Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The risk factors for urinary dysfunction after autonomic nerve-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective study at Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG1307)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of urinary dysfunction after autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective multiinstitution study of 1002 rectal cancer patients conducted between January 2008 and December 2012 in Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group. Patients who had preoperative urinary dysfunction or had not undergone autonomic nerve preservation surgery were excluded. Urinary dysfunction was defined as that with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 2. Patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 887 patients were analyzed. Postoperative urinary dysfunction was observed in 77 patients (8.8%). A multivariate logistic analysis showed that a tumor location in lower rectum (odds ratio [OR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–3.71; p = 0.02), tumor diameter ≥ 40 mm (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.19–4.44; p < 0.01), operation time ≥ 240 min (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.19–4.44; p < 0.01), blood loss ≥ 300 ml (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.12–3.84; p = 0.02), and diabetes (OR 3.26; 95% CI 1.80–5.89; p < 0.01) were independent risk factors of urinary dysfunction. The incidence of urinary dysfunction exceeded 20% in patients with 3 preoperative predictors (tumor location, tumor diameter, diabetes).

Conclusions

This result demonstrated that high-risk patients with more than two risk factors should be informed of the risk of urinary dysfunction.

Trial registration

UMIN000033688

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 341(8843):457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelso H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(8):583–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hojo K, Vernava AM 3rd, Sugihara K, Katumata K (1991) Preservation of urine voiding and sexual function after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 34(7):532–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akatsu T, Fujita S (1995) Patterns of recurrence after nerve-sparing surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma with special reference to loco-regional recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 38(11):1162–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kin C, Rhoads KF, Jalali M, Shelton AA, Welton ML (2013) Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):738–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SY, Kang SB, Kim DW, Oh HK, Ihn MH (2015) Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 39(1):275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST, Hsieh ML, Chen JS, Tang R (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1688–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zmora O, Madbouly K, Tulchinsky H, Hussein A, Khaikin M (2010) Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery – is it necessary for that long? Dis Colon Rectum 53(3):321–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang JH, Kang SB, Lee SM, Park JS, Kim DW, Ahn S (2012) Randomized controlled trial of tamsulosin for prevention of acute voiding difficulty after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 36(11):2730–2737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang CY, Chaudhry OO, Halabi WJ, Nguyen V, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2012) Risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infection and urinary retention in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Am Surg 78(10):1100–1104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burgos FJ, Romero J, Fernandez E, Perales L, Tallada M (1988) Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 31(9):682–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 11(7):637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C, Mauvais F, Mariani P, Valleur P (1999) Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a ramdomized controlled trial. Surgery. 125(2):135–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, Mori T, Mochizuki H, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1663–1672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujita S, Yamamoto S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2003) Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Br J Surg 90(12):1580–1585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y et al (2018) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23(1):1–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1995) Nerve-sparing surgery with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A(7–8):1229–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mori T, Takahashi K, Yasuno M (1998) Radical resection with autonomic nerve preservation and lymph node dissection techniques in lower rectal cancer surgery and its results: the impact of lateral lymph node dissection. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 383(6):409–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maeda K, Maruta M, Utsumi T, Sato H, Toyama K, Matsuoka H (2003) Bladder and male sexual functions after autonomic nerve-sparing TME with or without lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 7(1):29–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y (2009) Male urinary and sexual functions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2779–2786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Saito N, Koda K, Nobuhiro K, Takiguchi K, Oda K, Soda H, Nunomura M, Sarashina H, Nakajima N (1999) Nerve-sparing surgery for advanced rectal cancer patients: special reference to Dukes C patients. World J Surg 23(10):1062–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Habib HN (1967) Experience and recent contributions in sacral nerve stimulation for voiding in both human and animal. Br J Urol 39(1):73–83 No abstract available

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lange MM, Maas CP, Marijnen CA et al (2008) Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision Trial: urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment is mainly caused by surgery. Br J Surg 95(8):1020–1028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown JS, Wessells H, Chancellor MB, Howards SS, Stamm WE, Stapleton AE, Steers WD, van den Eeden SK, McVary KT (2005) Urologic complications of diabetes. Diabetes Care 28(1):177–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu G, Daneshgari F (2014) Diabetic bladder dysfunction. Chin Med J 127(7):1357–1364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kyo K, Sameshima S, Takahashi M, Furugori T, Sawada T (2006) Impact of autonomic nerve preservation and lateral node dissection on male urogenital function after total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer. World J Surg 30(6):1014–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Georgiou P, Tan E, Gouvas N, Antoniou A, Brown G, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis P (2009) Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 10(11):1053–1062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagawa H, Muto T, Sunouchi K, Higuchi Y, Tsurita G, Watanabe T, Sawada T (2001) Randomized, controlled trial of lateral node dissection vs. nerve-preserving resection in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 44(9):1274–1280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2005) Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 390(6):517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cöl C, Hasdemir O, Yalcin E et al (2005) The assessment of urinary function following extended lymph node dissection for colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 31(3):237–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ito M, Kobayashi A, Fujita S et al (2018) Colorectal Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: results from a randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or III lower rectal cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study, JCOG0212). Eur J Surg Oncol 44(4):463–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Kanemitsu Y, Ohue M, Fujii S, Shiozawa M, Yamaguchi T, Moriya Y (2012) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 13(6):616–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision. Int J Color Dis 31(6):1125–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Costanzi A, Rigamonti L, Mari GM, Miranda A, Crippa J, Berardi V, Maggioni D (2015) A prospective video-controlled study of genito-urinary disorders in 35 consecutive laparoscopic TMEs for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 29(7):1721–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pollack J, Holm T, Cedermark B, Altman D, Holmström B, Glimelius B, Mellgren A (2006) Late adverse effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 93(12):1519–1525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW et al (2005) Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients--a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 23(25):6199–6206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all members of the institutions participating in the “YCOG 1307” project: Kazuteru Watanabe and Masashi Momiyama (NTT Medical Center Tokyo), Hidenobu Masui (Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital), Yasuhisa Mochizuki (Yokohama Municipal Citizen’s Hospital), Shigeru Yamagishi (Fujisawa Municipal Citizen’s Hospital), Tadao Fukushima (Saiseikai Yokohama Nanbu Hospital), Hitoshi Sekido (National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center), Mitsutaka Sugita and Akira Watanabe (Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital), Nobuyuki Kamimukai (Yokohama Hodogaya Central Hospital), Kunio Kameda (Yokosuka Municipal Citizen’s Hospital), Noriyuki Kamiya (Ito Municipal Hospital), and Daisuke Morioka (Yokohama Ekisaikai Hospital).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JW and MO contributed to the study design. All of the authors contributed to the data collection, data analysis, and interpretation. JW and KN contributed to the statistical analyses. All of the authors contributed to the writing or review of the report and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Watanabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Approval of the research protocol

The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Advisory Committee of Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine and the institutional review board of each participating hospital before the study was initiated.

Registry and the Registration No. of the Study: This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000033688 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toritani, K., Watanabe, J., Suwa, Y. et al. The risk factors for urinary dysfunction after autonomic nerve-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective study at Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG1307). Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 1697–1703 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03374-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03374-3

Keywords

Navigation