Advertisement

Syncope and bundle branch block

Diagnostic approach
  • Angel Moya
  • Nuria Rivas-Gandara
  • Jordi Perez-Rodón
  • Jaume Franciso-Pascual
  • Alba Santos-Ortega
  • Patricia Fumero
  • Ivo Roca-Luque
Schwerpunkt

Abstract

Syncope and bundle branch block are reviewed, addressing their specific clinical characteristics, natural history, initial diagnostic approach and the role and limitations of different diagnostic tests with a special focus on electrophysiological studies and implantable loop recorders. A critical review of the different published strategies to be followed in these patients is made and finally an algorithm of how to manage these patients is proposed.

Keywords

Implantable cardioverter–defibrillator Electrocardiogram Cardiac electrophysiology techniques Implantable loop recorder Tilt-table test 

Synkope und Schenkelblock

Diagnostisches Vorgehen

Zusammenfassung

Synkope und Schenkelblock werden beurteilt in Hinblick auf deren spezifische klinische Charakteristika, natürlichen Verlauf und Verfahren zur initialen Diagnostik sowie die Bedeutung und Limitierungen verschiedener diagnostischer Untersuchungen mit speziellem Fokus auf elektrophysiologische Studien und implantierbare Loop-Rekorder. Es erfolgt eine kritische Beurteilung der unterschiedlichen publizierten Strategien bei diesen Patienten, und abschließend wird ein Algorithmus zur Behandlung solcher Patienten vorgeschlagen.

Schlüsselwörter

Implantierbarer Kardioverter-Defibrillator Elektrokardiogramm Kardiale elektrophysiologische Verfahren Implantierbarer Loop-Rekorder Kipptischuntersuchung 

Notes

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

A. Moya, N. Rivas-Gandara, J. Perez-Rodón, J. Franciso-Pascual, A. Santos-Ortega, P. Fumero and I. Roca-Luque declare that they have no competing interests.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Sagristà-Sauleda J, Romero B, Permanyer-Miralda G et al (1999) Clinical usefulness of head-up tilt test in patients with syncope and intraventricular conduction defect. Europace 1:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moya A, Garcia-Civera R, Croci F et al (2011) Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with syncope and bundle branch block. Eur Heart J 32:1535–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH, Murphy E et al (1982) Natural history of “high-risk” bundle-branch block: final report of a prospective study. N Engl J Med 307:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quinn J, McDermott D, Stiell I, Kohn M, Wells G (2006) Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 47:448–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin TP, Hanusa BH, Kapoor WN (1997) Risk stratification of patients with syncope. Ann Emerg Med 29:459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Del Rosso A, Ungar A, Maggi R et al (2008) Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope at initial evaluation in patients referred urgently to a general hospital: the EGSYS score. Heart 94:1620–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colivicchi F, Ammirati F, Melina D, Guido V, Imperoli G, Santini M (2003) Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. Eur Heart J 24:811–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reed MJ, Newby DE, Coull AJ, Prescott RJ, Jacques KG, Gray AJ (2010) The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:713–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quinn J, McDermott D (2011) Electrocardiogram findings in emergency department patients with syncope. Acad Emerg Med 18:714–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pérez-Rodon J, Martínez-Alday J, Barón-Esquivias G et al (2014) Prognostic value of the electrocardiogram in patients with syncope: data from the group for syncope study in the emergency room (GESINUR). Heart Rhythm 11:2035–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Click RL, Gersh BJ, Sugrue DD et al (1987) Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 59:817–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ezri M, Lerman BB, Marchlinski FE, Buxton AE, Josephson ME (1983) Electrophysiologic evaluation of syncope in patients with bifascicular block. Am Heart J 106:693–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morady F, Higgins J, Peters RW et al (1984) Electrophysiologic testing in bundle branch block and unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 54:587–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brignole M, Menozzi C, Moya A et al (2001) Mechanism of syncope in patients with bundle branch block and negative electrophysiological test. Circulation 104:2045–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Twidale N, Heddle WF, Ayres BF, Tonkin AM (1988) Clinical implications of electrophysiology study findings in patients with chronic bifascicular block and syncope. Aust N Z J Med 18:841–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martí-Almor J, Cladellas M, Bazán V et al (2010) Nuevos predictores de evolución a bloqueo auriculoventricular en pacientes con bloqueo bifascicular. Rev Esp Cardiol 63:400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F et al (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J 30:2631–2671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A et al (2015) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. The task force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 36:2793–2867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benezet-Mazuecos J, Ibanez B, Rubio JM et al (2007) Utility of in-hospital cardiac remote telemetry in patients with unexplained syncope. Europace 9:1196–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scheinman MM, Peters RW, Morady F, Sauve MJ, Malone P, Modin G (1983) Electrophysiologic studies in patients with bundle branch block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 6:1157–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roca I, Francisco-Pascual J, Oristrell G et al (2018) Syncope, conduction disturbances and negative electrophysiological test: risk score to predict pacemaker indication in follw-up. Heart Rhythm Scientific Session, Boston, 2018. Abstract #9963Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marti-Almor J, Cladellas M, Bazan V et al (2009) Long-term mortality predictors in patients with chronic bifascicular block. Europace 11:1201–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petrac D, Radic B, Birtic K, Gjurovic J (1996) Prospective evaluation of infrahisal second-degree AV block induced by atrial pacing in the presence of chronic bundle branch block and syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:784–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tonkin AM, Heddle WF, Tornos P (1978) Intermittent atrioventricular block: procainamide administration as a provocative test. Aust N Z J Med 8:594–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bergfeldt L, Edvardsson N, Rosenqvist M, Vallin H, Edhag O (1994) Atrioventricular block progression in patients with bifascicular block assessed by repeated electrocardiography and a bradycardia-detecting pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 74:1129–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Olshansky B, Hahn EA, Hartz VL, Prater SP, Mason JW (1999) Clinical significance of syncope in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring (ESVEM) trial. The ESVEM investigators. Am Heart J 137:878–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Link MS, Kim KM, Homoud MK, Estes NA 3rd, Wang PJ (1999) Long-term outcome of patients with syncope associated with coronary artery disease and a nondiagnostic electrophysiologic evaluation. Am J Cardiol 83:1334–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sutton R, Brignole M (2014) Twenty-eight years of research permit reinterpretation of tilt-testing: hypotensive susceptibility rather than diagnosis. Eur Heart J 35:2211–2212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sagrista-Sauleda J, Romero B, Permanyer-Miralda G et al (1999) Clinical usefulness of head-up tilt test in patients with syncope and intraventricular conduction defect. Europace 1:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Locati ET, Moya A, Oliveira M et al (2016) External prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring in unexplained syncope and palpitations: results of the SYNARR-Flash study. Europace 18:1265–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moya A, Brignole M, Sutton R et al (2008) Reproducibility of electrocardiographic findings in patients with suspected reflex neurally-mediated syncope. Am J Cardiol 102:1518–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Santini M, Castro A, Giada F et al (2013) Prevention of syncope through permanent cardiac pacing in patients with bifascicular block and syncope of unexplained origin: the PRESS study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 6:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krahn AD, Morillo CA, Kus T et al (2012) Empiric pacemaker compared with a monitoring strategy in patients with syncope and bifascicular conduction blockrationale and design of the Syncope: Pacing or Recording in the Later Years (SPRITELY) study. Europace 14:1044–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aste M, Oddone D, Donateo P et al (2016) Syncope in patients paced for atrioventricular block. Europace 18:1735–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kalscheur MM, Donateo P, Wenzke KE et al (2016) Long-term outcome of patients with bifascicular block and unexplained syncope following cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 39:1126–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angel Moya
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nuria Rivas-Gandara
    • 2
  • Jordi Perez-Rodón
    • 2
  • Jaume Franciso-Pascual
    • 2
  • Alba Santos-Ortega
    • 2
  • Patricia Fumero
    • 1
  • Ivo Roca-Luque
    • 2
  1. 1.Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology DepartmentHospital Universitari DexeusBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology DepartmentHospital Universitari Vall d’HebronBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations