Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 138, Issue 5, pp 635–642 | Cite as

Outcome of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections caused by pathogens resistant to biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a prospective cohort study

  • Doruk Akgün
  • Carsten Perka
  • Andrej Trampuz
  • Nora Renz
Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) caused by pathogens, for which no biofilm-active antibiotics are available, are often referred to as difficult-to-treat (DTT). However, it is unclear whether the outcome of DTT PJI is worse than those of non-DTT PJI. We evaluated the outcome of DTT and non-DTT PJI in a prospective cohort treated with a two-stage exchange according to a standardized algorithm.

Methods

Patients with hip and knee PJI from 2013 to 2015 were prospectively included and followed up for ≥ 2 years. DTT PJI was defined as growth of microorganism(s) resistant to all available biofilm-active antibiotics. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to compare the probability of infection-free survival between DTT and non-DTT PJI and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated.

Results

Among 163 PJI, 30 (18.4%) were classified as DTT and 133 (81.6%) as non-DTT. At a mean follow-up of 33 months (range 24–48 months), the overall treatment success was 82.8%. The infection-free survival rate at 2 years was 80% (95% CI 61–90%) for DTT PJI and 84% (95% CI 76–89%) for non-DTT PJI (p = 0.61). The following mean values were longer in DTT PJI than in non-DTT PJI: hospital stay (45 vs. 28 days; p < 0.001), prosthesis-free interval (89 vs. 58 days; p < 0.001) and duration of antimicrobial treatment (151 vs. 117 days; p = 0.003).

Conclusions

The outcome of DTT and non-DTT PJI was similar (80–84%), however, at the cost of longer hospital stay, longer prosthesis-free interval and longer antimicrobial treatment. It remains unclear whether patients undergoing two-stage exchange with a long interval need biofilm-active antibiotics. Further studies need to evaluate the outcome in patients treated with biofilm-active antibiotics undergoing short vs. long interval.

Keywords

Periprosthetic joint infection Difficult-to-treat Outcome Biofilm-active antibiotics 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors DA, NR and AT declare that they have no conflict of interest. Author CP reports grants from Aesculap, personal fees from Zimmer, Smith & Nephew, Depuy/Synthes, Ceramtec and Link, outside the submitted work.

References

  1. 1.
    Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00155 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry D, Parvizi J (2010) Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the medicare population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):52–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1013-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ong KL, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry DJ, Parvizi J (2009) Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):105–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bongartz T, Halligan CS, Osmon DR, Reinalda MS, Bamlet WR, Crowson CS, Hanssen AD, Matteson EL (2008) Incidence and risk factors of prosthetic joint infection after total hip or knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 59(12):1713–1720.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24060 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Man FH, Sendi P, Zimmerli W, Maurer TB, Ochsner PE, Ilchmann T (2011) Infectiological, functional, and radiographic outcome after revision for prosthetic hip infection according to a strict algorithm. Acta Orthop 82(1):27–34.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.548025 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engesaeter LB, Dale H, Schrama JC, Hallan G, Lie SA (2011) Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 82(5):530–537.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.623572 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haddad FS, Sukeik M, Alazzawi S (2015) Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1):8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3721-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oussedik SI, Dodd MB, Haddad FS (2010) Outcomes of revision total hip replacement for infection after grading according to a standard protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(9):1222–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.23663 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Macheras GA, Kateros K, Galanakos SP, Koutsostathis SD, Kontou E, Papadakis SA (2011) The long-term results of a two-stage protocol for revision of an infected total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(11):1487–1492.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.27319 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gooding CR, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS (2011) Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):985–993.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1579-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mortazavi SM, Vegari D, Ho A, Zmistowski B, Parvizi J (2011) Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):3049–3054.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2030-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurd MF, Ghanem E, Steinbrecher J, Parvizi J (2010) Two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty: does resistance of the infecting organism influence the outcome? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(8):2060–2066.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1296-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tzeng A, Tzeng TH, Vasdev S, Korth K, Healey T, Parvizi J, Saleh KJ (2015) Treating periprosthetic joint infections as biofilms: key diagnosis and management strategies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 81(3):192–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.08.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McConoughey SJ, Howlin R, Granger JF, Manring MM, Calhoun JH, Shirtliff M, Kathju S, Stoodley P (2014) Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections. Future Microbiol 9(8):987–1007.  https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.14.64 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zimmerli W, Widmer AF, Blatter M, Frei R, Ochsner PE (1998) Role of rifampin for treatment of orthopedic implant-related staphylococcal infections: a randomized controlled trial. Foreign-body infection (FBI) Study Group. JAMA 279(19):1537–1541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Widmer AF, Gaechter A, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W (1992) Antimicrobial treatment of orthopedic implant-related infections with rifampin combinations. Clin Infect Dis 14(6):1251–1253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drancourt M, Stein A, Argenson JN, Zannier A, Curvale G, Raoult D (1993) Oral rifampin plus ofloxacin for treatment of Staphylococcus-infected orthopedic implants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37(6):1214–1218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Isiklar ZU, Darouiche RO, Landon GC, Beck T (1996) Efficacy of antibiotics alone for orthopaedic device related infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res (332):184–189Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chuard C, Herrmann M, Vaudaux P, Waldvogel FA, Lew DP (1991) Successful therapy of experimental chronic foreign-body infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by antimicrobial combinations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35(12):2611–2616CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    John AK, Baldoni D, Haschke M, Rentsch K, Schaerli P, Zimmerli W, Trampuz A (2009) Efficacy of daptomycin in implant-associated infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: importance of combination with rifampin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(7):2719–2724.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00047-09 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Owusu-Ababio G, Rogers J, Anwar H (1999) Effectiveness of ciprofloxacin microspheres in eradicating bacterial biofilm. J Control Release 57(2):151–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elkhatib W, Noreddin A (2014) Efficacy of ciprofloxacin-clarithromycin combination against drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa mature biofilm using in vitro experimental model. Microb Drug Resist 20(6):575–582.  https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2014.0024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reffuveille F, Fuente-Nunez Cde L, Fairfull-Smith KE, Hancock RE (2015) Potentiation of ciprofloxacin action against Gram-negative bacterial biofilms by a nitroxide. Pathog Dis 73 (5).  https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftv016
  24. 24.
    El Helou OC, Berbari EF, Lahr BD, Eckel-Passow JE, Razonable RR, Sia IG, Virk A, Walker RC, Steckelberg JM, Wilson WR, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR (2010) Efficacy and safety of rifampin containing regimen for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases: official publication of the European Society. of Clinical Microbiology 29(8):961–967.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-0952-9 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giulieri SG, Graber P, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W (2004) Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm. Infection 32(4):222–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-004-4020-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zimmerli W, Moser C (2012) Pathogenesis and treatment concepts of orthopaedic biofilm infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 65(2):158–168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00938.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rasouli MR, Tripathi MS, Kenyon R, Wetters N, Della Valle CJ, Parvizi J (2012) Low rate of infection control in enterococcal periprosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(10):2708–2716.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2374-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kheir MM, Tan TL, Higuera C, George J, Della Valle CJ, Shen M, Parvizi J (2016) Periprosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Enterococci Have Poor Outcomes. J Arthroplasty.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.017 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ueng SW, Lee CY, Hu CC, Hsieh PH, Chang Y (2013) What is the success of treatment of hip and knee candidal periprosthetic joint infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(9):3002–3009.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3007-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ochsner PEBO., Bodler PM, Broger I, Eich G, Hefti F, Maurer T, Nötzli H, Seiler S, Suva D, Trampuz A, Uckay I, Vogt M, Zimmerli W (2016) Infections of the musculoskeletal system. Basic principles, prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Swiss orthopaedics in-house publisher, GrandvauxGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Akgun D, Trampuz A, Perka C, Renz N (2017) High failure rates in treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection: results from a seven-year retrospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 99-B(5):653–659.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0851.R1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Perez-Prieto D, Portillo ME, Puig-Verdie L, Alier A, Martinez S, Sorli L, Horcajada JP, Monllau JC (2017) C-reactive protein may misdiagnose prosthetic joint infections, particularly chronic and low-grade infections. Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3430-5 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boettner F, Zustin J, Kolbel B, Ruther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Soder S, Muller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Diaz-Ledezma C, Higuera CA, Parvizi J (2013) Success after treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a Delphi-based international multidisciplinary consensus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(7):2374–2382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2866-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kusuma SK, Ward J, Jacofsky M, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ (2011) What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):1002–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1619-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Akgun D, Muller M, Perka C, Winkler T (2017) A positive bacterial culture during re-implantation is associated with a poor outcome in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for deep infection. Bone Joint J 99-B(11):1490–1495.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2017-0243-R1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Achermann Y, Eigenmann K, Ledergerber B, Derksen L, Rafeiner P, Clauss M, Nuesch R, Zellweger C, Vogt M, Zimmerli W (2013) Factors associated with rifampin resistance in staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI): a matched case-control study. Infection 41(2):431–437.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-012-0325-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hoell S, Moeller A, Gosheger G, Hardes J, Dieckmann R, Schulz D (2016) Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: what is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(4):447–452.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2404-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Osmon DR (2016) Microbiology and antimicrobial challenges of prosthetic joint infection. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.  https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00639 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Preininger B, Janz V, von Roth P, Trampuz A, Perka CF, Pfitzner T (2017) Inadequacy of joint aspiration for detection of persistent periprosthetic infection during two-stage septic revision knee surgery. Orthopedics.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20170411-04 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nana A, Nelson SB, McLaren A, Chen AF (2016) What’s new in musculoskeletal infection: update on biofilms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(14):1226–1234.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00300 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zimmerli W, Sendi P (2017) Orthopaedic biofilm infections. APMIS 125(4):353–364.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12687 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nelson CL, Jones RB, Wingert NC, Foltzer M, Bowen TR (2014) Sonication of antibiotic spacers predicts failure during two-stage revision for prosthetic knee and hip infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(7):2208–2214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3571-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351(16):1645–1654.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra040181 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zeller V, Lhotellier L, Marmor S, Leclerc P, Krain A, Graff W, Ducroquet F, Biau D, Leonard P, Desplaces N, Mamoudy P (2014) One-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic hip infection: results of a large prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(1):e1.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Trampuz A, Zimmerli W (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of implant-associated septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 10(5):394–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Parvizi J, Azzam K, Ghanem E, Austin MS, Rothman RH (2009) Periprosthetic infection due to resistant staphylococci: serious problems on the horizon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(7):1732–1739.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0857-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Parry MC, Duncan CP (2014) The challenge of methicillin resistant staphylococcal infection after total hip replacement: overlooked or overstated? Bone Joint J 96-B(11 Supple A):60–65.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34333 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sendi P, Zimmerli W (2011) Challenges in periprosthetic knee-joint infection. Int J Artif Organs 34(9):947–956.  https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000032 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Baldoni D, Haschke M, Rajacic Z, Zimmerli W, Trampuz A (2009) Linezolid alone or combined with rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental foreign-body infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(3):1142–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00775-08 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Trampuz A, Murphy CK, Rothstein DM, Widmer AF, Landmann R, Zimmerli W (2007) Efficacy of a novel rifamycin derivative, ABI-0043, against Staphylococcus aureus in an experimental model of foreign-body infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51(7):2540–2545.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00120-07 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doruk Akgün
    • 1
  • Carsten Perka
    • 1
  • Andrej Trampuz
    • 1
  • Nora Renz
    • 1
  1. 1.Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal SurgeryCharité, Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations