Abstract
The rheological behavior and morphology of carbon nanofiber/polystyrene (CNF/PS) composites in their melt phase have been characterized both through experimental measurements and modeling. Composites prepared in the two different processes of solvent casting and melt blending are contrasted; melt-blended and solvent-cast composites were each prepared with CNF loadings of 2, 5, and 10 wt%. A morphological study revealed that the melt blending process results in composites with shorter CNFs than in the solvent-cast composites, due to damage caused by the higher stresses the CNFs encounter in melt blending, and that both processes retain the diameter of the as-received CNFs. The addition of carbon nanofiber to the polystyrene through either melt blending or solvent casting increases the linear viscoelastic moduli, G′ and G″, and steady-state viscosity, η, in the melt phase monotonically with CNF concentration, more so in solvent cast composites with their longer CNFs. The melt phase of solvent-cast composites with higher CNF concentrations exhibit a plateau of the elastic modulus, G′, at low frequencies, an apparent yield stress, and large first normal stress difference, N 1, at low strain rates, which can be attributed to contact-based network nanostructure formed by the long CNFs. A nanostructurally-based model for CNF/PS composites in their melt phase is presented which considers the composite system as rigid rods in a viscoelastic fluid matrix. Except for two coupling parameters, all material constants in the model for the composite systems are deduced from morphological and shear flow measurements of its separate nanofiber and polymer melt constituents of the composite. These two coupling parameters are polymer–fiber interaction parameter, σ, and interfiber interaction parameter, C I. Through comparison with our experimental measurements of the composite systems, we deduce that σ is effectively 1 (corresponding to no polymer–fiber interaction) for all CNF/PS nanocomposites studied. The dependence of CNF orientation on strain rate which we observe in our experiments is captured in the model by considering the interfiber interaction parameter, C I, as a function of strain rate. Applied to shear flows, the model predicts the melt-phase, steady-state viscosities, and normal stress differences of the CNF/PS composites as functions of shear rate, polymer matrix properties, fiber length, and mass concentration consistent with our experimental measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Advani SG, Tucker CL (1987) The use of tensors to describe and predict fiber orientation in short fiber composites. J Rheol 31(8):751–784
Advani SG, Tucker CL (1990) Closure approximations for three-dimensional structure tensors. J Rheol 34(3):367–386
Azaiez J (1996) Constitutive equations for fiber suspensions in viscoelastic media. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 66:35–54
Baker RTK (1989) Catalytic growth of carbon filaments. Carbon 27(3):315–323
Bird RB, Curtiss CF, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids. Wiley, New York
Caldeira G, Maia JM, Carneiro OS, Covas JA, Bernardo CA (1998) Production and characterization of innovative carbon fiber–polycarbonate composites. Polym Compos 19(2):147–151
Carneiro OS, Maia JM (2000a) Rheological behavior of (short) carbon fiber/thermoplastic composites. Part I: the influence of fiber type, processing conditions and level of incorporation. Polym Compos 21(6):960–969
Carneiro OS, Maia JM (2000b) Rheological behavior of (short) carbon fiber/thermoplastic composites. Part II: the influence of matrix type. Polym Compos 21(6):970–977
Carneiro OS, Covas JA, Bernardo CA, Caldeira G, Van Hattum FWJ, Ting JM, Alig RL, Lake ML (1998) Production and assessment of polycarbonate composites reinforced with vapor-grown carbon fibers. Compos Sci Technol 58(3–4):401–407
Cintra JS, Tucker CL (1995) Orthotropic closure approximation for flow-induced fiber orientation. J Rheol 39(6):1095–1122
Cox WP, Merz EH (1958) Correlation of dynamic and steady viscosities. J Polym Sci 28:619–622
Dinh SM, Armstrong RC (1984) A rheological equation of state for semi-concentrated fiber suspensions. J Rheol 28:207–227
Doi M, Edwards SF (1987) The theory of polymer dynamics. Clarendon, Oxford
Doraiswamy D, Mujumdar AN, Tsao I, Beris AN, Danforth SC, Metzner AB (1991) The Cox–Merz rule extended: a rheological model for concentrated suspensions and other materials with a yield stress. J Rheol 35(4):647–685
Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. Wiley, New York
Folgar F, Tucker CL (1984) Orientation behaviour of fibres in concentrated suspensions. J Reinf Plast Compos 3:98–119
Glasgow DG, Jacobsen RL, Burton DJ, Kwag C, Kennel E, Lake ML, Brittain WJ, Rice BP (2003) Carbon nanofiber polymer composites. International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition
Hammel E, Tang X, Trampert M, Schmitt T, Mauthner K, Eder A, Potschke P (2004) Carbon nanofibers for composite applications. Carbon 42(5–6):1153–1158
Heremans J (1985) Electrical conductivity of vapor-grown carbon fibers. Carbon 23(4):431–436
Heremans J, Beetz CP Jr (1985) Thermal conductivity and thermopower of vapor-grown graphite fibers. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 32(4):1981–1986
Higgins BA, Brittain WJ (2005) Polycarbonate carbon nanofiber composites. Eur Polym J 41(5):889–893
Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58
Kearns JC, Shambaugh RL (2002) Polypropylene fibers reinforced with carbon nanotubes. J Appl Polym Sci 86(8):2079–2084
Kinloch IA, Roberts SA, Windle AH (2002) A rheological study of concentrated aqueous nanotube dispersions. Polymer 43:7483–7491
Koyama T (1972) Formation of carbon fibers from benzene. Carbon 10:757
Koyama T, Endo M (1973) Structure and growth processes of vapor-grown carbon fibers (in Japanese). Ohyo Butsuri 42:690
Krishnamoorti R, Giannelis EP (1997) Rheology of end-tethered polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Macromolecules 30:4097–4102
Krishnamoorti R, Vaia RA, Giannelis EP (1996) Structure and dynamics of polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Chem Mater 8(8):1728–1734
Kumar S, Doshi H, Srinivasarao M, Park JO, Schiraldi DA (2002) Fibers from polypropylene/nano carbon fiber composites. Polymer 43(5):1701–1703
Lake ML, Glasgow DG, Kwag C, Burton DJ (2002) Carbon nanofiber polymer composites: electrical and mechanical properties. International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition
Larson RG (1999) The structure and rheology of complex fluids. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Larson RG, Winey KI, Patel SS, Watanabe H, Bruinsma R (1993) The rheology of layered liquids: lamellar block copolymers and smectic liquid crystals. Rheol Acta 32:245–253
Liu C, Zhang J, He J, Hu G (2003) Gelation in carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Polymer 44(24):7529–7532
Lozano K, Barrera EV (2001) Nanofiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites. I. Thermoanalytical and mechanical analyses. J Appl Polym Sci 79:125–133
Lozano K, Bonilla-rios J, Barrera EV (2001) A study on nanofiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites (II): investigation of the mixing rheology and conduc-tion properties. J Appl Polym Sci 80:1162–1172
Lozano K, Yang S, Zeng Q (2004) Rheological analysis of vapor-grown carbon nanofiber-reinforced polyethylene composites. J Appl Poly Sci 93(1):155–162
Ma H, Zeng J, Realff ML, Kumar S, Schiraldi DA (2003) Processing, structure, and properties of fibers from polyester/carbon nanofiber composites. Compos Sci Technol 63(11):1617–1628
Macosko CW (1994) Rheology: principles, measurements, and applications. Wiley, New York
Patton RD, Pittman CU Jr, Wang L, Hill JR (1999) Vapor grown carbon fiber composites with epoxy and poly(phenylene sulfide) matrices. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 30A(9):1081–1091
Pötschke P, Fornes TD, Paul DR (2002) Rheological behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites. Polymer 43:3247–3255
Prasse T, Cavaille J-Y, Bauhofer W (2003) Electric anisotropy of carbon nanofibre/epoxy resin composites due to electric field induced alignment. Compos Sci Technol 63(13):1835–1841
Richard P, Prasse T, Cavaille JY, Chazeau L, Gauthier C, Duchet J (2003) Reinforcement of rubbery epoxy by carbon nanofibres. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process A352(1–2):344–348
Solomon MJ, Almusallam AS, Seefeldt KF, Somwangthanaroj A, Varadan P (2001) Rheology of polypropylene/clay hybrid materials. Macromolecules 34:1864–1872
Speck JS, Endo M, Dresselhaus MS (1989) Structure and intercalation of thin benzene derived carbon fibers. J Cryst Growth 94(4):834–848
Tibbetts GG (1983) Carbon fibers produced by pyrolysis of natural gas in stainless steel tubes. Appl Phys Lett 42(8):666–668
Tibbetts GG, Beetz CP Jr (1987) Mechanical properties of vapor-grown carbon fibers. J Phys D Appl Phys 20(3):292–297
Tibbetts GG, McHugh JJ (1999) Mechanical properties of vapor grown carbon fiber composites with thermoplastic matrices. J Mater Res 14:2871–2880
Tibbetts GG, Endo M, Beetz CP Jr (1986) Carbon fibers grown from the vapor phase: a novel material. SAMPE Journal 22(5):30–35, 60
Tucker CL (1991) Fiber regimes for fiber suspensions in narrow gaps. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 39:239–268
Van Hattum FWJ, Bernardo CA, Finegan JC, Tibbetts GG, Alig RL, Lake ML (1999) A study of the thermomechanical properties of carbon fiber–polypropylene composites. Polym Compos 20(5):683–688
Xu J, Chatterjee S, Koelling KW, Wang Y, Bechtel SE (2005) Shear and extensional rheology of carbon nanofiber suspensions. Rheol Acta 44(6):537–562
Ying Z, Du J-H, Bai S, Li F, Liu C, Cheng H-M (2002) Mechanical properties of surfactant-coating carbon nanofiber/epoxy composite. Int J Nanosci 1(5–6):425–430
Zhong W-H, Li J, Xu LR, Michel JA, Sullivan LM, Lukehart CM (2004) Graphitic carbon nanofiber (GCNF)/polymer materials. I. GCNF/epoxy monoliths using hexanediamine linker molecules. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 4(7):794–802
Acknowledgement
This work is funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. DMI-0115445).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Xu, J., Bechtel, S.E. et al. Melt shear rheology of carbon nanofiber/polystyrene composites. Rheol Acta 45, 919–941 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-005-0077-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-005-0077-8