullary Nail AND Intertrochanteric Fracture OR “Long OR Short Nail AND intertrochanteric Fracture.” Studies were excluded if they were “single-arm” studies (i.e., reporting on either long or short CMN but not both), or did not report at least one of the outcomes being meta-analyzed. Furthermore, cadaveric studies, animal studies, basic science articles, editorial articles, surveys and studies were excluded.
Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts from all identified articles. Full-text articles were obtained for review if necessary, to allow further assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Additionally, all references from the included studies were reviewed and reconciled to verify that no relevant articles were missing from the systematic review.
Short nails were associated with statistically significantly less estimated blood loss and operative time compared to long nails. There were no significant differences in transfusion rates, implant failures or overall re-operation rates between implant lengths. Similarly, there was no significant difference in peri-implant fracture between implant lengths.
Overall, the available clinical evidence supports the use of short cephalomedullary nails for the majority of intertrochanteric femur fractures.
Study design/level of evidence
Meta-analysis; Level III, therapeutic.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Niu E, Yang A, Harris AH, Bishop J (2015) Which fixation device is preferred for surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the united states? a survey of orthopaedic surgeons. ClinOrthopRelat Res 473(11):3647–3655
Anglen JO, Weinstein JN (2008) Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Bone Joint Surg 90(4):700–707
Werner BC, Fashandi AH, Gwathmey FW, Yarboro SR (2015) Trends in the management of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the United States 2005–2011. Hip Int 25(3):270–276
Hulet DA, Whale CS, Beebe MJ, Rothberg DL, Gililland JM, Zhang C et al (2019) Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for fixation of stable versus unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Orthopedics 42(2):e202–e209
Shannon SF, Yuan BJ, Cross WW 3rd, Barlow JD, Torchia ME, Holte PK et al (2019) Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for pertrochanteric hip fractures: a randomized prospective study. J Orthop Trauma 33(10):480–486
Liu J, Frisch NB, Mehran N, Qatu M, Guthrie ST (2018) Short-term medical complications following short versus long cephalomedullary nails. Orthopedics 41(5):e636–e642
Krigbaum H, Takemoto S, Kim HT, Kuo AC (2016) Costs and Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nailing of OTA 31–A2 proximal femur fractures in US veterans. J Orthop Trauma 30(3):125–129
Dunn J, Kusnezov N, Bader J, Waterman BR, Orr J, Belmont PJ (2016) Long versus short cephalomedullary nail for trochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review. J OrthopTraumatol 17(4):361–367
Boone C, Carlberg KN, Koueiter DM, Baker KC, Sadowski J, Wiater PJ et al (2014) Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31–A1 and A2). J Orthop Trauma 28(5):e96–e100
Frisch NB, Nahm NJ, Khalil JG, Les CM, Guthrie ST, Charters MA (2017) Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for pertrochanteric hip fracture. Orthopedics 40(2):83–88
Guo XF, Zhang KM, Fu HB, Cao W, Dong Q (2015) A comparative study of the therapeutic effect between long and short intramedullary nails in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. Chin J Traumatol 18(6):332–335
Okcu G, Ozkayin N, Okta C, Topcu I, Aktuglu K (2013) Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: a standard or long nail? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(9):2768–2775
Kleweno C, Morgan J, Redshaw J, Harris M, Rodriguez E, Zurakowski D et al (2014) Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. J Orthop Trauma 28(7):391–397
Li Z, Liu Y, Liang Y, Zhao C, Zhang Y (2015) Short versus long intramedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. Int J ClinExp Med 8(4):6299–6302
Kanakaris NK, Tosounidis TH, Giannoudis PV (2015) Nailing intertrochanteric hip fractures: short versus long; locked versus nonlocked. J Orthop Trauma 29(Suppl 4):S10–S16
Hou Z, Bowen TR, Irgit KS, Matzko ME, Andreychik CM, Horwitz DS et al (2013) Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): long versus short cephalomedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 27(6):318–324
Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg 85(1):1–3
Schumm WR, Higgins M, Lockett L, Huang S, Abdullah N, Asiri A et al (2017) Does dividing the range by four provide an accurate estimate of a standard deviation in family science research? a teaching editorial. Marriage Fam Rev 53(1):1–23
Shin WC, Lee ES, Suh KT (2018) The difference between short and long intramedullary nailing as the treatment for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture (AO/OTA 31-A2) in elderly patients. J Korean OrthopAssoc 52(1):25–32
Sellan M, Bryant D, Tieszer C, Papp S, Lawendy A, Liew A et al (2019) Short versus long InterTAN fixation for geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multicentre head-to-head comparison. J Orthop Trauma 33(4):169–174
Luo X, He S, Li Z, Li Q (2020) Quantification and influencing factors of perioperative hidden blood loss during intramedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(10):1339–1348
Luque Pérez R, ChecaBetegón P, Galán-Olleros M, Arvinius C, Valle-Cruz J, Marco F (2020) Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0
Robinson CM, Adams CI, Craig M, Doward W, Clarke MC, Auld J (2002) Implant-related fractures of the femur following hip fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 84(7):1116–1122
Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jonsson A, Zlowodzki M, Haidukewych GJ (2009) Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(6):460–464
Vaughn J, Cohen E, Vopat BG, Kane P, Abbood E, Born C (2014) Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up. Eur J OrthopSurgTraumatol 25(4):665–670
Murena L, Moretti A, Meo F, Saggioro E, Barbati G, Ratti C et al (2018) Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(3):351–359
Hong CC, Nashi N, Makandura MC, Tan JH, Peter L, Murphy D (2017) The long and short of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture. Singap Med J 58(2):85–91
Zhang W, Antony Xavier RP, Decruz J, Chen YD, Park DH (2020) Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03399-2
Horwitz DS, Tawari A, Suk M (2016) Nail length in the management of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. J Am AcadOrthopSurg 24(6):e50–e58
Lindvall E, Sanders R, Dipasquale T, Herscovici D, Haidukewych G, Sagi C (2009) Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures: comparison of 56 cases. J Orthop Trauma 23(7):485–492
There is no funding source.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Cinque, M.E., Goodnough, L.H., MD, B.J.S. et al. Short versus long cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of 3208 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03752-z
- Cephalomedullary nail
- Intertrochanteric femur fracture
- Long nail
- Short nail