Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rotator cuff tears in proximal humeral fractures: an MRI cohort study in 76 patients

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim was to evaluate if concomitant injury to the rotator cuff is important for functional outcome in proximal humerus fractures, and to relate loss of function to malunion of the fractures.

Materials and methods

A total of 76 patients treated conservatively for proximal humerus fracture were included in this cohort study. Performing an MRI examination at the time of injury and after 12 months, tears of the rotator cuffs were classified as partial- or full thickness. The fractures were classified, according to the AO classification, and the degree of tubercle displacement and humeral head inclination evaluated at 12 months. Constant score was used as outcome measure.

Results

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations confirmed 22 rotator cuff tears (four full thicknesses) diagnosed at the time of injury, and 10 additional tears (three full thicknesses) at one year. Functional loss at one year significantly corresponded to the tears at the time of injury (P = 0.004), varus malunion of the head and displacement of tubercles (P < 0.001).

Interpretation

Partial- as well as full thickness tears of the rotator cuff are important for functional outcome. Skeletal deterioration seems even more important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Audigè L, Bhandari M, Kellam J (2004) How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand 75(2):184–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertoft ES, Lundh I, Ringquist I (1984) Physiotherapy after fracture of the proximal end of the humerus. Scand J Rehabil Med 16:11–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Budoff JE (2006) Arthroscopic rotator cuff debridement. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 7(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cofield RH (1988) Comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop 230:49–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Constant CR, Murley AHG (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Othop 214:160–164

    Google Scholar 

  6. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72(4):365–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2004) The impacted varus (A2.2) proximal humeral fracture: prediction of outcome and results of nonoperative treatment in 99 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75(6):736–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaebler C, McQueen MM, Court-Brown C (2003) Minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures: epidemiology and outcome in 507 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 74(5):580–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallo RA, Sciulli R, Daffner RH et al (2007) Defining the relationship between rotator cuff injury and proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop 458:70–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodgson S, Iannotti J, Evans P (2006) Proximal humerus fracture rehabilitation. Clin Orthop 44(2):131–138

    Google Scholar 

  11. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bone. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nanda R, Goodschild L, Gamble A, Campbell R, Rangan A (2007) Does the presence of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear influence outcome after proximal humeral fractures? J Trauma 62:1436–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Potter HG, Birchansky SB (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: a tailored approach. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 6(1):43–56

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider T, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Drescher W, Fink B, Schmidt J, Apell HJ (2003) The significance of subacromial arthrography to verify partial bursal-side rotator cuff ruptures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:481–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siebenrock KA, Gerber C (1993) The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75-A(12):1751–1755

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K (2004) Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:708–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomazeau H, Rollan Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F (1996) Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand 67(3):264–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilmanns C, Bonnaire F (2002) Rotator cuff alterations resulting from humeral head fractures. Injury 33(9):781–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamaguchi K, Tetro AM, Blam O, Evanoff BA, Teefey SA, Middleton WD (2001) Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(3):199–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zanetti M, Wieshaupt D, Jost B, Gerber C, Hodler J (1999) MR imaging for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff: high prevalence of greater tuberosity fractures and subscapularis tendon tears. Am J Roentgenol 172(2):463–467

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, Oslo University Hospital Aker HF, 0514, Oslo, Norway

    Tore Fjalestad & Knut Strømsøe

  2. Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo University Hospital Aker HF, Oslo, Norway

    Margrethe Ø. Hole

  3. Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital Aker HF, Oslo, Norway

    Judith Blücher & Morten G. Stiris

  4. Department of Neurophysiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål HF, Oslo, Norway

    Inger Anette H. Hovden

Authors
  1. Tore Fjalestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margrethe Ø. Hole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judith Blücher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Inger Anette H. Hovden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Morten G. Stiris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Knut Strømsøe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tore Fjalestad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fjalestad, T., Hole, M.Ø., Blücher, J. et al. Rotator cuff tears in proximal humeral fractures: an MRI cohort study in 76 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 575–581 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0953-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0953-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation