Advertisement

Functionalized graphene nanoplatelets/modified polybutadiene hybrid composite

  • Solmaz AliyevaEmail author
  • Rasim Alosmanov
  • Irada Buniyatzadeh
  • Goncha Eyvazova
  • Abdulseid Azizov
  • Abel Maharramov
Original Contribution
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (FGNPs) were synthesized through oxidative chlorophosphorylation (OxCh) reaction of graphite and subsequent hydrolysis of obtained chlorophosphonated graphite. Then FGNPs were used as a nanoscale filler to fabricate FGNPs/modified polybutadiene (MPB) hybrid composite (FGNPs/MPB). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy found that FGNPs have phosphonate functional groups and FGNPs/MPB has phosphonate and phosphate functional groups. X-ray diffraction showed that the thickness of FGNPs is 13.53 nm and the number of their layers is equal to 40, which are less than graphite’s thickness (37.08) and layers (111). FGNPs show high conductivity and dielectric permittivity than graphite, while FGNPs/MPB has improved electric properties than MPB without filler. Thermal properties of FGNPs/MPB also improve due to the fact that FGNPs achieve a high degree of dispersion with less agglomeration. As observed in the scanning electron microscope images, FGNPs/MPB displays a two-phase morphology with an MPB continuous phase and a dispersed FGNPs phase.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Graphene nanoplatelets Polybutadiene Hybrid composite Thermal properties Electrical properties Morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Melytec LLC for providing help in SEM-EDS analysis of samples. The authors also thank Emin Aliyev, MA for providing language help.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Science Development Foundation under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan – Grant № EİF/MQM/Elm-Tehsil-1-2016-1(26)-71/02/4.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li B, Zhong WH (2011) Review on polymer/graphite nanoplatelet nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 46:5595–5614.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5572-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pumera M (2010) Graphene-based nanomaterials and their electrochemistry. Chem Soc Rev 39:4146–4157.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C002690P CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kotov NA (2006) Carbon sheet solutions. Nature 442:254–255.  https://doi.org/10.1038/442254a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kausar A, Muhammad W-U, Bakhtiar (2015) Processing and characterization of fire-retardant modified polystyrene/functional graphite composites. Compos Interfaces 22:517–530.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2015.1049860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nam K-H, Cho J, Yeo H (2018) Thermomechanical behavior of polymer composites based on edge-selectively functionalized graphene nanosheets. Polym 10:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10010029
  7. 7.
    Nieto A, Lahiri D, Agarwal A (2012) Synthesis and properties of bulk graphene nanoplatelets consolidated by spark plasma sintering. Carbon 50:4068–4077.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gatti T, Vicentini N, Mba M, Menna E (2016) Organic functionalized carbon nanostructures for functional polymer-based nanocomposites. Eur J Org Chem 2016:1071–1090.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201501411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cunha E, Ren H, Lin F, Kinloch IA, Sun Q, Fan Z, Young RJ (2018) The chemical functionalization of graphene nanoplatelets through solvent-free reaction. RSC Adv 8:33564–33573.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA04817G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aliyeva S, Alosmanov R, Buniyatzadeh I et al (2019) Recent developments in edge-selective functionalization of surface of graphite and derivatives – a review. Soft Mater 17:448–466.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2019.1600549
  11. 11.
    Goods JB, Sydlik SA, Walish JJ, Swager TM (2014) Phosphate functionalized graphene with tunable mechanical properties. Adv Mater 26:718–723.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201303477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim M-J, Jeon I-Y, Seo J-M, Dai L, Baek JB (2014) Graphene phosphonic acid as an efficient flame retardant. ACS Nano 8:2820–2825.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn4066395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghafuri H, Talebi M (2016) Water-soluble phosphated graphene: preparation, characterization, catalytic reactivity, and adsorption property. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:2970–2982.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu X, Li J, Wang X, Chen C, Wang X (2015) High performance of phosphate-functionalized graphene oxide for the selective adsorption of U(VI) from acidic solution. J Nucl Mater 466:56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dehghani F, Sardarian AR, Doroodmand MM (2014) Preparation and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), functionalized with phosphonic acid (MWCNTs–C–PO3H2) and its application as a novel, efficient, heterogeneous, highly selective and reusable catalyst for acetylation of alcohols, phenols, aromatic amines, and thiols. J Iran Chem Soc 11:673684–673684.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-013-0339-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ensafi AA, Golbon Haghighi M, Jafari-Asl M (2018) Phosphine-functionalized graphene oxide, a high-performance electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Appl Surf Sci 427:722–729.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holt B, Arnold AM, Sydlik SA (2016) Phosphate functionalized graphene oxide as a bone graft substitute material. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress.  https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00175
  18. 18.
    Kannan R, Bipinlal U, Kurungot S, Pillai VK (2011) Enhanced electrocatalytic performance of functionalized carbon nanotube electrodes for oxygen reduction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:10312–10317.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02853C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bai H, Li Y, Zhang H, Chen H, Wu W, Wang J, Liu J (2015) Anhydrous proton exchange membranes comprising of chitosan and phosphorylated graphene oxide for elevated temperature fuel cells. J Membr Sci 495:48–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Żelechowska K, Prześniak-Welenc M, Łapiński M, Kondratowicz I, Miruszewski T (2017) Fully scalable one-pot method for the production of phosphonic graphene derivatives. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 8:1094–1103 10.3762%2Fbjnano.8.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shukla G, Pandey RP, Shahi VK (2016) Temperature resistant phosphorylated graphene oxide-sulphonated polyimide composite cation exchange membrane for water desalination with improved performance. J Membr Sci 520:972–982.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai Y, Wu C, Liu Z, Zhang L, Chen L, Wang J, Wang X, Yang S, Wang S (2017) Fabrication of a phosphorylated graphene oxide–chitosan composite for highly effective and selective capture of U(VI). Environ Sci Nano 4:1876–1886.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EN00412E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li J, Li X, Zhu K, Wang H, Fei G (2018) Reinforcement of phosphorylated graphene oxide on the anticorrosive properties of waterborne acrylate-epoxy resin coatings. J Macromol Sci Part A 55:649–657.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2018.1504611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alosmanov R, Wolski K, Matuschek G, Magerramov A, Azizov A, Zimmermann R, Aliyev E, Zapotoczny S (2017) Effect of functional groups on the thermal degradation of phosphorus- and phosphorus/nitrogen-containing functional polymers. J Therm Anal Calorim 130:799–812.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6464-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boehm HP (1994) Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon 32:759–769.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90031-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crompton TR (1993) Practical polymer analysis. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Socrates G (2004) Long DA (2004) Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies. Tables and ChartsThird edn. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bragg WH, Bragg WL (1913) The reflection of X-rays by crystals. Proc R Soc London Ser A 88:428–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patterson AL (1939) The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys Rev 56:978–982.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Girgis BS, Temerk YM, Gadelrab MM, Abdullah ID (2007) X-ray diffraction patterns of activated carbons prepared under various conditions. Carbon Lett 8:95–100.  https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2007.8.2.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jeon I-Y, Choi H-J, Jung S-M, Seo JM, Kim MJ, Dai L, Baek JB (2013) Large-scale production of edge-selectively functionalized graphene nanoplatelets via ball milling and their use as metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc 135:1386–1393.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3091643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu C, Hu G (2014) Effect of nitric acid treatment on the preparation of graphene sheets by supercritical N,N-dimethylformamide exfoliation. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:14310–14314.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5019707
  33. 33.
    Hatui G, Malas A, Bhattacharya P et al (2015) Effect of expanded graphite and PEI-co-silicon rubber on the thermo mechanical, morphological as well as rheological properties of in situ composites based on poly (ether imide) and liquid crystalline polymer. J Alloys Compd 619:709–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jeon I-Y, Shin Y-R, Sohn G-J et al (2012) Edge-carboxylated graphene nanosheets via ball milling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:5588 LP – 5593.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116897109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Antunes M, Gedler G, Abbasi H, Velasco JI (2016) Graphene nanoplatelets as a multifunctional filler for polymer foams. Mater Today Proc 3:S233–S239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2016.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ben Difallah B, Kharrat M, Dammak M, Monteil G (2012) Microstructure, friction and wear analysis of thermoplastic based composites with solid lubricant. Mech Ind 13:337–346.  https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2012041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hong X, Yu W, Chung DDL (2017) Electric permittivity of reduced graphite oxide. Carbon 111:182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Galindo B, Alcolea SG, Gómez J (2014) Effect of the number of layers of graphene on the electrical properties of TPU polymers. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 64:12008.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/64/1/012008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fang X-Y, Yu X-X, Zheng H-M, Jin HB, Wang L, Cao MS (2015) Temperature- and thickness-dependent electrical conductivity of few-layer graphene and graphene nanosheets. Phys Lett A 379:2245–2251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.06.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grove TT, Masters MF, Miers RE (2005) Determining dielectric constants using a parallel plate capacitor. Am J Phys 73:52–56.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1794757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang A, Chung DDL (2014) Dielectric and electrical conduction behavior of carbon paste electrochemical electrodes, with decoupling of carbon, electrolyte and interface contributions. Carbon 72:135–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.01.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fang X, Liu X, Cui Z-K, Qian J, Pan J, Li X, Zhuang Q (2015) Preparation and properties of thermostable well-functionalized graphene oxide/polyimide composite films with high dielectric constant, low dielectric loss and high strength via in situ polymerization. J Mater Chem A 3:10005–10012.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00943J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Güler Ö, Güler SH, Selen V, Albayrak MG, Evin E (2016) Production of graphene layer by liquid-phase exfoliation with low sonication power and sonication time from synthesized expanded graphite. Fullerenes Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct 24:123–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2015.1114472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kong B-S, Geng J, Jung H-T (2009) Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene and gold nanoparticles by vacuum filtration and spontaneous reduction of gold ions. Chem Commun:2174–2176.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B821920F
  45. 45.
    Bhattacharya P, Dhibar S, Hatui G, Mandal A, Das T, Das CK (2014) Graphene decorated with hexagonal shaped M-type ferrite and polyaniline wrapper: a potential candidate for electromagnetic wave absorbing and energy storage device applications. RSC Adv 4:17039–17053.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA00448E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Doyle CD (1961) Estimating thermal stability of experimental polymers by empirical thermogravimetric analysis. Anal Chem 33:77–79.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60169a022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yasmin A, Daniel IM (2004) Mechanical and thermal properties of graphite platelet/epoxy composites. Polymer 45:8211–8219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ma W, Wu L, Zhang D, Wang S (2013) Preparation and properties of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane functionalized graphene/polyurethane nanocomposite coatings. Colloid Polym Sci 291:2765–2773.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-013-3014-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Macan J, Brnardić I, Orlić S, Ivanković H, Ivanković M (2006) Thermal degradation of epoxy–silica organic–inorganic hybrid materials. Polym Degrad Stab 91:122–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bajaj P, Jha NK, Kumar RA (2018) Effect of mica on the curing behavior of an amine-cured epoxy system: differential scanning calorimetric studies. J Appl Polym Sci 40:203–212.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1990.070400116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tuteja A, Mackay ME, Hawker CJ, Van Horn B (2005) Effect of ideal, organic nanoparticles on the flow properties of linear polymers: non-Einstein-like behavior. Macromolecules 38:8000–8011.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma050974h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abot JL, Yasmin A, Daniel IM (2002) Mechanical and thermoviscoelastic behavior of clay/epoxy nanocomposites. MRS Proc 740:I6.5.  https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-740-I6.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu K, Chen S, Luo Y, Jia D, Gao H, Hu G, Liu L (2013) Edge-functionalized graphene as reinforcement of epoxy-based conductive composite for electrical interconnects. Compos Sci Technol 88:84–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pandit JA, Sudarshan K, Athawale AA (2016) Electrically conductive epoxy-polyester-graphite nanocomposites modified with aromatic amines. Polymer 104:49–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.09.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sarkar S, Bekyarova E, Niyogi S, Haddon RC (2011) Diels−Alder chemistry of graphite and graphene: graphene as diene and dienophile. J Am Chem Soc 133:3324–3327.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja200118b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jeon I-Y, Choi E-K, Bae S-Y, Baek J-B (2010) Edge-functionalization of pyrene as a miniature graphene via Friedel–crafts acylation reaction in poly(phosphoric acid). Nanoscale Res Lett 5:1686–1691.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-010-9697-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dogadina AV, Ionin BI, Petrov AA (1990) 1,3-Alkadiene-phosphonates. Sov Sci Rev B Chem 15:1–55Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schroeder JP, Sopchak WP (1960) The reaction of phosphorus trichloride and oxygen with polymers. J Polym Sci 47:417–433.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1960.1204714937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Boyce CBC, Webb SB, Phillips L (1974) The phosphorus trichloride–oxigen–olefin reaction: scope and mechanism. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:1650–1658.  https://doi.org/10.1039/P19740001650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ChemistryBaku State UniversityBakuAzerbaijan
  2. 2.Faculty of PhysicsBaku State UniversityBakuAzerbaijan

Personalised recommendations