Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Right ventricular (RV) pacing increases the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and hospitalization rate for heart failure. Many patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) are implanted with a DDDR pacemaker to ensure the treatment of slowly conducted atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular (AV) block. Many pacemakers are never reprogrammed after implantation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of programming DDIR with a long AV delay in patients with SND and preserved AV conduction as a possible strategy to reduce RV pacing in comparison with a nominal DDDR setting including an AV search hysteresis.

Methods

In 61 patients (70 ± 10 years, 34 male, PR < 200 ms, AV-Wenckebach rate at ≥130 bpm) with symptomatic SND a DDDR pacemaker was implanted. The cumulative prevalence of right ventricular pacing was assessed according to the pacemaker counter in the nominal DDDR-Mode (AV delay 150/120 ms after atrial pacing/sensing, AV search hysteresis active) during the first postoperative days and in DDIR with an individually programmed long fixed AV delay after 100 days (median).

Results

With the nominal DDDR mode the median incidence of right ventricular pacing amounted to 25.2%, whereas with DDIR and long AV delay the median prevalence of RV pacing was significantly reduced to 1.1% (P < 0.001). In 30 patients (49%) right ventricular pacing was almost completely (<1%) eliminated, n = 22 (36%) had >1% <20% and n = 4 (7%) had >40% right ventricular pacing. The median PR interval was 161 ms. The median AV interval with DDIR was 280 ms.

Conclusions

The incidence of right ventricular pacing in patients with SND and preserved AV conduction, who are treated with a dual chamber pacemaker, can significantly be reduced by programming DDIR with a long, individually adapted AV delay when compared with a nominal DDDR setting, but nonetheless in some patients this strategy produces a high proportion of disadvantageous RV pacing. The DDIR mode with long AV delay provides an effective strategy to reduce unnecessary right ventricular pacing but the effect has to be verified in every single patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adomian G, Beazell J (1986) Myofibrillar disarray produced in normal hearts by chronic electrical pacing. Am Heart J 112:79–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE et al (1998) Atrioventricular conduction during long term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome. Circulation 98:1315–1321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen HR, Svendsen JH, on behalf of the DAN-PACE-Investigators (2001) The danish multicenter randomised study on atrial inhibited versus dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome the DAN-PACE-study. Heart Drug 1:67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cowell R, Morris-Thurgood J, Ilsley C, Paul V (1994) Septal short atrioventricular delay pacing: additional hemodynamic improvements in heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17:1980–1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Delhaas T, Arts T, Prinzen FW, Reneman RS (1994) Regional fibre stress- fibre strain area as estimate of regional oxygen demand in the canine heart. J Physiol 477:481–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dennis MJ, Sparks PB (2004) Pacemaker mediated tachykardia as a complication of the autointrinsic conduction search function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27(1):824–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Teresa E, Gómez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G, et al. (2007) Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: rationale and design of the PREVENT-HF study. Europace. 9:442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Funck RC, Blanc JJ, Mueller HH, et al (2006) BioPace study group biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the ‘biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block to prevent cardiac desynchronization biopace’ study. Europace 8:629–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Janosik D, Pearson A, Buckingham T, Labovitz A, Reed R (1989) The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed ad paced atrial events during physiologic pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 14:499–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemke B, Nowak B, Pfeiffer D (2005) Leitlinien zur Herzschrittmachertherapie. Z Kardiol 94:704–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee MA, Dea MW, Langberg JJ et al (1994) Effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing on the left ventricular perfusion innervation function and histology. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:225–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Melzer C, Sowelam S, Scheldon TJ et al (2005) Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunktion using an enhanced search AV algorithm. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28:521–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Müller-Nordhorn J, Schüler G, Roll S, Willich SN (2006) Implantation of a cardiac pacemaker—comparison of subjective stress and mood between in- and outpatients. Clin Res Cardiol 95:539–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen JC, Bottcher M, Nielsen TT et al (2000) Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber or dual chamber pacing- effect of pacing mode and rate. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1453–1461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK (2003) A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:614–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Andersen HR (1999) Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Europace 2:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Owen CH, Esposito DJ, Davis JW, Glower DD (1998) The effects of ventricular pacing on left ventricular geometry, function, myocardial oxygen consumption, end efficiency of contraction in conscious dogs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:1417–1429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Prinzen FW, Cheriex EC, Delhaas T et al (1995) Asymmetric thickness of the left ventricular wall resulting from asynchronous electric activation: a study in dogs with ventricular pacing and in patients with left bundle branch block. Am Heart J 130:1045–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Savoure A, Fröhlig G, Galley D et al (2005) A new dual chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28:43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sgarbossa E, Pinski SL, Wilkoff BL, Castle LW, Trohman RG, Maloney JD (1993) Is programming a long AV-delay effective in permitting spontaneous ventricular activation? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16:872

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP et al (2005) Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial. Heart Rhythm. 2:830–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinberg JS, Fischer A, Wang P, et al (2005) The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16:359–365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Strohmer B, Pichler M, Froemmel M, Migschitz M, Hintriger F, On behalf of the ELVIS study Group (2004) Evaluation of atrial conduction time at various sites of right atrial pacing and influence on atrioventricular delay optimization by surface electrocardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27:468–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sutton R, Kenny R (1986) The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 9:1110–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E, et al (2007) Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease. N Engl J Med 357:1000–1008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al (2003) Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sick sinus dysfunction. Circulation 107:2932–2937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Casavant D et al (2005) Multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and efficacy study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomaske M, Harpes P, Pretre R, Dodge-Khatami A, Bauersfeld U (2007) Evolution of paced QRS and QTc intervals in children with epicardial pacing leads. Clin Res Cardiol 96:787–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tse HF, Lau CP (1997) Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:744–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Oosterhout MFM, Prinzen FW, Arts T et al (1998) Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Circulation 98:588–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE et al (2002) Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the dual chamber and VVI implantable defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA 288:3115–3123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Willems S, Eckardt L, Hoffmann E, Klemm H, Pitschner HF, Reithmann C, Tebbenjohanns J, Zrenner B (2007) Leitlinie invasive elektrophysiologische Diagnostik. Clin Res Cardiol 96:634–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Aischa Nitardy, Holger Langreck, Rainer Dietz & Martin Stockburger

Authors
  1. Aischa Nitardy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holger Langreck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rainer Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Stockburger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aischa Nitardy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nitardy, A., Langreck, H., Dietz, R. et al. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode. Clin Res Cardiol 98, 25–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-008-0716-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-008-0716-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation