Diagnosis of glenoid labral tears using 3-tesla MRI vs. 3-tesla MRA: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 112 Downloads
Various protocols exist for magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) of the shoulder, including 3D isotropic scanning and positioning in neutral (2D neutral MRA), or abduction-external-rotation (ABER).
MRA does not improve diagnostic accuracy for labral tears when compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed using 3-Tesla (3T) magnets.
Systematic review of the Cochrane, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Included studies compared 3T MRI or 3T MRA (index tests) to arthroscopic findings (reference test). Methodological appraisal performed using QUADAS-2. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Ten studies including 929 patients were included. Index test bias and applicability were a concern in the majority of studies. The use of arthroscopy as the reference test raised concern of verification bias in all studies. For anterior labral lesions, 3T MRI was less sensitive (0.83 vs. 0.87 p = 0.083) than 3T 2D neutral MRA. Compared to 3T 2D neutral MRA, both 3T 3D Isotropic MRA and 3T ABER MRA significantly improved sensitivity (0.87 vs. 0.95 vs. 0.94). For SLAP lesions, 3T 2D neutral MRA was of similar sensitivity to 3T MRI (0.84 vs. 0.83, p = 0.575), but less specific (0.99 vs. 0.92 p < 0.0001). For posterior labral lesions, 3T 2D neutral MRA had greater sensitivity than 3T 3D Isotropic MRA and 3T MRI (0.90 vs. 0.83 vs. 0.83).
At 3-T, MRA improved sensitivity for diagnosis of anterior and posterior labral lesions, but reduced specificity in diagnosis of SLAP tears. 3T MRA with ABER positioning further improved sensitivity in diagnosis of anterior labral tears.
Level of evidence
Keywords3-Tesla MRI MRA Labrum Accuracy Diagnosis
There is no funding source.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 1.Kaplan PA, Dussault R, Helms CA et al (2001) Shoulder. In: Kaplan PA (ed) Musculoskeletal MRI. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 175–223Google Scholar
- 6.Wintzell G, Larsson H, Larsson S, Indirect MR (1998) arthrography of anterior shoulder instability in the ABER and the apprehension test positions a prospective comparative study of two different shoulder positions during MRI using intravenous gadodiamide contrast for enhancement of the joint fluid. Skelet Radiol 27(9):488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Schreinemachers SA, van der Hulst VP, Jaap Willems W, Bipat S, van der Woude HJ (2009) Is a single direct MR arthrography series in ABER position as accurate in detecting anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions as conventional MR arthrography? Skelet Radiol 38(7):675–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0692-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dietrich TJ, Zanetti M, Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Fucentese SF, Hodler J (2010) Articular cartilage and labral lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic performance of 3D water-excitation true FISP MR arthrography. Skelet Radiol 39:473–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0844-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB et al (2011) QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Choo HJ, Lee SJ, Kim OH, Seo SS, Kim JH. Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with two-dimensional MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 2012; 262(3):921 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11111261
- 18.Jung JY, Yoon YC, Choi SH, Kwon JW, Yoo J, Choe BK (2009) Three-dimensional isotropic shoulder MR arthrography: comparison with two-dimensional MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions at 3.0 T. Radiology 250(2):498–505. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2493071548 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Oh DK, Yoon YC, Kwon JW, Choi SH, Jung JY, Bae S et al. Comparison of indirect isotropic MR arthrography and conventional MR arthrography of labral lesions and rotator cuff tears: a prospective study. AJR 2009; 192:473–479. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1223