The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the new method including 3D printing-based preoperative planning, surgical workshop, and contouring of the plate versus conventional method in the surgical treatment of complex acetabular fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data in a cohort of 88 patients of complex acetabular fracture with mean 29.95 ± 4.84 months (24–41 months) follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisting of 41 patients were performed previewed surgery with a 3D printing-based pre-contoured plate on a 3D printing model. Group 2, comprised of 47 patients, were treated by the traditional contoured plate technique. The quality of reduction was assessed using criteria described by Matta. Functional outcome was evaluated using Modified Postel Merle D’Aubigne score. A custom-made quiz was used to evaluate the chief assistant.

Results

The study showed no significant differences in measured preoperative variables except for the age between the Group 1 and Group 2 (p > 0.05). Compared with the Group 2, the intraoperative blood loss, operative time was significantly decreased in Group 1 (p < 0.05). There were no significant statistical differences in the quality of reduction and Modified Postel Merle D’Aubigne score (p > 0.05). The result of evaluation of assistant in Group 1 was significantly high than in Group 2 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

3D printing-based pre-contoured plate is a more effective and reliable method than traditional contoured plate technique for treating the complex acetabular fractures. Meanwhile, the 3D printing is a useful orthopedic surgical education tool which can improve the understanding of the complex acetabular fracture for a young surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 46:1615–1646

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tile M, Helfet DL, Kellam JF, Vrahas M (2015) Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, Principles and methods of management

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yammine K, Violato C (2016) The effectiveness of physical models in teaching anatomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 21(4):883–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9644-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hurson C, Tansey A, O’Donnchadha B, Nicholson P, Rice J, McElwain J (2007) Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures. Injury 38(10):1158–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.05.020

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Huang Z, Song W, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Zhou D, Zhou X, He Y (2018) Three-dimensional printing model improves morphological understanding in acetabular fracture learning: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0191328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191328

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pahuta MA, Schemitsch EH, Backstein D, Papp S, Gofton W (2012) Virtual fracture carving improves understanding of a complex fracture: a randomized controlled study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(24):e182. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Maini L, Sharma A, Jha S, Sharma A, Tiwari A (2018) Three-dimensional printing and patient-specific pre-contoured plate: future of acetabulum fracture fixation? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Off Publ Eur Trauma Soc 44(2):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0738-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zeng C, Xing W, Wu Z, Huang H, Huang W (2016) A combination of three-dimensional printing and computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for preoperative planning of acetabular fracture reduction. Injury 47(10):2223–2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chana-Rodriguez F, Mananes RP, Rojo-Manaute J, Gil P, Martinez-Gomiz JM, Vaquero-Martin J (2016) 3D surgical printing and pre contoured plates for acetabular fractures. Injury 47(11):2507–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Matta JM (2006) Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach: a 10-year perspective. J Orthop Trauma 20(1 Suppl):S20–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78(11):1632–1645

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Jt Surg Am 55(8):1629–1632

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ficat RP (1985) Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Jt Surg Br 67(1):3–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Laird A, Keating JF (2005) Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(7):969–973. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.16017

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum, 2nd ed. Elson RAT (ed), translator. Springer, Berlin

  17. 17.

    Bagaria V, Chaudhary K (2017) A paradigm shift in surgical planning and simulation using 3Dgraphy: experience of first 50 surgeries done using 3D-printed biomodels. Injury 48(11):2501–2508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Maini L, Verma T, Sharma A, Sharma A, Mishra A, Jha S (2018) Evaluation of accuracy of virtual surgical planning for patient-specific pre-contoured plate in acetabular fracture fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(4):495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2868-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hung CC, Li YT, Chou YC, Chen JE, Wu CC, Shen HC, Yeh TT (2018) Conventional plate fixation method versus pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing-assisted contoured plate fixation method in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3963-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shen F, Chen B, Guo Q, Qi Y, Shen Y (2013) Augmented reality patient-specific reconstruction plate design for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(2):169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-012-0775-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Duncan JM, Nahas S, Akhtar K, Daurka J (2015) The Use of a 3D printer in pre-operative planning for a patient requiring acetabular reconstructive surgery. J Orthop Case Rep 5(1):23–25. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.247

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wu X, Liu R, Yu J, Xu S, Yang C, Shao Z, Yang S, Ye Z (2018) Mixed reality technology-assisted orthopedics surgery navigation. Surg Innovation 25(3):304–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350618771413

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Xing Wei, Ping Liu, Hu Wang, Yahui Fu, for collecting the data, and Yuxuan Cong for helping to finish the statistics. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Honghui Hospital, Xi′an Jiaotong University Health Science Center (No. 2016–088). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients signed informed consent forms prior to the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Kandemir, U., Zhang, B. et al. The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 215–222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03472-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acetabulum
  • Fractures
  • 3D printing
  • Internal fixation
  • Plate