Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterograde colonic irrigations by percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy in refractory colorectal functional disorders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In case reports or small studies, percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy (PEC) has been proposed as an alternative to the Malone intervention to perform antegrade colonic enemas. Our goal was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance of PEC in a large group of patients with refractory colorectal functional disorders.

Methods

From September 2006 to April 2014, all patients undergoing PEC for constipation, fecal incontinence, and incontinence after rectal resection in two expert centers were studied. The PEC procedure consisted in anchoring the caecum to the abdominal wall (caecopexy) and placing a specifically designed tube in the colonic lumen to perform antegrade enemas. The quality of life (GIQLI), constipation (Kess), and incontinence (Cleveland) scores were assessed before PEC and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

A total of 69 patients were included. GIQLI scores were significantly improved in constipation group (n = 43), incontinence group (n = 19), and rectal resection group (n = 10). In the constipation group, Kess score decreased from 25.9 before PEC to 20.6 at 2 years (p = 0.01). In the incontinence and post-rectal resection groups, Cleveland scores decreased from 14.3 before PEC to 2.7 at 6 months (p = 0.01) and to 10.4 at 2 years (p = 0.04). Overall, PEC was considered successful by patients in 58%, 74%, and 90% of cases, in constipation, incontinence, and rectal resection groups, respectively. Chronic pain (52%) at the catheter site was the most frequent complication.

Conclusions

Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy for antegrade colonic enemas improves significantly the quality of life of patients with colorectal disorder refractory to medical treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mason HJ, Serrano-Ikkos E, Kamm MA (2000) Psychological morbidity in women with idiopathic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 95(10):2852–2857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belsey J, Greenfield S, Candy D, Geraint M (2010) Systematic review: impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31(9):938–949

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dudekula A, Huftless S, Bielefeldt K (2015) Colectomy for constipation: time trends and impact based on the US Nationwide inpatient sample, 1998-2011. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 42(11–12):1281–1293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet Lond Engl 336(8725):1217–1218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerharz EW, Vik V, Webb G, Leaver R, Shah PJ, Woodhouse CR (1997) The value of the MACE (Malone antegrade colonic enema) procedure in adult patients. J Am Coll Surg 185(6):544–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiely EM, Ade-Ajayi N, Wheeler RA (1994) Caecal flap conduit for antegrade continence enemas. Br J Surg 81(8):1215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marsh PJ, Kiff ES (1996) Ileocaecostomy: an alternative surgical procedure for antegrade colonic enema. Br J Surg 83(4):507–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Christensen P, Buntzen S, Krogh K, Laurberg S (2001) Ileal neoappendicostomy for antegrade colonic irrigation. Br J Surg 88(12):1637–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lees NP, Hodson P, Hill J, Pearson RC, MacLennan I (2004) Long-term results of the antegrade continent enema procedure for constipation in adults. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 6(5):362–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heshmat S, DeFoor W, Minevich E, Reddy P, Reeves D, Sheldon C (2008) Use of customized MIC-KEY gastrostomy button for management of MACE stomal complications. Urology 72(5):1026–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meurette G, Lehur P-A, Coron E, Regenet N (2010) Long-term results of Malone’s procedure with antegrade irrigation for severe chronic constipation. Gastroentérologie Clin Biol 34(3):209–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Uno Y (2006) Introducer method of percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy and antegrade continence enema by use of the Chait trapdoor cecostomy catheter in patients with adult neurogenic bowel. Gastrointest Endosc 63(4):666–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duchalais E, Meurette G, Mantoo SK, Le Rhun M, Varannes SB d, Lehur P-A et al (2015) Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy for severe constipation in adults: feasibility, durability, functional and quality of life results at 1 year follow-up. Surg Endosc 29(3):620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmülling C, Neugebauer E et al (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82(2):216–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Lescure G, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1999) First validation of the French version of the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI). Gastroentérologie Clin Biol 23(1):25–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunniss PJ (2000) Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 43(10):1419–1426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Biyani D, Barrow E, Hodson P, Watson AJM, Maclennan I (2007) Endoscopically placed caecostomy buttons: a trial ACE procedure. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 9(4):373–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Klaassen Z, Marshall E, Tubbs RS, Louis RG, Wartmann CT, Loukas M (2011) Anatomy of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves with observations of their spinal nerve contributions. Clin Anat N Y N 24(4):454–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoy NY, Metcalfe P, Kiddoo DA (2013) Outcomes following fecal continence procedures in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction. J Urol 189(6):2293–2297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Digestive disease institute, especially the stomal therapy nurses Cathy Serage and Guylene Fachet, and the endoscopy staff.

Funding

The authors have not received any funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucille Quénéhervé.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

E Coron has received speaker’s fees from Cook medical and Fujifilm, and is member of the board of Medtronic. J Ricard, L Quénéhervé, C Lefevre, M Le Rhun, E Chabrun, E Duchalais-Dassonneville, G Meurette, Y Touchefeu, S Bruley des Varannes, and F Zerbib have nothing to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ricard, J., Quénéhervé, L., Lefevre, C. et al. Anterograde colonic irrigations by percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy in refractory colorectal functional disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 169–175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3183-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3183-7

Keywords

Navigation