Skip to main content
Log in

Fluid collection bags pose a threat for bacterial contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, internally controlled, non-blinded trial

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical equipment, and especially the so-called ‘splash basins’ that are used intraoperatively, are a potential source of bacterial contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). With this risk in mind, many commercially available draping kits include plastic bags that can be used to collect fluid or to temporarily store instruments. Following this rationale, we hypothesised that first: the fluid collection bags are a potential reservoir of bacteria and second: there is a time dependency for bacterial contamination.

Materials and methods

After ethics approval, we investigated in a prospective, internally controlled, non-blinded trial 43 patients who received primary THA. At the beginning of the surgery, we took deep, representative, intracapsular tissue samples, which served as negative controls. At the end of surgery, tissue samples were taken from the bottom of the ‘fluid collection bag’ for microbiological analysis.

Results

All 86 control samples were negative. Out of the samples taken from the bags, a pathogen could be detected in four patients (9.3%). All pathogens were detected after a surgery time lasting longer than 90 min.

Conclusion

We were able to show that fluid collection bags are a potential reservoir for bacteria in THA when surgery time was greater than a 90-min threshold. Our data suggest that the risks from fluid collection bags outweigh the advantages of using them. Therefore, we recommend against the use of fluid collection bags intraoperatively in primary THA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kapadia BH, Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Bozic KJ, Mont MA (2016) The economic impact of periprosthetic infections after total hip arthroplasty at a specialized tertiary-care center. J Arthroplast 31(7):1422–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapadia BH, McElroy MJ, Issa K, Johnson AJ, Bozic KJ, Mont MA (2014) The economic impact of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty at a specialized tertiary-care center. J Arthroplast 29(5):929–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parisi TJ, Konopka JF, Bedair HS (2017) What is the long-term economic societal effect of periprosthetic infections after THA? A Markov analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(7):1891–1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5333-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Webb BG, Lichtman DM, Wagner RA (2008) Risk factors in total joint arthroplasty: comparison of infection rates in patients with different socioeconomic backgrounds. Orthopedics 31(5):445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shohat N, Parvizi J (2017) Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection: examining the recent guidelines. J Arthroplast 32(7):2040–2046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Friedrich MJ, Ploeger MM, Schmolder J, Strauss AC, Pennekamp PH, Vavken P, Gravius S (2016) Outcome predictors in prosthetic joint infections—validation of a risk stratification score for prosthetic joint infections in 120 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 82(1):143–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shirley OC, Bayan A, Zhu M, Dalton JP, Wiles S, Young SW (2017) Do surgical helmet systems affect intraoperative wound contamination? A randomised controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(11):1565–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2795-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Maiyah M, Bajwa A, Mackenney P, Port A, Gregg PJ, Hill D, Finn P (2005) Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(4):556–559. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beldame J, Lagrave B, Lievain L, Lefebvre B, Frebourg N, Dujardin F (2012) Surgical glove bacterial contamination and perforation during total hip arthroplasty implantation: when gloves should be changed. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(4):432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.10.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis N, Curry A, Gambhir AK, Panigrahi H, Walker CR, Wilkins EG, Worsley MA, Kay PR (1999) Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 81(5):886–889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaya I, Ugras A, Sungur I, Yilmaz M, Korkmaz M, Cetinus E (2012) Glove perforation time and frequency in total hip arthroplasty procedures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 46(1):57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulcahy DM, McCormack D, McElwain JP (1994) Intraoperative suction catheter tip contamination. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39(6):371–373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson AH, Drew S, Anderson J, Bentley G, Ridgway GL (1993) Suction tip contamination in the ultraclean-air operating theatre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75(4):254–256

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Anto B, McCabe J, Kelly S, Morris S, Rynn L, Corbett-Feeney G (2006) Splash basin bacterial contamination during elective arthroplasty. J Infect 52(3):231–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2005.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glait SA, Schwarzkopf R, Gould S, Bosco J, Slover J (2011) Is repetitive intraoperative splash basin use a source of bacterial contamination in total joint replacement? Orthopedics 34(9):e546–e549. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20110714-06

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gehrke T, Parvizi J (2014) Proceedings of the international consensus meeting on periprosthetic joint infection. Foreword. J Orthop Res 32(Suppl 1):S2–S3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Petersdorf S, Pagenstert GI, Weisskopf M, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2013) Evaluation of an interdisciplinary therapy algorithm in patients with prosthetic joint infections. Int Orthop 37(11):2271–2278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1995-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boettner F, Zustin J, Kolbel B, Ruther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Soder S, Muller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gundtoft PH, Pedersen AB, Varnum C, Overgaard S (2017) Increased mortality after prosthetic joint infection in primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5289-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jamsen E, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Konttinen YT, Odgaard A, Stefansdottir A, Lidgren L (2010) Prevention of deep infection in joint replacement surgery. Acta Orthop 81(6):660–666. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.537805

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lidwell OM (1986) Clean air at operation and subsequent sepsis in the joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 211:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  22. Urquhart DM, Hanna FS, Brennan SL, Wluka AE, Leder K, Cameron PA, Graves SE, Cicuttini FM (2010) Incidence and risk factors for deep surgical site infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplast 25(8):1216–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.08.011 (e1211–1213)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baird RA, Nickel FR, Thrupp LD, Rucker S, Hawkins B (1984) Splash basin contamination in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 187:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351(16):1645–1654. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra040181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. D. Wimmer.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, Faculty of Medicine (IRB # 200/16).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ploeger, M.M., Jacobs, C., Gathen, M. et al. Fluid collection bags pose a threat for bacterial contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, internally controlled, non-blinded trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 1159–1163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2970-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2970-5

Keywords

Navigation