Pregnancy outcome after first trimester use of angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers: an observational cohort study
Ongoing discussion about the safety of renin–angiotensin inhibitors in the first trimester and limited data on pregnancy outcomes after exposure to angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs).
Observational cohort study compares outcomes of 215 prospectively ascertained pregnancies with first trimester exposure to ARBs with 642 non-hypertensive pregnancies.
The rate of major birth defects in the ARB cohort (9/168, 5.4%) was higher than in the comparison group (17/570, 3%), but not significantly increased (ORadj 1.9, 95% CI 0.7–4.9). There was no distinct pattern of anomalies among infants with birth defects. The risk of spontaneous abortions was not increased (HRadj 0.9, 95% CI 0.5–1.6), although the cumulative incidence was in the upper normal range (0.22, 95% CI 0.15–0.32). Higher rates of prematurity (ORadj 3.0; 95% CI 1.7–5.1) and a reduced birth weight after adjustment for sex and gestational age were observed. There was no evidence for an increased risk for major birth defects, spontaneous abortions, or preterm birth in a sensitivity analysis comparing ARB exposed hypertensive women to hypertensive women without ARB exposure during the first trimester.
Our study supports the hypothesis that ARBs are not major teratogens. Patients inadvertently exposed to ARBs during the early pregnancy may be reassured. Nevertheless, women planning pregnancy should avoid ARBs. In selected cases, ARBs might be continued under careful monitoring of menstrual cycle and discontinued as soon as pregnancy is recognized.
KeywordsAngiotensin AT1 receptor blockers Birth defect Chronic hypertension Pregnancy outcome Spontaneous abortion Congenital malformation
This work was performed with financial support from the German Ministry of Health (BMG) and the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). The study was registered with the German Clinical Trial register (DRKS00010502) and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA1/107/16).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
- 3.Tschope C, Birner C, Bohm M, Bruder O, Frantz S, Luchner A, Maier L, Stork S, Kherad B, Laufs U (2018) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies: expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the “Heart Failure Working Group” of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG). Clin Res Cardiol 107(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1170-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M, Christiaens T, Cifkova R, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Galderisi M, Grobbee DE, Jaarsma T, Kirchhof P, Kjeldsen SE, Laurent S, Manolis AJ, Nilsson PM, Ruilope LM, Schmieder RE, Sirnes PA, Sleight P, Viigimaa M, Waeber B, Zannad F, Task Force M (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 31(7):1281–1357. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Oppermann M, Padberg S, Kayser A, Weber-Schoendorfer C, Schaefer C (2013) Angiotensin-II receptor 1 antagonist fetopathy—risk assessment, critical time period and vena cava thrombosis as a possible new feature. Br J Clin Pharmacol 75(3):822–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04388.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bullo M, Tschumi S, Bucher BS, Bianchetti MG, Simonetti GD (2012) Pregnancy outcome following exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists: a systematic review. Hypertension 60(2):444–450. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.112.196352 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fitton CA, Steiner MFC, Aucott L, Pell JP, Mackay DF, Fleming M, McLay JS (2017) In-utero exposure to antihypertensive medication and neonatal and child health outcomes: a systematic review. J Hypertens 35(11):2123–2137. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001456 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Polifka JE (2012) Is there an embryopathy associated with first-trimester exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists? A critical review of the evidence. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 94 (8):576–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bateman BT, Patorno E, Desai RJ, Seely EW, Mogun H, Dejene SZ, Fischer MA, Friedman AM, Hernandez-Diaz S, Huybrechts KF (2017) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and the risk of congenital malformations. Obstet Gynecol 129(1):174–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001775 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Diav-Citrin O, Shechtman S, Halberstadt Y, Finkel-Pekarsky V, Wajnberg R, Arnon J, Di Gianantonio E, Clementi M, Ornoy A (2011) Pregnancy outcome after in utero exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Reprod Toxicol 31(4):540–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Karthikeyan VJ, Ferner RE, Baghdadi S, Lane DA, Lip GY, Beevers DG (2011) Are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers safe in pregnancy: a report of ninety-one pregnancies. J Hypertens 29(2):396–399. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e328341885d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.EUROCAT (2017) European surveillance of congenital anomalies: Malformation Coding Guides. http://www.eurocat-network.eu/aboutus/datacollection/guidelinesforregistration/malformationcodingguides. Accessed 24 Nov 2017
- 22.Austin PC, Stuart EA (2015) Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 34(28):3661–3679. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6607 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hoeltzenbein M, Beck E, Fietz AK, Wernicke J, Zinke S, Kayser A, Padberg S, Weber-Schoendorfer C, Meister R, Schaefer C (2017) Pregnancy outcome after first trimester use of methyldopa: a prospective cohort study. Hypertension 70(1):201–208. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.09110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Bateman BT, Huybrechts KF, Fischer MA, Seely EW, Ecker JL, Oberg AS, Franklin JM, Mogun H, Hernandez-Diaz S (2015) Chronic hypertension in pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:337.e331-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.EUROCAT (2017) European surveillance of congenital, anomalies: prevalence Tables. http://www.eurocat-network.eu/accessprevalencedata/prevalencetable. Accessed 27 Sept 2017
- 26.Ramakrishnan A, Lee LJ, Mitchell LE, Agopian AJ (2015) Maternal hypertension during pregnancy and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Cardiol 36(7):1442–1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-015-1182-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Fisher SC, Van Zutphen AR, Werler MM, Lin AE, Romitti PA, Druschel CM, Browne ML, The National Birth Defects Prevention S (2017) Maternal antihypertensive medication use and congenital heart defects: updated results from the national birth defects prevention study. Hypertension 69 (5):798–805. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.08773 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Charlton RA, Neville AJ, Jordan S, Pierini A, Damase-Michel C, Klungsoyr K, Andersen AM, Hansen AV, Gini R, Bos JH, Puccini A, Hurault-Delarue C, Brooks CJ, de Jong-van den Berg LT, de Vries CS (2014) Healthcare databases in Europe for studying medicine use and safety during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 23(6):586–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3613 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Hoeltzenbein M, Beck E, Meixner K, Schaefer C, Kreutz R (2016) Pregnancy outcome after exposure to the novel oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban in women at suspected risk for thromboembolic events: a case series from the German Embryotox Pharmacovigilance Centre. Clin Res Cardiol 105(2):117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0893-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Chappell LC, Enye S, Seed P, Briley AL, Poston L, Shennan AH (2008) Adverse perinatal outcomes and risk factors for preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension 51(4):1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.107.107565 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar