Temporal changes in outcomes of women and men undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: 2005–2013
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) has undergone impressive progress during the last decade, both in strategies and equipment. It is unknown whether technical refinement has translated into improved outcomes in women undergoing CTO-PCI.
Method and results
A total of 2002 consecutive patients (17% females, mean age 65.2 ± 10.7 years) undergoing PCI of at least one CTO lesion at our center between 01/2005 and 12/2013 were evaluated. The incidence of adverse events was compared between two time series (2005–2009 and 2010–2013). A significant increase in adverse lesion characteristics over time was noted in both, women and men (p < 0.001), while technical success rates significantly increased in men but not in women (ptrend < 0.001 in men and ptrend=0.9 in women). The incidence of procedural complications was significantly higher in women as compared to men and increased over the study period in women (p < 0.05) but not in men. Accordingly, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified female sex as a strong predictor of PCI-related complications in recent years, while this was not the case in earlier years (adjusted HR 2.03, 95% CI 0.62–6.6, p = 0.2 and adjusted HR 4.7, 95% CI 1.8–12.3, p = 0.002, respectively, p < 0.001 for log LH ratio). In addition, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after a 3-year follow-up significantly declined in men (log rank = 0.046), while no changes were observed in women.
While higher success rates and a reduced rate of MACE have been achieved in men, the incidence of procedural complications in women undergoing CTO-PCI has increased over time.
KeywordsChronic total occlusion Women Temporal trend Percutaneous coronary intervention
All authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Olga Mayenfisch Foundation, Switzerland, the OPO Foundation, Switzerland, the Novartis Foundation, Switzerland, and the Swissheart Foundation (to CG).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Pancholy SB, Shantha GP, Patel T, Cheskin LJ (2014) Sex differences in short-term and long-term all-cause mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous intervention: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 174(11):1822–1830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lichtman JH, Wang Y, Jones SB, Leifheit-Limson EC, Shaw LJ, Vaccarino V, Rumsfeld JS, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP (2014) Age and sex differences in inhospital complication rates and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: evidence from the NCDR((R)). Am Heart J 167(3):376–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Patel VG, Brayton KM, Tamayo A, Mogabgab O, Michael TT, Lo N, Alomar M, Shorrock D, Cipher D, Abdullah S, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2013) Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6(2):128–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Reifart N, Werner GS, Sianos G, Bonnier H, Sievert H, Ehladad S, Bufe A, Shofer J, Gershlick A, Hildick-Smith D, Escaned J, Erglis A, Sheiban I, Thuesen L, Serra A, Christiansen E, Buettner A, Costanzo L, Barrano G, Di Mario C (2011) In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry. EuroIntervention 7(4):472–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, Galbraith PD, Osherov AB, Yalonetsky S, Gannot S, Samuel M, Weisbrod M, Bierstone D, Sparkes JD, Wright GA, Strauss BH (2012) Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(11):991–997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Toma A, Stahli BE, Gick M, Gebhard C, Nuhrenberg T, Mashayekhi K, Ferenc M, Neumann FJ, Buettner HJ (2017) Impact of multi-vessel versus single-vessel disease on outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions. Clin Res Cardiol 106(6):428–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Stahli BE, Gebhard C, Gick M, Ferenc M, Mashayekhi K, Buettner HJ, Neumann FJ, Toma A (2017) Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion according to baseline renal function. Clin Res Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1179-x
- 16.Sianos G, Werner GS, Galassi AR, Papafaklis MI, Escaned J, Hildick-Smith D, Christiansen EH, Gershlick A, Carlino M, Karlas A, Konstantinidis NV, Tomasello SD, Di Mario C, Reifart N, Club E (2012) Recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions: 2012 consensus document from the EuroCTO club. EuroIntervention 8(1):139–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, Kimura T, Hayashi Y, Muramatsu T, Ochiai M, Noguchi Y, Kato K, Shibata Y, Hiasa Y, Doi O, Yamashita T, Hinohara T, Tanaka H, Mitsudo K (2011) Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(2):213–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.GUSTO investigators (1993) An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 329 (10):673–682Google Scholar
- 19.Claessen BE, Chieffo A, Dangas GD, Godino C, Lee SW, Obunai K, Carlino M, Chantziara V, Apostolidou I, Henriques JP, Leon MB, Di Mario C, Park SJ, Stone GW, Moses JW, Colombo A, Mehran R (2012) Gender differences in long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. J Invasive Cardiol 24(10):484–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Karatasakis A, Iwnetu R, Danek BA, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Jaffer FA, Yeh RW, Kandzari DE, Lembo NJ, Patel M, Mahmud E, Lombardi WL, Wyman RM, Grantham JA, Doing AH, Toma C, Choi JW, Uretsky BF, Moses JW, Kirtane AJ, Ali ZA, Parikh M, Karacsonyi J, Rangan BV, Thompson CA, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2017) The impact of age and sex on in-hospital outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 29(4):116–122Google Scholar
- 22.Sharma V, Wilson W, Smith W, McEntegart M, Oldroyd K, Sidik N, Bagnall A, Egred M, Irving J, Strange J, Johnson T, Walsh S, Hanratty C, Spratt J (2017) Comparison of characteristics and complications in men versus women undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous intervention. Am J Cardiol 119(4):535–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Anderson ML, Peterson ED, Brennan JM, Rao SV, Dai D, Anstrom KJ, Piana R, Popescu A, Sedrakyan A, Messenger JC, Douglas PS (2012) Short- and long-term outcomes of coronary stenting in women versus men: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services cohort. Circulation 126(18):2190–2199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Duvernoy CS, Smith DE, Manohar P, Schaefer A, Kline-Rogers E, Share D, McNamara R, Gurm HS, Moscucci M (2010) Gender differences in adverse outcomes after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) percutaneous coronary intervention registry. Am Heart J 159(4):677–683 e671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Hoebers LP, Claessen BE, Dangas GD, Park SJ, Colombo A, Moses JW, Henriques JP, Stone GW, Leon MB, Mehran R (2013) Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions in elderly patients (>/=75 years): five-year outcomes from a 1,791 patient multi-national registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82(1):85–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Zhang J, Han YL, Li Y, Wang SL, Jing QM, Wang XZ, Ma YY, Luan B, Wang G, Wang B (2010) Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with multiple coronary chronic total occlusions. Chin Med J (Engl) 123(7):789–793Google Scholar
- 31.Piper WD, Malenka DJ, Ryan TJ Jr, Shubrooks SJ Jr, O’Connor GT, Robb JF, Farrell KL, Corliss MS, Hearne MJ, Kellett MA Jr, Watkins MW, Bradley WA, Hettleman BD, Silver TM, McGrath PD, O’Mears JR, Wennberg DE, Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study G (2003) Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J 145 (6):1022–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Aronow HD, Steinhubl SR, Brennan DM, Berger PB, Topol EJ (2009) Bleeding risk associated with 1 year of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial. Am Heart J 157(2):369–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Roe MT, Messenger JC, Weintraub WS, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Dai D, Chen AY, Klein LW, Masoudi FA, McKay C, Hewitt K, Brindis RG, Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS (2010) Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(4):254–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar